NY State Assembly Bill A99

OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!

Two people get to decide if you get forcefully detained on the mere suspicion of being in contact with a person with a disease.

No payment for your detention, no punishment if they get it wrong.

Judges brought in as an afterthought just to rubberstamp the choice.

How would you have felt if this was applied in the 80's during the AIDS pandemic?

I’m with you

If people want to spread infectious diseases it is their own damn business. If you don’t want my diseases....Don’t go out in public
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!

Two people get to decide if you get forcefully detained on the mere suspicion of being in contact with a person with a disease.

No payment for your detention, no punishment if they get it wrong.

Judges brought in as an afterthought just to rubberstamp the choice.

How would you have felt if this was applied in the 80's during the AIDS pandemic?

I’m with you

If people want to spread infectious diseases it is their own damn business. If you don’t want my diseases....Don’t go out in public

No, you aren't. You are being your usual sarcastic dickhead self.
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!
Leave it to the house idiot.
Ya, he didn't even read the snippet. (or maybe he did and he is purposely being obtuse.)

This gives the government the power to seize anyone, not just those that are ill.

Anyone they claim. All they have to do is say, "Hey, we suspect them of being infectious."

. . . and then throw them in a camp completely saturated with the diseased.

:rolleyes:


. . . it's the perfect cover for tyranny.

(regardless of how dangerous the disease may, or may not actually be.)
It would be ironic and a happy consequence should this become law, that RW’s neighbor informs on him and off to the gulag he goes.
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!

Two people get to decide if you get forcefully detained on the mere suspicion of being in contact with a person with a disease.

No payment for your detention, no punishment if they get it wrong.

Judges brought in as an afterthought just to rubberstamp the choice.

How would you have felt if this was applied in the 80's during the AIDS pandemic?

I’m with you

If people want to spread infectious diseases it is their own damn business. If you don’t want my diseases....Don’t go out in public
I have a better idea....

Anyone that doesn't want to die from an incurable deadly STD should avoid having sex with a Democrat, since Biden wants to make it legal for the LIbs to spread those.....
 
Ya, he didn't even read the snippet. (or maybe he did and he is purposely being obtuse.)

This gives the government the power to seize anyone, not just those that are ill.

UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED

MAY POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY
 
Last edited:
Most folks were alarmed at this.



But now? Do a Google search for this, "NY State Assembly Bill A99"

Because now, it is coming here.


" ” 2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE- GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN- TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO- PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION.”

That's right, detention facilities, concentration camps.

The establishment releases criminals, while rounding up law abiding folks. Up is now down.


No, ‘most’ folks aren’t.

It’s the folks on the right who are ‘alarmed’ – dishonest demagogues propagating lies about “detention facilities” and “concentration camps.”

The reprehensible right has no shame.
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!

Two people get to decide if you get forcefully detained on the mere suspicion of being in contact with a person with a disease.

No payment for your detention, no punishment if they get it wrong.

Judges brought in as an afterthought just to rubberstamp the choice.

How would you have felt if this was applied in the 80's during the AIDS pandemic?

I’m with you

If people want to spread infectious diseases it is their own damn business. If you don’t want my diseases....Don’t go out in public
I have a better idea....

Anyone that doesn't want to die from an incurable deadly STD should avoid having sex with a Democrat, since Biden wants to make it legal for the LIbs to spread those.....
Link
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!

Two people get to decide if you get forcefully detained on the mere suspicion of being in contact with a person with a disease.

No payment for your detention, no punishment if they get it wrong.

Judges brought in as an afterthought just to rubberstamp the choice.

How would you have felt if this was applied in the 80's during the AIDS pandemic?

I’m with you

If people want to spread infectious diseases it is their own damn business. If you don’t want my diseases....Don’t go out in public
I have a better idea....

Anyone that doesn't want to die from an incurable deadly STD should avoid having sex with a Democrat, since Biden wants to make it legal for the LIbs to spread those.....
Link
Conservatives don’t need links, all they need are lies.
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!
Leave it to the house idiot.
Ya, he didn't even read the snippet. (or maybe he did and he is purposely being obtuse.)

This gives the government the power to seize anyone, not just those that are ill.

Anyone they claim. All they have to do is say, "Hey, we suspect them of being infectious."

. . . and then throw them in a camp completely saturated with the diseased.

:rolleyes:


. . . it's the perfect cover for tyranny.

(regardless of how dangerous the disease may, or may not actually be.)
It would be ironic and a happy consequence should this become law, that RW’s neighbor informs on him and off to the gulag he goes.
That is just the start of it

Cuomo is obviously looking to set up Death Camps where he can lock up his political enemies
 
Ya, he didn't even read the snippet. (or maybe he did and he is purposely being obtuse.)

This gives the government the power to seize anyone, not just those that are ill.

UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED
You still haven't replied to my point about Biden's plan....

Why do you think that running around and giving people an incurable deadly disease (without having to tell them you have it)
is cool????
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!
Leave it to the house idiot.
Ya, he didn't even read the snippet. (or maybe he did and he is purposely being obtuse.)

This gives the government the power to seize anyone, not just those that are ill.

Anyone they claim. All they have to do is say, "Hey, we suspect them of being infectious."

. . . and then throw them in a camp completely saturated with the diseased.

:rolleyes:


. . . it's the perfect cover for tyranny.

(regardless of how dangerous the disease may, or may not actually be.)
It would be ironic and a happy consequence should this become law, that RW’s neighbor informs on him and off to the gulag he goes.
That is just the start of it

Cuomo is obviously looking to set up Death Camps where he can lock up his political enemies
Yes, make fun and ridicule. Common tactic used by fools.
 
Most folks were alarmed at this.



But now? Do a Google search for this, "NY State Assembly Bill A99"

Because now, it is coming here.


" ” 2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE- GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN- TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO- PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION.”

That's right, detention facilities, concentration camps.

The establishment releases criminals, while rounding up law abiding folks. Up is now down.


No, ‘most’ folks aren’t.

It’s the folks on the right who are ‘alarmed’ – dishonest demagogues propagating lies about “detention facilities” and “concentration camps.”

The reprehensible right has no shame.

There it is. Send those righties to the camps. Yippee!!!!
 
OMG

This is horrible.....Keeping an infectious person away from the General Population.

Damn It! We have a Constitutional right to spread infection if we want to!

Two people get to decide if you get forcefully detained on the mere suspicion of being in contact with a person with a disease.

No payment for your detention, no punishment if they get it wrong.

Judges brought in as an afterthought just to rubberstamp the choice.

How would you have felt if this was applied in the 80's during the AIDS pandemic?

I’m with you

If people want to spread infectious diseases it is their own damn business. If you don’t want my diseases....Don’t go out in public
I have a better idea....

Anyone that doesn't want to die from an incurable deadly STD should avoid having sex with a Democrat, since Biden wants to make it legal for the LIbs to spread those.....
Link
I gave you one....

And you can use Google (or DuckGoGo) to get a bunch more....

So get your gay ass busy!!!!
 
Democrats, like their Chinese counterparts, love the idea of rounding everyone they don't like into concentration camps. America needs war because at this point, peace is worse.
 
The founders also believed in mandatory quarantines during a pandemic. They did so in the 1700s. Bit smarter than conspiracy kooks, those fellows were so ahead of their time!
 
Most folks were alarmed at this.



But now? Do a Google search for this, "NY State Assembly Bill A99"

Because now, it is coming here.


" ” 2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE- GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN- TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO- PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION.”

That's right, detention facilities, concentration camps.

The establishment releases criminals, while rounding up law abiding folks. Up is now down.


No, ‘most’ folks aren’t.

It’s the folks on the right who are ‘alarmed’ – dishonest demagogues propagating lies about “detention facilities” and “concentration camps.”

The reprehensible right has no shame.

So what exactly is this about then?

Why does the state need this Bill then?

If this is the wrong interpretation, you tell me what this is about?

 
The founders also believed in mandatory quarantines during a pandemic. They did so in the 1700s. Bit smarter than conspiracy kooks, those fellows were so ahead of their time!
There is a difference between quarantining sick people and healthy people.

iu
 
The founders also believed in mandatory quarantines during a pandemic. They did so in the 1700s. Bit smarter than conspiracy kooks, those fellows were so ahead of their time!

For specific situations, a person coming off a ship, or against a far deadlier disease like typhoid or smallpox. They also only had that in their arsenal, as modern medicine was not in existence, or even the testing required to sort people out.

They also limited the quarantine to definitive areas, so maybe a block was quarantined but not whole cities, and not rural areas just because the government is too lazy to issue separate edicts.
 
Most folks were alarmed at this.



But now? Do a Google search for this, "NY State Assembly Bill A99"

Because now, it is coming here.


" ” 2. UPON DETERMINING BY CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE THAT THE HEALTH OF OTHERS IS OR MAY BE ENDANGERED BY A CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER, OR SUSPECTED CASE, CONTACT OR CARRIER OF A CONTAGIOUS DISEASE THAT, IN THE OPINION OF THE GOVERNOR, AFTER CONSULTATION WITH THE COMMISSIONER, MAY POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY, THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELE- GEE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE COMMISSIONER OR THE HEADS OF LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS, MAY ORDER THE REMOVAL AND/OR DETENTION OF SUCH A PERSON OR OF A GROUP OF SUCH PERSONS BY ISSUING A SINGLE ORDER, IDEN- TIFYING SUCH PERSONS EITHER BY NAME OR BY A REASONABLY SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION OF THE INDIVIDUALS OR GROUP BEING DETAINED. SUCH PERSON OR GROUP OF PERSONS SHALL BE DETAINED IN A MEDICAL FACILITY OR OTHER APPRO- PRIATE FACILITY OR PREMISES DESIGNATED BY THE GOVERNOR OR HIS OR HER DELEGEE AND COMPLYING WITH SUBDIVISION FIVE OF THIS SECTION.”

That's right, detention facilities, concentration camps.

The establishment releases criminals, while rounding up law abiding folks. Up is now down.


No, ‘most’ folks aren’t.

It’s the folks on the right who are ‘alarmed’ – dishonest demagogues propagating lies about “detention facilities” and “concentration camps.”

The reprehensible right has no shame.

You're not going to have an argument with a conspiracy enthusiast, like the OP. They are not rational, there's always a scary "they" with a grand plan. Derpa derp derp derp, derpitty derp is the only adequate response. Read some studies on the mental deficiency that causes one to become a conspiracy enthusiast, and you'll learn where it all comes from and how it's not fruitful to engage. They'll end up either getting mental health assistance, dying looking under their beds or worse, doing what the Nashville guy did.
 
The founders also believed in mandatory quarantines during a pandemic. They did so in the 1700s. Bit smarter than conspiracy kooks, those fellows were so ahead of their time!
There is a difference between quarantining sick people and healthy people.

iu
This doesnt sound healthy to me but of course, there's always the nutter take on these things:

POSE AN IMMINENT AND SIGNIFICANT THREAT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH RESULTING IN SEVERE MORBIDITY OR HIGH MORTALITY
 

Forum List

Back
Top