BlindBoo
Diamond Member
- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,638
- 16,608
- 2,180
Do democrats think that Carter ended the war, or Ford?
Actually, it was the North Vietnamese that ended the war and unified Vietnam. Happened under Ford.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do democrats think that Carter ended the war, or Ford?
What attempt?
What part of the Vietnam war did you miss?
Oh yeah..the Nixon part.
Nixon was bringing troops out in early 1972 as a result of the Nixon Doctrine and the war ended in 1973 under Nixon. Perhaps you are thinking of another president.
Nixon was a traitor.
How Richard Nixon Sabotaged 1968 Vietnam Peace Talks to Get Elected President
ACA Section I Title 1 Sec 1004. The effective dates are fixed in the law. The president has no authority to alter laws passed by Congress.Administering a law is not synonymous with breaking it.
Obama has committed no illegal acts.
You need to sit down and shut up.
The ACA set out black and white deadlines for mandates etc. Nothing authorized the president to alter those deadlines. Ergo his acts are illegal.
According to whom? Some Fox News Pundits? Rush Limbaugh?
You have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
The president is part of the executive branch. That means he executes laws. He can execute them as he sees fit.
If he violated the law, as you falsely claim, than some entity would have already taken him to court. A judge would have stopped his execution of the law.
Hasn't happened.
Dream on.
Nixon was bringing troops out in early 1972 as a result of the Nixon Doctrine and the war ended in 1973 under Nixon. Perhaps you are thinking of another president.
Nixon was a traitor.
How Richard Nixon Sabotaged 1968 Vietnam Peace Talks to Get Elected President
So, Nixon was a traitor, because he lied about a minor league, petty and inconsequential burglary, but Obama is a saint, because all he did was lying repeatedly and compelling his foolish acolytes in the Senate and the House to lie on his behalf, in order to steal an election.
Speaks volumes of your morality and values.
Republicans have been looking for a retaliatory impeachment for 40 years
Gee I think most Republicans would have voted to impeach Nixon.
Fail.
More truthiness?
6 of the Committee's 17 Republicans joined all 21 Democrats in voting for the article.....
The History Place - Impeachment: Richard Nixon
But don't let things like facts stop your "Truthiness" now.
Yeah, impeachment and removal couldnt happen without strong GOP support. Which there was.That revelation resulted in a complete collapse of support for Nixon in Congress. On Friday, August 9, Nixon resigned the presidency and avoided the likely prospect of losing the impeachment vote in the full House and a subsequent trial in the Senate.
Gee I think most Republicans would have voted to impeach Nixon.
Fail.
More truthiness?
6 of the Committee's 17 Republicans joined all 21 Democrats in voting for the article.....
The History Place - Impeachment: Richard Nixon
But don't let things like facts stop your "Truthiness" now.
Oh gosh a little knowledge is a stupid thing.
Yeah, impeachment and removal couldnt happen without strong GOP support. Which there was.That revelation resulted in a complete collapse of support for Nixon in Congress. On Friday, August 9, Nixon resigned the presidency and avoided the likely prospect of losing the impeachment vote in the full House and a subsequent trial in the Senate.
ACA Section I Title 1 Sec 1004. The effective dates are fixed in the law. The president has no authority to alter laws passed by Congress.The ACA set out black and white deadlines for mandates etc. Nothing authorized the president to alter those deadlines. Ergo his acts are illegal.
According to whom? Some Fox News Pundits? Rush Limbaugh?
You have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
The president is part of the executive branch. That means he executes laws. He can execute them as he sees fit.
If he violated the law, as you falsely claim, than some entity would have already taken him to court. A judge would have stopped his execution of the law.
Hasn't happened.
Dream on.
In 1946, legislators passed the Administrative Procedures Act, which governs the way that regulatory agencies carry out legislation. That law both gives agencies discretion in setting up laws, but holds them accountable for carrying out Congresss intentions.
Under the Administrative Procedure Act precedent, the courts can compel agencies that have been unreasonably delayed, says Simon Lazarus, a senior counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Center. Those tend to involve delays that have gone on for years.
Courts have frequently grappled with issues of what counts as an unreasonable delay and, as many experts will tell you, they still havent set a bright line between executive discretion and disobedience.
Still, there is precedent that gives us some guidance into what is, and is not, appropriate.
In Chevron v. NRDC, a 1984 Supreme Court case, the justices granted regulatory authority when it comes to filling in any ambiguous gaps in a law. The idea there was that the agency has the experts, and it also makes the executive branch electorally accountable, Bagley says. Youd want the President to be making the tough calls.
Another case decided in the District of Columbia circuit court that same year provided additional guidance on what standards the courts should look to, in determining whether a delay was unreasonable. In that case, Telecommunications Research and Action Center v. FCC, the judges outlined a six-pronged test to understand delays that extended beyond statutory deadlines.
It stated that delays that might be reasonable in the sphere of economic regulation are less tolerable when human health and welfare are at stake and said the court should also take into account where Congress has provided a timetable or other indication of the speed with which it expects the agency to proceed in enabling statute.
The White House keeps changing Obamacare. Is that legal?
According to whom? Some Fox News Pundits? Rush Limbaugh?
You have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
The president is part of the executive branch. That means he executes laws. He can execute them as he sees fit.
If he violated the law, as you falsely claim, than some entity would have already taken him to court. A judge would have stopped his execution of the law.
Hasn't happened.
Dream on.
Lying about Benghazi, IRS, NSA, Obamacare, and delaying Obamacare so he could get reelected are all illegal acts. He should go to prison, and you are a dumbass!
K..
Lets talk about this stuff.
Benghazi - The CIA was holding prisoners in the consulate and had set up a station there in violation of international law. Do you want that stopped?
NSA - Had it's powers broadened and expanded by the Patriot Act. Would you like that repealed?
Obamacare - Passed the two houses, certified by the Supreme Court and Survived close to 50 attempts to repeal it. There have been some modifications caused by Insurance Company Tom Foolery and Republican opposition. What was your beef again?
IRS - It was found that the Tea Party PAC groups were in violation of the law, yet were allowed to exist anyway. The Law, which completely prohibits PACs from engaging in political activity does not comport with IRS rules. Should the law be enforced?
Ball's in your court Birdy.
Lying about Benghazi, IRS, NSA, Obamacare, and delaying Obamacare so he could get reelected are all illegal acts. He should go to prison, and you are a dumbass!
K..
Lets talk about this stuff.
Benghazi - The CIA was holding prisoners in the consulate and had set up a station there in violation of international law. Do you want that stopped?
NSA - Had it's powers broadened and expanded by the Patriot Act. Would you like that repealed?
Obamacare - Passed the two houses, certified by the Supreme Court and Survived close to 50 attempts to repeal it. There have been some modifications caused by Insurance Company Tom Foolery and Republican opposition. What was your beef again?
IRS - It was found that the Tea Party PAC groups were in violation of the law, yet were allowed to exist anyway. The Law, which completely prohibits PACs from engaging in political activity does not comport with IRS rules. Should the law be enforced?
Ball's in your court Birdy.
That [bird]dog won't hunt.
According to whom? Some Fox News Pundits? Rush Limbaugh?
You have no idea what you are talking about, as usual.
The president is part of the executive branch. That means he executes laws. He can execute them as he sees fit.
If he violated the law, as you falsely claim, than some entity would have already taken him to court. A judge would have stopped his execution of the law.
Hasn't happened.
Dream on.
Lying about Benghazi, IRS, NSA, Obamacare, and delaying Obamacare so he could get reelected are all illegal acts. He should go to prison, and you are a dumbass!
K..
Lets talk about this stuff.
Benghazi - The CIA was holding prisoners in the consulate and had set up a station there in violation of international law. Do you want that stopped?
NSA - Had it's powers broadened and expanded by the Patriot Act. Would you like that repealed?
Obamacare - Passed the two houses, certified by the Supreme Court and Survived close to 50 attempts to repeal it. There have been some modifications caused by Insurance Company Tom Foolery and Republican opposition. What was your beef again?
IRS - It was found that the Tea Party PAC groups were in violation of the law, yet were allowed to exist anyway. The Law, which completely prohibits PACs from engaging in political activity does not comport with IRS rules. Should the law be enforced?
Ball's in your court Birdy.
More truthiness?
6 of the Committee's 17 Republicans joined all 21 Democrats in voting for the article.....
The History Place - Impeachment: Richard Nixon
But don't let things like facts stop your "Truthiness" now.
Oh gosh a little knowledge is a stupid thing.
Yeah, impeachment and removal couldnt happen without strong GOP support. Which there was.That revelation resulted in a complete collapse of support for Nixon in Congress. On Friday, August 9, Nixon resigned the presidency and avoided the likely prospect of losing the impeachment vote in the full House and a subsequent trial in the Senate.
6 out of 17 is 35%. Not really strong, but certainly enough to get Tricky Dick to resign.
Lying about Benghazi, IRS, NSA, Obamacare, and delaying Obamacare so he could get reelected are all illegal acts. He should go to prison, and you are a dumbass!
K..
Lets talk about this stuff.
Benghazi - The CIA was holding prisoners in the consulate and had set up a station there in violation of international law. Do you want that stopped?
NSA - Had it's powers broadened and expanded by the Patriot Act. Would you like that repealed?
Obamacare - Passed the two houses, certified by the Supreme Court and Survived close to 50 attempts to repeal it. There have been some modifications caused by Insurance Company Tom Foolery and Republican opposition. What was your beef again?
IRS - It was found that the Tea Party PAC groups were in violation of the law, yet were allowed to exist anyway. The Law, which completely prohibits PACs from engaging in political activity does not comport with IRS rules. Should the law be enforced?
Ball's in your court Birdy.
Your diversion to ignore facts does not interest me!
K..
Lets talk about this stuff.
Benghazi - The CIA was holding prisoners in the consulate and had set up a station there in violation of international law. Do you want that stopped?
NSA - Had it's powers broadened and expanded by the Patriot Act. Would you like that repealed?
Obamacare - Passed the two houses, certified by the Supreme Court and Survived close to 50 attempts to repeal it. There have been some modifications caused by Insurance Company Tom Foolery and Republican opposition. What was your beef again?
IRS - It was found that the Tea Party PAC groups were in violation of the law, yet were allowed to exist anyway. The Law, which completely prohibits PACs from engaging in political activity does not comport with IRS rules. Should the law be enforced?
Ball's in your court Birdy.
Your diversion to ignore facts does not interest me!
I posted the facts, kiddo. And that's why none of these "scandals" got any traction.
Reality sucks, doesn't it?
Obama vs. Nixon - who is a bigger crook?
» Poll: At same point in term, Nixon approval rating higher than Obama » News -- GOPUSA
Keep in mind that Nixon was viciously attacked by the media, while Obama is totally and unquestioningly supported by the media.
Obama vs. Nixon - who is a bigger crook?
» Poll: At same point in term, Nixon approval rating higher than Obama » News -- GOPUSA
Keep in mind that Nixon was viciously attacked by the media, while Obama is totally and unquestioningly supported by the media.
I liken this to a debate I had with another about sports.
The argument was which was worse, Pete Rose for gambling or A Rod and others for doping.
My contention was the doping was far worse because it had impact on the entire game of baseball where gambling was with a man and his personal problem.
Nixon affected his own legacy with his lies.
Obama affected an entire nation with his lies.
Obama vs. Nixon - who is a bigger crook?
» Poll: At same point in term, Nixon approval rating higher than Obama » News -- GOPUSA
Keep in mind that Nixon was viciously attacked by the media, while Obama is totally and unquestioningly supported by the media.
I liken this to a debate I had with another about sports.
The argument was which was worse, Pete Rose for gambling or A Rod and others for doping.
My contention was the doping was far worse because it had impact on the entire game of baseball where gambling was with a man and his personal problem.
Nixon affected his own legacy with his lies.
Obama affected an entire nation with his lies.
Absolutely and totally correct and appropriate sports analogy.
The fact nobody died due to Watergate, but at least five died due to bungling and lying of the Obama administration.
Obama vs. Nixon - who is a bigger crook?
» Poll: At same point in term, Nixon approval rating higher than Obama » News -- GOPUSA
Keep in mind that Nixon was viciously attacked by the media, while Obama is totally and unquestioningly supported by the media.
I liken this to a debate I had with another about sports.
The argument was which was worse, Pete Rose for gambling or A Rod and others for doping.
My contention was the doping was far worse because it had impact on the entire game of baseball where gambling was with a man and his personal problem.
Nixon affected his own legacy with his lies.
Obama affected an entire nation with his lies.
Absolutely and totally correct and appropriate sports analogy.
The fact nobody died due to Watergate, but at least five died due to bungling and lying of the Obama administration.
I liken this to a debate I had with another about sports.
The argument was which was worse, Pete Rose for gambling or A Rod and others for doping.
My contention was the doping was far worse because it had impact on the entire game of baseball where gambling was with a man and his personal problem.
Nixon affected his own legacy with his lies.
Obama affected an entire nation with his lies.
Absolutely and totally correct and appropriate sports analogy.
The fact nobody died due to Watergate, but at least five died due to bungling and lying of the Obama administration.
If Nixon faced the same Fauxrage from certain news networks, hell there would have been a call for his impeachment for the murder of the 4 students in Ohio by his National Guard.
I liken this to a debate I had with another about sports.
The argument was which was worse, Pete Rose for gambling or A Rod and others for doping.
My contention was the doping was far worse because it had impact on the entire game of baseball where gambling was with a man and his personal problem.
Nixon affected his own legacy with his lies.
Obama affected an entire nation with his lies.
Absolutely and totally correct and appropriate sports analogy.
The fact nobody died due to Watergate, but at least five died due to bungling and lying of the Obama administration.
Watergate was only the opening of the can of worms. How many do you suppose died when Nixon lied about his secret excursions of American troops into Laos and Cambodia? How many died during the secret and illegal bombing campaigns in those countries? How many Americans were lost performing those activities? What about his campaign lie that he had a "secret plan" for peace to end the war in Vietnam? His secret plan turned out to be intensifying the war and doubling the number of caualties by the time it was over. He orchestrated a dishonorable peace agreement by making promises he knew would not be kept. The S. Vietnamese knew it and the N. Vietnames knew it. He gave up Vietnam and all the sacrifices made by the US in exchange for trade relations with China. The Nixon peace agreement made the sacrifice of 60,000 Americans a mockery. He left our allies abandoned to be murdered, imprisoned and saw boat loads of them die at sea while trying to escape the slaughter. It may be true that he was gone when Vietnam fell, but he is the one who instigated the defeat with his peace agreement.
Absolutely and totally correct and appropriate sports analogy.
The fact nobody died due to Watergate, but at least five died due to bungling and lying of the Obama administration.
If Nixon faced the same Fauxrage from certain news networks, hell there would have been a call for his impeachment for the murder of the 4 students in Ohio by his National Guard.
Nixon being forced out of his presidency meant nothing?