Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hillary probing the elephant ? heh... no wait, sniper fire....OMG.
Birfers are the gift that just keeps on giving.
Proceed.
The Democratic Party thanks you for you efforts.
that's the big question. is it defined. wikipedia says no. consensus, as like global warming.The term is defined: read the Constitution.
well, i've always said, you should try and get out more.The best laugh of the day.
wrong. their job is to review lower (hear deliberate render) cases. the congress does not define or interpret the constitution. (in this country)The SC doesn't define, it interprets. It's up to Congress define, hopefully without ambiguity, so that the SC doesn't have to step in and interpret.
remember healthcare ? Marbury v. Madisonwrong. their job is to review lower cases. the congress does not define or interpret the constitution. (in this country)The SC doesn't define, it interprets. It's up to Congress define, hopefully without ambiguity, so that the SC doesn't have to step in and interpret.
What does review mean, but to interpret? If it didn't interpret the law or the Constitution, there'd be no need for the SC. As for defining, what is the promulgation of a law, but defining what's legal and what isn't? IMO, you need to put a little more thought into your posts.wrong. their job is to review lower (hear deliberate render) cases. the congress does not define or interpret the constitution. (in this country)The SC doesn't define, it interprets. It's up to Congress define, hopefully without ambiguity, so that the SC doesn't have to step in and interpret.
your understanding of the process is wrong. the congress legislates, not by fiat. they do not define the constitution.What does review mean, but to interpret? If it didn't interpret the law or the Constitution, there'd be no need for the SC. As for defining, what is the promulgation of a law, but defining what's legal and what isn't? IMO, you need to put a little more thought into your posts.wrong. their job is to review lower (hear deliberate render) cases. the congress does not define or interpret the constitution. (in this country)The SC doesn't define, it interprets. It's up to Congress define, hopefully without ambiguity, so that the SC doesn't have to step in and interpret.
well it's no snopes or factcheck, that's for real..Oh goody goody.
Yet another idiotic thread about Obama's birth certificate.
"I like the Daily Caller" pretty much sums it up.
When are these brainless yahoos gonna come up with something FACTUAL?
huffington, olberman.......brian williams...heh
You're playing with words. Legislation IS definition. The SC is the one that decides if the definition is correct. You're getting to much into your own head instead of learning what words actually mean.your understanding of the process is wrong. the congress legislates, not by fiat. they do not define the constitution. they can amend the constitution, that's quite different. we're talking about article two here.natural born has been evaded, i'll take justice thomas' word on that over yours. no offense.
thank god you're not the teacher here.You're playing with words. Legislation IS definition. The SC is the one that decides if the definition is correct. You're getting to much into your own head instead of learning what words actually mean.your understanding of the process is wrong. the congress legislates, not by fiat. they do not define the constitution. they can amend the constitution, that's quite different. we're talking about article two here.natural born has been evaded, i'll take justice thomas' word on that over yours. no offense.
I AM.thank god you're not the teacher here.You're playing with words. Legislation IS definition. The SC is the one that decides if the definition is correct. You're getting to much into your own head instead of learning what words actually mean.
you wish.. as far as i know jillian is the only constitutional lawyer here, but i was gone for awhile.I AM.thank god you're not the teacher here.You're playing with words. Legislation IS definition. The SC is the one that decides if the definition is correct. You're getting to much into your own head instead of learning what words actually mean.
