Newsmax Offers Tucker EVERYTHING — Complete Control Over ALL Programming

I heard that....yes I did.:)


Newsmax Offers Tucker EVERYTHING — Complete Control Over ALL Programming​

 
Rumble is also interested.... so....

He won't have any problems finding a next suitable work place! :)
 
He knew the Dominion fraud was false.
Did he? You know that for a fact? Or are you repeating the deep state assigned talking point?

But Westwall is correct. In 2020, the Democrats were all over Dominion for fear the machines were not reliable or were switching votes.

And any machine that is on line, on the internet, is going to be susceptible to hacking and meddling:

So how come only Republicans are somehow devious or evil or in the wrong to question these machines?
 
Did he? You know that for a fact? Or are you repeating the deep state assigned talking point?

But Westwall is correct. In 2020, the Democrats were all over Dominion for fear the machines were not reliable or were switching votes.

And any machine that is on line, on the internet, is going to be susceptible to hacking and meddling:

So how come only Republicans are somehow devious or evil or in the wrong to question these machines?
Because there was nothing worng with them. Fox paid 3/4 of a billion dollars because of these lies.
 
Because there was nothing worng with them. Fox paid 3/4 of a billion dollars because of these lies.
You don't know whether there was anything wrong nor do I. But there were sufficient witnesses who observed some things that were not right to justify looking into it. Fox admitted to one statement re those machines that could not be substantiated--what news organization ANYWHERE never got something wrong?--but did not admit to wrongdoing. They settled to avoid expense of a very long trial with no assurance of what a jury verdict would be.

And the fact still remains that the Democrats were very vocal and proactive about concerns re those machines in 2020. But oddly no lawsuit then.

And while it may or may not be relevant in this case, dark money can buy a lot of legal harassment and other uglies when it comes to politics.
 
You don't know whether there was anything wrong nor do I. But there were sufficient witnesses who observed some things that were not right to justify looking into it. Fox admitted to one statement re those machines that could not be substantiated--what news organization ANYWHERE never got something wrong?--but did not admit to wrongdoing. They settled to avoid expense of a very long trial with no assurance of what a jury verdict would be.

And the fact still remains that the Democrats were very vocal and proactive about concerns re those machines in 2020. But oddly no lawsuit then.

And while it may or may not be relevant in this case, dark money can buy a lot of legal harassment and other uglies when it comes to politics.
How many news organizations paid 3/4 of a billion when they thought they were right? That's a very far fetched defense of Fox and tucker.
 
How many news organizations paid 3/4 of a billion when they thought they were right? That's a very far fetched defense of Fox and tucker.
Tucker was not part of that lawsuit. Fox could easily afford the settlement which was nowhere near the largest amount paid in some of these huge lawsuits. And again they determined it was cheaper to settle than the expense of a very long trial and uncertainties of jury verdicts.
 
Just point to one lie.

Only one?


It was Tucker above the others, or more often anyway, that sealed the win for Dominion. You do understand that Fox had already lost the lawsuit before they agreed to Settle don’t you?
 
There will be a huge demand on cable outlets for Newsmax if this happens. Look for attacks on Newsmax and continuing attacks on Carlson.



Except Fox still has Tucker under contract and in a non compete clause. The powers that be want to silence him for the 2024 election.
 
Did he? You know that for a fact? Or are you repeating the deep state assigned talking point?

But Westwall is correct. In 2020, the Democrats were all over Dominion for fear the machines were not reliable or were switching votes.

And any machine that is on line, on the internet, is going to be susceptible to hacking and meddling:

So how come only Republicans are somehow devious or evil or in the wrong to question these machines?

Ok. Let’s compare two statements.

1) there is a danger that the voting machines could be hacked.

2) The voting machines were definitely hacked. The company knows it. They are the ones who did it with help from Hugo Chavez.

See the difference?
 

Forum List

Back
Top