Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
She won't do that because no one's going to pay her $20,000 to do that, which was to be her payment to perform at Berkeley.
That isn't very much...bill clinton, the rapist, got 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia for putin, when hilary was Secretary of State.....
Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
No, it's not.
Not even close.
Read the first five words of the First Amendment and try to find where "congress made a law ..."
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
^^^ From the coward hiding behind a keyboard.Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
Do you consider this infringement of free speech?So in your estimation faction A has the right to voice their opinions regarding the faction B's free speech, but faction B is not to be given reciprocal free speech voicing their opinions on faction A's? There's several names for that type of thinking.
Why, or why not?
You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.
That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool!
Tell me, thoughtless.
did the people that contracted her pull their offer because of the threats made about her speaking?
She has to have inflammatory speeches, since she got left behind on looks..
Never listened to her, I'll take your word.
But the point is infringement.
She has the right to spew what she wants, per the Constitution.
Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
She won't do that because no one's going to pay her $20,000 to do that, which was to be her payment to perform at Berkeley.
That isn't very much...bill clinton, the rapist, got 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia for putin, when hilary was Secretary of State.....
1.5mill to listen to the pussy grabber brag that he's a serial sexual predator, cheats, lies, steals and probably did his own daughter.
So?
Still doesn't make this a free speech issue.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Still doesn't make this a free speech issue.
Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
No, it's not.
Not even close.
Read the first five words of the First Amendment and try to find where "congress made a law ..."
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Your word games won't protect you if this nation keeps going down this path.
Do you consider this infringement of free speech?
Why, or why not?
You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.
That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool!
Tell me, thoughtless.
did the people that contracted her pull their offer because of the threats made about her speaking?
She has to have inflammatory speeches, since she got left behind on looks..
Never listened to her, I'll take your word.
But the point is infringement.
She has the right to spew what she wants, per the Constitution.
No one is stopping her.
I've heard her on Bill Maher and she's very UN-American. She's got that right too.
This is not a First Amendment issue. Nor have her rights been "infringed" upon anymore than the rights of a screaming liberal to speak at some fundie niter school.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
What we have here folksJust look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
No, it's not.
Not even close.
Read the first five words of the First Amendment and try to find where "congress made a law ..."
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Your word games won't protect you if this nation keeps going down this path.
Always the drama queen but no amount of RWNJ ignorance will make this a 1st amend issue.
Just once, think it through. Read the 1st amendment and show me where it guarantees anyone, right or left, the "right" to speak at a college.
This is a contractural dispute. Nothing more.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.That seems to be the definition of infringing free speech.because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
No, it's not.
Not even close.
Read the first five words of the First Amendment and try to find where "congress made a law ..."
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Your word games won't protect you if this nation keeps going down this path.
Always the drama queen but no amount of RWNJ ignorance will make this a 1st amend issue.
Just once, think it through. Read the 1st amendment and show me where it guarantees anyone, right or left, the "right" to speak at a college.
This is a contractural dispute. Nothing more.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
There's a simple formula with Ms. Coulter. The louder she screams, the more money she makes. It's that simple. Good example of the Ponzi Scheme of Outrage. And of capitalism. And of PT Barnum being correct once again.Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
She won't do that because no one's going to pay her $20,000 to do that, which was to be her payment to perform at Berkeley.
That isn't very much...bill clinton, the rapist, got 500,000 dollars for speeches in Russia for putin, when hilary was Secretary of State.....
1.5mill to listen to the pussy grabber brag that he's a serial sexual predator, cheats, lies, steals and probably did his own daughter.
So?
Still doesn't make this a free speech issue.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
There's a simple formula with Ms. Coulter. The louder she screams, the more money she makes. It's that simple. Good example of the Ponzi Scheme of Outrage. And of capitalism. And of PT Barnum being correct once again.Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
Your rationalizations for your side's brown shirt tactics are noted. They will not protect you if this nation keeps going down this path.
Ann Coulter is an American patriot who loves the Constitution.She has to have inflammatory speeches, since she got left behind on looks..You wrote that in response to this regarding Coulter;
That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool!
Tell me, thoughtless.
did the people that contracted her pull their offer because of the threats made about her speaking?
Never listened to her, I'll take your word.
But the point is infringement.
She has the right to spew what she wants, per the Constitution.
No one is stopping her.
I've heard her on Bill Maher and she's very UN-American. She's got that right too.
This is not a First Amendment issue. Nor have her rights been "infringed" upon anymore than the rights of a screaming liberal to speak at some fundie niter school.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Grow up!Ann Coulter is an American patriot who loves the Constitution.She has to have inflammatory speeches, since she got left behind on looks..Tell me, thoughtless.
did the people that contracted her pull their offer because of the threats made about her speaking?
Never listened to her, I'll take your word.
But the point is infringement.
She has the right to spew what she wants, per the Constitution.
No one is stopping her.
I've heard her on Bill Maher and she's very UN-American. She's got that right too.
This is not a First Amendment issue. Nor have her rights been "infringed" upon anymore than the rights of a screaming liberal to speak at some fundie niter school.
Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com
Coulter is Tyranny's Whore.
^^^ From the coward hiding behind a keyboard.Just look at all the stupid ridiculous books this neo-Nazi witch has published.
Amazon.com: Ann Coulter
Nobody can say with a straight face that her right to free speech is being infringed simply because protestors caused her to be disinvited from speaking at U.C. Berkley.
Being invited to speak at a University is a privilege, not a right. No one ever invites me to speak at universities and I'm a lot smarter and articulate than Coulter.
If she dares, she can place a soap box on the campus parking lot, stand on it, and spout her racist garbage to her heart's content.
However, she will not do that because she is a coward who hides behind security guards.
Wonderful.
Than I expect that you are on board to deny "ALL" Federal funding for these Universities.
Then we can discuss this "privilege" of speaking at Berkeley.
And before you become spastic and twist your panties in a knot, know that I am not a Republican or right wing.
But you are a fucking moron.
That had nothing to do with infringing speech, because Coulter didn't show up for her stunt and stab at further agitating to get more publicity. There was no infringement because the two factions never came together for any type of exchange, fool! And it had nothing to do with BLM infringing on Sander's speech. Two different things altogether you are trying to meld together in your logical fallacy!
moony you know dam well you would do her.....
Isn't it something? Conservatives want to privatize everything, and conservatives also believe that the private sector should have immunity when it comes to civil rights.
Never listened to her, I'll take your word.
But the point is infringement.
She has the right to spew what she wants, per the Constitution.
Just once, think it through. Read the 1st amendment and show me where it guarantees anyone, right or left, the "right" to speak at a college.
