Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Keep up the stupidity, then left weirdos like you are nothing but retards, live with it. Hussein proved he had wmd's, even pervert bill and all the dimwits said he did before W got in office. IDIOT!Dogstyle, the lovely thing about "Conspiracy Theorists" is that no matter how many time we prove to you it's a weather balloon, you still insist it's a flying saucer.
So what do these E-mail prove? That the CIA really thought the cause was the movie, and the White House repeated that.
Oh my God, the WHite House Agreed with the CIA! What a scandal!
Actually the CIA Chief testified under oath before Congress that they didn't say anything about a video, because they didn't know what caused it, and that they were surprised that Susan Rice used that talking point, because it didn't come from them.
What happened today, April 2
Former CIA acting director Michael Morell testified before the House Intelligence Committee today, denying allegations of a cover-up related to the 2012 Benghazi attacks or that anyone one in the Obama administration deliberately misled Congress on what happened in Benghazi. Morell admitted it took analysts four days after Libyan authorities told them there were no protests on video in their possession to analyze it, something that he said came up in the CIA's review of its process. Morell also told committee members it wasn't possible to say exactly what motivated the Benghazi attackers, because none of them were caught.
Morell explained that he wasn't convinced by the chief of station's account largely because the station chief's account began only when he got there, after the attacks had started, and that it was also based on press reports. Other press reports, Morell pointed out, did mention protests.
Asked about Sunday talk show interviews with Susan Rice, then the national security advisor, in the aftermath of the Benghazi attacks, Morell said they largely followed the talking points the intelligence community agreed on, but did not agree with her linking of spontaneous protests to the YouTube clip of Innocence of Muslims. That clip was blamed for protests in Libya and in other countries.
Ex-CIA Chief Testifies on Benghazi: Don?t Know the Motivation Because Attackers Haven?t Been Caught Yet - Reason 24/7 : Reason.com
Mike Morell didn't throw anyone under the bus, but it said that he didn't agree with the White House's version of events on the ground. It's a perfect example of double-speak.
Joe, you are a terrible spokesperson for the Obama Administration. If they're paying you they need to get their money back.
Guy, you cherry pick one line, while ignoring that Morell shot down Issa's usual batch of conspiracy theories.
there were protests in Libya. there were protests in other countries. And one of them escalated inot a riot, or perhaps Al Qaeda took advantage of a riot to launch an attack.
But of course, the people like you, who have no problem iwht THOUSANDS of people dying over a lie about WMD's, are going to insist that not being sure of what caused this riot is the biggest scandal, ever.
It's what happens when you spend your whole life hating, i guess.
Dogstyle, the lovely thing about "Conspiracy Theorists" is that no matter how many time we prove to you it's a weather balloon, you still insist it's a flying saucer.
So what do these E-mail prove? That the CIA really thought the cause was the movie, and the White House repeated that.
Oh my God, the WHite House Agreed with the CIA! What a scandal!
Actually the CIA Chief testified under oath before Congress that they didn't say anything about a video, because they didn't know what caused it, and that they were surprised that Susan Rice used that talking point, because it didn't come from them.
What happened today, April 2
Former CIA acting director Michael Morell testified before the House Intelligence Committee today, denying allegations of a cover-up related to the 2012 Benghazi attacks or that anyone one in the Obama administration deliberately misled Congress on what happened in Benghazi. Morell admitted it took analysts four days after Libyan authorities told them there were no protests on video in their possession to analyze it, something that he said came up in the CIA's review of its process. Morell also told committee members it wasn't possible to say exactly what motivated the Benghazi attackers, because none of them were caught.
Morell explained that he wasn't convinced by the chief of station's account largely because the station chief's account began only when he got there, after the attacks had started, and that it was also based on press reports. Other press reports, Morell pointed out, did mention protests.
Asked about Sunday talk show interviews with Susan Rice, then the national security advisor, in the aftermath of the Benghazi attacks, Morell said they largely followed the talking points the intelligence community agreed on, but did not agree with her linking of spontaneous protests to the YouTube clip of Innocence of Muslims. That clip was blamed for protests in Libya and in other countries.
Ex-CIA Chief Testifies on Benghazi: Don?t Know the Motivation Because Attackers Haven?t Been Caught Yet - Reason 24/7 : Reason.com
Mike Morell didn't throw anyone under the bus, but it said that he didn't agree with the White House's version of events on the ground. It's a perfect example of double-speak.
Joe, you are a terrible spokesperson for the Obama Administration. If they're paying you they need to get their money back.
Guy, you cherry pick one line, while ignoring that Morell shot down Issa's usual batch of conspiracy theories.
there were protests in Libya. there were protests in other countries. And one of them escalated inot a riot, or perhaps Al Qaeda took advantage of a riot to launch an attack.
But of course, the people like you, who have no problem iwht THOUSANDS of people dying over a lie about WMD's, are going to insist that not being sure of what caused this riot is the biggest scandal, ever.
It's what happens when you spend your whole life hating, i guess.
Yeah nothing to see here, folks.
Except we know the White House coached her to repeat the line they had concocted: that a video was responsible for a riot. They concocted it because the truth--it was a terrorist attack on a poorly defended position--might cost Obama the election.
Yes, we know this. Yes, it's proven. Yes, it's criminal. Yes, people desperately want to dismiss it in one way or another but they can't. Because it's the truth.
No scandal on the scale of Nixon. However the lesson about the negative consequences of our interventionist policy is largely ignored.
If that were true every presidential press secretary for um, ever, would be in jail.
Anyway, she's smart and a practiced politician, I'm sure it only took a few minutes to go over the Talking Points, it not like they are a new concept. Not like the GOP candidate from 2008. Now that was a candidate that was in need of a lot of coaching.
You're right. It's worse than Nixon. Nixon didnt lie about a foreign policy disaster to help his re-election. He covered up for loyal staffers.
Again, "they all do it" is a fail. They do not all do it. Only Barack Obama has lied intentionally to boost his re-election chances.
Who knows how long it took to coach Rice in the official lies? What does it matter? She was told to lie. That shouldn't happen.
It will be interesting to see, Willie. For someone to call themselves a "journalist" and then look the other way when an Administration so blatantly lies makes them nothing more than a politician's "bitch". Some of them don't seem to have a problem with that role...for others...such as Karl from ABC...it's apparent that they DO have some journalistic integrity left.
Dogstyle, the lovely thing about "Conspiracy Theorists" is that no matter how many time we prove to you it's a weather balloon, you still insist it's a flying saucer.
So what do these E-mail prove? That the CIA really thought the cause was the movie, and the White House repeated that.
Oh my God, the WHite House Agreed with the CIA! What a scandal!
Dogstyle, the lovely thing about "Conspiracy Theorists" is that no matter how many time we prove to you it's a weather balloon, you still insist it's a flying saucer.
So what do these E-mail prove? That the CIA really thought the cause was the movie, and the White House repeated that.
Oh my God, the WHite House Agreed with the CIA! What a scandal!
Actually the CIA Chief testified under oath before Congress that they didn't say anything about a video, because they didn't know what caused it, and that they were surprised that Susan Rice used that talking point, because it didn't come from them.
What happened today, April 2
Former CIA acting director Michael Morell testified before the House Intelligence Committee today, denying allegations of a cover-up related to the 2012 Benghazi attacks or that anyone one in the Obama administration deliberately misled Congress on what happened in Benghazi. Morell admitted it took analysts four days after Libyan authorities told them there were no protests on video in their possession to analyze it, something that he said came up in the CIA's review of its process. Morell also told committee members it wasn't possible to say exactly what motivated the Benghazi attackers, because none of them were caught.
Morell explained that he wasn't convinced by the chief of station's account largely because the station chief's account began only when he got there, after the attacks had started, and that it was also based on press reports. Other press reports, Morell pointed out, did mention protests.
Asked about Sunday talk show interviews with Susan Rice, then the national security advisor, in the aftermath of the Benghazi attacks, Morell said they largely followed the talking points the intelligence community agreed on, but did not agree with her linking of spontaneous protests to the YouTube clip of Innocence of Muslims. That clip was blamed for protests in Libya and in other countries.
Ex-CIA Chief Testifies on Benghazi: Don?t Know the Motivation Because Attackers Haven?t Been Caught Yet - Reason 24/7 : Reason.com
Mike Morell didn't throw anyone under the bus, but it said that he didn't agree with the White House's version of events on the ground. It's a perfect example of double-speak.
Joe, you are a terrible spokesperson for the Obama Administration. If they're paying you they need to get their money back.
Guy, you cherry pick one line, while ignoring that Morell shot down Issa's usual batch of conspiracy theories.
there were protests in Libya. there were protests in other countries. And one of them escalated inot a riot, or perhaps Al Qaeda took advantage of a riot to launch an attack.
But of course, the people like you, who have no problem iwht THOUSANDS of people dying over a lie about WMD's, are going to insist that not being sure of what caused this riot is the biggest scandal, ever.
It's what happens when you spend your whole life hating, i guess.
No scandal on the scale of Nixon. However the lesson about the negative consequences of our interventionist policy is largely ignored.
If that were true every presidential press secretary for um, ever, would be in jail.
Anyway, she's smart and a practiced politician, I'm sure it only took a few minutes to go over the Talking Points, it not like they are a new concept. Not like the GOP candidate from 2008. Now that was a candidate that was in need of a lot of coaching.
You're right. It's worse than Nixon. Nixon didnt lie about a foreign policy disaster to help his re-election. He covered up for loyal staffers.
Again, "they all do it" is a fail. They do not all do it. Only Barack Obama has lied intentionally to boost his re-election chances.
Who knows how long it took to coach Rice in the official lies? What does it matter? She was told to lie. That shouldn't happen.
Your ignorance of Watergate is astounding, either that or it's willful lying.
You're right. It's worse than Nixon. Nixon didnt lie about a foreign policy disaster to help his re-election. He covered up for loyal staffers.
Again, "they all do it" is a fail. They do not all do it. Only Barack Obama has lied intentionally to boost his re-election chances.
Who knows how long it took to coach Rice in the official lies? What does it matter? She was told to lie. That shouldn't happen.
Your ignorance of Watergate is astounding, either that or it's willful lying.
No, I actually lived through it so remember it pretty well.
Your distortions and deflections are astounding. You must be getting unhinged as the truth comes out.
And what's really telling is that they've chosen to continue to pile lie upon lie in an attempt to brazen their way out of being exposed as liars.
This Administration thinks the American people are stupid enough to buy this latest story that Rice's briefing and talking points were never about Benghazi...but were about general unrest around the globe. Why would an email about THAT be classified and hidden from Congressional investigators until it was forced to be released by a freedom of information law suit? The answer to that question is obvious...the Obama White House KNOWS that it proves that they lied and did so deliberately.
And what's really telling is that they've chosen to continue to pile lie upon lie in an attempt to brazen their way out of being exposed as liars.
This Administration thinks the American people are stupid enough to buy this latest story that Rice's briefing and talking points were never about Benghazi...but were about general unrest around the globe. Why would an email about THAT be classified and hidden from Congressional investigators until it was forced to be released by a freedom of information law suit? The answer to that question is obvious...the Obama White House KNOWS that it proves that they lied and did so deliberately.
Your ignorance of Watergate is astounding, either that or it's willful lying.
No, I actually lived through it so remember it pretty well.
Your distortions and deflections are astounding. You must be getting unhinged as the truth comes out.
Sure you do. 72 was an election year. The botched burglary was actually the second one and it was all about the upcoming elections. The plumbers were connected to the Presidents re-election campaign.
I think ya'll righties are getting pretty desperate. You've gone from Obama watched a 7 hour battle in real time and gave stand down orders, to their Talking Points were not 100% accurate, so they were lying to get re-elected.
Funny stuff
No, I actually lived through it so remember it pretty well.
Your distortions and deflections are astounding. You must be getting unhinged as the truth comes out.
Sure you do. 72 was an election year. The botched burglary was actually the second one and it was all about the upcoming elections. The plumbers were connected to the Presidents re-election campaign.
I think ya'll righties are getting pretty desperate. You've gone from Obama watched a 7 hour battle in real time and gave stand down orders, to their Talking Points were not 100% accurate, so they were lying to get re-elected.
Funny stuff
What's "funny" is watching you attempt to defend the indefensible. Susan Rice was sent out to those 5 Sunday morning talk shows to tell the American people lies about what happened in Benghazi and that email proves it.
A very bad video no one ever saw. Well, except for the Dear Leader and his lackeys. Just another sad farce. And where did the Terrorists get the weapons they used to murder our Ambassador? That should be investigated. It would prove to be the most disturbing aspect of this travesty. But it doesn't look either Party has the guts to investigate that.
A very bad video no one ever saw. Well, except for the Dear Leader and his lackeys. Just another sad farce. And where did the Terrorists get the weapons they used to murder our Ambassador? That should be investigated. It would prove to be the most disturbing aspect of this travesty. But it doesn't look either Party has the guts to investigate that.
You know very well that ignorant people will not do any research at all and believe what they are told.
I hear it happens in Muslim countries too!!!!!
WH Tries Jedi Mind Trick to Explain Smoking Gun Benghazi Email
It [the smoking gun email] was explicitly not about Benghazi. It was about the overall situation in the region, the Muslim world, where you saw protests across embassy facilities across the region.
It was the political version of "These are not the droids you are looking for."
