'No ceasefire until Gaza siege lifted'

[P F Tinmore]

Actually the war crime is Hamas terrorists shooting rockets at Israel from behind its own civilians, as noted by the UN.

Yes, that is a war crime as well.

That may be true taken as isolated incidents. It is curious, however, that neither Israel nor anyone else has attempted to bring the Palestinians to court for this alleged violation of international law. Perhaps the case would not be as cut and dried as portrayed.

For example:

Najd was a Palestinian farm village of about 700 people. Its existence predated the Ottoman Empire.

Before the creation of Israel Zionist terrorist gangs attacked Najd, occupied the village, and expelled the people to what is now the Gaza Strip.

In 1951 Israel built a settlement on the occupied territory of Najd.

What would be a "legal" means for the Palestinians to roust these settlers from this occupied territory?

Indeed. Let's get credible testimony in a court room from a collection of Islamo-loons representing the Islamic terrorists from Hamas

Indeed.

It is a matter of history. Look it up.

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

If a people live someplace, uncontested, for hundreds of years, why would you even think that it is not theirs? Well, besides your hate.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Doesn't matter. Cease Fire. All weapons turned over. 50 family members of Hamas delivered as hostages for good behavior. There is no equality of Israel with Hamas.

 

[Hollie]

Yes, that is a war crime as well.

That may be true taken as isolated incidents. It is curious, however, that neither Israel nor anyone else has attempted to bring the Palestinians to court for this alleged violation of international law. Perhaps the case would not be as cut and dried as portrayed.

For example:

Najd was a Palestinian farm village of about 700 people. Its existence predated the Ottoman Empire.

Before the creation of Israel Zionist terrorist gangs attacked Najd, occupied the village, and expelled the people to what is now the Gaza Strip.

In 1951 Israel built a settlement on the occupied territory of Najd.

What would be a "legal" means for the Palestinians to roust these settlers from this occupied territory?

Indeed. Let's get credible testimony in a court room from a collection of Islamo-loons representing the Islamic terrorists from Hamas

Indeed.

It is a matter of history. Look it up.

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

If a people live someplace, uncontested, for hundreds of years, why would you even think that it is not theirs? Well, besides your hate.

So you agree that the Jews living in the area 1,000 years before the invention of islam and Moslems have a claim to the land.

Elsewhere, Christianity wants Egypt back.

 

[P F Tinmore]

That may be true taken as isolated incidents. It is curious, however, that neither Israel nor anyone else has attempted to bring the Palestinians to court for this alleged violation of international law. Perhaps the case would not be as cut and dried as portrayed.

For example:

Najd was a Palestinian farm village of about 700 people. Its existence predated the Ottoman Empire.

Before the creation of Israel Zionist terrorist gangs attacked Najd, occupied the village, and expelled the people to what is now the Gaza Strip.

In 1951 Israel built a settlement on the occupied territory of Najd.

What would be a "legal" means for the Palestinians to roust these settlers from this occupied territory?

Indeed. Let's get credible testimony in a court room from a collection of Islamo-loons representing the Islamic terrorists from Hamas

Indeed.

It is a matter of history. Look it up.

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

If a people live someplace, uncontested, for hundreds of years, why would you even think that it is not theirs? Well, besides your hate.

So you agree that the Jews living in the area 1,000 years before the invention of islam and Moslems have a claim to the land.

Elsewhere, Christianity wants Egypt back.

Sure. Everyone who has ancestors from there have the right to live there.

I have never disputed that.

 

[Hollie]

Indeed. Let's get credible testimony in a court room from a collection of Islamo-loons representing the Islamic terrorists from Hamas

Indeed.

It is a matter of history. Look it up.

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

If a people live someplace, uncontested, for hundreds of years, why would you even think that it is not theirs? Well, besides your hate.

So you agree that the Jews living in the area 1,000 years before the invention of islam and Moslems have a claim to the land.

Elsewhere, Christianity wants Egypt back.

Sure. Everyone who has ancestors from there have the right to live there.

I have never disputed that.

The Jews, having lived there for 1,000 years, uncontested, before the invention of Moslems and Islam, well, it's theirs, just as you described.

When are the Palis leaving the historically Jewish lands?

 

[P F Tinmore]

It is a matter of history. Look it up.

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

If a people live someplace, uncontested, for hundreds of years, why would you even think that it is not theirs? Well, besides your hate.

So you agree that the Jews living in the area 1,000 years before the invention of islam and Moslems have a claim to the land.

Elsewhere, Christianity wants Egypt back.

Sure. Everyone who has ancestors from there have the right to live there.

I have never disputed that.

The Jews, having lived there for 1,000 years, uncontested, before the invention of Moslems and Islam, well, it's theirs, just as you described.

When are the Palis leaving the historically Jewish lands?

And a few percent of the Palestinians were Jews at the end of WWI.

What is your point?

 

[Hollie]

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

If a people live someplace, uncontested, for hundreds of years, why would you even think that it is not theirs? Well, besides your hate.

So you agree that the Jews living in the area 1,000 years before the invention of islam and Moslems have a claim to the land.

Elsewhere, Christianity wants Egypt back.

Sure. Everyone who has ancestors from there have the right to live there.

I have never disputed that.

The Jews, having lived there for 1,000 years, uncontested, before the invention of Moslems and Islam, well, it's theirs, just as you described.

When are the Palis leaving the historically Jewish lands?

And a few percent of the Palestinians were Jews at the end of WWI.

What is your point?

I'd have to ask that question relative to your last attempt at a sentence.

 

[Roudy]

Actually the war crime is Hamas terrorists shooting rockets at Israel from behind its own civilians, as noted by the UN.

Yes, that is a war crime as well.

That may be true taken as isolated incidents. It is curious, however, that neither Israel nor anyone else has attempted to bring the Palestinians to court for this alleged violation of international law. Perhaps the case would not be as cut and dried as portrayed.

For example:

Najd was a Palestinian farm village of about 700 people. Its existence predated the Ottoman Empire.

Before the creation of Israel Zionist terrorist gangs attacked Najd, occupied the village, and expelled the people to what is now the Gaza Strip.

In 1951 Israel built a settlement on the occupied territory of Najd.

What would be a "legal" means for the Palestinians to roust these settlers from this occupied territory?

Indeed. Let's get credible testimony in a court room from a collection of Islamo-loons representing the Islamic terrorists from Hamas.

Indeed.

It is a matter of history. Look it up.

No such thing as a Palestinian, Palestinian village, or Palestinian anything during 700 years of the Ottoman Empire.

 

[JFish123]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[JFish123]

The One State Solution



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Billo_Really]

Hamas receives material support from the UN agency that provides exclusive welfare dollars for their continued maintenance. Money that could be used to better the lives of Balesdinians is used instead to promote the goals and aims of the Hamas "Death Cult" charter. Balesdinians die as a result.

The Balesdinians got what they wanted: an Islamic terrorist syndicate to represent them. That same Islamic terrorist syndicate causes their deaths.

Karma, don't you agree?

End the siege and they won't need UN aid.

 

[Billo_Really]

No difference between Hamas, ISIS, and Boko Haram. Same Islamic terrorist animals, different geographical territory.

Except that Israel provides support to ISIS animals.

 

[Billo_Really]

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

Typical racist bullshit from a Zionist Islamophobe.

 

[JFish123]

No difference between Hamas, ISIS, and Boko Haram. Same Islamic terrorist animals, different geographical territory.

Except that Israel provides support to ISIS animals.

Yes because Israel supports people that want to behead and blow them up.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[JFish123]

targeting and blowing up bystanders is terrorism. Do you find it terrorism? Or because there Jews it's ok?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Denying over a million people their inalienable rights for almost a half-century, is far worse.

Blowing up innocent bystanding Jewish women and children. Is that wrong to you? Yes or no? And btw, if you go off on another topic, that means you choose no


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hollie]

Indeed, I did. Did you know the Ottomon's built settlements in the terrorities on the land they stole and occupied?

Indeed, Hamas has a long history of Islamic terrorism. Indeed, they're the bastard child of the Muslim Brotherhood.

What is your suggestion for the arbitrary timeframe to be used for establishing ownership of the land?

That's a tough one. Let's see.... [drumming fingers on the table]...... a rabid Jooooo hater needs a timeline for establishing a pre-Joooooo timeline for when he can arbitrarily exclude the Jooooooos from the disputed territories and Israel...... let's see.....

Typical racist bullshit from a Zionist Islamophobe.

Typical inability to address the salient points.

Since when is "Palestinian" is race?

 

[Hollie]

Hamas receives material support from the UN agency that provides exclusive welfare dollars for their continued maintenance. Money that could be used to better the lives of Balesdinians is used instead to promote the goals and aims of the Hamas "Death Cult" charter. Balesdinians die as a result.

The Balesdinians got what they wanted: an Islamic terrorist syndicate to represent them. That same Islamic terrorist syndicate causes their deaths.

Karma, don't you agree?

End the siege and they won't need UN aid.

Islamic terrorism doesn't exist through free trade.

 

[JFish123]

It's not racist to know Palestine was NEVER a state. That Palestine is controlled by a terrorist organization (Hamas). That the culture of muslims in Palestine and elsewhere is that Jews eat the blood of children, are evil, or that Palestinians teach there children to hate and kill Jews! Or that muslims hate Jews because there "prophet" said too. It's not racist to believe in FACTS have a nice day anti-Semites


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Humanity]

Palestinians teach there children to hate and kill Jews!

Palestinians don't need to....

Israel does a far better job with every passing day!

 

[JFish123]

Palestinians teach there children to hate and kill Jews!

Palestinians don't need to....

Israel does a far better job with every passing day!

Yes and the Palestinians and other muslims blow themselves up and teach their kids to do the same but hey you'd probably agree their just Jews right? Lol good job


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk