New IPCC Report: Climate Change no big deal!!!

Just a little $.02 from skooks........here in New York, ZERO computer models predicted snow this morning for Long Island. As I speak, its a Jonestown on the raod as 3" of snow have all major arteries jammed for miles and accidents galore!! Chalk one up again for computer models.

They are completely bogus for prediction use......which means one of two things:


1) Some people saw too many episodes of Star Trek in their younger years


or


2) Know computer models are a dart game but use the phrase as a ruse to promote their agenda.



Its one or the other.



Moreover, there clearly is a fundemental difference in the thinking of conservatives vs far left. People on the far left really do believe that there are solutions for everything........they have a bondless belief in technology or a changing of the institutions to solve every problem that man faces. Of course, this is absurd. The far left looks at going green as if it were a zero sum game.......no unintended consequences to be concerned about.......as if we were using Monopoly money in our economies. Conservatives understand that public policy decisions have very real costs and that real people dont use Monopoly money in real life. Adopting green energy 100% based upon computer models necessarily means the poor class gets massively bigger and the middle class shrinks and disappears eventually............while the 1%ers get massively wealthy. Conservatives dont think that is exactly a good idea while to the far left, these considerations are nothing but an afterthought to be dealt with later.








And PS.....go google hurricane computer models and click on IMAGES. These computer models are carbon copies of the brian patterns of Mamooth..............all over the fucking place. Its laughable.
 
Last edited:
Skook, you do realize no one actually reads your delusional ravings, right? You should probably just stick with the pictures.


Yes.....Im delusional, especially with that epic thread the skeptics got going on this forum called PROOF THE SKEPTICS ARE WINNING!!!

Ummm..............61,000 views and over 3,000 posts in the thread!!


I'll settle for delusional.......as long as they are well read!!!:badgrin::badgrin::D
 
1998 was a super El Nino. 2005 and 2010 were moderate El Nino's. 2013, the fourth warmest year after 2010, 2005, and 1998, was ENSO neutral. A super El Nino now will be very interesting.






Oh? So ALL those years of record warmth were the result of NATURAL causes eh? Do tell.....

Well, if that is what you get out of what I wrote, perhaps you had better see your doctor concerning senility.





Well, everything you mentioned as contributing to the warm years is entirely natural and devoid of mans influence. So...yeah! That's basically what you said!
 
Poor skook is having problems with all the contradictory claims from his side.

First, two lukwarmers/semi-denialists helped write the new report, which kills the denier conspiracy theory about being censored.

Second, those two lukewarmers are contradicting each other.

Tol says the draft says thing are worse.

"The drafts became too alarmist,"

Ridley says the draft says things are better.

"the IPCC is becoming more cautious about its effects."

Those two need to get together and get their stories straight. Until then, the applicable headline here is "deniers in disarray".

Nope.. Tol pulled out the cabal to go public.. They BLOCKED his contributions to report with EXCUSES about deadlines and editing. Things are NOT censored at the IPCC -- they just get LOST or edited without the authors' consent..

A lot of things that you people claim, just seem to get 'lost' when it comes to having them actually published in a peer reviewed journal anywhere in the world.

As with MOST of these defections from the IPCC side show -- THIS ONE is well documented. With arguments flying from both sides. It's not "buried".. It's very much public.

BTW Clueless: Most everything Tol contributed to the ECONOMIC report of the IPCC DID PREVIOUSLY appear or was referenced in his "peer-reviewed" work...
 
1998 was a super El Nino. 2005 and 2010 were moderate El Nino's. 2013, the fourth warmest year after 2010, 2005, and 1998, was ENSO neutral. A super El Nino now will be very interesting.

Why? You guys totally dependent on Mother Nature to prove your MAN-MADE GW for ya?
Just listen to both of you... ANY factor that can ENHANCE the frivolous Global Avg Temp, also has the power to kick the shit out it.. Actually proving that CO2 isn't the master control knob of climate..

Actually the above statement simply proves how utterly clueless you are.

Oh please Mr Wizard.. Explain that at my clueless level of understanding !!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top