Next 3-4 Weeks Will Be Explosive

[Lastamender]

"They said they were" is your proof???

The same guy who lied about 3 million illegal votes in the 2016 election. But we should believe him this time?

Exactly how desperate and retarded are you??

Regardless of your dementia, someone showed the actual locations of drop boxes in that area and they didn't match up.

When asked about it, Gregg Phillips response was that was just a dramatization for the movie and not to be taken literally.

“The movie graphics are not literal interpretations of our data.” ~ Gregg Phillips

Not about 2016.

 

[Faun]

They said they were and the technology is precise. Again, you know it. Everyone who is informed does.

And no, it's not that precise. Gregg Phillips presented his research to the GBI last year and upon review, rejected Phillips' "evidence" because it showed the pings were within "100 feet" of drop boxes. Too inconclusive to draw any conclusions...

 

[Faun]

I asked you to source that and what are they doing there day after day before the election but trafficking ballots?

Now source your bullshit claim.

LOLOL

You can't even prove those dots on that map were actually drop boxes.

 

[Lastamender]

And no, it's not that precise. Gregg Phillips presented his research to the GBI last year and upon review, rejected Phillips' "evidence" because it showed the pings were within "100 feet" of drop boxes. Too inconclusive to draw any conclusions...

Old news.

 

[Faun]

Old news.

So?

 

[Lastamender]

So?

So?

 

[Faun]

Not about 2016.

It's not about 2016, it's about Gregg Phillips' lack of credibility.

 

[meaner gene]

Old news.

Old debunked news. Which at the time you claimed would be proof positive of voter fraud.

 

[Faun]

So?

So 100 feet is not precise.

 

[Lastamender]

It's not about 2016, it's about Gregg Phillips' lack of credibility.

He is very credible. Why don't you get someone to look at the data and debunk it? Because it cannot be debunked. They got caught.

 

[Lastamender]

So 100 feet is not precise.

The NYT and the SC disagree.

 

[Faun]

I asked you to source that and what are they doing there day after day before the election but trafficking ballots?

Now source your bullshit claim.

Here's another screen shot from 2000 Mules...

... what city is that map of?

 

[Lastamender]

Old debunked news. Which at the time you claimed would be proof positive of voter fraud.

The fraud has been proven. 55% of likely voters believe the election was stole. By 2024 it will be 80%, if not more.

 

[Faun]

He is very credible.

LOLOL

He has no credibility. He lied in 2016 that he figured out 3 million non-citizens voted that year...

 

[Lastamender]

Here's another screen shot from 2000 Mules...

... what city is that map of?

You tell me. You know damn well they told you in the video.

 

[Faun]

The fraud has been proven. 55% of likely voters believe the election was stole. By 2024 it will be 80%, if not more.

Great, post Rasmussen's definition of a "likely voter"...

 

[meaner gene]

He is very credible. Why don't you get someone to look at the data and debunk it? Because it cannot be debunked. They got caught.

None of the data is based on actual identification of a cellphone. All it shows is that somebody who went within 100 feet of a political organization, also went within 100 feet of a polling drop box.

Of all you know, that could have been a letter carrier delivering the mail every day.

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOL

He has no credibility. He lied in 2016 that he figured out 3 million non-citizens voted that year...

Then get the data and debunk it. Phillips paid for the data. Pony up, buy the data and debunk it. I'll wait.

 

[Faun]

You tell me. You know damn well they told you in the video.

LOL

Why should I tell you when I'm asking you what city that map represents??

Don't you know?

Can't you say?

 

[Lastamender]

None of the data is based on actual identification of a cellphone. All it shows is that somebody who went within 100 feet of a political organization, also went within 100 feet of a polling drop box.

Of all you know, that could have been a letter carrier delivering the mail every day.

Then the SCOTUS and the NYT are wrong? That is what you are claiming. Plus even 100 feet away from 30 or 40 drop boxes for days is quite suspicious and warrants a full investigation. Right?