The T
George S. Patton Party
- May 24, 2009
- 48,111
- 5,582
One of the resident idiots...barks.Obama Is Presiding Over The Fastest 6 Month Drop In Unemployment Since 1984
Ya..but he is still blaaaaaack.
Moron.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of the resident idiots...barks.Obama Is Presiding Over The Fastest 6 Month Drop In Unemployment Since 1984
Ya..but he is still blaaaaaack.
And he was handed the fasted decline in employment in the history of the United States.
Funny, Republicans created one and tried to stop the other.
Is anything ever Obama's fault?
When are you punks ever going to take credit for your liberal policies?
Yeah.... I know.... never right?
Sure. As soon as you assholes admit that Reaganomics was the greatest con job ever pulled on the American taxpayer and that cutting taxes on the rich was a horrible idea.
You remember David Stockman, don't you? He was REAGAN'S BUDGET DIRECTOR. What did he say about it?
Is anything ever Obama's fault?
When are you punks ever going to take credit for your liberal policies?
Yeah.... I know.... never right?
Sure. As soon as you assholes admit that Reaganomics was the greatest con job ever pulled on the American taxpayer and that cutting taxes on the rich was a horrible idea.
You remember David Stockman, don't you? He was REAGAN'S BUDGET DIRECTOR. What did he say about it?
I know what he said, the question is, why is it when comments are posted by obamas econ. advisers they never count?
and Il'l take his con job over obamas con job any day of the week.
Sure. As soon as you assholes admit that Reaganomics was the greatest con job ever pulled on the American taxpayer and that cutting taxes on the rich was a horrible idea.
You remember David Stockman, don't you? He was REAGAN'S BUDGET DIRECTOR. What did he say about it?
I know what he said, the question is, why is it when comments are posted by obamas econ. advisers they never count?
and Il'l take his con job over obamas con job any day of the week.
Then you're either enormously wealthy or a fool to still think that Reaganomics works.
The GOP is saying that yeah.......okay.........we're starting to show a bit of a recovery, but it's Obama's policies that are slowing it down, and if we followed their policies, we'd be recovering faster.
But it was their policies that they enacted in 2003 that caused the meltdown of 2008.
Incidentally, the stock market closed at almost 13,000 the other day.
How are his policies bad again?
According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
^Yep.According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
^Yep.According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
Obamabots apparently love being lied to.
According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
^Yep.According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
The GOP is saying that yeah.......okay.........we're starting to show a bit of a recovery, but it's Obama's policies that are slowing it down, and if we followed their policies, we'd be recovering faster.
But it was their policies that they enacted in 2003 that caused the meltdown of 2008.
Incidentally, the stock market closed at almost 13,000 the other day.
How are his policies bad again?
The Republicans are running out of ways to deny we're in a recovery, and when they reach the end of that rope, mark my words,
they'll go to Plan B and start trying to take credit for it (citing, for example, the extension of the Bush tax cuts).
Guaranteed.
According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
U-6 counts those people and it's at a 36 month low.
Yes it is as the workforce is shrinking.^Yep.According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
It's entirely asinine. I'd love for unemployment to be on the decline but in reality, according to the current logic, it's actually going up.
According to the current equation, the calculus is incredibly flawed. In essence, we could have 100 million who have fallen off government ledgers and have 3 percent unemployment. It's an insult to those who do use their brain to think.
Obamabots apparently love being lied to.
And he was handed the fasted decline in employment in the history of the United States.
Funny, Republicans created one and tried to stop the other.
Sure. As soon as you assholes admit that Reaganomics was the greatest con job ever pulled on the American taxpayer and that cutting taxes on the rich was a horrible idea.
You remember David Stockman, don't you? He was REAGAN'S BUDGET DIRECTOR. What did he say about it?
I know what he said, the question is, why is it when comments are posted by obamas econ. advisers they never count?
and Il'l take his con job over obamas con job any day of the week.
Then you're either enormously wealthy or a fool to still think that Reaganomics works.
Trickle-down economics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaSure. As soon as you assholes admit that Reaganomics was the greatest con job ever pulled on the American taxpayer and that cutting taxes on the rich was a horrible idea.
You remember David Stockman, don't you? He was REAGAN'S BUDGET DIRECTOR. What did he say about it?
I know what he said, the question is, why is it when comments are posted by obamas econ. advisers they never count?
and Il'l take his con job over obamas con job any day of the week.
Then you're either enormously wealthy or a fool to still think that Reaganomics works.
The economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted that "trickle-down economics" had been tried before in the United States in the 1890s under the name "horse and sparrow theory." He wrote, "Mr. David Stockman has said that supply-side economics was merely a cover for the trickle-down approach to economic policywhat an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: 'If you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.'" Galbraith claimed that the horse and sparrow theory was partly to blame for the Panic of 1896.