Netanyahu's response to UN's resulution.

[Lipush]

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

I think we all know why people don't like jews.

Yeah. We do. For many reasons.

Good poeople are often hated.

 

[Spare_change]

So the people at the UN didn't look at the facts? The White House didn't look at the facts?

Some 570,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank....

1.4 million Arabs live in Israel. Why are they not considered an obstacle to peace? Why is the mere presence of Jews an "obstacle to peace"?

It's the presence of militarized citadels that prevent sovereignty and a contiguous state that is the problem.

What kind of nonsense is that???

It is the presence of militarized citadels that ensure sovereignty and a contiguous state. See our southern border for further proof.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Not a bad idea. Israel does need to kick out the Palestinians. Or stop moving into their neighborhoods.
And stop pretending. If your plan all along was to take their land stop pretending and lying. Just do it. Seems to me the GOP will go along. They love fucking with the middle east.

The Security Council resolution that passed Friday condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation under international law” and an obstacle to peace. The Council approved it 14 to 0, with the United States abstaining instead of using its unilateral veto, as it has in the past.

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

When any criticism pointed at you is "nothing more than anti Israel propaganda" then fuck you guys. You're on your own.

Its not just nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. We think you guys are assholes. It's why a lot of people don't like jews.

No, you don't like Jews because you are a simple minded racist.

Or you are all just annoying

Peace cannot exist without justice. A future peace cannot exist without recognizing factual history. The irony is only two types of people will ignore the above guidance — “heartless Zionists” and “Hamas terrorists.”

Hopefully the majority of us can build a strong enough middle ground to neutralize both extremes and finally get what we all want — peace.

The distinguishing feature of your post is that they contain no facts, just racist rants.

 

[Spare_change]

I think we need to stop treating these people like second class citizens.

You need to give Palestinians their own country. One morter lobbed into Israel level 1/4 of the country. You two are an abusive couple who need to get a divorce.

What other solution is there?

You force relocate all Palestinians into Syria and fortify your borders.

Problem solved.

Not a bad idea. Israel does need to kick out the Palestinians. Or stop moving into their neighborhoods.
And stop pretending. If your plan all along was to take their land stop pretending and lying. Just do it. Seems to me the GOP will go along. They love fucking with the middle east.

The Security Council resolution that passed Friday condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation under international law” and an obstacle to peace. The Council approved it 14 to 0, with the United States abstaining instead of using its unilateral veto, as it has in the past.

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

When any criticism pointed at you is "nothing more than anti Israel propaganda" then fuck you guys. You're on your own.

Its not just nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. We think you guys are assholes. It's why a lot of people don't like jews.

The slogan you're looking for is "I'm anti-Semitic and proud of it !!"

 

[toomuchtime_]

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

I think we all know why people don't like jews.

No, people who claim not to like Jews or other ethnic groups are not thinkers and have no idea why they hold these prejudices.

 

[Lipush]

History does not support the Palestine position - no matter how they try to twist it.

Further, the leadership of Palestine has continually refused creation of a Palestinian state, so there's really nothing to talk about.

Well no one supports Israel's position except for

A. Republicans
B. American Jews
C. Israeli Jews

... which, in your opinion, automatically makes it wrong? Maybe, just maybe, people should actually look at the facts, understand the history of the area, and discover that Israel has several times offered a two-state solution, only to be rejected by quasi-Palestinian authority. How convenient it is to ignore history and the truth .....

So the people at the UN didn't look at the facts? The White House didn't look at the facts?

Some 570,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, in settlements that most countries consider to be illegal and the United States terms illegitimate. Israel disputes that, citing historical, political and Biblical links to the areas, as well as security concerns.

Most countries think what you are doing is illegal. Maybe if most countries saw things exactly like the Jews see things we'd all agree. But then we would all be jews.

Oh, they looked at the facts - they just chose to ignore them. It is the politically expedient thing to do. And, why do you suppose that would be? Think it might have anything to do with spreading democracy in the Middle East? Think it might have anything to do with upsetting the oil producers? Think it might have anything to do with the duplicity of the US? Can any country afford to have the Arab countries rise up in protest to supporting Israel?

By what stretch of imagination do you honestly believe that the land doesn't belong to Israel? No because somebody else said it doesn't - but what is the proof that makes you comfortable with your version of the truth?

As you say, Israel cites historical, political, and Biblical proofs ---- are they wrong? Where? What's wrong with their proofs?

I would hate to live where Jews are the majority.

We would hate it if you lived here, too.

Next.

 

[sealybobo]

Not a bad idea. Israel does need to kick out the Palestinians. Or stop moving into their neighborhoods.
And stop pretending. If your plan all along was to take their land stop pretending and lying. Just do it. Seems to me the GOP will go along. They love fucking with the middle east.

The Security Council resolution that passed Friday condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation under international law” and an obstacle to peace. The Council approved it 14 to 0, with the United States abstaining instead of using its unilateral veto, as it has in the past.

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

And I don't hate anyone. I don't like you, trust you, I don't think you care about anyone but yourselves and I think you guys are hypocrites. Most jews have a huge chip on their shoulders. Blacks do it too. They say, "it's because I'm black". Well Jews have the same attitude.

And I have yet to meet one jew who was capable of having any empathy for the other side. So you are impossible to talk to unless you agree of course then you are cool but the minute you disagree you are labeled anti semetic. Well guess what? I'm anti semetic.

 

[sealybobo]

Well no one supports Israel's position except for

A. Republicans
B. American Jews
C. Israeli Jews

... which, in your opinion, automatically makes it wrong? Maybe, just maybe, people should actually look at the facts, understand the history of the area, and discover that Israel has several times offered a two-state solution, only to be rejected by quasi-Palestinian authority. How convenient it is to ignore history and the truth .....

So the people at the UN didn't look at the facts? The White House didn't look at the facts?

Some 570,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, in settlements that most countries consider to be illegal and the United States terms illegitimate. Israel disputes that, citing historical, political and Biblical links to the areas, as well as security concerns.

Most countries think what you are doing is illegal. Maybe if most countries saw things exactly like the Jews see things we'd all agree. But then we would all be jews.

Oh, they looked at the facts - they just chose to ignore them. It is the politically expedient thing to do. And, why do you suppose that would be? Think it might have anything to do with spreading democracy in the Middle East? Think it might have anything to do with upsetting the oil producers? Think it might have anything to do with the duplicity of the US? Can any country afford to have the Arab countries rise up in protest to supporting Israel?

By what stretch of imagination do you honestly believe that the land doesn't belong to Israel? No because somebody else said it doesn't - but what is the proof that makes you comfortable with your version of the truth?

As you say, Israel cites historical, political, and Biblical proofs ---- are they wrong? Where? What's wrong with their proofs?

I would hate to live where Jews are the majority.

We would hate it if you lived here, too.

Next.

But it would improve the smell. No way these guys don't smell

 

[Spare_change]

I think we need to stop treating these people like second class citizens.

You need to give Palestinians their own country. One morter lobbed into Israel level 1/4 of the country. You two are an abusive couple who need to get a divorce.

What other solution is there?

You force relocate all Palestinians into Syria and fortify your borders.

Problem solved.

Not a bad idea. Israel does need to kick out the Palestinians. Or stop moving into their neighborhoods.
And stop pretending. If your plan all along was to take their land stop pretending and lying. Just do it. Seems to me the GOP will go along. They love fucking with the middle east.

The Security Council resolution that passed Friday condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation under international law” and an obstacle to peace. The Council approved it 14 to 0, with the United States abstaining instead of using its unilateral veto, as it has in the past.

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Jews will continue to build in Jerusalem. Because it is forever Jewish. It's ours and if the UN doesn't like it they can just F### OFF!

It is that uncompromising (and irrational) position that will result in the Jewish colonial project to end in tears. It is truly unbelievable that these people won't accept that the land was inhabited by Muslims and Christians before the hordes of people that happened to practice Judaism, from other continents, invaded the land and expropriated, evicted and now rule over the native people they were unable to evict. If you people don't compromise and accept the reality that you took the land from the existing inhabitants, the future is not bright.

When, exactly, did this purported "invasion" happen?

Let's get all the facts out ...

 

[Spare_change]

... which, in your opinion, automatically makes it wrong? Maybe, just maybe, people should actually look at the facts, understand the history of the area, and discover that Israel has several times offered a two-state solution, only to be rejected by quasi-Palestinian authority. How convenient it is to ignore history and the truth .....

So the people at the UN didn't look at the facts? The White House didn't look at the facts?

Some 570,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, in settlements that most countries consider to be illegal and the United States terms illegitimate. Israel disputes that, citing historical, political and Biblical links to the areas, as well as security concerns.

Most countries think what you are doing is illegal. Maybe if most countries saw things exactly like the Jews see things we'd all agree. But then we would all be jews.

Oh, they looked at the facts - they just chose to ignore them. It is the politically expedient thing to do. And, why do you suppose that would be? Think it might have anything to do with spreading democracy in the Middle East? Think it might have anything to do with upsetting the oil producers? Think it might have anything to do with the duplicity of the US? Can any country afford to have the Arab countries rise up in protest to supporting Israel?

By what stretch of imagination do you honestly believe that the land doesn't belong to Israel? No because somebody else said it doesn't - but what is the proof that makes you comfortable with your version of the truth?

As you say, Israel cites historical, political, and Biblical proofs ---- are they wrong? Where? What's wrong with their proofs?

I would hate to live where Jews are the majority.

We would hate it if you lived here, too.

Next.

But it would improve the smell. No way these guys don't smell

Pretty fucking childish ....

 

[Lipush]

Not a bad idea. Israel does need to kick out the Palestinians. Or stop moving into their neighborhoods.
And stop pretending. If your plan all along was to take their land stop pretending and lying. Just do it. Seems to me the GOP will go along. They love fucking with the middle east.

The Security Council resolution that passed Friday condemned Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem as a “flagrant violation under international law” and an obstacle to peace. The Council approved it 14 to 0, with the United States abstaining instead of using its unilateral veto, as it has in the past.

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

When any criticism pointed at you is "nothing more than anti Israel propaganda" then fuck you guys. You're on your own.

Its not just nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. We think you guys are assholes. It's why a lot of people don't like jews.

No, you don't like Jews because you are a simple minded racist.

Or you are all just annoying

Peace cannot exist without justice. A future peace cannot exist without recognizing factual history. The irony is only two types of people will ignore the above guidance — “heartless Zionists” and “Hamas terrorists.”

Hopefully the majority of us can build a strong enough middle ground to neutralize both extremes and finally get what we all want — peace.

Justice is subjective. It's not absolute. Justice for the Arab wouldn't be justice for the Jew. So who will decide what is "Justice", exactly?

 

[Shusha]

Well guess what? I'm anti semetic.

 

[Lipush]

So the people at the UN didn't look at the facts? The White House didn't look at the facts?

Some 570,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank....

1.4 million Arabs live in Israel. Why are they not considered an obstacle to peace? Why is the mere presence of Jews an "obstacle to peace"?

It's the presence of militarized citadels that prevent sovereignty and a contiguous state that is the problem.

Actually, it's the presence of Islamic terrorists whose fascist ideology knows no passage of time or geographic boundaries and who are equipped and maintained with a dedicated UN funded welfare fraud that is the problem.

You are too one sided to see anything the other side is saying. We can't have you or Hamas deciding what is the best thing to do because neither of you are reasonable. That's why we have things like the UN.

You are one sided as well. You seems to think Palestinians have no hands in this and it is all the evil Israelis' doing.

At least, that is the impression you convey in your posts.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The wording in U.N. resolutions is meant to be taken precisely. I mention this because you wrote that the condemnation of settlements "in the West Bank and East Jerusalem" but since East Jerusalem is in the West Bank, it is best to stick to the text of the Resolution 2334 which states: "Condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions ..." (italics mine)

The resolution is indeed a rebuke of Israeli policy.

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

And I don't hate anyone. I don't like you, trust you, I don't think you care about anyone but yourselves and I think you guys are hypocrites. Most jews have a huge chip on their shoulders. Blacks do it too. They say, "it's because I'm black". Well Jews have the same attitude.

And I have yet to meet one jew who was capable of having any empathy for the other side. So you are impossible to talk to unless you agree of course then you are cool but the minute you disagree you are labeled anti semetic. Well guess what? I'm anti semetic.

You are anti semitic because it is your nature to be. Clearly, you are not capable of rational thought on this subject.

 

[Spare_change]

... which, in your opinion, automatically makes it wrong? Maybe, just maybe, people should actually look at the facts, understand the history of the area, and discover that Israel has several times offered a two-state solution, only to be rejected by quasi-Palestinian authority. How convenient it is to ignore history and the truth .....

I wouldn't give them a choice. I'd move them out. Or you could be really insane and just build settlements around them and have the enemy living among you every day hating you. I think the jews like having the arabs to kick around.

... and i think you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

The land belongs to Israel by rights of war. They were attacked, and drove the enemy out. All the rest is just BS. Israel has offered the land to Palestine in return for peace many times - each time, Palestine has refused. In fact, Israel has pulled people out of the "occupied territory" three times that I can remember, and still Palestine refuses to accept a two-state solution.

The problem isn't Israel - the problem is Palestinian leaders who are using our liberals, and their Arab counterparts, to try to force Israel into the sea. They, the Palestinian leaders, want it all --- and will accept nothing short of the elimination of Israel.

Y'all need to figure out whose team you're playing on ...

Most of the world and the White House says you are fos. Maybe only you jews know what you are talking about. I've met Jews and that does seem to be their attitude.

LOL - given that I've been a practicing (and sometimes not practicing) Catholic my whole life, your scurrilous attack will go down as incredibly misguided.

I challenge you to show me a SINGLE - just one, anywhere - verifiable "proof" cited by ANYBODY that says Israel doesn't have rights of ownership to that land.

I'll wait right here for you ....

UN Security Council Resolution 298

"The Security Council,

Recalling its resolutions 252 (1968) of 21 May 1968 and 267 (1969) of 3 July 1969 and the earlier General Assembly resolutions 2253 (ES-V) and 2254 (ES-V) of 4 and 14 July 1967 concerning measures and actions by Israel designed to change the status of the Israeli-occupied section of Jerusalem,

Having considered the letter of the Permanent Representative of Jordan on the situation in Jerusalem 1/ and the reports of the Secretary-General,2/ and having heard the statements of the parties concerned on the question,

Reaffirming the principle that acquisition of territory by military conquest is inadmissible,

Noting with concern the non-compliance by Israel with the above-mentioned resolutions,......."


United Nations Official Document

A UN resolution? THAT is the "law" you cite???

Surely, you're not serious .....

 

[sealybobo]

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

I think we all know why people don't like jews.

No, people who claim not to like Jews or other ethnic groups are not thinkers and have no idea why they hold these prejudices.

I have ideas why. And I don't hate jews the same way I don't hate blacks. But do I like the black community as a group? No I do not. But I don't hate blacks or think I'm better than them. Just as a group or as a whole I think they suck major balls.

Jews in America are alright other than being a little annoying. If you disagree with their politics, which usually I do, they are sooo stubborn and they/you don't even see that your loyalty is not with the USA it's with Israel. If not why do you think you always see things the Israel's way and I don't? For years I took the Jews side but the more I learned the more I realize you guys are horrible people. You almost deserve the level of respect you get from the Arabs. You get what you give.

Do you love the black community? If not, does that make you a racist? Do you agree with the arab community? Does that make you anti arab? Are you evil? Are you ignorant for not agreeing 100% with blacks and arabs? Then why am I anti semetic for not agreeing with Jews or thinking you guys are the bad actors in this?

The UN says you are wrong. How else am I supposed to judge you? You don't like their decision but that's what I would expect from a jew.

So if you can realize that you are not racist just because you don't always agree with the black community, you can then see how people who don't agree with Israel aren't automatically anti semetic.

 

[Lipush]

... which, in your opinion, automatically makes it wrong? Maybe, just maybe, people should actually look at the facts, understand the history of the area, and discover that Israel has several times offered a two-state solution, only to be rejected by quasi-Palestinian authority. How convenient it is to ignore history and the truth .....

So the people at the UN didn't look at the facts? The White House didn't look at the facts?

Some 570,000 Israelis live in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, in settlements that most countries consider to be illegal and the United States terms illegitimate. Israel disputes that, citing historical, political and Biblical links to the areas, as well as security concerns.

Most countries think what you are doing is illegal. Maybe if most countries saw things exactly like the Jews see things we'd all agree. But then we would all be jews.

Oh, they looked at the facts - they just chose to ignore them. It is the politically expedient thing to do. And, why do you suppose that would be? Think it might have anything to do with spreading democracy in the Middle East? Think it might have anything to do with upsetting the oil producers? Think it might have anything to do with the duplicity of the US? Can any country afford to have the Arab countries rise up in protest to supporting Israel?

By what stretch of imagination do you honestly believe that the land doesn't belong to Israel? No because somebody else said it doesn't - but what is the proof that makes you comfortable with your version of the truth?

As you say, Israel cites historical, political, and Biblical proofs ---- are they wrong? Where? What's wrong with their proofs?

I would hate to live where Jews are the majority.

We would hate it if you lived here, too.

Next.

But it would improve the smell. No way these guys don't smell

How old are you, really?...

Because this is just embarrassing.

 

[sealybobo]

Well, at least they didn't accuse the Jews of poisoning wells or draining the blood of Christian/Muslim children to make Passover matzo.

What this resolution makes clear is that the UN has too much money to waste on resolutions that are nothing more than anti Israel propaganda. After Jan. 20, an accounting will be made of how much it really needs to do useful work.

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

And I don't hate anyone. I don't like you, trust you, I don't think you care about anyone but yourselves and I think you guys are hypocrites. Most jews have a huge chip on their shoulders. Blacks do it too. They say, "it's because I'm black". Well Jews have the same attitude.

And I have yet to meet one jew who was capable of having any empathy for the other side. So you are impossible to talk to unless you agree of course then you are cool but the minute you disagree you are labeled anti semetic. Well guess what? I'm anti semetic.

You are anti semitic because it is your nature to be. Clearly, you are not capable of rational thought on this subject.

I love that term being tossed about. Anti Semitic. Sure, just because I think you are wrong in this case that makes me anti semitic? You jews are as bad as black americans. Every criminal black cries when they get shot that they were shot because the cop was a racist. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with how you treat the arabs in Palestine.

I have no skin in the game. If I had to pick jew or arab I would pick the jews every day of the week. You are much better people than the arabs. But that doesn't mean I think you are right here.

 

[Spare_change]

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

And I don't hate anyone. I don't like you, trust you, I don't think you care about anyone but yourselves and I think you guys are hypocrites. Most jews have a huge chip on their shoulders. Blacks do it too. They say, "it's because I'm black". Well Jews have the same attitude.

And I have yet to meet one jew who was capable of having any empathy for the other side. So you are impossible to talk to unless you agree of course then you are cool but the minute you disagree you are labeled anti semetic. Well guess what? I'm anti semetic.

You are anti semitic because it is your nature to be. Clearly, you are not capable of rational thought on this subject.

I love that term being tossed about. Anti Semitic. Sure, just because I think you are wrong in this case that makes me anti semitic? You jews are as bad as black americans. Every criminal black cries when they get shot that they were shot because the cop was a racist. It couldn't possibly have anything to do with how you treat the arabs in Palestine.

I have no skin in the game. If I had to pick jew or arab I would pick the jews every day of the week. You are much better people than the arabs. But that doesn't mean I think you are right here.

... and you know the funny thing?

He doesn't even realize how he sounds ....

 

[Lipush]

The Israelis did not poison wells but they did steal them for use by settlers thereby depriving Palestinians of adequate fresh water.
Israel admits cutting West Bank water supply, but blames Palestinian Authority

We all knew Jews are unreasonable and this is just illustrating it.

And I'm not happy how we're going back to another Republican president and all of the sudden we are talking about war with Iran and Israel again. It was a nice 8 years during Obama when we didn't to worry about Israel.

Republicans always want to bring up Soros but they never mention this hymie bastard who will tell the USA what to do when it comes to Israel & the ME.

We get it: you hate Jews but you have no idea why.

I think we all know why people don't like jews.

No, people who claim not to like Jews or other ethnic groups are not thinkers and have no idea why they hold these prejudices.

I have ideas why. And I don't hate jews the same way I don't hate blacks. But do I like the black community as a group? No I do not. But I don't hate blacks or think I'm better than them. Just as a group or as a whole I think they suck major balls.

Jews in America are alright other than being a little annoying. If you disagree with their politics, which usually I do, they are sooo stubborn and they/you don't even see that your loyalty is not with the USA it's with Israel. If not why do you think you always see things the Israel's way and I don't? For years I took the Jews side but the more I learned the more I realize you guys are horrible people. You almost deserve the level of respect you get from the Arabs. You get what you give.

Do you love the black community? If not, does that make you a racist? Do you agree with the arab community? Does that make you anti arab? Are you evil? Are you ignorant for not agreeing 100% with blacks and arabs? Then why am I anti semetic for not agreeing with Jews or thinking you guys are the bad actors in this?

The UN says you are wrong. How else am I supposed to judge you? You don't like their decision but that's what I would expect from a jew.

So if you can realize that you are not racist just because you don't always agree with the black community, you can then see how people who don't agree with Israel aren't automatically anti semetic.

You seem to deslike poeple in general. So I guess it's ok...

Are you a narccicist? Because that will just wrap the package even more perfect.