No, Chansley Was Not Escorted Into the Capitol Building

What you call a tour wasn’t a tour. He was told to leave before and during that period of time.

These are facts that you are ignorant of.

You’re brainwashed.
Same lie. Show us where he was told before and during this tour you claim never happened? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Same lie. Show us where he was told before and during this tour you claim never happened? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
I already did. He was told at 2:16.

The officer who met him after leaving the gallery told him to leave again.
 
No. I haven’t run away from a single thing. Why must you lie?

Pretty lame-ass of you.

Some of them may have impeded the official proceeding.

May have? Seriously?

Post #259:

May? They delayed the official proceeding as everyone had to be evacuated and the Capitol needed to be cleared of these idiots.

Did overrunning the Capitol obstruct or impede the official proceeding?
 
"Calmly walking within the guide ropes"? Really? Guess that you've never been to the Capitol then, because the only people allowed on the floor of either the House or the Senate are Congress personnel, or those whom they invite. General public IS NOT allowed on the floor of those 2 places. If the horned one was "within guide ropes", then how in the hell did he get all the way up to the podium? There are no guide ropes that you can stay in that allow you access to that place.



The more you avoid watching the video the stupider you become.
 
May have? Seriously?

Yep. And others did not.
Post #259:
Don’t cite an empty post number. What about that post?
May? They delayed the official proceeding as everyone had to be evacuated and the Capitol needed to be cleared of these idiots.
So what. Those that did so did so. Others didn’t do so. And you fail to even address intent.
Did overrunning the Capitol obstruct or impede the official proceeding?
Already addressed.
 
He knew what he was pleading to:

Before he was sentenced, Chansley told U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth it was wrong for him to enter the Capitol and that he accepts responsibility for his actions.

"I have no excuse," Chansley said. "No excuses whatsoever. My behavior is indefensible."

The judge said Chansley's remorse appeared to be genuine but noted the seriousness of his actions in the Capitol. "What you did was terrible," Lamberth said. "You made yourself the center of the riot."

His attorney has said Chansley was "horrendously smitten" by Trump and believed like other rioters that Trump had called him to the Capitol, but later felt betrayed after Trump refused to grant him and others who participated in the insurrection a pardon.

Watkins has said Chansley had been under pressure from family members not to plead guilty because they believed Trump would be reinstated as president and pardon him.

The question has nothing to do if he knew the charge.
 
Yep. And others did not.


So what. Those that did so did so. Others didn’t do so.
Oh so now it’s not “may have“. Now you acknowledge that they did obstruct and impede the official proceeding. And now you’re distinguishing between them. Do tell. Which ones delayed the official proceeding and which ones didn’t?
 
That's what The Cult does. They lie





I agree - the original KKK, BABY-KILLING / GROOMING / F*ING / TRAFFICKING CULT engages in scandals, illegal spying, treason, failed coups, and lying constantly.

If they didn't have an authoritarian control of govt their party would probably be officially labeled as a terrorist group / enemy of the state and be outlawed by now.
 
There was no guided tour. An officer followed him around for a few minutes. That’s what you’re falsely labeled a “tour”, because you’re a liar or a lemming.
There were 9 officers at one time. More of your lies.

It's hilarious how you claim something happened "during and after" something you claimed didn't happen. :cuckoo: :auiqs.jpg: :cuckoo: :auiqs.jpg: :cuckoo: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Oh so now it’s not “may have“. Now you acknowledge that they did obstruct and impede the official proceeding. And now you’re distinguishing between them. Do tell. Which ones delayed the official proceeding and which ones didn’t?
I believe I already acknowledged that the official proceeding was delayed for a few hours. But you can’t seem to manage to acknowledge that the burden of proof has to establish individual responsibility.
 
I believe I already acknowledged that the official proceeding was delayed for a few hours.
You also said that some “may have” obstructed or impeded the official proceeding.

Is it they “may have“ obstructed the official proceeding or is it they did obstruct the official proceeding? Which is it?
 

Forum List

Back
Top