"No actionable evidence" of an altered outcome'

[rightwinger]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it




.

 

[jknowgood]

So if there is nothing there what is your problem?
Trump is falsely calling out voter fraud in the last few hours , ..well then lets see

.

Obama ENCOURAGED illegals to vote, that's the only reason Hillary leads the irrelevant popular vote

That and Russian's hacking into our voting machines

Please show the proof of that...you know, the proof the people who made te claim ssid they DON'T have.

Proof? Don't be a dummy. I'm taking a page out of your playbook and running with it for 4 years.

Should make for a good time

Oh we had proof but Obama wouldn't investigate it. You know because he was also involved in it. I can't wait to hear you whine when Hillary and Obama are indicted.

 

[jknowgood]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it

Yeah and do away with the illegals vote and Trump wins the popular vote also.

 

[AntonToo]

Let's recount every state.

If they are so worried about everything....let's look at the whole system.

You want to donate to pay for it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Let's recount every state.

If they are so worried about everything....let's look at the whole system.

You want to donate to pay for it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

Evidence according to who ?

A group nobody had heard of before ?

And now, based on their word, the biggest loser is looking for a recount.

I could care less about Trump winning or losing. What's more funny has been the meltdown of the left and Hillary's fortunes have ebbed and flowed. Now, they are (recount aside) pitching major hissy fits over losing.

And you really think your sillyassed questions represent some kind of rebuke ?

Do you want a rightwing source challenging rightwing win?

If so, you are stupid, so take that finger and put it back in your pocket dummy.

 

[jknowgood]

That and Russian's hacking into our voting machines

Please show the proof of that...you know, the proof the people who made te claim ssid they DON'T have.

Proof? Don't be a dummy. I'm taking a page out of your playbook and running with it for 4 years.

Should make for a good time

Got it - you have NO proof to support your false claims and delusions...

And Hillary is still a lying FLIP-FLOPPER...

...Abd TRUMP is STILL your new President. "P

Good night, Snowflake

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Don't forget about the media all in for her.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Let's recount every state.

If they are so worried about everything....let's look at the whole system.

You want to donate to pay for it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Let's recount every state.

If they are so worried about everything....let's look at the whole system.

You want to donate to pay for it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

Evidence according to who ?

A group nobody had heard of before ?

And now, based on their word, the biggest loser is looking for a recount.

I could care less about Trump winning or losing. What's more funny has been the meltdown of the left and Hillary's fortunes have ebbed and flowed. Now, they are (recount aside) pitching major hissy fits over losing.

And you really think your sillyassed questions represent some kind of rebuke ?

Do you want a rightwing source challenging rightwing win?

If so, you are stupid, so take that finger and put it back in your pocket dummy.

Was this supposed to make sense ?

Try again.

 

[jknowgood]

Please show the proof of that...you know, the proof the people who made te claim ssid they DON'T have.

Proof? Don't be a dummy. I'm taking a page out of your playbook and running with it for 4 years.

Should make for a good time

Got it - you have NO proof to support your false claims and delusions...

And Hillary is still a lying FLIP-FLOPPER...

...Abd TRUMP is STILL your new President. "P

Good night, Snowflake

Plenty of proof. Ask the CIA and FBI. They're the ones who said the Russians are behind the Wikileaks sabotage. And now the government has found reason to question the election results of multiple states. Good luck with that lil' buddy.

Remember, I'm here for you to help you through this.

The FBI declared there was no such proof, only speculation - I posted the link - you lie.

The only group proven to have manipulated the elections / Primaries were the DNC.

The 'government' found no reason to question the outcome - again, you lie. It was a group of self-professed scientists who admitted they have no evidence.

All of this is the result of butthurt Snowflakes who, like Hillary, refuse to accept the election outcome - the same thing they demonized Trump for saying he might not do.

Your accusations are opinions, false narratives, and lies, continuously repeated - already proven with links already posted.

Snowflakes like yourself are sad, pathetic losers who can't face reality so you keep making shit up while denying the facts...
Like the FACT Hillary is a lying FLIP-FLOPPER!

The DNC's own lawyer, as proven/stated above, says the recount WON'T change a thing. WHY? Because HILLARY LOST - WAS REJECTED...AGAIN.

She was such a piss-poor politician, Sect of State, and lifelong Washington Insider she could not beat a millionaire reality TV star with the help of the DNC, President, and paid political terrorists.

And now she has flip-flopped and is leading the Snowflakes in contesting the results of an election she swore she would accept.

Good luck with that, Snowflake. I've wasted enough time on you. Have a good night...

Yep. Comey said there was no proof about Hilary, and not even any reason for speculation.

No, he said that more than likely our enemies got classified information off of Hillary's private emails.

 

[easyt65]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it

Gimme a quote showing Trump agrees there should be a recount....

Nice talking to you.

 

[AntonToo]

You want to donate to pay for it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

You want to donate to pay for it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

Evidence according to who ?

A group nobody had heard of before ?

And now, based on their word, the biggest loser is looking for a recount.

I could care less about Trump winning or losing. What's more funny has been the meltdown of the left and Hillary's fortunes have ebbed and flowed. Now, they are (recount aside) pitching major hissy fits over losing.

And you really think your sillyassed questions represent some kind of rebuke ?

Do you want a rightwing source challenging rightwing win?

If so, you are stupid, so take that finger and put it back in your pocket dummy.

Was this supposed to make sense ?

Try again.

It does to anyone non-stupid.

Election results will ALWAYS be challenged by the side that lost. So your demands that no less that right-slanted source you'd approve of bring up the evidence is retarded.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it

His reference to illegal votes is altogether different....and should be looked at.

California would take a year to muddle through...but I think it is worth it. And they should deport everyone they find.

If we go to the trouble of doing this and we find people who have cheated the system...they should go to jail.

 

[AntonToo]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it

Gimme a quote showing Trump agrees there should be a recount....

Nice talking to you.

Trump is not going to agree to a recount of his win dummy.

Were you born yesterday? You reason like it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Why should Wisconsin or Michigan get special attention ?

There is NO EVIDENCE. Got that ?

So, if you are going to look at one, by rights you should look at them all.

YOU are willing to donate to pay to look at any of them ?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

Evidence according to who ?

A group nobody had heard of before ?

And now, based on their word, the biggest loser is looking for a recount.

I could care less about Trump winning or losing. What's more funny has been the meltdown of the left and Hillary's fortunes have ebbed and flowed. Now, they are (recount aside) pitching major hissy fits over losing.

And you really think your sillyassed questions represent some kind of rebuke ?

Do you want a rightwing source challenging rightwing win?

If so, you are stupid, so take that finger and put it back in your pocket dummy.

Was this supposed to make sense ?

Try again.

It does to anyone non-stupid.

Election results will ALWAYS be challenged by the side that lost. So your demands that no less that right-slanted source you'd approve of bring up the evidence is retarded.

Jill Stein didn't lose.

She was never in the race.

Unless you really believe she thinks she has a 0.00000001 % chance of winning based on a recount.

Once again, you fail.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it

Gimme a quote showing Trump agrees there should be a recount....

Nice talking to you.

Trump is not going to agree to a recount of his win dummy.

Were you born yesterday? You reason like it.

Look at the claim of the quote prior to his response.

Maybe you should lecture Rightwinger.

 

[mudwhistle]

Despite a lawyer for the Democratic campaign admitting there is "no actionable evidence" of an altered outcome' should a recount be conducted in Wisconsin, Hillary still now demands one.

Thank God she is a 'woman of her word' & vowed she would accept the outcome of the election...


News from The Associated Press

Let's not forget that Hillary had plenty of fun at Trump's expense on this issue during the campaign..
.

 

[easyt65]

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

What is the reason for 'checking'?

There is no evidence of fraud.

Aside from the acknowledgment that approx. 3 million illegals voted after the US President encouraged them to illegally do so, there is no evidence to suggest these votes modified the Electoral College Vote.

There is nothing to suggest that a recount will change the outcome - even the DNC lawyer admitted to that.

There is no basis for a re-count request.

 

[AntonToo]

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

There is statistical evidence. What there isn't is PROOF.

What is the Trumpster objection to double checking?
Are you afraid fraud will be found?
Is that what you are concerned about after non-stop rhetoric about voter fraud? Finding of it?

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

Evidence according to who ?

A group nobody had heard of before ?

And now, based on their word, the biggest loser is looking for a recount.

I could care less about Trump winning or losing. What's more funny has been the meltdown of the left and Hillary's fortunes have ebbed and flowed. Now, they are (recount aside) pitching major hissy fits over losing.

And you really think your sillyassed questions represent some kind of rebuke ?

Do you want a rightwing source challenging rightwing win?

If so, you are stupid, so take that finger and put it back in your pocket dummy.

Was this supposed to make sense ?

Try again.

It does to anyone non-stupid.

Election results will ALWAYS be challenged by the side that lost. So your demands that no less that right-slanted source you'd approve of bring up the evidence is retarded.

Jill Stein didn't lose.

She was never in the race.

Unless you really believe she thinks she has a 0.00000001 % chance of winning based on a recount.

Once again, you fail.

By Trump winning she lost relative to Hillary win. Besides, it keeps her relevant.

 

[mudwhistle]

What is Trump worried about?

ALSO, the election is not over until states certify their votes....after all absentee votes and provisional ballots are counted and not until any recounts legally requested within the rules, are completed....and then the electors vote, dec 19th....then the winning candidate become the official president elect....

I think the problem is Jill Stein has no legal standing to demand a recount. She's obviously been put up to this by Hillary.

For some strange reason I feel Jill will be buying a beachfront vacation home after this is over. I hope she was paid in advance thru donations. After all, you can buy a nice piece of property with $6 million dollars.

 

[rightwinger]

Evidently, Trump himself has said there are millions of illegal votes

We don't know what impact this could have in Florida, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and North Carolina

We need to recount to be sure....Even Trump admits it

Yeah and do away with the illegals vote and Trump wins the popular vote also.

Trump has raised an important issue with the election

IT WAS A FRAUD

He says millions of illegals voted during the election. We need to recheck and recount each ballot to be sure

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Evidence according to who ?

A group nobody had heard of before ?

And now, based on their word, the biggest loser is looking for a recount.

I could care less about Trump winning or losing. What's more funny has been the meltdown of the left and Hillary's fortunes have ebbed and flowed. Now, they are (recount aside) pitching major hissy fits over losing.

And you really think your sillyassed questions represent some kind of rebuke ?

Do you want a rightwing source challenging rightwing win?

If so, you are stupid, so take that finger and put it back in your pocket dummy.

Was this supposed to make sense ?

Try again.

It does to anyone non-stupid.

Election results will ALWAYS be challenged by the side that lost. So your demands that no less that right-slanted source you'd approve of bring up the evidence is retarded.

Jill Stein didn't lose.

She was never in the race.

Unless you really believe she thinks she has a 0.00000001 % chance of winning based on a recount.

Once again, you fail.

By Trump winning she lost relative to Hillary win.

She was never in the race and stands to gain nothing via a recount.

It's that simple.

So why is she doing it ?

Why didn't Hillary call for a recount ? That I would have understood.

But all this based on some newly arrived group ?

The left is now beyond stupid.

 

[AntonToo]

Clinton already conceeded and even finding of fraud in a particular state won't change outcome. What is the objection?

What is the reason for 'checking'?

Statistical anomalies correlating to use of electronic machines.

What is your reason for NOT checking?