Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That the best you got in your bag of anti-American lies to spew?"Mission Accomplished"
you stupid fucking libertards still do not understand, "Mission Accomplished" was for the ship and what it's role was.
............
You've long since lost your gag reflex, haven't you?
Have some of you forgotten that we LOST in Vietnam?
Take it to congress and get back to us.Europe has traditionally spent little on military, using the bulk of its' resources for social services. Sorta like the left here.Why are we still in Germany, Japan, Korea....etc?
Because of special interests that want our tax money.
Nope, we left troops to prevent anyone taking advantage of the power vacuum
Where's the power vaccuum in Europe now if we leave? Can't Europe fill it?
Which is exactly why we shouldn't be there in any capacity that they could muster themselves.
Obama declared Iraq a stable and secure Democracy.Have some of you forgotten that we LOST in Vietnam?
lol, if winning in Vietnam was VITAL to our interests, and we LOST, why haven't we been destroyed, or severely harmed,
by the loss of those imaginary vital interests?
We lost in Vietnam and the consequences were of no importance whatsoever. We lost 58,000 people for 'vital interests' that didn't exist...
...no different than Iraq. 4500 people lost for 'vital interests' that didn't exist.
The math for what? Is this another 45% is a majority parable?Why are we still in Germany, Japan, Korea....etc?We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs
Had it won?
So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?
That's been a good question for 50 years...
From 1939 to 1945 US armed forces grew from 350,000 to more than 12 million....
From Nov 1943 to Nov 1945, US non farm payrolls SHRANK from roughly 43 to 39 million......
That's the math....
Historians would be laughing hysterically at your comment.Iraq was won, then Obama switched sides
Iraqnam was so "won" that the Iraqnamese wanted us out....
Bush's big mistake was leaving the deal openended for his successor to make his own arrangements with the Iraqis. Nobody knew that Obama would side with Islamic Jihad, withdraw all US troops and hand Iraq, Syria and Libya over to his brothers in Jihad
Bush was unable to negotiate a deal is the point.
Bush failed as a negotiator.
Well, that proves you can post a picture.The fact that you think an open source is automatically credible as long as it forwards an agenda is what is funny. Especially since you think the burden should shift to the skeptic using a credible source. You guys are a hoot.Wikipedia? LOLWas the word salad of a post supposed to present some kind of argument or point? Because the point seems to be you dont have a fucking clue what you're babbling about.
Bonus Army - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
What's not factual in the link?
Obama declared Iraq a stable and secure Democracy.Have some of you forgotten that we LOST in Vietnam?
lol, if winning in Vietnam was VITAL to our interests, and we LOST, why haven't we been destroyed, or severely harmed,
by the loss of those imaginary vital interests?
We lost in Vietnam and the consequences were of no importance whatsoever. We lost 58,000 people for 'vital interests' that didn't exist...
...no different than Iraq. 4500 people lost for 'vital interests' that didn't exist.
Mission Accomplished.
How's that working out?Then Iraq's fight with ISIS is Iraq's responsibility.
Take it to congress and get back to us.Europe has traditionally spent little on military, using the bulk of its' resources for social services. Sorta like the left here.Because of special interests that want our tax money.
Nope, we left troops to prevent anyone taking advantage of the power vacuum
Where's the power vaccuum in Europe now if we leave? Can't Europe fill it?
Which is exactly why we shouldn't be there in any capacity that they could muster themselves.
How's that working out?Then Iraq's fight with ISIS is Iraq's responsibility.
We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs
Had it won?
So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?
Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed
Obama declared Iraq a stable and secure Democracy.Have some of you forgotten that we LOST in Vietnam?
lol, if winning in Vietnam was VITAL to our interests, and we LOST, why haven't we been destroyed, or severely harmed,
by the loss of those imaginary vital interests?
We lost in Vietnam and the consequences were of no importance whatsoever. We lost 58,000 people for 'vital interests' that didn't exist...
...no different than Iraq. 4500 people lost for 'vital interests' that didn't exist.
Mission Accomplished.
Then Iraq's fight with ISIS is Iraq's responsibility.
Kurds have been begging Obama for arms starting 6 years ago. To fight this new growing group that calls themselves ISIS.Obama declared Iraq a stable and secure Democracy.Have some of you forgotten that we LOST in Vietnam?
lol, if winning in Vietnam was VITAL to our interests, and we LOST, why haven't we been destroyed, or severely harmed,
by the loss of those imaginary vital interests?
We lost in Vietnam and the consequences were of no importance whatsoever. We lost 58,000 people for 'vital interests' that didn't exist...
...no different than Iraq. 4500 people lost for 'vital interests' that didn't exist.
Mission Accomplished.
Then Iraq's fight with ISIS is Iraq's responsibility.
How's that working out?Then Iraq's fight with ISIS is Iraq's responsibility.
Who cares? Bush created the mess in Iraq for no good reason.
Have some of you forgotten that we LOST in Vietnam?
NO!! i have not forgotten how LBJ and McNamara fucked us who wanted to fight that war like all previous wars and win.., e.g., WWII !!
We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs
Had it won?
So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?
Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed
I am not sure Vietnam was ever winnable. I am thinking the best we could have done is maintain the Status Quo, which the south was not able to do with out the US. Nixon tried to bomb them into submission but the MSM in America would have none of it.
Vietnam was winnable. But pansy politicians kept it from happening.We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs
Had it won?
So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?
Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed
I am not sure Vietnam was ever winnable. I am thinking the best we could have done is maintain the Status Quo, which the south was not able to do with out the US. Nixon tried to bomb them into submission but the MSM in America would have none of it.
Vietnam was winnable. But pansy politicians kept it from happening.We had Iraq won...then Obungles fumbled it away, we could have won Vietnam but politics prevented it, the two common denominators? Democrat CINCs
Had it won?
So why would we have needed to stay 10 years after "Mission Accomplished"?
Germany, Japan ring a bell? You're dismissed
I am not sure Vietnam was ever winnable. I am thinking the best we could have done is maintain the Status Quo, which the south was not able to do with out the US. Nixon tried to bomb them into submission but the MSM in America would have none of it.
