Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, facts
Being a typical arrogrant lib, you will never admit when you are wrong or that is is possible the contry does not support liberal Dems
As with reagan in 84 - libs said they did not lose
They said the country bought into slick marketing
Reagan won 49 states
Do you really think that Al Qaeda cannot walk and chew gum at the same time?
Do you really think they don't have nineteen or twenty guys who are NOT part of that "handful of deadenders in their final throes" in Iraq (that we can't quite seem to eliminate) that might be able to.... I dunno....slip across the border with Mexico and poison the water supply of Los Angeles or San Diego?
Do you really think that fighting in Iraq is keeping America safer from terrorist attack when you yourself bemoan the lack of security at our borders. You say you live in San Diego? How many ships tie up at the docks in your city and unload containers that have NEVER been scanned for radioactive material? Don't you think that the money we are FLUSHING DOWN THE SHITTER in Iraq MIGHT be better spent in making our borders AND PORTS safer from enemy incursion?
Do you really think that Al Qaeda cannot walk and chew gum at the same time?
Do you really think they don't have nineteen or twenty guys who are NOT part of that "handful of deadenders in their final throes" in Iraq (that we can't quite seem to eliminate) that might be able to.... I dunno....slip across the border with Mexico and poison the water supply of Los Angeles or San Diego?
Do you really think that fighting in Iraq is keeping America safer from terrorist attack when you yourself bemoan the lack of security at our borders. You say you live in San Diego? How many ships tie up at the docks in your city and unload containers that have NEVER been scanned for radioactive material? Don't you think that the money we are FLUSHING DOWN THE SHITTER in Iraq MIGHT be better spent in making our borders AND PORTS safer from enemy incursion?
Yeah, it just doesn't make sense to believe that as long as we have troops in Iraq, we won't be attacked here.
I never want to see any of our troops killed or innocent civilians. However, I know that if we do not keep the war on terror overseas we will fight it over here. We as Americans will not even vote to put a fence up to stop illegal person from crossing our boarders so we are wide open to all kinds of dangerous problem and keeping some of them over there protect us in some way here.
I am more worried about the lack of security in Ameica since I moved to San Diego and have seen the illegals just come and come. Please let us keep the fight out of the USA or we will have the dismay of children running for thier lives because war is on our soil.
I know no one wants to stand up and put a fence at our boarders and I cannot alone do this. But, let us keep fighting the terrorist over there until we feel that our safety if assured.
I do not believe for a moment that the numbers of Al Qaeda fighters presently in Iraq represents anything more than a small percentage of their total available human assets.IMO, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. IF in fact, the fighting in Iraq is keeping many terrorists otherwise occupied there, it stands to reason they aren't able to be there and here at the same time.
However, that does not necessarily preclude some of them breaking away to come here, nor am I convinced that those doing the fighting in Iraq are the ones who would do the attacking here.
IMO, a couple of factors have kept them from attacking again to this point. One would be limited resources. Two would be the need to outdo their last attack as anything less could be considered anticlimactic.
It sure as Hell isn't because of Homeland Security and/or that bandaid on an artery the Patriot Act.
his point was: polls don't PROVE anything. you fucking moron.
but the words and actions of Dems do
that is what the poll shows - and why libs are angry the poll was published
I say again: when RSR posts polls, his polls are, somehow, PROOF of something. WHen I post polls, RSR won't even acknowledge their validity or the fact that they might INDICATE something.
Let's talk polls again when you start showing me that you are willing to look at polls other than the ones YOU want to post. mmmmkay?
Libs have swoed their true intentions by what they say and do
The polls are reflecting how the public views those actions
They disapprove of them
interesting. the polls reflect how the public views the actions of the democrats? Like when the democrats passed a funding bill that included deadlines for troop withdrawals and 57% of America supported them? IS that what you are talking about?
You must not be up on current events MM
Dems surrendered to Pres Bush on their surrender bill
what does the fact that we did not have a veto proof majority have to do with the fact that 57% of America supported a bill that included withdrawal deadlines? How do you explain America's support for that bill that the president vetoed?
Keep making excuses - your base is not buying it either
I am not making excuses. I am waiting for you to answer a simple question.
are you ever going to do that or are you going to keep running away from answering it?
simple questions, RSR:
what does the fact that we did not have a veto proof majority have to do with the fact that 57% of America supported a bill that included withdrawal deadlines? How do you explain America's support for that bill that the president vetoed?
and..
how can you say that the surge is working and that American casualties have decreased because of the surge when, in fact, they have gone up every single month since the start of the surge?
answer them or for a change and quit trying to spin away from them.
