Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right. He agreed to 3-5 years in prison just for shits and giggles.Cohen was not convicted you hack, try to get your facts straight before you start a thread and look stupid.
He agreed so the feds couldn't go after his estate.
Cohen doesnāt have an āestateā. Heās not dead yet.
Cohen plead to avoid extended jail time after the guy heās lied for, defended, and aided and abetted for over 10 years, threw him to the wolves.
Whatever it is the feds threatened confiscation of assets (happy now)?
This is all of course supposition because no one has any real details of the plea agreement anyway yet.
It has moved beyond thatItās not a wet dreamKeep that wet dream alive if you must but here are the facts over a year and a half into the Mueller investigation not Trump not a member of his family or anyone on his 2016 campaign has plead guilty to been charged with or indicted on anything that was supposed to be the focus of this investigation.Manafort was there when discussions with the Russians were held. He was there when it was discussed with Trump. Manafort made changes to the GOP platform to help Russia
Now he is facing jail. Will he offer information in return for a lighter sentence?
Manafort was a key advisor at the time of the Russian involvement
He has a story to tell
Nothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
Tip of the icebergIt has moved beyond thatItās not a wet dreamKeep that wet dream alive if you must but here are the facts over a year and a half into the Mueller investigation not Trump not a member of his family or anyone on his 2016 campaign has plead guilty to been charged with or indicted on anything that was supposed to be the focus of this investigation.
Manafort was a key advisor at the time of the Russian involvement
He has a story to tell
Nothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
Are you not the one that wrote he was not found guilty? Therefore you can not claim a Trump scandal.Trump has been one continuous scandal as four key aides have been convicted and six face indictmentSince we are useing your interpretation of the word scandal and not the dictionary. As you yourself have stated it does not matter what someone says or what is written, unless they are convicted then there is no scandal. So we can agree that there is no scandal about Trump. So once again 44 did not know what he was talking about when he tried to make a case about Trump having a scandal when he did not.So just because you want it to be a scandal for Trump does not make it one. Glad to see we both agree.Let me help youI will give you a little light reading just so you understand the meaning of scandal.
Definition of SCANDAL
The simple fact he is not in jail is not the accepted definition of scandal. He was in charge. You like to point at the people around Trump and say god it is such a scandal. If you are trying to equate those around Trump as a scandal then you have to accept your lord high priest had scandals.
Obama repeats the myth that his administration was free of scandal - The Boston Globe
LIST: Obamaās 29 scandals and the mediaās campaign to hide them
It seems even journalists disagree with you.
Just because people call in to Rush Limbaugh doesnāt make it a scandal
See....that is the difference
There were no scandals for the Great Obama....he did not need to tweet his innocence every day, he did not have to pay off prostitutes, he did not declare his man crush on Putin
Zero for the Great Obama
Are you not the one that wrote he was not found guilty? Therefore you can not claim a Trump scandal.Trump has been one continuous scandal as four key aides have been convicted and six face indictmentSince we are useing your interpretation of the word scandal and not the dictionary. As you yourself have stated it does not matter what someone says or what is written, unless they are convicted then there is no scandal. So we can agree that there is no scandal about Trump. So once again 44 did not know what he was talking about when he tried to make a case about Trump having a scandal when he did not.So just because you want it to be a scandal for Trump does not make it one. Glad to see we both agree.Let me help you
Just because people call in to Rush Limbaugh doesnāt make it a scandal
See....that is the difference
There were no scandals for the Great Obama....he did not need to tweet his innocence every day, he did not have to pay off prostitutes, he did not declare his man crush on Putin
Zero for the Great Obama
Or are we down to I want it to be true so I will say it is. Anything else I will hide my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears.
Damn what do they teach you kids in school?
Is that like the filthy ass Democrats saying that Crooked Hillary didn't commit any crimes even thought Comey said she did?
Pay attention Skippy. Comey said that Hillary did NOT commit any crimes. It made you idiots lose your minds.
Right. He agreed to 3-5 years in prison just for shits and giggles.Cohen was not convicted you hack, try to get your facts straight before you start a thread and look stupid.
He agreed so the feds couldn't go after his estate.
Cohen doesnāt have an āestateā. Heās not dead yet.
Cohen plead to avoid extended jail time after the guy heās lied for, defended, and aided and abetted for over 10 years, threw him to the wolves.
Whatever it is the feds threatened confiscation of assets (happy now)?
This is all of course supposition because no one has any real details of the plea agreement anyway yet.
Yes, the feds can seize assets purchased with the proceeds of crime. Cohen had been doing Dumb Donaldās criminal work for 10 years.
Trump has already thrown Junior under the bus. I have more respect for Flynn who plead out to keep his idiot son from going to jail.
Trump is once again giving interviews and implicating himself in crimes and continuing his obstruction of justice out in the open.
Four key staff members have been convicted.Are you not the one that wrote he was not found guilty? Therefore you can not claim a Trump scandal.Trump has been one continuous scandal as four key aides have been convicted and six face indictmentSince we are useing your interpretation of the word scandal and not the dictionary. As you yourself have stated it does not matter what someone says or what is written, unless they are convicted then there is no scandal. So we can agree that there is no scandal about Trump. So once again 44 did not know what he was talking about when he tried to make a case about Trump having a scandal when he did not.So just because you want it to be a scandal for Trump does not make it one. Glad to see we both agree.Let me help you
Just because people call in to Rush Limbaugh doesnāt make it a scandal
See....that is the difference
There were no scandals for the Great Obama....he did not need to tweet his innocence every day, he did not have to pay off prostitutes, he did not declare his man crush on Putin
Zero for the Great Obama
Or are we down to I want it to be true so I will say it is. Anything else I will hide my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears.
Damn what do they teach you kids in school?
And you can try and make it about Trump but in your own words there is no scandal until he is convicted so you are still playing at trying to make yourself important and right.Four key staff members have been convicted.Are you not the one that wrote he was not found guilty? Therefore you can not claim a Trump scandal.Trump has been one continuous scandal as four key aides have been convicted and six face indictmentSince we are useing your interpretation of the word scandal and not the dictionary. As you yourself have stated it does not matter what someone says or what is written, unless they are convicted then there is no scandal. So we can agree that there is no scandal about Trump. So once again 44 did not know what he was talking about when he tried to make a case about Trump having a scandal when he did not.So just because you want it to be a scandal for Trump does not make it one. Glad to see we both agree.
See....that is the difference
There were no scandals for the Great Obama....he did not need to tweet his innocence every day, he did not have to pay off prostitutes, he did not declare his man crush on Putin
Zero for the Great Obama
Or are we down to I want it to be true so I will say it is. Anything else I will hide my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears.
Damn what do they teach you kids in school?
Meanwhile The Godfather sits and sweats
Right now....The scandal is in the Trump administrationAnd you can try and make it about Trump but in your own words there is no scandal until he is convicted so you are still playing at trying to make yourself important and right.Four key staff members have been convicted.Are you not the one that wrote he was not found guilty? Therefore you can not claim a Trump scandal.Trump has been one continuous scandal as four key aides have been convicted and six face indictmentSince we are useing your interpretation of the word scandal and not the dictionary. As you yourself have stated it does not matter what someone says or what is written, unless they are convicted then there is no scandal. So we can agree that there is no scandal about Trump. So once again 44 did not know what he was talking about when he tried to make a case about Trump having a scandal when he did not.See....that is the difference
There were no scandals for the Great Obama....he did not need to tweet his innocence every day, he did not have to pay off prostitutes, he did not declare his man crush on Putin
Zero for the Great Obama
Or are we down to I want it to be true so I will say it is. Anything else I will hide my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears.
Damn what do they teach you kids in school?
Meanwhile The Godfather sits and sweats
Tip of the icebergIt has moved beyond thatItās not a wet dream
Manafort was a key advisor at the time of the Russian involvement
He has a story to tell
Nothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
It has moved beyond thatItās not a wet dreamKeep that wet dream alive if you must but here are the facts over a year and a half into the Mueller investigation not Trump not a member of his family or anyone on his 2016 campaign has plead guilty to been charged with or indicted on anything that was supposed to be the focus of this investigation.
Manafort was a key advisor at the time of the Russian involvement
He has a story to tell
Nothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
Tip of the icebergIt has moved beyond thatItās not a wet dream
Manafort was a key advisor at the time of the Russian involvement
He has a story to tell
Nothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
Four key staff members have been convicted.Are you not the one that wrote he was not found guilty? Therefore you can not claim a Trump scandal.Trump has been one continuous scandal as four key aides have been convicted and six face indictmentSince we are useing your interpretation of the word scandal and not the dictionary. As you yourself have stated it does not matter what someone says or what is written, unless they are convicted then there is no scandal. So we can agree that there is no scandal about Trump. So once again 44 did not know what he was talking about when he tried to make a case about Trump having a scandal when he did not.So just because you want it to be a scandal for Trump does not make it one. Glad to see we both agree.
See....that is the difference
There were no scandals for the Great Obama....he did not need to tweet his innocence every day, he did not have to pay off prostitutes, he did not declare his man crush on Putin
Zero for the Great Obama
Or are we down to I want it to be true so I will say it is. Anything else I will hide my eyes and stick my fingers in my ears.
Damn what do they teach you kids in school?
Meanwhile The Godfather sits and sweats
Tip of the icebergIt has moved beyond thatNothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
Any day now, any day now.
Tip of the icebergIt has moved beyond that
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
Any day now, any day now.
So far as I can tell, nothing has come out that puts Trump in any jeopardy. It might happen tomorrow, but it hasn't happened today.
YupTip of the icebergIt has moved beyond thatNothing he has been charged with has anything to do with Russian involvement in the election. If it did, it'd be proof he has a story to tell.
The scope gets bigger every day. The more they dig, the more they find
Yep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
Any day now, any day now.
Millions of dollarsTip of the icebergYep, and so far, nothing is surfacing to confirm your belief that "Manafort has a story to tell."
That doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
Any day now, any day now.
So far as I can tell, nothing has come out that puts Trump in any jeopardy. It might happen tomorrow, but it hasn't happened today.
It's a disgrace whet they are doing. The Manafort charges date back a decade, the opted to to not go after him until Trump was elected; then they resurrected them and went after him.
Millions of dollarsTip of the icebergThat doesnāt mean itās not happening. Mueller leaks nothing.
Given that Manafort was just convicted of 8 felony charges and would have been convicted of all 18 if not for one dumb juror who stubbornly refused to change her vote, but could not explain why she rejected the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.
The second trial will be in DC, where Trump got only 4% of the votes. Itās going to be really difficult to pack a Jury with Trump voters at this trial. Not to mention that it failed abysmally at this last trial. The evidence was THAT overwhelming.
More proof: Mueller handed the Cohen trial off to the prosecutors in the Southern District of New York. Heās handed off the Bustina prosecution off to other prosecutors as well as all of the other ongoing trials. The ONLY prosecution Mueller has retained is Manafort.
That speaks volumes.
More to come
Any day now, any day now.
So far as I can tell, nothing has come out that puts Trump in any jeopardy. It might happen tomorrow, but it hasn't happened today.
It's a disgrace whet they are doing. The Manafort charges date back a decade, the opted to to not go after him until Trump was elected; then they resurrected them and went after him.
Millions of dollarsTip of the iceberg
More to come
Any day now, any day now.
So far as I can tell, nothing has come out that puts Trump in any jeopardy. It might happen tomorrow, but it hasn't happened today.
It's a disgrace whet they are doing. The Manafort charges date back a decade, the opted to to not go after him until Trump was elected; then they resurrected them and went after him.
And still no Russian collusion.
