"absolutely not evidence" ? It's in every Vietnam history book printed. Common accepted knowledge that was discussed when we were in Vietnam. "Where exactly, did Minh claim he was inspire by Jefferson?", in a letter he wrote to President Truman, the same one he discussed with President Obama, which Obama mentioned, which started this whole debate.
If I pick up a history book from the USSR it will talk about how the economy was so bad in the US that old people had to eat cat food, what's your point?
I didn't say there is no evidence, I asked a specific poster what she was basing her assessment of the evidence on.
The point is that for over 65 years the FACT that Ho Chi Minh claimed he was inspired to form an independent Vietnam by the American Revolution and the founding fathers has been accepted without question or debate until the current leader of Vietnam brought this subject up to the current President of the United States by referencing an actual letter written by Ho to President Truman. When the current President mentioned this portion of his meeting with the leader of Vietnam to the press, which he was obligated to do, it suddenly became a debate. A nonsense debate. It's an argument and debate about a non issue. It's a prime example of how the the folks who make a living out of "riling up the base" make a living. They get attention and publicity and that is why they get paid for speaking engagements and quest appearances on TV news programs. The sad part is that it makes the whole conservative movement look stupid and like a bunch of suckers. Instead of pressing forward with issue's that can be won and obtained, time is wasted on this kind of dumb stuff.
Last edited: