CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,706
- 72,010
- 2,330
2 decades, no warming
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
2 decades, no warming
Yes, we are do something. However, much of that reduction is due to the reduced economic activity during the recession and the slow recovery."I know the discussions can be tense and decisions are difficult and I know how angry some people are about the predicament they've been put in by big nations that have benefited from industrialization for a long period of time," Kerry saidThe following is a quote from Kerry, is it just me or does this not make a lick of sense?
"The Paris pact, he added, would not be "the silver bullet that eliminates this threat but I think everyone here can agree that we certainly won't eliminate it without an agreement," added Kerry."
So, will the agreement solve a problem or not? If not then why bother at all?
Maybe I am just being a conspriacy theory nut but it seems to me that the whole goal is control over all of the world's economy. Also it is being used to bring America down and third world countries up to some sort of standard the left wing has set.
No time to quarrel Kerry warns of climate tragedy - Yahoo News
The developed nations who are responsible for most of the problem are asking the undeveloped nations to make the big cuts while they do practically nothing. And Kerry questions why they are pissed?
America is doing nothing? Shutting our industrial base under Obama is nothing?
This graph seems to indicate by plan or not we are doing something:
If it was such a big deal...Why not build a 100 more gw of nuclear by 2020 and cut a 50 billion dollar check for fusion research? We just had a net gain for energy earlier this year. So it holds a lot of promise.
I support solar and wind...but it isn't ever going to take care of more than 25-30% of our energy needs.
Yes, we are do something. However, much of that reduction is due to the reduced economic activity during the recession and the slow recovery."I know the discussions can be tense and decisions are difficult and I know how angry some people are about the predicament they've been put in by big nations that have benefited from industrialization for a long period of time," Kerry saidThe following is a quote from Kerry, is it just me or does this not make a lick of sense?
"The Paris pact, he added, would not be "the silver bullet that eliminates this threat but I think everyone here can agree that we certainly won't eliminate it without an agreement," added Kerry."
So, will the agreement solve a problem or not? If not then why bother at all?
Maybe I am just being a conspriacy theory nut but it seems to me that the whole goal is control over all of the world's economy. Also it is being used to bring America down and third world countries up to some sort of standard the left wing has set.
No time to quarrel Kerry warns of climate tragedy - Yahoo News
The developed nations who are responsible for most of the problem are asking the undeveloped nations to make the big cuts while they do practically nothing. And Kerry questions why they are pissed?
America is doing nothing? Shutting our industrial base under Obama is nothing?
This graph seems to indicate by plan or not we are doing something:
2 decades, no warming
Oh, well clearly nothing to worry about.
Except what happens if the temperatures were supposed to drop say, 3 degrees in 2 decades. But because of man made climate change competing with natural climate change it means there is, as of now, not much difference in temperatures?
2 decades, no warming
Oh, well clearly nothing to worry about.
Except what happens if the temperatures were supposed to drop say, 3 degrees in 2 decades. But because of man made climate change competing with natural climate change it means there is, as of now, not much difference in temperatures?
Tell me now or forever STFU, what should the world temperature be?
I'd like to see it raised to where it was 5 million years ago. Warmer winters for my area...More food production.
Yes, we are do something. However, much of that reduction is due to the reduced economic activity during the recession and the slow recovery."I know the discussions can be tense and decisions are difficult and I know how angry some people are about the predicament they've been put in by big nations that have benefited from industrialization for a long period of time," Kerry saidThe following is a quote from Kerry, is it just me or does this not make a lick of sense?
"The Paris pact, he added, would not be "the silver bullet that eliminates this threat but I think everyone here can agree that we certainly won't eliminate it without an agreement," added Kerry."
So, will the agreement solve a problem or not? If not then why bother at all?
Maybe I am just being a conspriacy theory nut but it seems to me that the whole goal is control over all of the world's economy. Also it is being used to bring America down and third world countries up to some sort of standard the left wing has set.
No time to quarrel Kerry warns of climate tragedy - Yahoo News
The developed nations who are responsible for most of the problem are asking the undeveloped nations to make the big cuts while they do practically nothing. And Kerry questions why they are pissed?
America is doing nothing? Shutting our industrial base under Obama is nothing?
This graph seems to indicate by plan or not we are doing something:
Bottom line, carbon output is going down. Will nothing satisfy the hate America first crowd?
If it was such a big deal...Why not build a 100 more gw of nuclear by 2020 and cut a 50 billion dollar check for fusion research? We just had a net gain for energy earlier this year. So it holds a lot of promise.
I support solar and wind...but it isn't ever going to take care of more than 25-30% of our energy needs.
Yes, we are do something. However, much of that reduction is due to the reduced economic activity during the recession and the slow recovery."I know the discussions can be tense and decisions are difficult and I know how angry some people are about the predicament they've been put in by big nations that have benefited from industrialization for a long period of time," Kerry saidThe following is a quote from Kerry, is it just me or does this not make a lick of sense?
"The Paris pact, he added, would not be "the silver bullet that eliminates this threat but I think everyone here can agree that we certainly won't eliminate it without an agreement," added Kerry."
So, will the agreement solve a problem or not? If not then why bother at all?
Maybe I am just being a conspriacy theory nut but it seems to me that the whole goal is control over all of the world's economy. Also it is being used to bring America down and third world countries up to some sort of standard the left wing has set.
No time to quarrel Kerry warns of climate tragedy - Yahoo News
The developed nations who are responsible for most of the problem are asking the undeveloped nations to make the big cuts while they do practically nothing. And Kerry questions why they are pissed?
America is doing nothing? Shutting our industrial base under Obama is nothing?
This graph seems to indicate by plan or not we are doing something:
Bottom line, carbon output is going down. Will nothing satisfy the hate America first crowd?
But then again it went down in 2008. Let's see what happened in 2008. Oh year, economic recession. When the economy picks up again what will happen?
2 decades, no warming
Oh, well clearly nothing to worry about.
Except what happens if the temperatures were supposed to drop say, 3 degrees in 2 decades. But because of man made climate change competing with natural climate change it means there is, as of now, not much difference in temperatures?
No offense but what you post is so typical of the GW argument. Don't look at what is happening look into the GW crystal ball and see the gloom and doom to come. It happened in the 70s and it is happening today. I am not sure why folks do it, do they like being scared?
2 decades, no warming
Oh, well clearly nothing to worry about.
Except what happens if the temperatures were supposed to drop say, 3 degrees in 2 decades. But because of man made climate change competing with natural climate change it means there is, as of now, not much difference in temperatures?
This is exactly why we say the AGW crowd is a cult
Yes, we are do something. However, much of that reduction is due to the reduced economic activity during the recession and the slow recovery."I know the discussions can be tense and decisions are difficult and I know how angry some people are about the predicament they've been put in by big nations that have benefited from industrialization for a long period of time," Kerry said
The developed nations who are responsible for most of the problem are asking the undeveloped nations to make the big cuts while they do practically nothing. And Kerry questions why they are pissed?
America is doing nothing? Shutting our industrial base under Obama is nothing?
This graph seems to indicate by plan or not we are doing something:
Bottom line, carbon output is going down. Will nothing satisfy the hate America first crowd?
But then again it went down in 2008. Let's see what happened in 2008. Oh year, economic recession. When the economy picks up again what will happen?
No offense but what you post is so typical of the GW argument. Don't look at what is happening look into the GW crystal ball and see the gloom and doom to come. It happened in the 70s and it is happening today. I am not sure why folks do it, do they like being scared?
The following is a quote from Kerry, is it just me or does this not make a lick of sense?
"The Paris pact, he added, would not be "the silver bullet that eliminates this threat but I think everyone here can agree that we certainly won't eliminate it without an agreement," added Kerry."
So, will the agreement solve a problem or not? If not then why bother at all?
Maybe I am just being a conspriacy theory nut but it seems to me that the whole goal is control over all of the world's economy. Also it is being used to bring America down and third world countries up to some sort of standard the left wing has set.
No time to quarrel Kerry warns of climate tragedy - Yahoo News
This is exactly why we say the AGW crowd is a cult
Why? Because they look at evidence and try and make a reasonable decision instead of just making something up on the spot and deciding it suits your needs and so, then it must be true?
One of the major flaws of this AGW scam is that nothing of the predictions the wackos made has ever come true to date. The earth is not burning up, seal levels are slightly rising at typical post ice age warming rates, hurricanes are not blowing the US off the map, the polar bears are increasing in numbers, the ice sheets are expanding and contrary to all the predictions we are having some damn cool winters and cooler than expected summers. it was damn cold here in Central Florida last night.
I guess Al Gore really knew this when he bought his ocean front home after predicting a 20 ft rise in ocean levels.