It would be a great compromise on the potty issue. I don't know why NC wouldn't use it, except it doesn't cover showers and locker rooms? Many colleges have had co-ed dorms and both genders sharing shower facilities and bathrooms for years and years. No one has had issues until now, that it involves transgenders. Hmmm. Why do you suppose that is?I don't know about you, but based on the reaction on this board to the Bathroom Law, it is anything but petty. To a lot of people who will continue to argue about it ad infinitum. He had to get involved because NC considered it to be a NOT AT ALL PETTY issue, deserving of a state law. I agree it's petty. But probably not for the same reason you do.Regardless of how you feel abut this issue, you should be PISSED that with all the serious issues facing this country, THIS is the kind of bullshit Obama chooses to focus on in between rounds of golf. Seriously people. Should the POTUS be involving himself in such petty disputes?
I think it's petty in terms of the President getting involved.
I think it's petty that the state of NC couldn't have offered up a perfectly reasonable law.
"Private businesses may conduct their bathrooms however they see fit. Government offices shall provide a proportional number of non gender specific bathrooms"
The last meaning if a goverment building has 6 bathrooms, mark 2 of them as non gender specific and move on with your fucking day.
Who could reasonably object to that compromise from either side?
Maybe because one system is voluntary, the other, not so much. I guess this administration didn't learn a damn thing when the supreme court told them they can't withhold existing federal funds just because a State refuses to implement a new mandate.