Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What the hell are you babbling about?Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.1. American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion, in that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance, from what you eat to what you smoke to what you say .Liberals place their faith in priestly experts who know better, who plan, exhort, badger, and scold. They try to use science to discredit traditional notions of religion and faith, but speak the language of pluralism and spirituality to defend nontraditional beliefs. Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism, p. 14.
2. Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, argues Coulter, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless, she throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:
its sacraments (abortion)
its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
its clergy (public school teachers)
its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
(Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism)
For example;
In a highly publicized stop at Monticello during Clinton's 1993 inaugural festivities, Gore pointed to carvings of Washington and Benjamin Franklin and asked the curator: 'Who are these guys?' He was surrounded by reporters and TV cameras when he said it.
Source: Slander
And the White House Press Secretary under Obama made fun of Palin for doing what MANY people do....write notes on her hand.
But that is not slander in your eyes. That is warranted criticism.
Leave that to the late night comedians. It is slander when the White House does it.
Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.Mr Prager is wrong. My politics lean toward the left and I cannot relate to what Mr Prager says about the left. It doesn't fit for my experience.
I don't think the right is evil. Nor do I consider my politics a religion. I have a religion, and it certainly affects my politics.
Mr Prager just lays out some broad sweeping generalizations. The other consideration is the people he quotes do not represent what the collecitve left thinks or feels.
I think there is far too much of this stereotyping and demonizing of the other side of the aisle.
You have a quick mind and you study the issues Political Chic. I always feel I learn something from you posts.
I don't think Mr Prager helps the cause.
1. American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion, in that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance, from what you eat to what you smoke to what you say .Liberals place their faith in priestly experts who know better, who plan, exhort, badger, and scold. They try to use science to discredit traditional notions of religion and faith, but speak the language of pluralism and spirituality to defend nontraditional beliefs. Jonah Goldberg, Liberal Fascism, p. 14.
2. Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, argues Coulter, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless, she throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:
its sacraments (abortion)
its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
its clergy (public school teachers)
its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
(Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism)
For example;
CLOSE ENCOUNTERS: IS AL GORE AN ALIEN?
by Jonah Goldberg
"While touring Monticello, Gore asked a guide, Who are these people? while pointing at statues of Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Ben Franklin."
In a highly publicized stop at Monticello during Clinton's 1993 inaugural festivities, Gore pointed to carvings of Washington and Benjamin Franklin and asked the curator: 'Who are these guys?' He was surrounded by reporters and TV cameras when he said it.
Source: Slander
What the hell are you babbling about?Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.
For example;
And the White House Press Secretary under Obama made fun of Palin for doing what MANY people do....write notes on her hand.
But that is not slander in your eyes. That is warranted criticism.
Leave that to the late night comedians. It is slander when the White House does it.
"Slander" is the title of Coulter's book that the quote came from.
And Goldberg and Coulter are not credible because Gore named specifically the left flank bust as Franklin without any help from the curator. The left flank bust WAS, in fact, Franklin.
As I have said, CON$ are so thoroughly brainwashed they see only what they were told to see by their programmers even after I told you that Gore names the left flank bust as Franklin without any help from the curator.Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.1. American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion, in that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance, from what you eat to what you smoke to what you say….Liberals place their faith in priestly experts who know better, who plan, exhort, badger, and scold. They try to use science to discredit traditional notions of religion and faith, but speak the language of pluralism and spirituality to defend ‘nontraditional’ beliefs.” Jonah Goldberg, “Liberal Fascism,” p. 14.
2. Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, argues Coulter, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless, she throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:
its sacraments (abortion)
its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
its clergy (public school teachers)
its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
(Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism)
For example;
In a highly publicized stop at Monticello during Clinton's 1993 inaugural festivities, Gore pointed to carvings of Washington and Benjamin Franklin and asked the curator: 'Who are these guys?' He was surrounded by reporters and TV cameras when he said it.
Source: Slander
CrackedEggsInTheAttic, you not only make this so easy for the right, but you make the left look really, really stupid...
I'm surprised that Mr. Limbaugh doesn't fire you as his PR man.
So your point is that Goldberg and Coulter report the inanity of Vice-President Gore???
Or that it never happened, as you imply in "same erroneous crap"..?
How about if I could document Gore saying it?
Would that mean that your supply of brain cells has approached a manageable number?
Now, get ready: here is where you go from action to traction...
[youtube]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4DIK2qppQoI&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4DIK2qppQoI&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Were you busy kissing the video screen?
If so, watch it again and hear Gore calling you a dolt!
Would you be willing to put up some money against me? We can settle up with PayPal, as long as you are not a Welsher.
As I have said, CON$ are so thoroughly brainwashed they see only what they were told to see by their programmers even after I told you that Gore names the left flank bust as Franklin without any help from the curator.Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.
For example;
CrackedEggsInTheAttic, you not only make this so easy for the right, but you make the left look really, really stupid...
I'm surprised that Mr. Limbaugh doesn't fire you as his PR man.
So your point is that Goldberg and Coulter report the inanity of Vice-President Gore???
Or that it never happened, as you imply in "same erroneous crap"..?
How about if I could document Gore saying it?
Would that mean that your supply of brain cells has approached a manageable number?
Now, get ready: here is where you go from action to traction...
[youtube]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4DIK2qppQoI&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4DIK2qppQoI&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Were you busy kissing the video screen?
If so, watch it again and hear Gore calling you a dolt!
As I have also said, I love Stuttering Limptard because I make money of the DittoTards STUPID enough to believe him. Now, he showed it twice and you missed it both times.
I will warranty with $20 or any amount you choose, that Gore named the left flank bust as Franklin without any help from the curator. That warranty is open to all takers.
i never said that, pea brainand what one of these does what was claimed?
easy answer, not one of them
[/i]
So, you support a collective doctrine over the rights of each individual...thanks for making that clear Dive...
(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama's "stimulus" bill;
(4) We support workers' right to secret ballot by opposing card check;
(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;
(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;
(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;
(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;
(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and
(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;
Most absurdly, Fund and Barnes, along with many other conservatives who have promoted paranoid nonsense about Journolist, seem to be suggesting that conservative journalists never, ever coordinate their messages with Republican politicians, lobbyists, policy experts and academics.
That is, to coin a phrase, a very big lie.
Specific, orderly, disciplined, ideological coordination -- and not the freewheeling blather to be found on Journolist -- has been proceeding every week for nearly two decades at the "Wednesday meetings" convened by lobbyist Grover Norquist in the Washington offices of Americans for Tax Reform.
As David Brock, who had attended those meetings, explained a few years ago in the Republican Noise Machine:
Every Wednesday morning in Norquist's Washington offices, the leaders of more than eighty conservative organizations -- including major right-wing media outlets and top Bush White House aides -- convene to set movement priorities, plan strategy, and adopt talking points. Norquist seems a cross between a Communist Party boss and a Mafia don as he presides over these strategy sessions ...
Conservative media turned out in full force for the weekly strategy meetings convened by right-wing activist Grover Norquist -- Peggy Noonan and John Fund of the Journal, representatives from National Review and the Washington Times, and a researcher for Bob Novak all checked in. The right-wing writers considered themselves part of the conservative movement "team," as Norquist put it ...
So no money on Franklin, that says everything. So both Coulter and Goldberg were lying about Franklin. That's settled.As I have said, CON$ are so thoroughly brainwashed they see only what they were told to see by their programmers even after I told you that Gore names the left flank bust as Franklin without any help from the curator.CrackedEggsInTheAttic, you not only make this so easy for the right, but you make the left look really, really stupid...
I'm surprised that Mr. Limbaugh doesn't fire you as his PR man.
So your point is that Goldberg and Coulter report the inanity of Vice-President Gore???
Or that it never happened, as you imply in "same erroneous crap"..?
How about if I could document Gore saying it?
Would that mean that your supply of brain cells has approached a manageable number?
Now, get ready: here is where you go from action to traction...
[youtube]<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4DIK2qppQoI&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4DIK2qppQoI&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>[/youtube]
Were you busy kissing the video screen?
If so, watch it again and hear Gore calling you a dolt!
As I have also said, I love Stuttering Limptard because I make money of the DittoTards STUPID enough to believe him. Now, he showed it twice and you missed it both times.
I will warranty with $20 or any amount you choose, that Gore named the left flank bust as Franklin without any help from the curator. That warranty is open to all takers.
From the Brown Bomber: "You can run, but you can't hide."
He missed a guy named George Washington....
"Who are those people?"
George Washington.
Al Gore, the Pride of Liberal Democrats!
Dolt.
I bet you thought I’d run out of ways to humiliate you.
[And the White House Press Secretary under Obama made fun of Palin for doing what MANY people do....write notes on her hand.
But that is not slander in your eyes. That is warranted criticism.
Leave that to the late night comedians. It is slander when the White House does it.
The Left Hates Conservatives
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.
2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred [by] mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the left's hatred of conservative individuals.
3. From Karl Marx to today, the Left has always hated people on the Right, not merely differed or been angry with them. Why?
a. First, the left thinks the right is evil. Examples are innumerable. For example, Howard Dean, the former head of the Democratic Party said, "In contradistinction to the Republicans ... (Democrats) don't believe kids ought to go to bed hungry at night." Or take Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who, among many similar comments, said, "I want to say a few words about what it means to be a Democrat. It's very simple: We have a conscience."
b. Second, when you don't confront real evil, you hate those who do. Whether out of guilt over their own cowardice or fear that the one who confronted the bully would provoke the bully to lash out more, those who refuse to confront the bully often resent the one who does. During the 1980s, the left expressed far more hatred of Ronald Reagan than of Soviet Communist dictator Leonid Brezhnev. And, when Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire," the liberal world was enraged ... at Reagan. Today, the left has similar contempt for those who take a hard line on Islamic terror. The liberal and leftist media routinely place quote marks around the words War on Terror the Obama administration has actually forbidden use of the term "Islamic terror." The real enemies the Democratic administration is prepared to name are the Republican Party, tea parties, Fox News and talk radio.
c. Third, the left's utopian vision is prevented only by the right. From its inception, leftism has been a secular utopian religion .imagining a utopian future. There will be no poor, no war, no conflict, no inequality. That future is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives.
4. How could a utopian not hate a conservative? The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians. The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians.
a. This hatred will only increase if the left feels its programs to greatly increase the size of the government are in any way threatened in the forthcoming elections."
The Dennis Prager Show
2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred [by] mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists.
The Left Hates Conservatives
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives…as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.
2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred…[by]…mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the left's hatred of conservative individuals.
3. From Karl Marx to today, the Left has always hated people on the Right, not merely differed or been angry with them. Why?
a. First, the left thinks the right is evil. Examples are innumerable. For example, Howard Dean, the former head of the Democratic Party said, "In contradistinction to the Republicans ... (Democrats) don't believe kids ought to go to bed hungry at night." Or take Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who, among many similar comments, said, "I want to say a few words about what it means to be a Democrat. It's very simple: We have a conscience."
b. Second, when you don't confront real evil, you hate those who do. Whether out of guilt over their own cowardice or fear that the one who confronted the bully would provoke the bully to lash out more, those who refuse to confront the bully often resent the one who does. During the 1980s, the left expressed far more hatred of Ronald Reagan than of Soviet Communist dictator Leonid Brezhnev. And, when Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire," the liberal world was enraged ... at Reagan. Today, the left has similar contempt for those who take a hard line on Islamic terror. The liberal and leftist media routinely place quote marks around the words War on Terror…the Obama administration has actually forbidden use of the term "Islamic terror." The real enemies the Democratic administration is prepared to name are the Republican Party, tea parties, Fox News and talk radio.
c. Third, the left's utopian vision is prevented only by the right. From its inception, leftism has been a secular utopian religion….imagining a utopian future. There will be no poor, no war, no conflict, no inequality. That future is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives.
4. How could a utopian not hate a conservative? The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians. The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians.
a. This hatred will only increase if the left feels its programs to greatly increase the size of the government are in any way threatened in the forthcoming elections."
The Dennis Prager Show
Partisan blather.
4. The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state;[/url]
Jarhead said:And the White House Press Secretary under Obama made fun of Palin for doing what MANY people do....write notes on her hand.
But that is not slander in your eyes. That is warranted criticism.
Leave that to the late night comedians. It is slander when the White House does it.
The Left Hates Conservatives
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.
2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred [by] mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the left's hatred of conservative individuals.
3. From Karl Marx to today, the Left has always hated people on the Right, not merely differed or been angry with them. Why?
a. First, the left thinks the right is evil. Examples are innumerable. For example, Howard Dean, the former head of the Democratic Party said, "In contradistinction to the Republicans ... (Democrats) don't believe kids ought to go to bed hungry at night." Or take Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who, among many similar comments, said, "I want to say a few words about what it means to be a Democrat. It's very simple: We have a conscience."
b. Second, when you don't confront real evil, you hate those who do. Whether out of guilt over their own cowardice or fear that the one who confronted the bully would provoke the bully to lash out more, those who refuse to confront the bully often resent the one who does. During the 1980s, the left expressed far more hatred of Ronald Reagan than of Soviet Communist dictator Leonid Brezhnev. And, when Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire," the liberal world was enraged ... at Reagan. Today, the left has similar contempt for those who take a hard line on Islamic terror. The liberal and leftist media routinely place quote marks around the words War on Terror the Obama administration has actually forbidden use of the term "Islamic terror." The real enemies the Democratic administration is prepared to name are the Republican Party, tea parties, Fox News and talk radio.
c. Third, the left's utopian vision is prevented only by the right. From its inception, leftism has been a secular utopian religion .imagining a utopian future. There will be no poor, no war, no conflict, no inequality. That future is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives.
4. How could a utopian not hate a conservative? The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians. The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians.
a. This hatred will only increase if the left feels its programs to greatly increase the size of the government are in any way threatened in the forthcoming elections."
The Dennis Prager Show
Best example of 'projection' I've seen in a very long time.
Jarhead said:And the White House Press Secretary under Obama made fun of Palin for doing what MANY people do....write notes on her hand.
But that is not slander in your eyes. That is warranted criticism.
Leave that to the late night comedians. It is slander when the White House does it.
Oh please. Palin has done nothing but slander Obama and the White House. It's her schtick, she has no other material. It's only when she thinks she might have to answer some tough questions NOT related to Obama that she needs to write notes to herself on her palms?
