Rshermr
VIP Member
No. Actually, the assumption that is absurd is yours. Which is copied, of course, from the standard bat shit crazy conservative sites that you frequent. Which continues to make you irrelevant. Which is why you have NO proof of your claim.A big argument made on the right is that unemployment compensation causes the unemployed to not seek jobs as vigorously and therefore lowers employment. So conversely, when in January Congress in its infinite wisdom let extended unemployment benefits expire, there should be a surge in employment, at least among the formerly long term unemployed, right?
It's a wonderful story except for one problem: it never happened. There is not one shred of evidence that cutting unemployment benefits off at 26 weeks led to a single extra worker employed; zero, zip, nada. The lack of comment from the same right-wing economists on this fact is deafening. Apparently there is no way to even cook the numbers to feign such an effect that was pronounced with such vigor just a few months ago.
This is pretty much the state of all conservative labor economics: politically attractive speculation with absolutely no evidence. At least in a demand-constrained economy (Hello, what have we been in for the last six years?).
Of course silly things like theory and evidence never have gotten in the way of conservatives living in The Alternate Reality. This is a proto-typical zombie idea. It does not matter how often it is disproven, after a few weeks someone will trot it out again to "prove" the "common sense fact" (code for something that can't be proven therefore must be passed off as self-evident even when all the facts show it to be false) that the way to fight unemployment is to abolish the minimum wage and all unemployment benefits. Anyone want to bet that this solution will not be advanced by Republicans in the coming election?
Graph: Total nonfarm payroll employment (seasonally adjusted)
Oops.
That only works if you think giving people incentives doesnt change their behavior. It's an absurd proposition. It has been demonstrated many times that people with ready access to UE benefits continue to receive them instead of taking a job because the opportunity costs for giving up benefits are higher than what any job might pay.