Nearly all of recent COVID deaths are among the unvaccinated

I don’t get it, especially those with kids. Their children can’t go to school, summer camp, etc without vaccination records for the basics - measles, polio, etc etc and those diseases have been nearly eradicated. How is this any different, except that the chances of getting the COVIDS is 100 times greater? :confused-84:
And the reason they have been nearly eradicated (especially in the US) is because of near universal vaccination.
 
Unvaccinated people are more likely to be right-leaning than left-leaning.
Thank you for that unscientific opinion.

Are you seriously denying this? It's obvious. Here are several sources:

View attachment 505171

View attachment 505168



View attachment 505169

View attachment 505170




Here are the top 10 states with vaccinations. All of them are blue.

View attachment 505388

Here are the bottom 10 states with vaccinations. They have 51 listed because they listed Washington DC separate. All of the bottom vaccinated states are red.

View attachment 505389
Doesn't surprise me one bit that most "blue" people are gullible sheep.

Right. Liberals are more likely to get the vaccine. That’s all I was showing. This guy gets it.
 
Why is it that CDC isn't at full vaccination? You would think that if it were so important they would be at 100%.

They aren't even close.

Actually that estimate is purely anecdotal as explained by the NIH/CDC. It could easily be off by +/- 50%, since it wasn't even based on statistics.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that CDC isn't at full vaccination? You would think that if it were so important they would be at 100%.

They aren't even close.

Actually that estimate is purely anecdotal as explained by the NIH/CDC. It could easily be off by +/- 50%, since it wasn't even based on statistics.





And yet the facts are the most educated, most expert in disease are not at 100%

So, your attempted deflection and diversion aside, why is the CDC not at 100%
 
And yet the facts are the most educated, most expert in disease are not at 100%

So, your attempted deflection and diversion aside, why is the CDC not at 100%
Within the margin of error of the data source, the CDC might be at 99.7% and your statement would still hold.

Arguing something is not at 100% can be said of just about everything.
 
Actually they rate medical personnel amongst the highest vaccinated.
Why did you fail to state taking the vaccine is a job requirement?
If they don’t they get fired.
It's almost ironic, since the states where people are most likely to get vaccinated can not make it a job requirement.
While those states where people are least likely to get vaccinated can be a requirement of employment.
Got any proof of that?
 
And yet the facts are the most educated, most expert in disease are not at 100%

So, your attempted deflection and diversion aside, why is the CDC not at 100%
Within the margin of error of the data source, the CDC might be at 99.7% and your statement would still hold.

Arguing something is not at 100% can be said of just about everything.





And you can't even provide evidence that they are at 50%.

Why is that?
 
It's almost ironic, since the states where people are most likely to get vaccinated can not make it a job requirement.
While those states where people are least likely to get vaccinated can be a requirement of employment.
Got any proof of that?

In April 2021, a Texas hospital system announced to its 26,000 employees that they all needed to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of staying employed. The hospital gave employees only a couple of narrow exemptions—based on a medical condition or a sincerely held religious belief, which the hospital granted when appropriate. More than 100 nurses and other healthcare employees filed suit against their employer, Houston Methodist Hospital and Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital, under Texas common law, claiming that it is unlawful for Houston Methodist to require the vaccine.

On June 12, 2021, after denying the employees’ request for a temporary restraining order—and a mere four days after Houston Methodist moved to dismiss the claims—U.S. District Judge Lynn N. Hughes inoculated employers from such challenges (at least in Texas) by kicking the lawsuit out of court because “Texas law only protects employees from being terminated for refusing to commit an act carrying criminal penalties to the worker … [and r]eceiving a COVID-19 vaccination is not an illegal act, and it carries no criminal penalties.”
 
And you can't even provide evidence that they are at 50%.

Why is that?
There is just as much evidence the CDC is at 100% vaccination, as there is that they're at 60%, or 40% or even at 0.01%

There have collected no data, and are using pure anecdotal information to form an opinion. As they are busy with much bigger matters.
 
It's almost ironic, since the states where people are most likely to get vaccinated can not make it a job requirement.
While those states where people are least likely to get vaccinated can be a requirement of employment.
Got any proof of that?

In April 2021, a Texas hospital system announced to its 26,000 employees that they all needed to receive a COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of staying employed. The hospital gave employees only a couple of narrow exemptions—based on a medical condition or a sincerely held religious belief, which the hospital granted when appropriate. More than 100 nurses and other healthcare employees filed suit against their employer, Houston Methodist Hospital and Houston Methodist The Woodlands Hospital, under Texas common law, claiming that it is unlawful for Houston Methodist to require the vaccine.

On June 12, 2021, after denying the employees’ request for a temporary restraining order—and a mere four days after Houston Methodist moved to dismiss the claims—U.S. District Judge Lynn N. Hughes inoculated employers from such challenges (at least in Texas) by kicking the lawsuit out of court because “Texas law only protects employees from being terminated for refusing to commit an act carrying criminal penalties to the worker … [and r]eceiving a COVID-19 vaccination is not an illegal act, and it carries no criminal penalties.”





Sooooo, riddle me this batman....why are medical professionals so reluctant to get vaccinated?

Why must they be COMPELLED to get vaccinated.

I am seeing a severe logic fail in your arguments.
 
And you can't even provide evidence that they are at 50%.

Why is that?
There is just as much evidence the CDC is at 100% vaccination, as there is that they're at 60%, or 40% or even at 0.01%

There have collected no data, and are using pure anecdotal information to form an opinion. As they are busy with much bigger matters.




There is no evidence that they are at 50%
 
Sooooo, riddle me this batman....why are medical professionals so reluctant to get vaccinated?

Why must they be COMPELLED to get vaccinated.

I am seeing a severe logic fail in your arguments.
You notice those medical personnel were in Texas, a red state, so their position is consistent with that of the others in the state.

That is not true in other states where the medical personnel lead in vaccination status.
 

Forum List

Back
Top