Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Obama's solution is that Americans must accept in thousands of un-vetted / inadequately vetted potential terrorists, despite ISIS vow to infiltrate the refugees and attack us like they have already done in France AND despite the attack that just happened right after Obama mocked valid citizen concerns, thereby potentially exposing ourselves to more terrorist attacks and dead Americans JUST to try to prove ISIS is not right?.
Except of course- that is just your lie- isn't it?
Obama has not proposed- and no one but a liar or an idiot would suggest- that his proposal to accept Syrian refugees fleeing ISIS will stop ISIS.
The Syrian refugees did not attack France- it was French and Belgian citizens that attacked France- French and Belgian citizens who were also Islamic extremists/terrorists/murderous thugs.
French and Belgian citizens who could have flown to the United States without any vetting at all.
Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?
What has been the national origin of those Islamic Terrorists who have attacked the United States?
9/11-- Saudi Arabia
Boston Bombing- Chechnya
San Bernadino- Pakistan
And we have been accepting refugees from Iraq and Afghanistan for years and years....but suddenly you are scared of Syrian refugees
So your solution is preventing those fleeing from ISIS from coming here? Refugees who take on average 1.5 to 2 years of processing to get here- when they instead could just hop on a plane to Canada and then slip across our unguarded northern border with no vetting at all?
Perhaps you think Obama should be bombing the Syrian refugees that flee ISIS to prevent them from coming here....
I don't, and I also don't know who the radicals look like. It's not like embedding terrorists in a group has never been done before right? you know this right? Please tell me you know this.
No you didn't. You claimed you made a "libturd" look dumb. How?I told you alreadyWell, then. I have no clue whatsoever what point you're trying to make.yepNo, you didn't. You realize the A bombs were after VE day, right?well I'm just saying, his comment was a stupid one. I proved why. Talk to your libturd friend.No shit, sherlock.
see I'd actually formulate a plan and be strategic. It is what a military leader would do. So you ranting and raving is just that, ranting and raving.well we bombed Japan and beat the Germans.We haven't. Japan had to be toppled causing millions of fatalities no matter how it was done. The A-bomb saved Japanese lives, because these guys would fight to their own death so long as the Emperor told them to.
You are promoting killing all Muslims, because unlike Japan where the war was over when the Emperor surrendered, there would be no party to surrender. Terrorism would never end until every Muslim was dead.
You are promoting genocide on a scale far above what has ever been seen on this earth.
But of course we both know what you're really doing is trolling.
How long have we been in Iraq? How long in Afghanistan? What now about Syria, Yemen, Nigeria, Africa, and other areas. When will it end? Is it your solution to continue to fight radical Islam for two thousand years? That's not my idea of winning.
Your 'solution' would be like us bombing China in order to defeat Japan.
But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Because Japan and Germany declared war on the United States.
As has ISIS.
I have no problem with bombing ISIS.
You want to bomb every Muslim in the world- again using an analogy- you would be advocating bombing German-Americans in the United States during WW2 because Hitler declared war against us.
Then why are you bitching about it?
but none of those others would be coming into this country unvetted. you keep bypassing that point.Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Obama's solution is that Americans must accept in thousands of un-vetted / inadequately vetted potential terrorists, despite ISIS vow to infiltrate the refugees and attack us like they have already done in France AND despite the attack that just happened right after Obama mocked valid citizen concerns, thereby potentially exposing ourselves to more terrorist attacks and dead Americans JUST to try to prove ISIS is not right?.
Except of course- that is just your lie- isn't it?
Obama has not proposed- and no one but a liar or an idiot would suggest- that his proposal to accept Syrian refugees fleeing ISIS will stop ISIS.
The Syrian refugees did not attack France- it was French and Belgian citizens that attacked France- French and Belgian citizens who were also Islamic extremists/terrorists/murderous thugs.
French and Belgian citizens who could have flown to the United States without any vetting at all.
Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?
What has been the national origin of those Islamic Terrorists who have attacked the United States?
9/11-- Saudi Arabia
Boston Bombing- Chechnya
San Bernadino- Pakistan
And we have been accepting refugees from Iraq and Afghanistan for years and years....but suddenly you are scared of Syrian refugees
So your solution is preventing those fleeing from ISIS from coming here? Refugees who take on average 1.5 to 2 years of processing to get here- when they instead could just hop on a plane to Canada and then slip across our unguarded northern border with no vetting at all?
Perhaps you think Obama should be bombing the Syrian refugees that flee ISIS to prevent them from coming here....
I don't, and I also don't know who the radicals look like. It's not like embedding terrorists in a group has never been done before right? you know this right? Please tell me you know this.
Absolutely it is possible that terrorist could be embedded within the Syrian refugees.
Or within a German student exchange program to the United States.
Unless you want to prevent every tourist and student and businessman AND refugee from coming to the United States- you cannot be certain you are excluding ever potential 'embedded terrorist'.
I know there are people who are so terrified now that that is what they do want.
When did conservative Americans become such cowards?
when did I say nuclear? post up that comment for me.see I'd actually formulate a plan and be strategic. It is what a military leader would do. So you ranting and raving is just that, ranting and raving.well we bombed Japan and beat the Germans.How long have we been in Iraq? How long in Afghanistan? What now about Syria, Yemen, Nigeria, Africa, and other areas. When will it end? Is it your solution to continue to fight radical Islam for two thousand years? That's not my idea of winning.
Your 'solution' would be like us bombing China in order to defeat Japan.
But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Because Japan and Germany declared war on the United States.
As has ISIS.
I have no problem with bombing ISIS.
You want to bomb every Muslim in the world- again using an analogy- you would be advocating bombing German-Americans in the United States during WW2 because Hitler declared war against us.
So far your 'strategic plan' is dropping nuclear bombs on Muslims- and that is ranting and raving.
I'm sorry, it wasn't your conversation.No you didn't. You claimed you made a "libturd" look dumb. How?I told you alreadyWell, then. I have no clue whatsoever what point you're trying to make.yepNo, you didn't. You realize the A bombs were after VE day, right?well I'm just saying, his comment was a stupid one. I proved why. Talk to your libturd friend.
You were agreeing with human being who said nuclear attack is the only "cure" for Islam.when did I say nuclear? post up that comment for me.see I'd actually formulate a plan and be strategic. It is what a military leader would do. So you ranting and raving is just that, ranting and raving.well we bombed Japan and beat the Germans.Your 'solution' would be like us bombing China in order to defeat Japan.
But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Because Japan and Germany declared war on the United States.
As has ISIS.
I have no problem with bombing ISIS.
You want to bomb every Muslim in the world- again using an analogy- you would be advocating bombing German-Americans in the United States during WW2 because Hitler declared war against us.
So far your 'strategic plan' is dropping nuclear bombs on Muslims- and that is ranting and raving.
It wasn't a private chat either. And it actually was my conversation with human being that you got involved in.I'm sorry, it wasn't your conversation.No you didn't. You claimed you made a "libturd" look dumb. How?I told you alreadyWell, then. I have no clue whatsoever what point you're trying to make.yepNo, you didn't. You realize the A bombs were after VE day, right?
Then why are you bitching about it?
Can't you read?
"Obama's personal drone program is both illegal and hypocritical. While declaring everyone has a right to due process - pointing to the terrorists in Gitmo - he simultaneously releases them on his own without allowing them to be given their day in court AND orders the assassination of others without giving them their day in court, instead killing them based on his say-so."
but you weren't the beneficiary of the comment. So, it wasn't your conversation.It wasn't a private chat either. And it actually was my conversation with human being that you got involved in.I'm sorry, it wasn't your conversation.No you didn't. You claimed you made a "libturd" look dumb. How?I told you alreadyWell, then. I have no clue whatsoever what point you're trying to make.
but none of those others would be coming into this country unvetted. you keep bypassing that point.Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Obama's solution is that Americans must accept in thousands of un-vetted / inadequately vetted potential terrorists, despite ISIS vow to infiltrate the refugees and attack us like they have already done in France AND despite the attack that just happened right after Obama mocked valid citizen concerns, thereby potentially exposing ourselves to more terrorist attacks and dead Americans JUST to try to prove ISIS is not right?.
Except of course- that is just your lie- isn't it?
Obama has not proposed- and no one but a liar or an idiot would suggest- that his proposal to accept Syrian refugees fleeing ISIS will stop ISIS.
The Syrian refugees did not attack France- it was French and Belgian citizens that attacked France- French and Belgian citizens who were also Islamic extremists/terrorists/murderous thugs.
French and Belgian citizens who could have flown to the United States without any vetting at all.
Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?
What has been the national origin of those Islamic Terrorists who have attacked the United States?
9/11-- Saudi Arabia
Boston Bombing- Chechnya
San Bernadino- Pakistan
And we have been accepting refugees from Iraq and Afghanistan for years and years....but suddenly you are scared of Syrian refugees
So your solution is preventing those fleeing from ISIS from coming here? Refugees who take on average 1.5 to 2 years of processing to get here- when they instead could just hop on a plane to Canada and then slip across our unguarded northern border with no vetting at all?
Perhaps you think Obama should be bombing the Syrian refugees that flee ISIS to prevent them from coming here....
I don't, and I also don't know who the radicals look like. It's not like embedding terrorists in a group has never been done before right? you know this right? Please tell me you know this.
Absolutely it is possible that terrorist could be embedded within the Syrian refugees.
Or within a German student exchange program to the United States.
Unless you want to prevent every tourist and student and businessman AND refugee from coming to the United States- you cannot be certain you are excluding ever potential 'embedded terrorist'.
I know there are people who are so terrified now that that is what they do want.
When did conservative Americans become such cowards?
.
Well, then. We'll just mark you down as incoherent and move on.but you weren't the beneficiary of the comment. So, it wasn't your conversation.It wasn't a private chat either. And it actually was my conversation with human being that you got involved in.I'm sorry, it wasn't your conversation.No you didn't. You claimed you made a "libturd" look dumb. How?I told you alreadyWell, then. I have no clue whatsoever what point you're trying to make.
when did I say nuclear? post up that comment for me.see I'd actually formulate a plan and be strategic. It is what a military leader would do. So you ranting and raving is just that, ranting and raving.well we bombed Japan and beat the Germans.Your 'solution' would be like us bombing China in order to defeat Japan.
But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
Because Japan and Germany declared war on the United States.
As has ISIS.
I have no problem with bombing ISIS.
You want to bomb every Muslim in the world- again using an analogy- you would be advocating bombing German-Americans in the United States during WW2 because Hitler declared war against us.
So far your 'strategic plan' is dropping nuclear bombs on Muslims- and that is ranting and raving.
again, yes they would need a visa to come and a passport. When did libturds decide it wasn't our country any longer.but none of those others would be coming into this country unvetted. you keep bypassing that point.Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?Obama's solution is that Americans must accept in thousands of un-vetted / inadequately vetted potential terrorists, despite ISIS vow to infiltrate the refugees and attack us like they have already done in France AND despite the attack that just happened right after Obama mocked valid citizen concerns, thereby potentially exposing ourselves to more terrorist attacks and dead Americans JUST to try to prove ISIS is not right?.
Except of course- that is just your lie- isn't it?
Obama has not proposed- and no one but a liar or an idiot would suggest- that his proposal to accept Syrian refugees fleeing ISIS will stop ISIS.
The Syrian refugees did not attack France- it was French and Belgian citizens that attacked France- French and Belgian citizens who were also Islamic extremists/terrorists/murderous thugs.
French and Belgian citizens who could have flown to the United States without any vetting at all.
Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?
What has been the national origin of those Islamic Terrorists who have attacked the United States?
9/11-- Saudi Arabia
Boston Bombing- Chechnya
San Bernadino- Pakistan
And we have been accepting refugees from Iraq and Afghanistan for years and years....but suddenly you are scared of Syrian refugees
So your solution is preventing those fleeing from ISIS from coming here? Refugees who take on average 1.5 to 2 years of processing to get here- when they instead could just hop on a plane to Canada and then slip across our unguarded northern border with no vetting at all?
Perhaps you think Obama should be bombing the Syrian refugees that flee ISIS to prevent them from coming here....
I don't, and I also don't know who the radicals look like. It's not like embedding terrorists in a group has never been done before right? you know this right? Please tell me you know this.
Absolutely it is possible that terrorist could be embedded within the Syrian refugees.
Or within a German student exchange program to the United States.
Unless you want to prevent every tourist and student and businessman AND refugee from coming to the United States- you cannot be certain you are excluding ever potential 'embedded terrorist'.
I know there are people who are so terrified now that that is what they do want.
When did conservative Americans become such cowards?
.
All of those would be unvetted- unlike refugees.
The German exchange student wouldn't even need a visa to come here, nor would the Belgian businessman.
So again- when did conservative Americans become such cowards?
byeWell, then. We'll just mark you down as incoherent and move on.but you weren't the beneficiary of the comment. So, it wasn't your conversation.It wasn't a private chat either. And it actually was my conversation with human being that you got involved in.I'm sorry, it wasn't your conversation.No you didn't. You claimed you made a "libturd" look dumb. How?I told you already
I explained that already, keep up if you want to discuss.when did I say nuclear? post up that comment for me.see I'd actually formulate a plan and be strategic. It is what a military leader would do. So you ranting and raving is just that, ranting and raving.well we bombed Japan and beat the Germans.
Because Japan and Germany declared war on the United States.
As has ISIS.
I have no problem with bombing ISIS.
You want to bomb every Muslim in the world- again using an analogy- you would be advocating bombing German-Americans in the United States during WW2 because Hitler declared war against us.
So far your 'strategic plan' is dropping nuclear bombs on Muslims- and that is ranting and raving.
Your comment: "well we bombed Japan and beat the Germans"- in reply to a proposal by someone else to drop nuclear bombs on Muslims.
If that is not your solution- my apologies.
What is your 'solution'?
again, yes they would need a visa to come. .but none of those others would be coming into this country unvetted. you keep bypassing that point.Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?Except of course- that is just your lie- isn't it?
Obama has not proposed- and no one but a liar or an idiot would suggest- that his proposal to accept Syrian refugees fleeing ISIS will stop ISIS.
The Syrian refugees did not attack France- it was French and Belgian citizens that attacked France- French and Belgian citizens who were also Islamic extremists/terrorists/murderous thugs.
French and Belgian citizens who could have flown to the United States without any vetting at all.
Why do you believe that these Syrian refugees are the real threat to the United States?
What has been the national origin of those Islamic Terrorists who have attacked the United States?
9/11-- Saudi Arabia
Boston Bombing- Chechnya
San Bernadino- Pakistan
And we have been accepting refugees from Iraq and Afghanistan for years and years....but suddenly you are scared of Syrian refugees
So your solution is preventing those fleeing from ISIS from coming here? Refugees who take on average 1.5 to 2 years of processing to get here- when they instead could just hop on a plane to Canada and then slip across our unguarded northern border with no vetting at all?
Perhaps you think Obama should be bombing the Syrian refugees that flee ISIS to prevent them from coming here....
I don't, and I also don't know who the radicals look like. It's not like embedding terrorists in a group has never been done before right? you know this right? Please tell me you know this.
Absolutely it is possible that terrorist could be embedded within the Syrian refugees.
Or within a German student exchange program to the United States.
Unless you want to prevent every tourist and student and businessman AND refugee from coming to the United States- you cannot be certain you are excluding ever potential 'embedded terrorist'.
I know there are people who are so terrified now that that is what they do want.
When did conservative Americans become such cowards?
.
All of those would be unvetted- unlike refugees.
The German exchange student wouldn't even need a visa to come here, nor would the Belgian businessman.
So again- when did conservative Americans become such cowards?
If you have nothing to hide and did nothing wrong why would you be worried...or you pointing out hos nations should be worried because with Obama, whether you have done something or not, he might attack yo ass?!Even if it weren't true, only a moron would not be concern when US warship are approaching with the aim of launch a few cruise missiles at you. You think it was an accident that Kerry offered them a way out, or that they accepted?
Kerry offered Syria a way out? So you are claiming Assad finally backed down and adhered to Obama's Red Line? Claiming now that somehow Obama's Red line WORKED?!
We haven't. Japan had to be toppled causing millions of fatalities no matter how it was done. The A-bomb saved Japanese lives, because these guys would fight to their own death so long as the Emperor told them to.A nuclear extermination campaign is not merely going to war, it is committing a massive war crime that would make the Holocaust look like a childish indiscretion. There are 150 million Muslims in Iraq, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Lebanon alone. I suppose you want them all dead plus the 150 million in Indonesia and 200 million in Afghanistan and Pakistan. 6 million Jews were mudered in the Holocaust.Hillary claims to be a veteran. A combat veteran at that. You are absolutely correct though. Unlike the pin-prick little war Obama is engaged in, it is my belief if you must go to war, then go forth to win in the shortest time possible.
It's not like we haven't done it before.
You are promoting killing all Muslims, because unlike Japan where the war was over when the Emperor surrendered, there would be no party to surrender. Terrorism would never end until every Muslim was dead.
You are promoting genocide on a scale far above what has ever been seen on this earth.
But of course we both know what you're really doing is trolling.
How long have we been in Iraq? How long in Afghanistan? What now about Syria, Yemen, Nigeria, Africa, and other areas. When will it end? Is it your solution to continue to fight radical Islam for two thousand years? That's not my idea of winning.
Your 'solution' would be like us bombing China in order to defeat Japan.
But- your "solution" would actually convince Muslims all around the world that ISIS was actually correct.
