meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,984
- 18,297
- 2,290
Wrong. Just search titles for Derek ChauvinThe right never defended corrupt dirty cops, sellout scum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong. Just search titles for Derek ChauvinThe right never defended corrupt dirty cops, sellout scum.
True, says who?It has the virtue of being true. No one is seriously suggesting otherwise.
Presidents do work from home... biden admitted he has a cabinet in his home where he locks secret documents up....
They attack people who want consequences for them.The right never defended corrupt dirty cops, sellout scum.
Wrong again, sock-o.They attack people who want consequences for them.
So yeah. They do.
He declassified them... and was cooperating with retuning them... you can't just put government documents in a envelope and drop it in the mail...So, your defense of your god is that more than 1.5 years ago he had some classified documents he was working with and just forgot about them and left them in his desk?
Really?
Hey, you run with that one![]()
I think it’s a lot more obvious that Trump was mishandling classified information than Clinton.So you think putting highly classified info on an unauthorized and improperly secured computer server where it can be hacked by foreign nations is no big deal. You can bet your ass the Russians, the Chinese, .op≥≥≥ the Iranians and the North Koreans all accessed that email.
Grasping at straws... you are being played.... just like with Russian collusion... don't let them do this to you again.....That was pathetic. He didn’t even touch on any of the actual issues.
He asks some interesting questions.
Why now? Because Trump dragged his feet for months. He dragged his feet with NARA. He tried to delay turning documents over to DoJ with phony claims of privilege. He delayed complying with the subpoena.
Why didn’t the DoJ just say “hey we are coming in”? That’s too stupid for words. They gave Trump the opportunity to comply. He didn’t. It’s on Trump. Not the DoJ.
Can he claim executive privilege? Hell no. You can’t claim executive privilege to the current executive. It’s idiotic to think that’s legitimate.
He claimed the photo was a scare tactic? It’s reality. It makes it harder for shitbags like Representative Ass Licker here to lie about it.
Nope. Saw it with my own two eyes. They defend the bad cops who kill civilians.Wrong again, sock-o.
Grasping at straws is being asked a question about the search which turned a hundred classified documents and then talking about Hunter Biden and baby formula.Grasping at straws... you are being played.... just like with Russian collusion... don't let them do this to you again.....
Word of mouth doesn't cut it... Anything that went down needs to be released entirely and not redacted.. It's all political bull crap that went down, just like everything else that's going down in an attempt to gain votes in an election. The Democrat's are so easily read that it's pathetic..This filing refutes so much of the right wing narrative about this whole fiasco.
When Jay Bratt went down to the storage locker on June 3rd, he was forbidden from looking through any of the boxes.
So whoever says that Trump was cooperating and willing to give them whatever they want can go fuck themselves.
You're full of shit, sock-o.Nope. Saw it with my own two eyes. They defend the bad cops who kill civilians.
Just look at Chauvin.
They got nothing again... you know that right?.... this is the same bunch that ran Russia gate....Grasping at straws is being asked a question about the search which turned a hundred classified documents and then talking about Hunter Biden and baby formula.
It’s in the new DoJ filing. You should read it.Word of mouth doesn't cut it
You just defended Chauvin by saying he was “overcharged” and yes tons of people defended him.You're full of shit, sock-o.
Nobody I know defended Chauvin....Though he was overcharged, nobody defended his excessive use of force.
"Marked classified" doesn't mean that they weren't subsequently declassified, sock-o.It’s in the new DoJ filing. You should read it.
No one defended Chauvin, and in fact Limbaugh, Hannity, and other's said on their podcast and on their shows that what Chauvin did wasn't right, and he needed to be punished severely for it. So you are here peddling bull crap lie's for the Democrat's eh ?Nope. Saw it with my own two eyes. They defend the bad cops who kill civilians.
Just look at Chauvin.
Wow....You are one seriously stupid fuck, sock-o.You just defended Chauvin by saying he was “overcharged” .