Ray From Cleveland
Diamond Member
- Aug 16, 2015
- 97,215
- 37,439
- 2,290
Its interesting that when it comes to abortion the fetus is not a living being worthy of life until its outside of its mother, yet the liberals insist on pre-natal care being part of the coverage.Let's see. A sick person just may not quite have the energy or resources that a healthy one may, ya think?
Things must be going pretty good for ya, cause you are coming across as seeming to think you are pretty strong. So strong and full of yourself that you believe you are far above ever needing a helping hand. Okay, God bless you! Go spend your money on killing losers.
Proverbs Chapter 8 Verse 12: I wisdom dwell with prudence, and find out knowledge of witty inventions.
Ya think , medical advances may be knowledge of witty inventions? Ya think, God wants that shared with some elite? Or did he state that he is no respecter of persons? His bounty is for all to receive if they only believe. His creation and His blessings is not to be controlled by some self imposed greater than others. So just who is the gatekeeper to the blessings? Are you God?
God helps those who help themselves.
I'm all for charity. I give when I can and many times when I really shouldn't. But there is a difference between one giving of themselves and one being forced to give. Forced charity is not charity at all, forced charity is theft.
Government is too corrupt to handle medical care. There always has to be ulterior motives. Commie Care was not about making sure everybody had insurance, Commie Care was designed to make as many government dependents as possible. Congrats, it worked. According to the White House, we created 14 million more government dependents thanks to Commie Care, and the government will be canceling income tax refund checks (or greatly reducing) to millions of Americans who desperately need their own money back.
Dear Ray: Imagine if Christians decided that Christian policies saved lives.
No sex outside of marriage, etc.
And started "mandating through govt" that if you choose to have sex outside of marriage you pay fines.
To pay for the children born out of wedlock.
What a mess, everyone would yell that's imposing beliefs through govt!
Yet when the Left imposes their beliefs, it's considered 'secular and fair game'? What?
So this 'right to health care' can be declared "the law of the land" by Democrats pushing it through govt.
But when the "right to life" is defended, no, that's violating separation of church and state.
Why isn't this being called out for what it is:
DISCRIMINATION BY CREED.
When "Right to Life" is struck down, it is argued that freedom of choice is more important, even if lives are lost or risks of damage come with that free choice.
But when "Right to health care" is maintained as a compelling interest of govt,
suddenly "freedom of choice" is not so important, and can be sacrificed for something
as HARMLESS as choosing other means of paying for health care besides insurance.
Free choice of abortion is not to be penalized or regulated by federal govt, or it's overreaching into privacy.
But free choice whether to buy insurance or pay and provide for health care by other means,
that choice is penalized? And regulated where it HAS TO BE INSURANCE or other govt regulated choices.
How is that being penalized and regulated, while the choice of abortion is not?
Because we've made the mistake of allowing liberals to define what terms and words mean.
For example, what does a fair share mean? A fair share to a liberal is what they think is fair. What you or I think fair is doesn't count. What you and I think fair means is everybody paying the same thing. Fair means equal.
A right. What is a right? Well a right is your ability to have or participate in something without the government stopping you; well........that's our definition: A right to free speech, a right to work at a job, a right to not have your personal property searched by the government without a warrant. Now, liberals added a new definition to the word "right." A right now is something you want even if somebody else has to pay for it. And if you don't want somebody else being forced to pay for something, you are denying a liberal their right.
Going to the abortion issue, why is it allowed? It's allowed because liberals have determined that life doesn't start until a baby takes it's first breath. Prior to that, it's just a mass of gunk that has no protection because it's not a living being. Liberals are even allowed to define what a life is.
Why should we pay money to cover a blob of cells that has no rights.
That's the way a liberal mind works. When we talk about religion, liberals are scared to death about an entity they don't believe exists. Try to figure that one out.
![ack-1 :ack-1: :ack-1:](/styles/smilies/ack-1.gif)
![ack-1 :ack-1: :ack-1:](/styles/smilies/ack-1.gif)