Newtown victims gets million from murdered woman

[2aguy]

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You have no idea...it takes 3 seconds to change magazines.....if that.....and I have shown you people who have actually researched the issue and they show you are wrong and have no idea.......

 

[2aguy]

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You should review this video...then you would know a little about what you are discussing....

 

[Old Rocks]

And had the boy, who actually did the shooting been captured, he should have been punished.

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

If it is not a semi-auto, and limited to five or six rounds, you are not going to reload it that fast. A revolver takes time to reload. My Savage 99e takes time to reload. Why have the war guns in the general population at all?

 

[2aguy]

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

If it is not a semi-auto, and limited to five or six rounds, you are not going to reload it that fast. A revolver takes time to reload. My Savage 99e takes time to reload. Why have the war guns in the general population at all?

Because the police and military have them...the quickest path to mass murder, genocide and ethnic cleansing is the German Model of gun control where only the police and military have guns......

And all of the current mass shootings could just as easily have been done with revolvers........you simply drop one and start shooting with the next one.....faster than changing magazines and it is ready to go as you draw......it even has a name, it is called the New York reload.....

 

[2aguy]

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

If it is not a semi-auto, and limited to five or six rounds, you are not going to reload it that fast. A revolver takes time to reload. My Savage 99e takes time to reload. Why have the war guns in the general population at all?

Watch the video...they show using revolvers one after another......

 

[2aguy]

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

If it is not a semi-auto, and limited to five or six rounds, you are not going to reload it that fast. A revolver takes time to reload. My Savage 99e takes time to reload. Why have the war guns in the general population at all?

Watch the video....the revolver portion takes place at the 11:00 mark......

 

[Gracie]

$$$$$$$$$$$

 

[2aguy]

And that would have helped the dead kids? You are bordering on insane.

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

If it is not a semi-auto, and limited to five or six rounds, you are not going to reload it that fast. A revolver takes time to reload. My Savage 99e takes time to reload. Why have the war guns in the general population at all?

In the video..the they used 5 revolvers, discarding them as they ran dry....18.8 seconds, firing 30 rounds.

The guy used a Glock 9mm and 2 15 round magazines at 22.9 seconds....

Tell me that banning semi auto pistols for law abiding people who do not use them to commit crimes or mass shootings is going to impact mass shooters in any way....

 

[Blackrook]

This is a fucking nightmare and it's not ever going to end.

Our society is paying the price for abandoning God, and his Ten Commandments.

Kids can learn about oral sex in public school and how to use a condom, but they will never learn the difference between right and wrong.

 

[candycorn]

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You have no idea...it takes 3 seconds to change magazines.....if that.....and I have shown you people who have actually researched the issue and they show you are wrong and have no idea.......

Fuck off bitch. 3 seconds of not shooting or killing is fantastic. Your stat is garbage since it is not under stress conditions.

 

[2aguy]

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You have no idea...it takes 3 seconds to change magazines.....if that.....and I have shown you people who have actually researched the issue and they show you are wrong and have no idea.......

Fuck off bitch. 3 seconds of not shooting or killing is fantastic. Your stat is garbage since it is not under stress conditions.

Do you kiss your prostitutes with that mouth.....?

Twit....do some actual research.....those who do the research tell us that the shooters are not under stress....that when they are shooting the unarmed people in gun free zones they do so in a calm manner.......which allows them to reload without problems.........

You can't handle facts, the truth or reality......I have given you actual research, you swear at me......you are a typical lefty.....

 

[pwjohn]

Newtown families split $1.5M from estate of gunman's mother
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — The families of more than a dozen victims of the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, will split $1.5 million under settlements of lawsuits filed against the gunman's mother's estate.
A lawyer for several victims' families says the settlements were finalized Dec. 17 in documents filed in Bridgeport Superior Court.
The lawsuits said Nancy Lanza failed to properly secure her legally owned Bushmaster AR-15 rifle. Her son, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, used the rifle to kill 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012. He killed his mother before the school shooting and killed himself afterward.

So she failed to properly secure her gun after she was dead?

This is the kicker
"Victims' families also are suing the maker of the Bushmaster rifle."
You have GOT to be fuckin kiddin me!
I guess we can start suing chevy when drunk drivers run over civilians. Maybe we could throw in Budweiser, too.
That is one of the most PATHETIC legal suits I have ever heard of.
And we have Presidential candidates supporting them getting sued!

Merry Christmas.

 

[candycorn]

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You have no idea...it takes 3 seconds to change magazines.....if that.....and I have shown you people who have actually researched the issue and they show you are wrong and have no idea.......

Fuck off bitch. 3 seconds of not shooting or killing is fantastic. Your stat is garbage since it is not under stress conditions.

Do you kiss your prostitutes with that mouth.....?

Twit....do some actual research.....those who do the research tell us that the shooters are not under stress....that when they are shooting the unarmed people in gun free zones they do so in a calm manner.......which allows them to reload without problems.........

You can't handle facts, the truth or reality......I have given you actual research, you swear at me......you are a typical lefty.....

You've done nothing but parrot lie after lie. The 9/11 truthers were more honest than you have been.

Fact: If you're re-loading you're not firing. Fact if you're not firing, you're not killing people.

Any argument to the contrary is bullshit. Sorry but it is.

 

[Esmeralda]

Newtown families split $1.5M from estate of gunman's mother
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — The families of more than a dozen victims of the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, will split $1.5 million under settlements of lawsuits filed against the gunman's mother's estate.
A lawyer for several victims' families says the settlements were finalized Dec. 17 in documents filed in Bridgeport Superior Court.
The lawsuits said Nancy Lanza failed to properly secure her legally owned Bushmaster AR-15 rifle. Her son, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, used the rifle to kill 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012. He killed his mother before the school shooting and killed himself afterward.

So she failed to properly secure her gun after she was dead?

This is the kicker
"Victims' families also are suing the maker of the Bushmaster rifle."
You have GOT to be fuckin kiddin me!
I guess we can start suing chevy when drunk drivers run over civilians. Maybe we could throw in Budweiser, too.
That is one of the most PATHETIC legal suits I have ever heard of.
And we have Presidential candidates supporting them getting sued!

You are 'one of the most pathetic' human beings on the planet. The mother did not keep the gun(s) safely away from her clearly and obviously disturbed and troubled son. Whether she is dead or not, her money/estate rightly goes to the victims of her son who used HER guns to slaughter little children and their teachers.

Whether the gun manufacturer is responsible: I'll leave that up to the courts.

The fact of your resentment displays your total lack of a human soul. You are a souless, black hearted individual.

 

[Jarlaxle]

As I said...

You dont ever say anything, dumbfuck.

What I say you are unable to understand, just as above.

Using your logic, that robber that sued the home owner deserved that money for hurting themselves on that glass they broke, right? You know, because they didn't have stronger glass?

The logic here is your fucking nutso kid shot out my window with the gun you didn't keep him away from, only this was so much worse so, pay up.

And the part where he had to murder her to get the gun…….do you think before you post?

Never!

 

[Jarlaxle]

And what would you have done to stop him before the act......? There is nothing you could have done or passed into law to stop the kid.

You are insane...you want laws that prevent crime before they happen...that is not what laws do...they tell you what you cannot do and what your punishment will be if you do it anyway.......

If one had to pass the same licensing requirements to own an assault weapon as to own a .45 Thompson, that stupid mother would not have had that weapon. And the kid might have been forced to try something like that with a gun that would have to be reloaded after five shots, some of the kids might have gotten away.

Simply reduce the capacity and increase the times necessary to re-load. During the times of re-loading and changing weaponry, there is a chance some can escape or physically challenge the shooter/return fire even.

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

If it is not a semi-auto, and limited to five or six rounds, you are not going to reload it that fast. A revolver takes time to reload. My Savage 99e takes time to reload. Why have the war guns in the general population at all?

Because the police and military have them...the quickest path to mass murder, genocide and ethnic cleansing is the German Model of gun control where only the police and military have guns......

And all of the current mass shootings could just as easily have been done with revolvers........you simply drop one and start shooting with the next one.....faster than changing magazines and it is ready to go as you draw......it even has a name, it is called the New York reload.....

Considering the timeline, Sandy Hook could have been done with a break-open 2-shot shotgun or a single-shot bolt-action rifle.

 

[2aguy]

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You have no idea...it takes 3 seconds to change magazines.....if that.....and I have shown you people who have actually researched the issue and they show you are wrong and have no idea.......

Fuck off bitch. 3 seconds of not shooting or killing is fantastic. Your stat is garbage since it is not under stress conditions.

Do you kiss your prostitutes with that mouth.....?

Twit....do some actual research.....those who do the research tell us that the shooters are not under stress....that when they are shooting the unarmed people in gun free zones they do so in a calm manner.......which allows them to reload without problems.........

You can't handle facts, the truth or reality......I have given you actual research, you swear at me......you are a typical lefty.....

You've done nothing but parrot lie after lie. The 9/11 truthers were more honest than you have been.

Fact: If you're re-loading you're not firing. Fact if you're not firing, you're not killing people.

Any argument to the contrary is bullshit. Sorry but it is.

I know...any fact, truth or reality that shows you are wrong is bullshit....while your complete and unfounded bullshit is reality...for you.....got it.

 

[2aguy]

Nope.....you have no idea how a gun works, there is nothing a magazine limit would do to save lives.....the Sandy Hook shooter switched magazines repeatedly as combat reloads and murdered over 26.....the Long Island shooter changed magazines on a crowded train and they only tackled him when he ran out of ammo completely, the South Carolina church shooter changed magazines several times to kill 9 people in the church in close quarters.....

Magazine reloads are a myth of the anti gunner and for the really anti gun extremists they are just a way to ban certain types of gun without having to actually ban the gun itself.

True or false, while changing magazines the gun isn't firing. True

True or false, while the gun isn't firing, it isn't killing people. True

Shut the fuck up

You have no idea...it takes 3 seconds to change magazines.....if that.....and I have shown you people who have actually researched the issue and they show you are wrong and have no idea.......

Fuck off bitch. 3 seconds of not shooting or killing is fantastic. Your stat is garbage since it is not under stress conditions.

Do you kiss your prostitutes with that mouth.....?

Twit....do some actual research.....those who do the research tell us that the shooters are not under stress....that when they are shooting the unarmed people in gun free zones they do so in a calm manner.......which allows them to reload without problems.........

You can't handle facts, the truth or reality......I have given you actual research, you swear at me......you are a typical lefty.....

You've done nothing but parrot lie after lie. The 9/11 truthers were more honest than you have been.

Fact: If you're re-loading you're not firing. Fact if you're not firing, you're not killing people.

Any argument to the contrary is bullshit. Sorry but it is.

Actual research shows that shooters in a mass shooter are not panicked or in a hurry, and are, in fact calm and leisurely in their shooting of unarmed people....ask people who study these things....

 

[candycorn]

Fact: if you are reloading, you are not firing. Fact if you're not firing, you're not killing people.

Any argument to the contrary is bullshit. Sorry but it is.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Newtown families split $1.5M from estate of gunman's mother
BRIDGEPORT, Conn. — The families of more than a dozen victims of the 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, will split $1.5 million under settlements of lawsuits filed against the gunman's mother's estate.
A lawyer for several victims' families says the settlements were finalized Dec. 17 in documents filed in Bridgeport Superior Court.
The lawsuits said Nancy Lanza failed to properly secure her legally owned Bushmaster AR-15 rifle. Her son, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, used the rifle to kill 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012. He killed his mother before the school shooting and killed himself afterward.

So she failed to properly secure her gun after she was dead?

This is the kicker
"Victims' families also are suing the maker of the Bushmaster rifle."
You have GOT to be fuckin kiddin me!
I guess we can start suing chevy when drunk drivers run over civilians. Maybe we could throw in Budweiser, too.
That is one of the most PATHETIC legal suits I have ever heard of.
And we have Presidential candidates supporting them getting sued!

Not nearly enough but then, no amount would be.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk