New Twitter files drop Dec 16th…FBI directly contacted Twitter and told them who to ban…emails to prove it,

[Moonglow]

All this happened during Trump yet you people are trying to blame everyone but Trump who was president.

 

[AntonToo]

Trump cant even block people on Twitter.

A court in New York found that when President Trump blocks people on Twitter, he violates the First Amendment because he is discriminating against certain viewpoints and preventing them from participating in debate on his Twitter page.

Now you are telling me it is ok for the FBI to tell Twitter who to ban?

You left wing lying assholes are too much for me.

Because a President IS government.

Government didn't block anyone here, Tweeter did.

 

[mamooth]

You really are this stupid aren't you?

Stop crying, fascists.

You lied. You were busted and humiliated, and so the whole planet is laughing at you. Again.

Learn from it. If you stop being dishonest fascist douches, you won't get humiliated for it. It really is that simple. Get off your knees, cease your tonguing of authoritarian bungholes, end your violence and censorship campaigns, tone down your stinking hypocrisy, and you won't be regarded as butthurt sore-loser cult bois any more.

Or not. Maybe you're all so addicted to the taste of Nazi rectums, you don't want to stop. We certainly can't stop you. We can only highlight your various sick perversions, and keep making you pariahs among decent human beings.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Just a continuous river of lies and filth coming out of the FBI. This organization is against the people and constitution. End that agency.

12ft |

12ft.io

 

[hadit]

Face

Who the hell said FBI doesn't co-ordinate with social media? Why wouldn't they?

FBI sent a list of Twitter policy violators, Twitter reviewed and agreed.

The FBI has no business monitoring a private company for users violating that company's policies. That's the company's business.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Sounds like Twitter colluded evilzly. It should be shut down.

 

[Hellbilly]

VIOLATION OF 1A.

Amendment I​

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

[AntonToo]

The FBI has no business monitoring a private company for users violating that company's policies. That's the company's business.

Is that in the Constitution?

Tweeter has decided that it is their business and co-operated with FBI. You are the one who doesn't like how they go about their business.

 

[hadit]

Is that in the Constitution?

Tweeter has decided that it is their business and co-operated with FBI. You are the one who doesn't like how they go about their business.

It is absolutely true that I do not approve of private companies getting entangled with the FBI, taking direction from them, etc. You do realize, don't you, that you would likely be front and center complaining should the FBI be headed by a TRUMP! loyalist who coordinated with either Twitter or Face Book to suppress viewpoints opposing him while championing viewpoints favorable to him? All in the name of safety, accuracy, etc., of course.

In fact, it is the extreme reactions to Musk stopping this practice that tells me a lot about those who were happy with the prior arrangement while being ticked off at the current one.

 

[Blaster]

Matt Taibbi just makes stupid stuff up. None of the messages say what he claims they say.

The ‘Twitter Files’ Is What It Claims to Expose

The purported exposé of Twitter’s political bias is itself an attempt to weaponize control of Twitter for political purposes.

nymag.com

So why is he doing it? Because he's a partisan hack, and he gets paid well to create propaganda.

The goal here is to justify the ongoing consevative censorship crusade, as currently highlighted by "I'M BANNING EVERY LIBERAL FOR BEING A LIBERAL" Elon Musk, or by "I'LL MAKE IT A FEDERAL CRIME TO FACT CHECK" Donald Trump.

Needless to say, many conservatives are thrilled to see Taibbi lie, because their lives are dedicated to censorship. That's how fascists roll.

Nonsense.

 

[Marener]

The FBI has no business monitoring a private company for users violating that company's policies. That's the company's business.

When people are posting misinformation trying to mislead voters and affect elections, it becomes a government issue.

 

[hadit]

When people are posting misinformation trying to mislead voters and affect elections, it becomes a government issue.

No, it does not. The vast majority of campaign ads contain lies and misinformation, and they are put out by the campaigns themselves. No one says the FBI should investigate and suppress "Granny gets pushed off the cliff", for example. Heck, if you want to pursue that line of argument, there would be maybe 2 democrat campaign ads that would be allowed to run during a campaign.

Quid Pro's administration has no business trying to control social media content to get himself re-elected.

 

[Marener]

No, it does not. The vast majority of campaign ads contain lies and misinformation, and they are put out by the campaigns themselves. No one says the FBI should investigate and suppress "Granny gets pushed off the cliff", for example. Heck, if you want to pursue that line of argument, there would be maybe 2 democrat campaign ads that would be allowed to run during a campaign.

Quid Pro's administration has no business trying to control social media content to get himself re-elected.

You’re missing the point.

If someone says that people should vote November 9th (the day after the election), that’s not a political messaging ad, that’s lying to suppress voter turnout.

Why shouldn’t the FBI flag that?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Face

Who the hell said FBI doesn't co-ordinate with social media? Why wouldn't they?

FBI sent a list of Twitter policy violators, Twitter reviewed and agreed.

I didn't realize it was the FBI's job to enforce Twitter's Terms of Service for them.

 

[hadit]

You’re missing the point.

If someone says that people should vote November 9th (the day after the election), that’s not a political messaging ad, that’s lying to suppress voter turnout.

Why shouldn’t the FBI flag that?

Because it's nonsense. We have the freedom to lie. In that case, it's incumbent on the voter to reject the recommendation. Political messaging ads are lies, do you dispute that? Case in point that was mentioned before, "Granny gets pushed off the cliff". Lies. Should the FBI shut that down?

 

[struth]

Tweeter was a subsidiary of the rogue fbi who worked to elect xiden

 

[Marener]

Because it's nonsense. We have the freedom to lie. In that case, it's incumbent on the voter to reject the recommendation. Political messaging ads are lies, do you dispute that? Case in point that was mentioned before, "Granny gets pushed off the cliff". Lies. Should the FBI shut that down?

Policing voter suppression isn’t nonsense.

 

[AntonToo]

I didn't realize it was the FBI's job to enforce Twitter's Terms of Service for them.

Nope, they didn't (and could not) enforce, they've requested review of specific activity that violated Tweeter policy and retention of related records.

 

[AntonToo]

Because it's nonsense. We have the freedom to lie.

Lie or not, you don't have a freedom to post on Tweeter or other private platforms in violation of their policies.

 

[Coyote]

Because it's nonsense. We have the freedom to lie. In that case, it's incumbent on the voter to reject the recommendation. Political messaging ads are lies, do you dispute that? Case in point that was mentioned before, "Granny gets pushed off the cliff". Lies. Should the FBI shut that down?

It isn’t nonsense. It’s fraud.