"No actionable evidence" of an altered outcome'

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump should have maintained that he would ask his Attorney General to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate hilly.

 

[Jackson]

There is no limit to how low the Democrats will go to win an election. The attorneys for Clinton have already said there is no actionable evidence of fraud. But Stein and Clinton still want a recount? It may have the opposite effect on the populace. Most people will just say, "Get over it already!"

 

[Jackson]

Trump should have maintained that he would ask his Attorney General to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate hilly.

He still might do this.

 

[BULLDOG]

Proof? Don't be a dummy. I'm taking a page out of your playbook and running with it for 4 years.

Should make for a good time

Got it - you have NO proof to support your false claims and delusions...

And Hillary is still a lying FLIP-FLOPPER...

...Abd TRUMP is STILL your new President. "P

Good night, Snowflake

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

 

[BULLDOG]

Proof? Don't be a dummy. I'm taking a page out of your playbook and running with it for 4 years.

Should make for a good time

Got it - you have NO proof to support your false claims and delusions...

And Hillary is still a lying FLIP-FLOPPER...

...Abd TRUMP is STILL your new President. "P

Good night, Snowflake

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Any evidence that happened?

 

[jknowgood]

Got it - you have NO proof to support your false claims and delusions...

And Hillary is still a lying FLIP-FLOPPER...

...Abd TRUMP is STILL your new President. "P

Good night, Snowflake

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

If it has classified information on it , then yes.

 

[jknowgood]

Got it - you have NO proof to support your false claims and delusions...

And Hillary is still a lying FLIP-FLOPPER...

...Abd TRUMP is STILL your new President. "P

Good night, Snowflake

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Any evidence that happened?

Aren't you liberal crying that it was Russia is responsible for all those leaks? If so where do you think they got the information?

 

[BULLDOG]

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

If it has classified information on it , then yes.

So you think there should be immediate investigations into Mike Flynn, Trump's new national security adviser? He has and regularly uses a private server. Lots of interesting info on that particular choice.
Gen. Flynn alleged to have committed major breach of Pentagon security - AMERICAblog News

 

[BULLDOG]

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Any evidence that happened?

Aren't you liberal crying that it was Russia is responsible for all those leaks? If so where do you think they got the information?

You are confused, aren't you? They hacked the DNC, not Hillary's server.

 

[jknowgood]

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

If it has classified information on it , then yes.

So you think there should be immediate investigations into Mike Flynn, Trump's new national security adviser? He has and regularly uses a private server. Lots of interesting info on that particular choice.
Gen. Flynn alleged to have committed major breach of Pentagon security - AMERICAblog News

If he is sending classified information on it , then yes.

 

[BULLDOG]

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

If it has classified information on it , then yes.

So you think there should be immediate investigations into Mike Flynn, Trump's new national security adviser? He has and regularly uses a private server. Lots of interesting info on that particular choice.
Gen. Flynn alleged to have committed major breach of Pentagon security - AMERICAblog News

If he is sending classified information on it , then yes.

How could anybody know without 8 or 9 different investigations?

 

[easyt65]

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

It is truly remarkable that you are trying to justify and excuse Hillary Clinton's CRIME of KNOWINGLY giving access to highly classified information to individuals who had no security clearances - to aides, lawyers, tech company employees, and even to her MAID.

This is 'Security 101 - Safeguarding classified information.

You are MORONICALLY trying to defend her for failing to / refusing to keep secure classified information....that she herself had in her possession illegally. (Once she left the State Department it was ILLEGAL for HER to have classified in her possession.)

Liberals / Hillary supporters apparently think you are being 'clever' in coming up with these idiotic defenses of her CRIMES - they sound 'sensible', 'cute', TO YOU ... but they lack the most basic understanding of laws, rules, and regulations regarding the safeguarding, handling, securing, and destruction of classified information.

This is training Hillary was required to receive prior to ever getting a security clearance, training she was required to have before being entrusted with the most basic low-level of classified information, let alone being given access to TS/SCI information she had to be 'Read Into', This is basic information she was required to sign documents acknowledging she KNEW and fully understood.

There IS no excuse for giving access to classified to the people she did.
There IS no justification.
She BROKE THE LAW - period.
She endangered Natl Security - period.

General Patraeus was charged with allowing / giving access to classified to a female reporter he was romantically involved with....

Hillary gave access to classified to her aides, her lawyers, outside tech company employees, her MAID....

HOLY F* - this goes WELL beyond 'incompetence'. This is WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL granting access to information the WH called 'so classified it could not be released in any format without causing GRAVE damage to our national security' to persons who had no security clearances at all!

This is not the laughable matter, the slip of the mind, the 'accident' you liberals so desperately try to make it seem. This is also not the 1st time the Clintons have been involved in INTENTIONAL crimes regarding classified. Several years ago Ex-Clinton employee/insider Sandy 'The Burglar' Burger was caught 'red handed' - STUFFING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS DOWN HIS PANTS AND TRYINT TO STEAL THEM. The documents, interestingly enough, dealt with Bill Clinton's Presidency - what he did know and what he did / didn't do. The investigation resulted in proving 'The Burglar' had already stolen and DESTROYED similar documents before he was caught.

At the VERY least - for her criminal mishandling of classified - Hillary Clinton should be stripped of her security clearance, NEVER to get it back again. If justice was fair under the Obama administration she would have been indicted already.


Convicted document thief Sandy Berger secretly worked for Hillary Clinton campaign

Obama Dines With Man Caught Stealing, Destroying Classified Documents

http://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/wa.../berger-thefts-still-weigh-on-archives-agents
- "It's been almost eight years since Clinton-era national security adviser Sandy Berger smuggled classified documents out of the National Archives that detailed his boss's efforts to thwart terrorist threats to the millennium celebrations. The crime cost Berger $50,000, 100 hours of community service, his security clearance, and his law license."
*** But his bosses made sure no connection was traceable back to them. (Now why in the hell would Burger risk prosecution on his own for the Clinton's if not doing so FOR the Clintons?!)

 

[Sun Devil 92]

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

If it has classified information on it , then yes.

So you think there should be immediate investigations into Mike Flynn, Trump's new national security adviser? He has and regularly uses a private server. Lots of interesting info on that particular choice.
Gen. Flynn alleged to have committed major breach of Pentagon security - AMERICAblog News

Yes.

 

[BULLDOG]

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

It is truly remarkable that you are trying to justify and excuse Hillary Clinton's CRIME of KNOWINGLY giving access to highly classified information to individuals who had no security clearances - to aides, lawyers, tech company employees, and even to her MAID.

This is 'Security 101 - Safeguarding classified information.

You are MORONICALLY trying to defend her for failing to / refusing to keep secure classified information....that she herself had in her possession illegally. (Once she left the State Department it was ILLEGAL for HER to have classified in her possession.)

Liberals / Hillary supporters apparently think you are being 'clever' in coming up with these idiotic defenses of her CRIMES - they sound 'sensible', 'cute', TO YOU ... but they lack the most basic understanding of laws, rules, and regulations regarding the safeguarding, handling, securing, and destruction of classified information.

This is training Hillary was required to receive prior to ever getting a security clearance, training she was required to have before being entrusted with the most basic low-level of classified information, let alone being given access to TS/SCI information she had to be 'Read Into', This is basic information she was required to sign documents acknowledging she KNEW and fully understood.

There IS no excuse for giving access to classified to the people she did.
There IS no justification.
She BROKE THE LAW - period.
She endangered Natl Security - period.

General Patraeus was charged with allowing / giving access to classified to a female reporter he was romantically involved with....

Hillary gave access to classified to her aides, her lawyers, outside tech company employees, her MAID....

HOLY F* - this goes WELL beyond 'incompetence'. This is WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL granting access to information the WH called 'so classified it could not be released in any format without causing GRAVE damage to our national security' to persons who had no security clearances at all!

This is not the laughable matter, the slip of the mind, the 'accident' you liberals so desperately try to make it seem. This is also not the 1st time the Clintons have been involved in INTENTIONAL crimes regarding classified. Several years ago Ex-Clinton employee/insider Sandy 'The Burglar' Burger was caught 'red handed' - STUFFING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS DOWN HIS PANTS AND TRYINT TO STEAL THEM. The documents, interestingly enough, dealt with Bill Clinton's Presidency - what he did know and what he did / didn't do. The investigation resulted in proving 'The Burglar' had already stolen and DESTROYED similar documents before he was caught.

At the VERY least - for her criminal mishandling of classified - Hillary Clinton should be stripped of her security clearance, NEVER to get it back again. If justice was fair under the Obama administration she would have been indicted already.

Cry me a river bitch. Your lies and character assassination worked. You shot your wad. Nothing you say now makes a bit of difference. You won't have 30 years of false accusations to use against your next opponent.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Asking for a recount is certainly keep her word to accept the election.

"Making sense, we're not," says Master Yoda

"Sense making, we are," because we will know for certain the election is acceptable.

Not accepting the results by demanding a recount is how she demonstrates her willingness to accept the results.....hmmmkay

 

[jknowgood]

Should all people with security clearance keep away from private servers?

It is truly remarkable that you are trying to justify and excuse Hillary Clinton's CRIME of KNOWINGLY giving access to highly classified information to individuals who had no security clearances - to aides, lawyers, tech company employees, and even to her MAID.

This is 'Security 101 - Safeguarding classified information.

You are MORONICALLY trying to defend her for failing to / refusing to keep secure classified information....that she herself had in her possession illegally. (Once she left the State Department it was ILLEGAL for HER to have classified in her possession.)

Liberals / Hillary supporters apparently think you are being 'clever' in coming up with these idiotic defenses of her CRIMES - they sound 'sensible', 'cute', TO YOU ... but they lack the most basic understanding of laws, rules, and regulations regarding the safeguarding, handling, securing, and destruction of classified information.

This is training Hillary was required to receive prior to ever getting a security clearance, training she was required to have before being entrusted with the most basic low-level of classified information, let alone being given access to TS/SCI information she had to be 'Read Into', This is basic information she was required to sign documents acknowledging she KNEW and fully understood.

There IS no excuse for giving access to classified to the people she did.
There IS no justification.
She BROKE THE LAW - period.
She endangered Natl Security - period.

General Patraeus was charged with allowing / giving access to classified to a female reporter he was romantically involved with....

Hillary gave access to classified to her aides, her lawyers, outside tech company employees, her MAID....

HOLY F* - this goes WELL beyond 'incompetence'. This is WILLFUL, INTENTIONAL granting access to information the WH called 'so classified it could not be released in any format without causing GRAVE damage to our national security' to persons who had no security clearances at all!

This is not the laughable matter, the slip of the mind, the 'accident' you liberals so desperately try to make it seem. This is also not the 1st time the Clintons have been involved in INTENTIONAL crimes regarding classified. Several years ago Ex-Clinton employee/insider Sandy 'The Burglar' Burger was caught 'red handed' - STUFFING CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS DOWN HIS PANTS AND TRYINT TO STEAL THEM. The documents, interestingly enough, dealt with Bill Clinton's Presidency - what he did know and what he did / didn't do. The investigation resulted in proving 'The Burglar' had already stolen and DESTROYED similar documents before he was caught.

At the VERY least - for her criminal mishandling of classified - Hillary Clinton should be stripped of her security clearance, NEVER to get it back again. If justice was fair under the Obama administration she would have been indicted already.

Cry me a river bitch. Your lies and character assassination worked. You shot your wad. Nothing you say now makes a bit of difference. You won't have 30 years of false accusations to use against your next opponent.

As corrupt as the Democrat party is, I'm sure we will.

 

[easyt65]

Cry me a river bitch. Your lies and character assassination worked.

In the face of such REAL overwhelming evidence you respond in THIS fashion.

There was no 'character Assassination' of Hillary Clinton. There were no lies - none were necessary. All that was needed was to factually recount Hillary's own actions. AGAIN - undeniably - Hillary illegally had possession of classified information and willingly gave access to that information to people who had no security clearances - her aides, outside tech company members, her lawyers, her MAID...

Even YOU are intelligent enough to KNOW this was CRIMINAL...you just won't admit it.

Hillary LOST the election.

She was REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was so corrupt she couldn't even beat Donald Trump with the deck stacked in her favor.

And now you're angry, bitter, butthurt, and lashing out with 'denying, lying, and justifying'!

So NO - YOU cry ME a river, BITCH!

 

[Sun Devil 92]

No evidence...but let's be sure.

Same thing I heard about the e-mail servers...only there is evidence.

 

[BULLDOG]

Cry me a river bitch. Your lies and character assassination worked.

In the face of such REAL overwhelming evidence you respond in THIS fashion.

There was no 'character Assassination' of Hillary Clinton. There were no lies - none were necessary. All that was needed was to factually recount Hillary's own actions. AGAIN - undeniably - Hillary illegally had possession of classified information and willingly gave access to that information to people who had no security clearances - her aides, outside tech company members, her lawyers, her MAID...

Even YOU are intelligent enough to KNOW this was CRIMINAL...you just won't admit it.

Hillary LOST the election.

She was REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was so corrupt she couldn't even beat Donald Trump with the deck stacked in her favor.

And now you're angry, bitter, butthurt, and lashing out with 'denying, lying, and justifying'!

So NO - YOU cry ME a river, BITCH!

Seems pretty hard to say she was rejected when she got more the 2 million more votes than Trump. Yes, he won on a technicality, but she got lots more votes. The voters rejected him.

 

[easyt65]

Seems pretty hard to say she was rejected when she got more the 2 million more votes than Trump. Yes, he won on a technicality, but she got lots more votes. The voters rejected him.

No, it's really EASY to say she was rejected. She lost...AGAIN. She's NOT the new President.

No, he did not win on a 'technicality'. The fact that US Presidents are chosen - as always - via the Electoral College is not a 'technicality'.

And if you subtract the 3 million illegal votes cast by illegals & Hillary lost the Popular Vote as well.



The voters ELECTED Trump, Snowflake.