🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

No More Department of Education?!

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,149
2,645
Bill introduced to terminate the Department of Education, bringing funding back to the states

"While the Senate was busy debating and finally confirming Betsy Devos as the next Secretary of Education, Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced a bill to abolish the entire Department of Education on December 31st, 2018. Rep. Massie joins Dana Loesch to discuss his bill, which has gone viral on the internet.

Rep. Massie explains how the Department of Education has roughly 4,500 bureaucrats making around $105,000 apiece a year, dictating to states what the students will learn and how they will learn it. He states by making this cut there will be more funding available to the states to be spent in the school system."


With Liberals, it always has been and always will be about CONTROL!
 
Bill introduced to terminate the Department of Education, bringing funding back to the states

"While the Senate was busy debating and finally confirming Betsy Devos as the next Secretary of Education, Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced a bill to abolish the entire Department of Education on December 31st, 2018. Rep. Massie joins Dana Loesch to discuss his bill, which has gone viral on the internet.

Rep. Massie explains how the Department of Education has roughly 4,500 bureaucrats making around $105,000 apiece a year, dictating to states what the students will learn and how they will learn it. He states by making this cut there will be more funding available to the states to be spent in the school system."


With Liberals, it always has been and always will be about CONTROL!
Agreed, but the p-school system is also about funding the D Party.
 
The key to preventing tyranny: de-centralized power.

The Dept of Education (and Energy) needs to go.
 
The key to preventing tyranny: de-centralized power.

The Dept of Education (and Energy) needs to go.
de=centralized power...and education. When that education is centralized, as you point out, it becomes more about indoctrination and control than anything else.
 
Bill introduced to terminate the Department of Education, bringing funding back to the states

"While the Senate was busy debating and finally confirming Betsy Devos as the next Secretary of Education, Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced a bill to abolish the entire Department of Education on December 31st, 2018. Rep. Massie joins Dana Loesch to discuss his bill, which has gone viral on the internet.

Rep. Massie explains how the Department of Education has roughly 4,500 bureaucrats making around $105,000 apiece a year, dictating to states what the students will learn and how they will learn it. He states by making this cut there will be more funding available to the states to be spent in the school system."


With Liberals, it always has been and always will be about CONTROL!

.
Ok, if you were a Vegas odds maker...what is the over/under on the number of House Republicans and Senate Republicans who will vote for this?
 
Last edited:
Don't be surprised when this bill goes nowhere.
 
The key to preventing tyranny: de-centralized power.

The Dept of Education (and Energy) needs to go.
Agreed...but following your analysis, of which I fully agree, we must also get rid of the federal government.
 
The key to preventing tyranny: de-centralized power.

The Dept of Education (and Energy) needs to go.
Agreed...but following your analysis, of which I fully agree, we must also get rid of the federal government.
There has to be some government, as a practical matter. Further, and more importantly, our constitution creates a federal government. Granted, the gov created by the constitution is one of much, much less power than what it evolved into today. So, a limited federal government is necessary, primarily for security.

While basic, it is worth reflecting on the fact that the intent of the Founders was that unless a power is expressly conferred upon the federal government, then it is reserved for the states. The leftists have created this perverse idea of negative powers whereby if something is not expressly forbidden by the constitution then it is permissible and, therefore, not unconstitutional. The biggest usurpation of states rights has been the negative authority found in the commerce clause over the past 100 years. It is striking how our nation is so unlike what is was intended to be.
 
The more they employee, the more votes they are assured. Does anyone realize if you took away public sector unions how few votes would be left for the Dems!?!
 
The key to preventing tyranny: de-centralized power.

The Dept of Education (and Energy) needs to go.
Agreed...but following your analysis, of which I fully agree, we must also get rid of the federal government.
There has to be some government, as a practical matter. Further, and more importantly, our constitution creates a federal government. Granted, the gov created by the constitution is one of much, much less power than what it evolved into today. So, a limited federal government is necessary, primarily for security.

While basic, it is worth reflecting on the fact that the intent of the Founders was that unless a power is expressly conferred upon the federal government, then it is reserved for the states. The leftists have created this perverse idea of negative powers whereby if something is not expressly forbidden by the constitution then it is permissible and, therefore, not unconstitutional. The biggest usurpation of states rights has been the negative authority found in the commerce clause over the past 100 years. It is striking how our nation is so unlike what is was intended to be.
The a problem with allowing some government, is it is akin to cancer. It grows and metastasizes into something deadly, which is exactly what we have today.

The Founders knew we would end up with criminals running the nation.
 

Forum List

Back
Top