Not laughing now, are you?

[Harry Dresden]

This just out on the morning news programs, so I made it my signature.. Donnie finally makes the cover of Time magazine.

finally?.....he has been on it 14 times so far.....

 

[Wry Catcher]

The old dead white guy in my avatar once claimed that Russia was trying to infiltrate every aspect of the United States, from the school system, to the media, and clear up into the government of this country.

Up to and as recently as a couple years ago the left scoffed at that idea, calling him a paranoid right-wing extremist engaged in a "witch hunt".

Not laughing now, are they?

Say it: "We're sorry Senator Joe. Please save us"

Yep.....for decades liberals poo poo'ed the premise of Russian spies in America.
Now, as with everything, Democrats have literally coopted the idea and expanded the premise exponentially.
This is what you can do if you control the media.
You can tell everyone the sky is red and even the most cynical person feels it's a possibility.

and NOW when the russians actually ARE infiltrated among you and are running the country, right wingers ignore it?

who would have thunk it?

please tell us exactly and specifically what the Russians did to affect our election, how many votes were changed, what laws were broken, and who benefitted.



no matter how many times you say it, there is nothing there. You have been duped by the media and the dems. They are lying to you and you are too dumb to know it.

What the Russians did was release private emails from the Democrats
Trump repeatedly used these emails to support his Crooked Hillary campaign
Did this information change any votes? There is no way of knowing for sure one way or the other

What we do know is that Trump took Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin by less than one percent. This leaked information could easily influence one percent of the vote

First of all the leaks came from wikileaks, there is no proof that wiki got them from Russia. Some think the leaks came from someone inside the Hillary campaign.

Sure Trump used those facts against her, what is wrong with that?

second, you are saying that the truth about corruption within the Hillary campaign, the DNC, and the media may have caused some people to not vote for her. Funny how the truth affects people, isn't it?

Wow, you were schooled by Roger Ailes and Faux News talking heads.

I can still remember before they were exposed in the movie Outfoxed a faux reporter introducing a character assassination by saying, "some people are saying ...". Later learning that the "some people" was usually a prior talking head, either another faux reporter or a paid commentator.

 

[JGalt]

Yep.....for decades liberals poo poo'ed the premise of Russian spies in America.
Now, as with everything, Democrats have literally coopted the idea and expanded the premise exponentially.
This is what you can do if you control the media.
You can tell everyone the sky is red and even the most cynical person feels it's a possibility.

and NOW when the russians actually ARE infiltrated among you and are running the country, right wingers ignore it?

who would have thunk it?

please tell us exactly and specifically what the Russians did to affect our election, how many votes were changed, what laws were broken, and who benefitted.



no matter how many times you say it, there is nothing there. You have been duped by the media and the dems. They are lying to you and you are too dumb to know it.

What the Russians did was release private emails from the Democrats
Trump repeatedly used these emails to support his Crooked Hillary campaign
Did this information change any votes? There is no way of knowing for sure one way or the other

What we do know is that Trump took Florida, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin by less than one percent. This leaked information could easily influence one percent of the vote

First of all the leaks came from wikileaks, there is no proof that wiki got them from Russia. Some think the leaks came from someone inside the Hillary campaign.

Sure Trump used those facts against her, what is wrong with that?

second, you are saying that the truth about corruption within the Hillary campaign, the DNC, and the media may have caused some people to not vote for her. Funny how the truth affects people, isn't it?

Wow, you were schooled by Roger Ailes and Faux News talking heads.

I can still remember before they were exposed in the movie Outfoxed a faux reporter introducing a character assassination by saying, "some people are saying ...". Later learning that the "some people" was usually a prior talking head, either another faux reporter or a paid commentator.

You probably think that your use of the word "faux" in referring to FOX News is cool or "edgy" but in reality, it's become passe to the point where anyone still using it is considered to be socially-retarded.

If you looked at the cable news channel ratings today, you'd probably see that nobody is considering FOX News to be the channel which is spewing fakery day after day. That would be CNN, MSNBC, etc.

 

[Dim Bulb]

The old dead white guy in my avatar once claimed that Russia was trying to infiltrate every aspect of the United States, from the school system, to the media, and clear up into the government of this country.

Up to and as recently as a couple years ago the left scoffed at that idea, calling him a paranoid right-wing extremist engaged in a "witch hunt".

Not laughing now, are they?

Say it: "We're sorry Senator Joe. Please save us"

I'll take "Greatest Witch Hunt in the History of Politics" for 600, Alex.