In assessing whether speech is racist I feel context is far more important in making the call over any judgement by dictionary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Without blacks there would be no United States. The entire wealth of the Colonial South was built on the backs of slaves. Without the genocide I’d native Americans there would be no United States and without Hispanics there would be no Texas and no California.
Not coincidentally, I think, the three most diverse states California, Texas and New York, are also the wealthiest. California and Texas being the most Hispanic. California also has a lot of Asians.
Good point-the media uses the white term.Why not American nationalism and who cares what color?No that's fine. Any supremacy is not-black, white, yellow.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Who brought the blacks? What systems were the blacks employed under? Who created those systems? Laws?Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Without blacks there would be no United States. The entire wealth of the Colonial South was built on the backs of slaves. Without the genocide I’d native Americans there would be no United States and without Hispanics there would be no Texas and no California.
Not coincidentally, I think, the three most diverse states California, Texas and New York, are also the wealthiest. California and Texas being the most Hispanic. California also has a lot of Asians.
You think? Then why all the bawling from the GOP about the term 'racist'?It does not matter anymore. The term racist is utterly meaningless now.
Blacks and browns are incapable by their very capacities of maintaining (forget projecting/enhancing) first world nations.Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Without blacks there would be no United States. The entire wealth of the Colonial South was built on the backs of slaves. Without the genocide I’d native Americans there would be no United States and without Hispanics there would be no Texas and no California.
Not coincidentally, I think, the three most diverse states California, Texas and New York, are also the wealthiest. California and Texas being the most Hispanic. California also has a lot of Asians.
Without blacks and browns holding us back the US would be in a much better state.
Without blacks there would be no United States.
Because we are tired of the political ploy/smear by liberals. We’re not bawling. We’re pissed.You think? Then why all the bawling from the GOP about the term 'racist'?It does not matter anymore. The term racist is utterly meaningless now.
And it will always have meaning for the folks in this country who are not white.
Go for it. Nobody is stopping you. I have already started referring to 'white' males. You need to differentiate yourselves. You behave quite differently from other color males in this country.The same way everytime someone of a race that is non-white has their color highlighted whden they perfom some action.Then why specify white?There is no such thing as “ nationalism” just as there is no such thing as “black” nationalism. If you love your country and want us to defeat our enemies around the globe and to be the most powerful nation on earth...your a patriot aka a nationalist. Your talking about “white supremacy.” Not the same. Thick as a fucking brick ain’t ya?So.....How? Nationalism is extreme love of ones country. Didn’t you read the goddamn definition. Idiots.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
You don't see a difference between nationalism, or love of your country, and white nationalism, which is love of a white country?
"First Black...First Hispanic...First Asian American" etc.
You see it's OK for every other group...including women to engage in identity politics...but absolutely forbidden for white males...have you ever considered that fact??
Well...we don't rape or murder quite as much but some are working on that.You need to differentiate yourselves. You behave quite differently from other color males in this country.The same way everytime someone of a race that is non-white has their color highlighted whden they perfom some action.Then why specify white?There is no such thing as “ nationalism” just as there is no such thing as “black” nationalism. If you love your country and want us to defeat our enemies around the globe and to be the most powerful nation on earth...your a patriot aka a nationalist. Your talking about “white supremacy.” Not the same. Thick as a fucking brick ain’t ya?So.....How? Nationalism is extreme love of ones country. Didn’t you read the goddamn definition. Idiots.
You don't see a difference between nationalism, or love of your country, and white nationalism, which is love of a white country?
"First Black...First Hispanic...First Asian American" etc.
You see it's OK for every other group...including women to engage in identity politics...but absolutely forbidden for white males...have you ever considered that fact??
Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Most people were Nationalists / White Nationalists, before a certain people with hook noses started thinking we should have White guilt, instead.
Black people in Africa do not consider themselves black. They attach themselves to their tribe. Just as most white people attach themselves to their ancestry as Irish, Italian, German, Dutch, French,Swedish, Polish, Russian, Hungarian, Greek, etc, etc,Go for it. Nobody is stopping you. I have already started referring to 'white' males. You need to differentiate yourselves. You behave quite differently from other color males in this country.The same way everytime someone of a race that is non-white has their color highlighted whden they perfom some action.Then why specify white?There is no such thing as “ nationalism” just as there is no such thing as “black” nationalism. If you love your country and want us to defeat our enemies around the globe and to be the most powerful nation on earth...your a patriot aka a nationalist. Your talking about “white supremacy.” Not the same. Thick as a fucking brick ain’t ya?So.....How? Nationalism is extreme love of ones country. Didn’t you read the goddamn definition. Idiots.
You don't see a difference between nationalism, or love of your country, and white nationalism, which is love of a white country?
"First Black...First Hispanic...First Asian American" etc.
You see it's OK for every other group...including women to engage in identity politics...but absolutely forbidden for white males...have you ever considered that fact??
If the kippa fits.Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Most people were Nationalists / White Nationalists, before a certain people with hook noses started thinking we should have White guilt, instead.
Yeah, Blame the Joos.....
liberal media and professoriate branding. Definition is the whole thing they are twisting.In assessing whether speech is racist I feel context is far more important in making the call over any judgement by dictionary.
Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Without blacks there would be no United States. The entire wealth of the Colonial South was built on the backs of slaves. Without the genocide I’d native Americans there would be no United States and without Hispanics there would be no Texas and no California.
Not coincidentally, I think, the three most diverse states California, Texas and New York, are also the wealthiest. California and Texas being the most Hispanic. California also has a lot of Asians.
Without blacks and browns holding us back the US would be in a much better state.
Haven't you got a cross to burn somewhere?If the kippa fits.
Hey Dragonlady I like the way you think. End the subjugation today! A one way boat ride to Monrovia, and problem solved! Shit we will even give them a $100 for when they get there as 'settling in' money.Without whites there would be no USA.Nationalism is fine.
White nationalism is a different story.
Without blacks there would be no United States. The entire wealth of the Colonial South was built on the backs of slaves. Without the genocide I’d native Americans there would be no United States and without Hispanics there would be no Texas and no California.
Not coincidentally, I think, the three most diverse states California, Texas and New York, are also the wealthiest. California and Texas being the most Hispanic. California also has a lot of Asians.
Without blacks and browns holding us back the US would be in a much better state.
Would it? It seems more like without you holding back the non-white races, keeping them in their place, you would all be doing better.
It takes a lot of money and energy to subjugate and incarcerate vast swaths of your population. Imagine if all that talent, energy and money was spent in lifting others up.
You might have a better, kinder, gentler nation.
Just finished...this is my relaxation hour. Beer?Haven't you got a cross to burn somewhere?If the kippa fits.