Big Bend Texas
Platinum Member
- Mar 14, 2022
- 9,242
- 5,228
- 893
- Thread starter
- #81
Well yes it does, not all of Russia's neighbors are NATO members.That makes no sense. They cannot invade NATO now without repercussions. Again, what have they lost?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well yes it does, not all of Russia's neighbors are NATO members.That makes no sense. They cannot invade NATO now without repercussions. Again, what have they lost?
The oil fields were destroyed by the Iraqis.I’m afraid you’re delusional. The US invaded Iraq TWICE based on lies. The result was our military destroyed the country’s infrastructure, except for the oil fields. Funny that…By some estimates one million Iraqi men, women, and children died. Yet you think this admirable.
Facts don't really seem to matter or even be welcome in these discussions.Interventions not "invasions", read the article.
How much new land did NATO keep from those interventions? Hint: none
Russia invades and keeps the land grab. See the difference?
Putin is the last man anyone should defend and fearing the asshole is a big mistake because you want your next Hitler, well there you go and believe me Putin will Genocide everyone he view as a threat!In Bosnia the Russians moved in threatening us as we bombed the Serbs who were committing Genocide. They took men, women, and children into stadiums and slsughtered them.
Fuck Russia
Russia could invade Alaska and I bet you a wooden nickel that some will say let Putin have it because they don’t want to upset the individual…Interventions not "invasions", read the article.
How much new land did NATO keep from those interventions? Hint: none
Russia invades and keeps the land grab. See the difference?
They only have enough prepositioned equipment to support a force of 15,000 men for about 30 days.Will you please STFU! Who the fuck said anything about salt mines? Uh, YOU DID, dumbass!
View attachment 638815
![]()
Cave-Dwellers: Inside the US Marine Corps Prepositioning Program-Norway
Deep within a Norwegian hillside, thousands of US Marine Corps combat veterans await their next assignment.www.defensenews.com
I guess these fucking thing are figments of my imagination! They sure look like Humvees to me!
The caves they are stored in have constant temperature and humidity. Corrosion is not an issue. Norwegian civilians maintain the equipment.
Now, go slither back under that rock in the desert of Texas until you learn some respect for your betters!
We're the only country on earth that has routinely rebuilt countries we've gone to war with and usually leave them better off than they were before we went to war with them.The US military has never invaded another country to keep the land and resources.
The US builds coalitions, like when we threw Saddam out of Kuwait.
The US removed Saddam from power and set Iraq free from his brutality.
The US went into AFG to eliminate AQ, and then mistakenly tried to build a democracy.
Putin took Crimea, and invaded Ukraine to make it part of Russia.
Really? Most of those countries are former Soviet states.Well yes it does, not all of Russia's neighbors are NATO members.
You should probably quit using words you don't understand.Go ahead keep poking the bear at its borders.....colonialists...globo homo expansionist tools
Compare your list to this one.Really? Most of those countries are former Soviet states.
These are countries that share a border with Russia:
Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Mongolia, Norway, Poland, Finland, and Ukraine.
Former Soviet states. NATO countries.
Now, you were saying?
When the Soviet Union was putting Nukes in Cuba in the early 1960's we laughed in a jovial manner. The globalists are doing this.Putin and all his little Putinettes are pretending that NATO, and a bigger NATO, is a threat to attack and invade ol' Mother Russia at any minute.
Which, of course, is paranoid fantasy. Those authoritarians sure to love to pump out that paranoid fantasy.
You mean the 50-100K that are dying like a stalk of bananas in Ukraine? They start out green, turn yellow, and die by the bunches!They only have enough prepositioned equipment to support a force of 15,000 men for about 30 days.
Russia could invade with an army of 50-100K easily.
Again, that's a very small amount of vehicles and supplies that would be rapidly exhausted if there was an invasion.
Without a constant logistical train brining in even more men, equipment and supplies those forces and stockpiles would be rapidly overwhelmed and overcome.
The US isn't putting nukes on Russia's border.When the Soviet Union was putting Nukes in Cuba in the early 1960's we laughed in a jovial manner. The globalists are doing this.
So? Like you said, NATO has always existed to prevent a Russian/Soviet invasion of Europe.Compare your list to this one.
Member countries
www.nato.int
Not all of Russia's Neighbors are NATO members.
I'm pretty sure the 3 Baltic States are NATO as well.Really? Most of those countries are former Soviet states.
These are countries that share a border with Russia:
Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Estonia, Finland, Georgia, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Mongolia, Norway, Poland, Finland, and Ukraine.
Former Soviet states. NATO countries.
Now, you were saying?
Russia has lost about 20,000 men in Ukraine a country many times the size of Finland. The biggest reason they've had such losses is they waited too late to invade and did so after the ground had already begun to thaw.You mean the 50-100K that are dying like a stalk of bananas in Ukraine? They start out green, turn yellow, and die by the bunches!
The Russian military is a paper tiger. Those conscripted soldiers have no incentive to fight for Mother Russia,
I want to know why you don't think we have ships that can resupply our forces.
It is a fact not all of Russia's neighbors are NATO countries and NATO is not bound to intervene in an invasion of non NATO member countries.So? Like you said, NATO has always existed to prevent a Russian/Soviet invasion of Europe.
If you had a point, you failed to make it again!
Yeah such a big difference. Untold numbers of dead and wounded, nations destroyed and thousands displaced. Dumb Americans think this is somehow admirable.Interventions not "invasions", read the article.
How much new land did NATO keep from those interventions? Hint: none
Russia invades and keeps the land grab. See the difference?
What nations specifically has NATO destroyed? NATO has only responded to ongoing conflicts and only done so with the to goal of stopping them from spreading and to end the massacres of civilians in those countries.Yeah such a big difference. Untold numbers of dead and wounded, nations destroyed and thousands displaced. Dumb Americans think this is somehow admirable.
Asking such a question further proves what a fool you are. Ever heard of Libya or Serbia?What nations specifically has NATO destroyed?