Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
CaféAuLait;4198315 said:NC governor recommends suspending elections for years to focus on jobs
Read more: Bev Perdue | NC Governor | Suspend Elections | Jobs | The Daily Caller
What a novel idea...
I wonder if she would want to do this if the republicans controlled the senate (political motivation) or if she is truly trying to help.
You are aware that the GOP controls the House, right?
CaféAuLait;4198315 said:NC governor recommends suspending elections for years to focus on jobs
Read more: Bev Perdue | NC Governor | Suspend Elections | Jobs | The Daily Caller
What a novel idea...
I wonder if she would want to do this if the republicans controlled the senate (political motivation) or if she is truly trying to help.
You are aware that the GOP controls the House, right?
Yes...and alot is being shelved by Dingy Harry Reid. Obama will capitalize on it for the purpose of claims of Republican Obstructionism.I wonder if she would want to do this if the republicans controlled the senate (political motivation) or if she is truly trying to help.
You are aware that the GOP controls the House, right?
You are aware that without the senate or the presidency controlling the house means nothing, right? We have already seen that the GOP can't push through any of their ideads or bills, all of them have been shot down by the dem senate and/or the president.
She got caught saying what was really on her mind. Notice the longer we are on this road? The more emboldened they become to show thier arrogance openly.And her proposed solution? Turn off democracy.So, in a serious speech, and in a serious voice, she advocates suspending elections.
And you want us to believe she was joking?
I'll let her words speak for themselves: Suspend Elections | Beverly Perdue | Audio | The Daily Caller
Meanwhile, you believe what you're told to believe, sheep.
She was making the point that politics are standing in the way of fixing things. Which is a perfectly valid point.
And she wasn't joking. Give it up.
She was making the point that politics are standing in the way of fixing things. Which is a perfectly valid point.
She's a fascist thug trying to establish a dictatorship, the dream and goal of the democratic party for decades.
It was a trial balloon, had it been ignored, Obama would be proposing the same as we speak.
And her proposed solution? Turn off democracy.So, in a serious speech, and in a serious voice, she advocates suspending elections.
And you want us to believe she was joking?
I'll let her words speak for themselves: Suspend Elections | Beverly Perdue | Audio | The Daily Caller
Meanwhile, you believe what you're told to believe, sheep.
She was making the point that politics are standing in the way of fixing things. Which is a perfectly valid point.
And she wasn't joking. Give it up.
Thank you for your meaningless message.What bothers me is that you attack the messanger and nothing about what perdue said, which makes you look like a bonified idiot.
But a distraction would be making Palins past sex life news worthy now thats a distraction from the failed obama economy.
bigrebnc here is projecting: he often attacks the messenger not the message. So does daveman.
thank you for your meaningless message.bigrebnc here is projecting: He often attacks the messenger not the message. So does daveman.
meaningless only to hard right fools, daveman.
You are the RINO, bigrebnc: you do not believe in classical liberal positions as do all true Republicans. The Founders passed a charter for governance that including representation, increasing enfranchisement, constitutional supremacy over states rights, a taxing authority and mechanism, a separation of state and organized religion, and an Articles III and V that provide the proper method of understanding and changing the document.
You are not a Republican.
No, actually, if elections were suspended by a vote of some sort, in accordance with the Constitution,
that would be democracy in action.
Ooops. Looks like Fakey is attacking the messenger.Thank you for your meaningless message.bigrebnc here is projecting: he often attacks the messenger not the message. So does daveman.
Meaningless only to Hard Right fools, daveman.
Yes, Gaea forbid you abide by the same standards you insist others do.bigrebnc's message, and your support of it, define its messengers.
No, actually, if elections were suspended by a vote of some sort, in accordance with the Constitution,
that would be democracy in action.
The only way they could be suspended is by amending the Constitution, retard. It could never be done "in accordance with the Constitution" as it now stands.
You really are a retard, aren't you?
You are the RINO, bigrebnc: you do not believe in classical liberal positions as do all true Republicans. The Founders passed a charter for governance that including representation, increasing enfranchisement, constitutional supremacy over states rights, a taxing authority and mechanism, a separation of state and organized religion, and an Articles III and V that provide the proper method of understanding and changing the document.
You are not a Republican.
Dude seperation of church and state was not in the constitution, the idea originated in a letter written well after the constitution was written.
The constitution also does not put constitutional supremacy over states rights, hence the 10th.
The taxing is in there but it was to be UNIFORM throughout the states, not progressive as it is now.
I think you have some things confused.
You are the RINO, bigrebnc: you do not believe in classical liberal positions as do all true Republicans. The Founders passed a charter for governance that including representation, increasing enfranchisement, constitutional supremacy over states rights, a taxing authority and mechanism, a separation of state and organized religion, and an Articles III and V that provide the proper method of understanding and changing the document.
You are not a Republican.
Dude seperation of church and state was not in the constitution, the idea originated in a letter written well after the constitution was written.
The constitution also does not put constitutional supremacy over states rights, hence the 10th.
The taxing is in there but it was to be UNIFORM throughout the states, not progressive as it is now.
I think you have some things confused.
Wrong. The Supremacy Clause puts 'constitutional supremacy over states rights. The 10th amendment only allows states authority that is not in conflict with the constitution.
You are the RINO, bigrebnc: you do not believe in classical liberal positions as do all true Republicans. The Founders passed a charter for governance that including representation, increasing enfranchisement, constitutional supremacy over states rights, a taxing authority and mechanism, a separation of state and organized religion, and an Articles III and V that provide the proper method of understanding and changing the document.
You are not a Republican.
Dude seperation of church and state was not in the constitution, the idea originated in a letter written well after the constitution was written.
The constitution also does not put constitutional supremacy over states rights, hence the 10th.
The taxing is in there but it was to be UNIFORM throughout the states, not progressive as it is now.
I think you have some things confused.
Wrong. The Supremacy Clause puts 'constitutional supremacy over states rights. The 10th amendment only allows states authority that is not in conflict with the constitution.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Dude seperation of church and state was not in the constitution, the idea originated in a letter written well after the constitution was written.
The constitution also does not put constitutional supremacy over states rights, hence the 10th.
The taxing is in there but it was to be UNIFORM throughout the states, not progressive as it is now.
I think you have some things confused.
Wrong. The Supremacy Clause puts 'constitutional supremacy over states rights. The 10th amendment only allows states authority that is not in conflict with the constitution.
Duh! Which was all but a small limited number of clearly spelled out items until you Progressives titty fucked the "Good and Commerce" Clause
