daveman
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #1,501
Look, if you're going to ignore the evidence I present, you can eat shit.Not that you'll accept any proof, but here it is:Really? Where's your proof that the CDC has an anti-gun agenda?
Keep in mind, this was in 1986 when Ronny Reagan appointed the head of the CDC.
Now go ahead -- screech "Nuh-UH!!" and stamp your feet like a small child. We both know you're going to.
I asked specifically what was your proof that the CDC had an anti-gun agenda in 1986, you posted a bunch of stuff showing they had one in the Clinton years.
In short, let's look at the sequence here.
1986, the Kellerman study confirms what everyone already suspected, that guns in the home are far more likely to kill household members than bad guys. This really isn't in dispute.
But Reagan and Bush were in the pocket of the NRA, so they didn't do all that much about it. Welll, reagan did come out for the Brady Bill after he left office.
Then Clinton comes along, and you have Waco and Ruby Ridge and Oklahoma City and a bunch of you nutters forming militias because the passed a few common sense laws.
And suddenly, Gosh, Darn, we need to get the CDC out of the business of looking into guns!
Good Gaea, you're absolutely TERRIFIED of conflicting views. But then, your pussyhood has never been in doubt.