Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
kamala said she was open to more debates AFTER the first one. donny wanted to change it up & have the fox one be b4 ABC, but he caved. & the very same day that she said at her rally she wanted more, was the day donny turned tail & said no more.
poor losing loser donny....................
What is there to accept? Trump has stated that he is no longer going to debate.
By the way and for your knowledge, you are exhausting your chances of me having any interest in debating with you. You offer no debate, just comebacks that only criticize but don't offer a rebuttal of the information given. The reality is that you are acting as a clown and the worst part is that you are not funny at all!
What is there to accept? Trump has stated that he is no longer going to debate.
By the way and for your knowledge, you are exhausting your chances of me having any interest in debating with you
ok..so then just stop replying…You offer no debate
just comebacks that only criticize but don't offer a rebuttal of the information given
The reality is that you are acting as a clown and the worst part is that you are not funny at all!
The only good point you've made since we started talking
BS but I know you believe it.On the contrary, I offer sound and reasonable arguments to your point. I think I have offered ample debate.
I’ve only pointed out that you claim to be focused on data and facts, but appear to only be interested in one side of those facts, dismissing the rest, which is fine. I’m not sure what “come backs” you are referring to. What information do you feel requires rebuttal? Our discussions have been mostly focused on your assertions that you are after stats, data, and facts, which I point out that your approach is one of bias, which skews your facts and data.
I’ve never intended to be humorous in our discussion, so the fact that I’m not funny is unsurprising
The Fox debate was proposed weeks ago, she dodged it. Why didn’t she accept it then? I think we all know why.
On the contrary, I offer sound and reasonable arguments to your point. I think I have offered ample debate.
I’ve only pointed out that you claim to be focused on data and facts, but appear to only be interested in one side of those facts, dismissing the rest, which is fine. I’m not sure what “come backs” you are referring to. What information do you feel requires rebuttal? Our discussions have been mostly focused on your assertions that you are after stats, data, and facts, which I point out that your approach is one of bias, which skews your facts and data.
I’ve never intended to be humorous in our discussion, so the fact that I’m not funny is unsurprising
