Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you have no answer.
You put your foot in your mouth and can't get it out.
Just man the fuck up and say it.
No, I know no such thing. I've actually lived in one of them, so I know whereof I speak, rather than pulling it out of my ass. Maybe that's the difference between you and me.
Btw you didn't "prove" squat. You claimed "Houstons [sic] lesbo [sic] lefty mayor just okay'd [sic] same sex benefits for city workers".
What does that mean, that the right is against equal rights? And again, Houston isn't one of your three cities anyway, so you're moving goalposts on top of everything else.
Guy, I'm a realist.
SCOTUS has become Congress with balls.
Clearly, Congress doesn't have the balls to tackle the really tough questions, so we need SCOTUS to do it for us.
The reality was that before Roe, women were having abortions, and the laws weren't really being enforced. All SCOTUS did was reflect reality.
In the case of Heller, you had Scalia imposing the NRA agenda over what a lot of sensible cities were already doing. Once that old creep is gone, good riddance to that sort of craziness.
Hitler's Table Talk has been debunked as a fraud.
It's generally to try to paint Hilter as a liberal atheist when he clearly wasn't.
Fact was, Germans were allowed to have guns. It was even seen as a sign of German manhood.
So you have no answer.
Really?
You're going to go that way?
You put your foot in your mouth and can't get it out.
Just man the fuck up and say it.
He did, which kicked the shit out of the retarded crap your buddy JoeB Stalin posted (and you defended.)
Or at least you lack the class to acknowledge that you were defeated...
Btw you didn't "prove" squat. You claimed "Houstons [sic] lesbo [sic] lefty mayor just okay'd [sic] same sex benefits for city workers".
Which proves that such decisions are often made at the local level, in contrast to your insistence that only the state makes such decisions.
You lost again, man up.
What does that mean, that the right is against equal rights? And again, Houston isn't one of your three cities anyway, so you're moving goalposts on top of everything else.
It means you got your ass handed to you, yet again.
Man up.
So you have no answer.
Really?
You're going to go that way?
He did, which kicked the shit out of the retarded crap your buddy JoeB Stalin posted (and you defended.)
Or at least you lack the class to acknowledge that you were defeated...
Which proves that such decisions are often made at the local level, in contrast to your insistence that only the state makes such decisions.
You lost again, man up.
What does that mean, that the right is against equal rights? And again, Houston isn't one of your three cities anyway, so you're moving goalposts on top of everything else.
It means you got your ass handed to you, yet again.
Man up.
No, moron-who-can't-mind-his-own-business, he ran from his own point. I challenged him to show me how the mayor of New Orleans is a "leftist"; he bailed out and went to Houston. I might add he then followed up with incoherent rants about how much he paid for his house and something he calls "obammycare", so he's a complete failure.
At least it was his own point rather than barging in on somebody else's point armed with nothing but Danth's Law like Pee Wee Fucking Herman.
Maybe you should try to, you know, manage your own points instead of trolling in on others like a retard.
You need to stop with the PMs. I've asked you to keep your comments here where you cant hide.
The fact that you want to argue the political leanings of those cities is ridiculous.
You stated that mayors dont make political decisions, that is utterly moronic.
Please keep your comments here so the rest of the board can laugh with me.
No, moron-who-can't-mind-his-own-business, he ran from his own point. I challenged him to show me how the mayor of New Orleans is a "leftist"; he bailed out and went to Houston. I might add he then followed up with incoherent rants about how much he paid for his house and something he calls "obammycare", so he's a complete failure.
At least it was his own point rather than barging in on somebody else's point armed with nothing but Danth's Law like Pee Wee Fucking Herman.
Maybe you should try to, you know, manage your own points instead of trolling in on others like a retard.
No, moron-who-can't-mind-his-own-business, he ran from his own point. I challenged him to show me how the mayor of New Orleans is a "leftist"; he bailed out and went to Houston. I might add he then followed up with incoherent rants about how much he paid for his house and something he calls "obammycare", so he's a complete failure.
At least it was his own point rather than barging in on somebody else's point armed with nothing but Danth's Law like Pee Wee Fucking Herman.
Maybe you should try to, you know, manage your own points instead of trolling in on others like a retard.
Are you pouting?
Dude, JoeB made a retarded claim, which you KNEW the idiot could never support - so you thought you could salvage his idiocy - and got your ass handed to you.
Negging me, holding your breath until you turn blue, stomping your feet, none of it will change the fact that claiming cities don't make laws regarding marriage was fucking retarded. JoeB is mental, he makes most of what he posts here up out of thin air.
Get over it and learn not to knee-jerk support JoeB - he may be a leftist, but he's an idiot. wait, I repeat myself.
Dear Democrats:
You own whatever comes out of this. If government officials are shot and/or killed in New York for taking firearms from law abiding citizens, the onus is on you. There are just some things you don't do: Don't hit on another man's woman, ride another man's Harley, and don't mess with his guns.
I'm sure the same goes for the ladies as well.
Drama Queen alert.
"shot and/or killed in New York for taking firearms from law abiding citizens"?
Uh - you're saying law abiding citizens would murder? That actually would make taking their guns away the right thing to do, doncha think?
Suppose the 2nd amendment read:
"The moon being made of green cheese, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
And then, nearly 200 years after that was ratified, astronauts finally land on the moon and prove once and for all that it is NOT made of green cheese.
Would it now be OK to infringe on the right of the people to keep and bear arms?
The answer, of course, is No, it's not OK to infringe.
"The moon being made of green cheese" is an explanation for why the right shall not be infringed.
It is not a condition controlling the infringement.
The same is true for the actual phrase, "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state". Even if it is somehow proven that a well regulated militia is NOT necessary, the 2nd amendment still says that the right of the people shall not be infringed.
PERIOD.
And unlike statements issued by Barack Obama that contain the word PERIOD, this one means it.
Dear Democrats:
You own whatever comes out of this. If government officials are shot and/or killed in New York for taking firearms from law abiding citizens, the onus is on you. There are just some things you don't do: Don't hit on another man's woman, ride another man's Harley, and don't mess with his guns.
I'm sure the same goes for the ladies as well.
Drama Queen alert.
"shot and/or killed in New York for taking firearms from law abiding citizens"?
Uh - you're saying law abiding citizens would murder? That actually would make taking their guns away the right thing to do, doncha think?
When the law is immoral it is not murder to resist it
Depends on who has a majority on the court, doesn't it?
actually no it doesn't. no matter who has a majority in the court, abortion is still not in the constitution. perhaps if you ever bothered to read it you would know that. you'd also know owning a gun is a right. but as usual you speak from ignorance.
but you comment is very interesting and telling. depends who has a majority in the court?
I thought the court was supposed to be impartial. Well not in a twisted liberal mind like yours. in typical douchebag liberal fashion, to you its about control. to you its about being able to force your agenda through. it's never about what is right, its all about what is right for you. the liberal way
Guy, I'm a realist. SCOTUS has become Congress with balls.
Clearly, Congress doesn't have the balls to tackle the really tough questions, so we need SCOTUS to do it for us.
The reality was that before Roe, women were having abortions, and the laws weren't really being enforced. All SCOTUS did was reflect reality.
In the case of Heller, you had Scalia imposing the NRA agenda over what a lot of sensible cities were already doing. Once that old creep is gone, good riddance to that sort of craziness.
You need to stop with the PMs. I've asked you to keep your comments here where you cant hide.
The fact that you want to argue the political leanings of those cities is ridiculous.
You stated that mayors dont make political decisions, that is utterly moronic.
Please keep your comments here so the rest of the board can laugh with me.
I haven't sent you any PMs since I informed you that any more showing up on my end would be deleted unread. Which they are.
YOU argued the poltical leanings of those mayors (not "those cities"), and that's what I challenged. And you melted down into "the prez", "Houston", "obammycare" [sic] and how much you paid for your fucking house. Which is to say, you failed to address the challenge in any way whatseover.
Again, you walk in here unarmed, you'll get wounded. Do your fucking homework next time, loser.
Back on topic................
Libs say.............
We are not going to take your guns.........not going to take your guns.........not going to take your guns............
Over and over again. We know they are full of shit. They are looking to put their strategy to work.
Joe the Idiot simply forgot to follow their rules and has skipped to the last step. Which means the Idiot should be taken back to RE-EDUCATION camp to get back with the plan.
Bottom line. WE WILL NOT OBEY..............That's the deal. I don't give a fuck if they ever pass the law................Again, I believe it's against the Constitution. So screw you guys.
Back on topic................
Libs say.............
We are not going to take your guns.........not going to take your guns.........not going to take your guns............
Over and over again. We know they are full of shit. They are looking to put their strategy to work.
Joe the Idiot simply forgot to follow their rules and has skipped to the last step. Which means the Idiot should be taken back to RE-EDUCATION camp to get back with the plan.
Bottom line. WE WILL NOT OBEY..............That's the deal. I don't give a fuck if they ever pass the law................Again, I believe it's against the Constitution. So screw you guys.
Guy, the problem is, you keep talking about all the people you want to shoot, and pretend like what happened today isn't directly a result of your insanity, the easier it will be for me to convince people that guns have to go.
You refuse to police yourselves, someone else will.
[
Wow............Yeah right now I'm going to shoot everyone and everything in Joe's mind...................
Your a troll, and a lunatic. You state things or take them out of context all the time Joe.....................
Your a LIAR Joe..............
Saying you'd shoot someone to protect your family is DREAMING ABOUT KILLING............
Your an Idiot...............
And by your statement, you'll push your IDEALS on those who don't agree but will not even back it up if the time ever comes.............
That make you a Coward Joe....................
We refuse to accept your Ideals................Forcing your beliefs on others is BS and is Tyranny................
Again. Let's state the opposite. Hypo sitcom....................We believe you should own a gun and pass a law for that everyone is now ordered to own a gun and a 1,000 rounds...................It is our belief. We passed the law.
Will you OBEY US JOE..................It's the law Joe.....................Are you a Law abiding citizen....................
Slavery was OK at one time Joe..........Laws protected it back then.................
Should we OBEY THAT AS WELL..................
Your a troll, and your BORING ME.
