No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

[IResist]

If Trump is innocent, he has acted more suspicious, paranoid and defensive of any person I've ever witnessed.

 

[LaDexter]

If Trump is innocent, he has acted more suspicious, paranoid and defensive of any person I've ever witnessed

Get real. Left wing liars never stop.

Dan Rostenkowski
Jim Wright
Webb Hubbell
Hillary
Bill
Blago

 

[ClosedCaption]

What is it Trump is working so hard at trying to cover up?

Male Pattern Baldness




...And Contacts with Russians. That's why he never has a bad thing to say about them. Rule #1: NEVER insult your bookie

 

[ColonelAngus]

You snowflakes are getting little hard ons over nothing.

You'd be better served to jerk it with tweezers and move on to more pressing issues, like cutting taxes and securing the southern border and deporting people who are here illegally and have committed crimes while they were living here illegally.

 

[Dragonlady]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

 

[Indeependent]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

 

[easyt65]

Being UN-able to provide any evidence to support their false claims against Trump, the media has begun to claim 'IT DOESN'T MATTER IF TRUMP COLLUDED OR NOT..'.

View attachment 128609



Does it matter? No evidence of Trump 'collusion' with Russia as media shift focus

"The headline in the Washington Examiner was rather eye-catching:

“At This Rate, It Won’t Matter If Trump Colluded with Russia.”

Huh! Won’t matter? Hasn’t that been the subject of a huge swath of media coverage for many months now?

Turns out the piece contained astute observations by Byron York, a Fox News contributor, on how the focus of all the journalistic digging and investigative machinery has shifted."



Another Day - STILL No Evidence...Frustrated Media shifts gears, changes tactics / focus.....
- Fake News All-In Liberal Motto: 'If at 1st you don't succeed, LIE, LIE again!"

who is "unable" to produce evidence, paid shill?

last I checked your fellow rightwingnuts have barely touched the surface and he already looks guilty of hell.

but thanks for the "alternative facts".

Thanks for admitting it - no evidence.

 

[Slade3200]

I'm sure you do but coming from somebody who believes verifiable fake news, I don't really give a shit

I said nothing about fake news, nor made any claims. So you just proved you are full of shit.

Your spreading the Seth rich conspiracy, aka, fake news. You're a puppet

Liar. I asked your retarded ass how you knew there was no connection. Your shit pile keeps growing!

I don't know there are no connections and neither do you. I also don't know that there are no connections between the pope and the U.K. Suicide bomber, but I guess we could investigate that too if we need another shiney object. Keep climbing down that rabbit hole though. Thats exactly where hannity wants you. Put some duct tape over your butthole though

I didn't claim there was no connection with dnc and the murder of Seth. I asked how you knew there was none, now you want to make it look like my baby. My butthole and Hannity has nothing to do with your keyboard bullshit. You just keep pilin' it up.

I answered your question. I don't know there isn't a connection. So what?

 

[toomuchtime_]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

lol So you are agreeing with me that there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, and not even any direct evidence that the Russian government committed any illegal acts to influence the election, so your point seems to be that you don't need any stinking evidence to believe all the rumors and allegations.

 

[Siete]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

 

[Indeependent]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

That's how is works on all levels of government.
DAs have the right to pursue or ignore anything they please unless they come under public pressure.

 

[toomuchtime_]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

All the evidence so far shows that this was all a hoax, so do you think they will indict Obama?

 

[Slade3200]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

All the evidence so far shows that this was all a hoax, so do you think they will indict Obama?

What evidence points to a hoax?

 

[Indeependent]

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

All the evidence so far shows that this was all a hoax, so do you think they will indict Obama?

What evidence points to a hoax?

Uh...no evidence?

 

[Siete]

The Watergate break-in didn't take down Nixon - it was the cover-up and obstruction of justice!

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

That's how is works on all levels of government.
DAs have the right to pursue or ignore anything they please unless they come under public pressure.

FBI = Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION

the investigation is in progress ... (maybe the dumbass RW's need to look up in progress)

next step(IF NECESSARY) prosecuting the guilty (IF ANYONES GUILTY)


derpity derp derp DERP DERP

 

[Luddly Neddite]

RWs live in LaLaLand. There are mountains of evidence and more every day.

Lots of money coming from Russia, every single trump minion has lied and then gotten caught in their lies. Very funny that his own spawn called daddy a liar. Or is it the other way around? Daddy said SleazeEric and Little DonDon lied!

As @Lahota said it was the cover up that got Nixon and the cheeto admitted he tried to obstruct justice and he said it twice!

And wow, this new report today.

Really couldn't blame the cheeto if he decided not to come back to the US. He lawyered up but this mess will drag on for a while yet.



Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[Siete]

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

All the evidence so far shows that this was all a hoax, so do you think they will indict Obama?

What evidence points to a hoax?

Uh...no evidence?

NO EVIDENCE YET ... not much gets by you does it moron

 

[Indeependent]

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

That's how is works on all levels of government.
DAs have the right to pursue or ignore anything they please unless they come under public pressure.

FBI = Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION

the investigation is in progress ... (maybe the dumbass RW's need to look up in progress)

next step(IF NECESSARY) prosecuting the guilty (IF ANYONES GUILTY)


derpity derp derp DERP DERP

It's called having lots of Taxpayer money and public pressure.
Municipalities don't have lots of Taxpayer money.

 

[Indeependent]

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

All the evidence so far shows that this was all a hoax, so do you think they will indict Obama?

What evidence points to a hoax?

Uh...no evidence?

NO EVIDENCE YET ... not much gets by you does it moron

Look, ma! An ad hominem!

 

[toomuchtime_]

lol But there is clearly no crime to cover up in this case. According to Feinstein, Manchin and Waters, there is no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and yesterday when asked directly by Congress if he knew of any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, John Brennan, Obama's CIA chief indicated he did not.

The fact that no one has been able to produce any direct evidence of the Russian government committing any illegal acts to influence the election or of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government shows this is like the political witch hunt of the 1950's, not the Watergate scandal.

Tom Brennan said that his agency doesn't "deal in evidence" because the CIA isn't do to court or make a legal case. The CIA deals in Intel and he had lots of Intel.

You keep hanging your hat on this "no evidence" thing and yet there was no evidence against Hillary and Bill Clinton but you believe they're guilty.

Typical Republican double standard.

Intel is evidence.

and when the investigation is OVER and ALL EVIDENCE has been gathered it will be turned over to the AG who will decide is there is ENOUGH EVIDENCE to make a case and PROSECUTE GUILTY PARTIES.


damn, how fuckin' dumb are RW's anyway ?

All the evidence so far shows that this was all a hoax, so do you think they will indict Obama?

What evidence points to a hoax?

Stupid question, but I'll play. The fact that after all these months we know that there is no direct evidence the Russian government committed any illegal acts to influence the election and no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to influence the election.

Before you start bullshitting about classified information we know that neither the FBI nor the CIA was able to produce such evidence in closed sessions with members of the Congressional intelligence committees or judiciary committees.