Noah's Ark with two of EVERY animal

there is agreement w/ the relevance of what you have written - it is you who does not understand to not disparage a heavenly being that survived the great flood, hogs to make your point - otherwise you are claiming the heavens responsible of deliberate debauchery - that's you.

there can not be a metaphor including the hevens that is desparaging of anything - on planet Earth - it's their creation. metaphysical polytheism. what exists after their flood.



you are claiming what does not exist - 10 commandments from the heavens - to insinuate a relevance for the heavens you can not claim and are not justified by any stretch of the imagination. by doing so.

they are the hallmark of the errors emblematic of those religions - paterfamilias - the particular repudiation the 1st century events were manifest in justification. - why they were crucified - sinner.
:blahblah: The only evidence available are the books found in the Holy Bible as a running history over the course of a 3500 year period. And you are yet to present your negative evidence that make them a false record of evidence. Again. All hat no cowboy. Why? You can't present evidence that you cannot find to exist. Prima Facie evidence is far from having no evidence.

The Bible stands as prima facie evidence until you prove that it is not. You can present all the negative logical fallacies that you wish and they will continue be nothing but circular arguments. Again. John Locke calls such arguments, "arguments of ignorance"...........you are arguing void of any knowledge on the subject, as admitted by yourself..........you can find no evidence.......that does not mean evidence does not exist, evidence such as the record found in the Holy Bible.
 
Last edited:
:blahblah: The only evidence available are the books found in the Holy Bible as a running history over the course of a 3500 year period. And you are yet to present your negative evidence that make them a false record of evidence. Again. All hat no cowboy. Why? You can't present evidence that you cannot find to exist. Prima Facie evidence is far from having no evidence.

The Bible stands as prima facie evidence until you prove that it is not. You can present all the negative logical fallacies that you wish and they will continue be nothing but circular arguments. Again. John Locke calls such arguments, "arguments of ignorance"...........you are arguing void of any knowledge on the subject, as admitted by yourself..........you can find no evidence.......that does not mean evidence does not exist, evidence such as the record found in the Holy Bible.
the facts are there were never tablets etched in the heavens with 10 commandments as the same as their existence at this present time, they do not exist - provide the tablets or remove the false commandments from all three desert religion documents.

no, the evidence would be the articles themselves - tablets etched in the heavens - that they do not exist and never have requires the false commandments be removed from whatever religious documents that use them or be accomplices to the deliberate crimes perpetrated by their nefarious purposes. obviously, that's clyde - the sinner, without remorse.

- who will burn for however long to be absolved of their heinous crime ... a long - long, time.
 
What Noah knew is irrelevant. If the flood happened as fundamentalists believe, the other continents would have been underwater. If Noah's Ark was the only refuge, as is stated in the Bible, no animals not native to the middle east would have survived.
/——-/ So every flood is worldwide? No regional floods? When it floods in Texas, the Sahara floods too?
WOWZA
 
no, the evidence would be the articles themselves - tablets etched in the heavens - that they do not exist and never have requires the false commandments be removed from whatever religious documents that use them or be accomplices to the deliberate crimes perpetrated by their nefarious purposes. obviously, that's clyde - the sinner, without remorse.

- who will burn for however long to be absolved of their heinous crime ... a long - long, time.

Real slow.......so even a liberal can understand it.........even a 7th grader such as yourself.

A false dilemma or false dichotomy. False dilemma - Wikipedia

You are attempting to limit the scope of evidence in not including the obvious prima facie evidence found in the history of the Judeo/Christian Philosophy. And you do this by saying, Naw Bro.............that is not true without proving that its not true based upon any objective evidence.

Woosh! You hear that? That is the sound of the wind passing between your ears. Now.....you attempt to deflect with the 2nd most common weapon used by the enlightened progressive humanist.........the personal ad hominem attack where the message is ignored and the attack on the messenger begins. LMAO :no_text11: Present your evidence that the 10 commandments are not a historical record......found to exist all around the globe. All civilized cultures base their system of jurisprudence upon the basic elements found in the 10 commandments. While there is no moral compass found in nature.

The fact that the civilized world bases its system of Justice upon some of the original concepts first described in the 10 commandments is more than prima facie evidence of the existence of these transcendent laws. Just a few for example: Murder, thievery, bearing false witness or perjury.........even today, the hand is placed upon the Holy Scriptures in court and to take an oath of office. In God we trust is found on our currency....etc.,

Even the US SYSTEM of Jurisprudence and the Untied States Constitution is based upon Blackstone's commentary on the laws of England. Blackstone based his commentaries on the morality found to exist within the Judeo/Christian Philosophy.


 
Last edited:
Maybe you don't care about archaeology or geology..
Maybe you're too stupid to realize that there are many "experts" on one web page who disagree with each other.
Only dumb people cherry pick from a visible multitude of choices.

You may care about these fields of study but you certainly lack the knowledge to understand anything they are presenting.
 
Maybe you're too stupid to realize that there are many "experts" on one web page who disagree with each other.
Only dumb people cherry pick from a visible multitude of choices.

You may care about these fields of study but you certainly lack the knowledge to understand anything they are presenting.
Of course, but there was no Ur of the Chaldeans until 900 years after Abraham.
 
Of course, but there was no Ur of the Chaldeans until 900 years after Abraham.
How do you know?
The fact is that you have your brain stuck in atheist mode and believe only what you want to believe.
Archeologists get paid to write what they write.
 
How do you know?
The fact is that you have your brain stuck in atheist mode and believe only what you want to believe.
Archeologists get paid to write what they write.
The Bible was redacted, amended and rewritten many times over hundreds of years and some of the stories are strictly teaching narratives and have no basis in history at all.
 
The Bible was redacted, amended and rewritten many times over hundreds of years and some of the stories are strictly teaching narratives and have no basis in history at all.
You have demonstrated over and over that you have never read the Bible from verse 1, so your post is meaningless to me.
At your age, repetition is a sure sign of dementia.
 

Forum List

Back
Top