NYTimes Exterminates George Bush!

[BlindBoo]

The same way we "justify" the majority of dem congressional members were also on board

Oh you mean by lying or being lied to?

147 Democrats in Congress voted against Iraq Resolution

111 Democrats in Congress voted for Iraq Resolution.

Iraq Resolution - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

Again, the two pictures being compared in the OP....are different pictures.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

 

[Edgetho]

Dozens -- No, HUNDREDS of photos were taken of the Lying Cocksucker in Chief marching in a parade he had NO right to claim as having anything to do with.... He has NO (0), Zero, American Slave Blood in him.....**

In fact, the Lying Cocksucker in Chief was raised in White Privilege and later took advantage of Affirmative Action programs....

But that's not why I called.

The photos are seconds, maybe milliseconds, apart.

The New Yawk Slimes is saying they're using the photos sent them. No shit.

But, being the scum of the earth -- dimocrap filth, they lied.... They omitted that they also got Dozens, maybe HUNDREDS of photos with the Bush family in them.

Whether the photo is cropped or not is completely irrelevant and only dimocrap morons would even think to bring it up.

The Slimes was sent HUNDREDS of photos with the Bush family in them and chose not to run one.

There is one with them in it 'after the jump'. Why couldn't they have run that one at the top of the page?

Simple: They're the scum of the earth. Like all dimocraps.

P.S.
** If you're dumb enough to believe that Barack 'the drunken idiot' Obama Sr is his real father (he isn't, it's Frank Marshall Davis, Member; Communist Party USA)

The entire dimocrap scum party is just one lie after another

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

Again, the two pictures being compared in the OP....are different pictures.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

Again, the two pictures being compared in the OP....are different pictures.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

 

[Skylar]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

Again, the two pictures being compared in the OP....are different pictures.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

Those aren't the same photograph. They have different angles.

For your claim to be accurate, the photo that the NY Times used had to have Bush in it originally...with the NY Times cropping him out.

You've presented no evidence that this the case. Instead, you've shown us a completely different picture from a completely different angle.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Did they crop Jeb Bush out too?

lol

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

Hmmmm.....you seem unable to respond to the questions.

Here, try again:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

 

[Skylar]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

I don't think 'crop' means what Political Chic thinks it means.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

Those aren't the same photograph. They have different angles.

For your claim to be accurate, the photo that the NY Times used had to have Bush in it originally...with the NY Times cropping him out.

You've presented no evidence that this the case. Instead, you've shown us a completely different picture from a completely different angle.

The RWnuts have pulled their usual stunt. They've manufactured an entirely false premise and then attacked the Times based on that false premise.

It's what they do.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you trying to tell us it was an accident? If so, noone that has any sense will fall for it. They had a choice to post a photo also with Bush. They didn't.

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

Those aren't the same photograph. They have different angles.

For your claim to be accurate, the photo that the NY Times used had to have Bush in it originally...with the NY Times cropping him out.

You've presented no evidence that this the case. Instead, you've shown us a completely different picture from a completely different angle.

Hmmmm.....you seem unable to respond to the questions.

Here, try again:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

Hmmmm.....you seem unable to respond to the questions.

Here, try again:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Your questions are based on a false premise, so they are irrelevant.

 

[Skylar]

The RWnuts have pulled their usual stunt. They've manufactured an entirely false premise and then attacked the Times based on that false premise.

It's what they do.

Yeah, how can you crop Bush from a photo that he wasn't in?

Could someone explain that to me?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I'm saying you can't crop a person out of a photo if they weren't in the photo to begin with.

So for the claims of the OP to be valid, you have to show us that the original photo included GW. And the photo offered isn't the original photo.

Its a completely different picture.

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

I don't think 'crop' means what Political Chic thinks it means.

You know exactly what I mean and what the OP reveals, don't you, you liar.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The RWnuts have pulled their usual stunt. They've manufactured an entirely false premise and then attacked the Times based on that false premise.

It's what they do.

Yeah, how can you crop Bush from a photo that he wasn't in?

Could someone explain that to me?

Sure....just answer the questions below:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Let's gauge the extent of your veracity;

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Oh, so now it's gone from ONE photo cropped to two different photos taken on the same day.

lol, you're the second best poster on this forum for making Political C look stupid.

Here ya' go, NYLiar:



Same:
2. Similar in kind, quantity, or degree.
same - definition of same by The Free Dictionary



And, to review:

And here, a return performance at open mic night....the NYLiar!

His act includes only two tricks:

Trick #1....lies

Trick #2....obfuscation and changing the subject.


Today it's Trick #2 on display:

You don't crop a photo by using an entirely different photo. Why is that concept above your brain capacity?

Hmmmm.....you seem unable to respond to the questions.

Here, try again:

1. Were the two photos taken the same day?
2. Where the same objects photographed?
3. What the same occasion the subject of both photos?
4.Was there a political reason for cropping the members of the photos?
5. Are you a lying sack of sewage?


Hint: all five have the same correct response.

Your questions are based on a false premise, so they are irrelevant.

I would say you've been exposed as a lying sack of sewage....

....but that would be gilding the lily, wouldn't it.

 

[Pogo]

I love the way Al Sharpton's peeking out from behind O'bama's shoulder, going "please notice me".

What an attention whore.

Btw look at the background in both pics. There are a lot more people showing in the one that the NYT ran than in the one with Bush on the side. That prolly has more to do with the choice than anything. Looks like ten times the impact.

 

[rightwinger]

The picture looks better without Bush in it. He is on the other side of the divider

Maybe next time Bush will learn where to position himself when the cameras start snapping

 

[Skylar]

You know exactly what I mean and what the OP reveals, don't you, you liar.

So when the OP said 'NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo" they didn't actually mean that the NY Times crops George W. Bush from Selma March photo?

I don't think 'crop' means what you think it means. For example, how do you crop someone out of a photo that they aren't in?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You know exactly what I mean and what the OP reveals, don't you, you liar.

So when the OP said 'NY Times Crops Out George W. Bush from Selma March Photo" they didn't actually mean that the NY Times crops George W. BVush from Selma March photo?

I don't think 'crop' means what you think it means. For example, how do you crop someone out of a photo that they aren't in?

I have to teach you English as well as decorum????

1. 
   
2. Cropping refers to the removal of the outer parts of an image to improve framing, accentuate subject matter or change aspect ratio. Depending on the application, this may be performed on a physical photograph, artwork or film footage, or achieved digitally using image editing software.
3. Cropping (image) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cropping_(image)
   Wikipedia

Of course, here, it was for political reasons.


In your face!