NRA receives surge in donations.

Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Civilians situations don't need this stuff, unless of course if you want to shoot up a school, then it's the perfect weapon.
Drug overdoses now kill more Americans than guns
More than 50,000 Americans died from drug overdoses last year — the most ever.
So should we ban all drugs?
You have no proper comeback so you move the goalposts. Please try again soon.
oh come on now, you "libertarians" and I used the term loosely, all want the war on drugs to go away and legalize it. Yet more people die per year from OD'ing than with an AR-15. if you cant play the game, then please don't show up again.

Should we ban all drugs because it kills more people than an Armalite Rifle -15?
 
Thats because the us govt doesnt sell nuclear weapons, dude.
There is no law prohibiting citizens from owning nukes. It might as well be impossible but it is perfectly legal.
Sorry, but you're wrong. The US doesn't want COUNTRIES possessing nukes, you think they're going to let you Arab-Americans own some? :biggrin:
Not nukes maybe, but tanks and cannons and shit--he's right, apparently. At least when I asked Google the question a lot of sites said yes.
Can you imagine all the crazies sitting in the bushes near an airport with their AA shoulder fired missiles? lol. People planting mines in parks... Shooting off cruise missiles from the back of their pick-up? ...
View attachment 185138
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
no you're not
 
Thinks hogg!

REPORT: NRA Gets Flooded With Donations After Being Attacked


On Tuesday, a new report revealed that donations to the National Rifle Association's (NRA) political action committee significantly increased in February after they were attacked by the media and far-left activists in the wake of the Parkland shooting.

"The PAC raised a total of $779,063 in February and reported $247,985 in donations in January," an increase of over 300%, The Washington Free Beacon reported.

The massive surge in donations comes after the gun rights group has been viciously attacked by the media and far-left activists like Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student David Hogg, who has referred to the NRA as "child murderers" on multiple occasions...

View attachment 185127


REPORT: NRA Gets Flooded With Donations After Being Attacked

Has Russian sent their donation yet?
 
Not nukes maybe, but tanks and cannons and shit--he's right, apparently. At least when I asked Google the question a lot of sites said yes.
Can you imagine all the crazies sitting in the bushes near an airport with their AA shoulder fired missiles? lol. People planting mines in parks... Shooting off cruise missiles from the back of their pick-up? ...
View attachment 185138
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
Why cant you statists just amend the Constitution instead of raping it?
 
Not nukes maybe, but tanks and cannons and shit--he's right, apparently. At least when I asked Google the question a lot of sites said yes.
Can you imagine all the crazies sitting in the bushes near an airport with their AA shoulder fired missiles? lol. People planting mines in parks... Shooting off cruise missiles from the back of their pick-up? ...
View attachment 185138
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Civilians situations don't need this stuff, unless of course if you want to shoot up a school, then it's the perfect weapon.
your opinion and we all know what that's worth

graphic image removed
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have been thinking about joining. It has never even crossed my mind, but we will need as much help as possible considering all of these statist faggots out there begging to have our rights taken away.
And how will joining the gun manufacturers lobby help you get your 2nd Amendment rights back that have already been taken away? Like the surface to air missiles you're not allowed to buy?
You can buy them. It is perfectly legal to own a nuke, too. I can own a tank with missiles.
You know, you have said a many of things we cant get, that we actually can. You have been corrected a bunch. Do you EVER learn?

You can own a commissioned tank with firing mechanism removed. The same with missiles....you would own a hunk of metal. What is your mindless point?
 
Can you imagine all the crazies sitting in the bushes near an airport with their AA shoulder fired missiles? lol. People planting mines in parks... Shooting off cruise missiles from the back of their pick-up? ...
View attachment 185138
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....
 
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....

The former Justice comments on the second amendment were not well thought. They played right into the NRA hands. No one wants to take guns away.

Reasonable restrictions on gun purchases would go a long way to preventing mass shootings.

To say attempts at gun control like enhanced gun checks will not stop any single incident is like saying....not starting smoking could prevent lung cancer...
 
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....
more of an editorial on society than guns.

No matter how you slice it a fraction of a fraction of a percent of people who can legally get a gun will kill with it.

Mass shootings while great press for liberal control efforts account for only about 1% of all murders

The vast majority of murders, 68%,occur in very small areas in 5 % of all the counties in the country and since those areas tend to historically urban and plagued by crime. We don't care about the murders that occur in them because they are mostly urban youths killing other urban youths.
 
I have been thinking about joining. It has never even crossed my mind, but we will need as much help as possible considering all of these statist faggots out there begging to have our rights taken away.
And how will joining the gun manufacturers lobby help you get your 2nd Amendment rights back that have already been taken away? Like the surface to air missiles you're not allowed to buy?
You can buy them. It is perfectly legal to own a nuke, too. I can own a tank with missiles.
You know, you have said a many of things we cant get, that we actually can. You have been corrected a bunch. Do you EVER learn?

You can own a commissioned tank with firing mechanism removed. The same with missiles....you would own a hunk of metal. What is your mindless point?
:bsflag:
Jacques Littlefield
They only have to be de-weaponized if they are being imported.
If they are already here, you have to register it and pay a couple fees and such.
There are some states that made the cannons illegal though.
 
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....

The former Justice comments on the second amendment were not well thought. They played right into the NRA hands. No one wants to take guns away.

Reasonable restrictions on gun purchases would go a long way to preventing mass shootings.

To say attempts at gun control like enhanced gun checks will not stop any single incident is like saying....not starting smoking could prevent lung cancer...

No one wants to take guns away they just want to ban most guns and then repeal the second amendment
 
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....
You do understand that even with the gun ban, people ended up dead? Why don't EVIL people follow the law? Why do idiots like you want to take our guns away but not the bad guys?
 
No matter how you slice it a fraction of a fraction of a percent of people who can legally get a gun will kill with it.
This is TRUE, and I do not deny it... most are good, law abiding citizens

So how man of you gun nuts have kids or grandkids in school? You don't worry about a shooter coming into that school with one of your, protected ARs, and shooting it up? I pray you never find the fate of the parents or grandparents of the 17 who died in Florida....but if you do. You need to still protect the ARs and military style fire arms out there. Cause you feel owning an AR is more important than any one of the lives of the kids that died either in Sandy Hook or in Florida.

Remember that....
 
Wrong again, I'm a Libertarian. Better luck next time.
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....
You do understand that even with the gun ban, people ended up dead? Why don't EVIL people follow the law? Why do idiots like you want to take our guns away but not the bad guys?
yea right.....:rolleyes:


If all murders and gun violence takes place in just 5% of the counties in the USA as SkullPilot said, then if you do not live in those counties, why do you even need an AR15 semi automatic rifle for protection, when there is nothing to protect?
 
Yeah sure you are. You admitted that AR-15s should be banned, Why?
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....
You do understand that even with the gun ban, people ended up dead? Why don't EVIL people follow the law? Why do idiots like you want to take our guns away but not the bad guys?
yea right.....:rolleyes:


If all murders and gun violence takes place in just 5% of the counties in the USA as SkullPilot said, then if you do not live in those counties, why do you even need an AR15 semi automatic rifle for protection, when there is nothing to protect?
Most murders and gun violence happens with pistols. Are you scared of the AR-15 because it looks scary?


Most people use the AR-15 to hunt with not defend themselves.

Here Are 7 Animals Hunters Kill Using an AR-15
“It’s the most capable tool for the job at this time,” said Eric Mayer, who runs AR15hunter.com. “Bar none. Period. It is.”

Which gun should be banned below?

img_5874.jpg muzzelite-Ruger_10-22-A.jpg
 
No matter how you slice it a fraction of a fraction of a percent of people who can legally get a gun will kill with it.
This is TRUE, and I do not deny it... most are good, law abiding citizens

So how man of you gun nuts have kids or grandkids in school? You don't worry about a shooter coming into that school with one of your, protected ARs, and shooting it up? I pray you never find the fate of the parents or grandparents of the 17 who died in Florida....but if you do. You need to still protect the ARs and military style fire arms out there. Cause you feel owning an AR is more important than any one of the lives of the kids that died either in Sandy Hook or in Florida.

Remember that....

No I don't worry about it.

The odds of being killed in a mass shooting in any location are 1 in 11,125 so the odds of being killed in a mass shooting at a school are considerably less
 
Why not? They were banned for 10 years before.....?
They were banned for 10 years before.....?
And?

FLASHBACK: CBS Reported Clinton’s ’94 Assault Weapons Ban Didn’t Prevent Columbine
Columbine shooters from using those weapons in the massacre:

“When Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold shot their way into Columbine High School in Colorado a few months ago, one of the guns in their arsenal was a powerful pistol called a TEC-9. That’s one of the guns supposedly outlawed by the assault-weapons ban, passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton back in 1994. So how were they able to get ahold of a banned gun? Well, as we found when we first aired this story in 1995, this ban wasn’t really a ban at all. One gun dealer in Kentucky, Bill Perkins, went so far as to call the law a joke.”
Liberals, are the Joke of the Universe...

View attachment 185140
Klarevas examined incidents before, during and after the assault weapons ban when six or more people were shot and killed.


• 1984 to 1994: 19 incidents


• 1994 to 2004 (ban is in effect): 12 incidents


• 2004 to 2014: 34 incidents


That shows a 183 percent increase of incidents in the decade after the ban, compared to the years during the ban.

You are right it did not stop mass shootings....

And Columbine had 30% less deaths, even with TWO people doing the shooting, with no assault weapons....vs the Valentine's Day school massacre....
You do understand that even with the gun ban, people ended up dead? Why don't EVIL people follow the law? Why do idiots like you want to take our guns away but not the bad guys?
yea right.....:rolleyes:


If all murders and gun violence takes place in just 5% of the counties in the USA as SkullPilot said, then if you do not live in those counties, why do you even need an AR15 semi automatic rifle for protection, when there is nothing to protect?
Most murders and gun violence happens with pistols. Are you scared of the AR-15 because it looks scary?


Most people use the AR-15 to hunt with not defend themselves.

Here Are 7 Animals Hunters Kill Using an AR-15
“It’s the most capable tool for the job at this time,” said Eric Mayer, who runs AR15hunter.com. “Bar none. Period. It is.”

Which gun should be banned below?

View attachment 185148 View attachment 185149

most murders are young urban minorities killing other young urban minorities which is why these people don't give a shit about most murders and only focus on the 1% of murders that happen in mass shootings
 

Forum List

Back
Top