NIGHTMARE scenario, is it possible?

This November's election turns into a complete legal shitshow and at some point Pelosi is appointed interim president?

Call me stupid if you like. I did study civics in school but I don't remember a situation like this being discussed.
And you were obviously not smart enough to know to provide all of the information possible to form arguents. You should be smart enough to find and quote the clause(s) concerning the elections of the almighty Presidency of the United States for the discussion.

You are stupid!:(
So you first post what you think is an accurate answer.
You then proceed to get your ass handed to you by other posters and your response is to call me stupid?

Really? Lol
 
Someone will get 270 unless there is a 269-269 split. No state is going to be able to refuse it's electors based on mythical voter fraud because they would also have to throw out the votes top to bottom...no Senators (in states that are electing senators), no Reps, no statewide officials.
Remember, voter fraud is depending on how close the vote is. If they allege 100,000 fraudulent votes, and the senator wins by 100,001 votes, they can still be certified the winner, since any election protest would fail from it not being able to change the outcome.

Those votes closer than the level of alleged fraud, would be the ones that would fail to be certified, and hence nobody elected for those positions.

No.

The narrative will change to fit the circumstances if the blob loses an election.
 
This November's election turns into a complete legal shitshow and at some point Pelosi is appointed interim president?

Call me stupid if you like. I did study civics in school but I don't remember a situation like this being discussed.
I see the very real potential for this to rapidly descend into widespread urban violence absent a convincing Trump win on election night, perhaps such is all but assured, what I do know is this, there is no scenario in which Biden wins where I, or tens of millions of other Americans accept such as a lawful result!
Why? The one who's actually been involved in election fraud is tRump.
Russia, still??? Do you still believe in Santa Claus too??? :th_BlackHelicopter:
Where have you been? Just yesterday he told all.his supporters to vote twice. He's b en trying to sabotage the post office. He's been spreading lies about mail in voting, and don't even get me started on 250+ meetings with Russians during the last presidential election.

Show us kid.
You've already seen the clip. You just wanna try to interpret it for us.

He said it, deal with it.
 
So you first post what you think is an accurate answer.
You then proceed to get your ass handed to you by other posters and your response is to call me stupid?

Really? Lol

Your scenario is based on if somehow, instead of elections being protested due to allegations of fraud, the election itself was called off.
Under that scenario the house would cease to exist after january 3rd, since no-one would be elected to it. And 1/3rd of the senate would be temporarily vacant, until the governor appoints a replacement senator to the vacancy.

So in essence the senate would exist, but there would be no house of representatives.

The presidency would devolve to the president pro-tem of the senate.

If the president pro-tem turns it down then it would go to the secretary of state, and down through the cabinet.
 
A written protest to any electoral vote can be made, and if signed by both a house member and senator, it put for a vote by both houses. If both houses agree, those EC votes are thrown out.
And it will not pass both houses (if it passes a single house).
That depends who is in charge comes january.

If the democrats hold the house and take the senate they would control the throwing out of electoral votes by a simple majority.
 
A written protest to any electoral vote can be made, and if signed by both a house member and senator, it put for a vote by both houses. If both houses agree, those EC votes are thrown out.
And it will not pass both houses (if it passes a single house).
That depends who is in charge comes january.

If the democrats hold the house and take the senate they would control the throwing out of electoral votes by a simple majority.

Okay...

Gee, give me some odds on any of that happening.
 
This November's election turns into a complete legal shitshow and at some point Pelosi is appointed interim president?

Call me stupid if you like. I did study civics in school but I don't remember a situation like this being discussed.
Trump will win in-person voting in a landslide...then Democrats will find out how many votes are needed to win and will produce the number of mail-in fraudulent votes to win. They will not concede, & they will drag the election out as long as needed to steal the election if possible.
 
A written protest to any electoral vote can be made, and if signed by both a house member and senator, it put for a vote by both houses. If both houses agree, those EC votes are thrown out.
And it will not pass both houses (if it passes a single house).
That depends who is in charge comes january.

If the democrats hold the house and take the senate they would control the throwing out of electoral votes by a simple majority.
...the screwing of equal representation designed by the Founding Fathers. Big population centers - key cities - would be all that is needed to win...but people in mass are fleeing those Democrat-controlled disaster areas...
 
This November's election turns into a complete legal shitshow and at some point Pelosi is appointed interim president?

Call me stupid if you like. I did study civics in school but I don't remember a situation like this being discussed.

Yes. It is possible.
 
Eventually Socialism will destroy America from within. The Democrats, through their lust for power, are doing their best to usher it in now.
 
So you first post what you think is an accurate answer.
You then proceed to get your ass handed to you by other posters and your response is to call me stupid?
Really? Lol
I did not lose the argument. GI Joe cannot comprehend the original nor the amended Electoral College rules - it only has rules for a tie in the count. That is why the election did not go by GI Joe's rules in the 2000 election where AL Gore challenged the vote count.

It is not "clear as a bell." If it were, there would not be this discussion.
 
So you first post what you think is an accurate answer.
You then proceed to get your ass handed to you by other posters and your response is to call me stupid?
Really? Lol
I did not lose the argument. GI Joe cannot comprehend the original nor the amended Electoral College rules - it only has rules for a tie in the count. That is why the election did not go by GI Joe's rules in the 2000 election where AL Gore challenged the vote count.

It is not "clear as a bell." If it were, there would not be this discussion.
The 2000 count has nothing to do with this feverish delusional rant. And yes the Constitution is clear on this. If the College can not vote in the President and Vice President that falls to Congress. The only time the succession event occurs is if the President and Vice President are unable to do their JOBS.
 
Eventually Socialism will destroy America from within. The Democrats, through their lust for power, are doing their best to usher it in now.
This Republic is too strong for a Marxist kabal to slay it by subversion or invasion.

The People of the United States are the greatest military and social force in the history of mankind.

We WILL prevail.
 
I did not lose the argument. GI Joe cannot comprehend the original nor the amended Electoral College rules - it only has rules for a tie in the count. That is why the election did not go by GI Joe's rules in the 2000 election where AL Gore challenged the vote count.
It is not "clear as a bell." If it were, there would not be this discussion.
The Constitution does not say 'if tied' but speaks of no candidate winning a plurality with a minimum of 26 states sending in slates of Electors.

We are so far away from that, t is not really worth the time worrying about it.

But if either too few states send in Elector vote slates or it is a tie in the Electoral college, it goes to the House, no ifs, ands or buts.
 
Eventually Socialism will destroy America from within. The Democrats, through their lust for power, are doing their best to usher it in now.
This Republic is too strong for a Marxist kabal to slay it by subversion or invasion.

The People of the United States are the greatest military and social force in the history of mankind.

We WILL prevail.
...thus their mail-in ballot fraud plan....besides, ever hear the way to boil a frog...raise the temperature slowly so by the time it notices it is too late...
 
So you first post what you think is an accurate answer.
You then proceed to get your ass handed to you by other posters and your response is to call me stupid?
Really? Lol
I did not lose the argument. GI Joe cannot comprehend the original nor the amended Electoral College rules - it only has rules for a tie in the count. That is why the election did not go by GI Joe's rules in the 2000 election where AL Gore challenged the vote count.

It is not "clear as a bell." If it were, there would not be this discussion.
You argued with someone else. NOT ME. Then after getting angry you lashed out at me.

You've cemented yourself as a petulant child in my book.
 
This November's election turns into a complete legal shitshow and at some point Pelosi is appointed interim president?

Call me stupid if you like. I did study civics in school but I don't remember a situation like this being discussed.


Oh, I have no doubt the Rats will try.....that's for sure.

The demonic Rats will give it their best shot.

Hopefully the POTUS already knows what to do when that happens.
 

Forum List

Back
Top