Obamacare Economy: 7 Years, 16 million Jobs Created, Middle Class Incomes Up $3K

[Faun]

Obamacare economy? LOL. These boys are chanting theology now. The gdp sucked for 8 years. Fail.

Bro -- every recession and depression we ever had was presided over by a GOP president starting with Herbert Hoover in 1929. What happens is this, the GOP, if they get
into power, remove all the stops that slows down the economy, like Dodd-Frank, EPA regs, tax breaks for 1%, etc. And the economy responds by tying a rocket to its body
and goes straight up and then crashes in about 6-7 years. The only GOP President that did not have a recession was Reagan, but if you were alive then, you might remember 18.5% interest rates and Volker increased the interest rate a full 1% to try to pull back the inflation. It wasn't until Clinton came in that it settled down a little. My message is this:
you are better off with an economy that grows at 2.5% than one that grows at a higher rate. The 2-2/1/2 % growth of the Democrats produces a much stronger economy that lasts. .

Why go back only to Hoover? The fact is, there's been a recession under almost every single Republican president.

There are only two exceptions ... One was James Garfield, who served only six months as president; and the other is Donald Trump, who's been president for only 3½ months (so far). Neither having had enough time in office to send us spiraling into recession like every other Republican president.

Republican presidents have recessions that were handed to them by Democrat presidents, like the Reagan recession, which was the result of 22% interest rates under the Carter administration, and the Bush 43 recession, which was the result of the tech bubble collapse that occurred at the end of the Clinton administration.

Nope, nearly all started during the Republican presidents' terms. And neither Reagan nor Bush inherited one. Both had recessions start under their respective terms.

ROFL, The collapse of the tech bubble started during the Clinton administration. That fact is irrefutable. Lib douche bags like you were gloating that the decline of the stock market during the last months of the Clinton administration were supposedly the result of the election recount.

Interest rates went to 22% during the Carter administration. Bringing those down caused the economy to go into a recession. That is the inevitable result of credit inflation.

Even the NBER is laughing at your ignorance. They say there was no recession when either Reagan or Bush became president...

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

 

[bripat9643]

If you could quote the section that supports your idiotic claim, you would have done so.

See that? I'm 100% right. You are too stupid to read the law for yourself. You need me to do it for you.

Since I feel pity for you, here ya go...

(c) PROVIDING SAFE AND SECURE PLACEMENTS FOR CHILDREN.— (1) POLICIES AND PROGRAMS.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Homeland Security, Attorney General, and Secretary of State shall establish policies and programs to ensure that unaccompanied alien children in the United States are protected from traffickers and other persons seeking to victimize or otherwise engage such children in criminal, harmful, or exploitative activity, including policies and programs reflecting best practices in witness security programs. (2) SAFE AND SECURE PLACEMENTS.—Subject to section 462(b)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(b)(2)), an unaccompanied alien child in the custody of the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall be promptly placed in the least restrictive setting that is in the best interest of the child. In making such placements, the Secretary may consider danger to self, danger to the community, and risk of flight. Placement of child trafficking victims may include placement in an Unaccompanied Refugee Minor program, pursuant to section 412(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1522(d)), if a suitable family member is not available to provide care. A child shall not be placed in a secure facility absent a determination that the child poses a danger to self or others or has been charged with having committed a criminal offense. The placement of a child in a secure facility shall be reviewed, at a minimum, on a monthly basis, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Secretary, to determine if such placement remains warranted.
(3) SAFETY AND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENTS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of subparagraph (B), an unaccompanied alien child may not be placed with a person or entity unless the Secretary of Health and Human Services makes a determination that the proposed custodian is capable of providing for the child’s physical and mental well-being. Such determination shall, at a minimum, include verification of the custodian’s identity and relationship to the child, if any, as well as an independent finding that the individual has not engaged in any activity that would indicate a potential risk to the child.​

Where does that statute prevent the government from returning the child to the country he/she came from? Answer: it doesn't.

BTW, dumbass, I'm not required to do your work for you, which includes posting any evidence needed to support your idiotic claims.

Strawman.

No one said it prevents kids from being sent back. It even lists such qualifiers.

It also provides for HHS to take custody and find homes for them in the U.S.

That's one option allowed. However, there's little evidence that the vast bulk of these kids have been victims of trafficking.

Bitch about it to the government. They're transporting tens of thousands of such kids all around the U.S. every year -- including 2017...

Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors By State

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

 

[bripat9643]

Bro -- every recession and depression we ever had was presided over by a GOP president starting with Herbert Hoover in 1929. What happens is this, the GOP, if they get
into power, remove all the stops that slows down the economy, like Dodd-Frank, EPA regs, tax breaks for 1%, etc. And the economy responds by tying a rocket to its body
and goes straight up and then crashes in about 6-7 years. The only GOP President that did not have a recession was Reagan, but if you were alive then, you might remember 18.5% interest rates and Volker increased the interest rate a full 1% to try to pull back the inflation. It wasn't until Clinton came in that it settled down a little. My message is this:
you are better off with an economy that grows at 2.5% than one that grows at a higher rate. The 2-2/1/2 % growth of the Democrats produces a much stronger economy that lasts. .

Why go back only to Hoover? The fact is, there's been a recession under almost every single Republican president.

There are only two exceptions ... One was James Garfield, who served only six months as president; and the other is Donald Trump, who's been president for only 3½ months (so far). Neither having had enough time in office to send us spiraling into recession like every other Republican president.

Republican presidents have recessions that were handed to them by Democrat presidents, like the Reagan recession, which was the result of 22% interest rates under the Carter administration, and the Bush 43 recession, which was the result of the tech bubble collapse that occurred at the end of the Clinton administration.

Nope, nearly all started during the Republican presidents' terms. And neither Reagan nor Bush inherited one. Both had recessions start under their respective terms.

ROFL, The collapse of the tech bubble started during the Clinton administration. That fact is irrefutable. Lib douche bags like you were gloating that the decline of the stock market during the last months of the Clinton administration were supposedly the result of the election recount.

Interest rates went to 22% during the Carter administration. Bringing those down caused the economy to go into a recession. That is the inevitable result of credit inflation.

Even the NBER is laughing at your ignorance. They say there was no recession when either Reagan or Bush became president...

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

What part of "they had recessions handed to them" didn't you understand?

 

[Faun]

Why go back only to Hoover? The fact is, there's been a recession under almost every single Republican president.

There are only two exceptions ... One was James Garfield, who served only six months as president; and the other is Donald Trump, who's been president for only 3½ months (so far). Neither having had enough time in office to send us spiraling into recession like every other Republican president.

Republican presidents have recessions that were handed to them by Democrat presidents, like the Reagan recession, which was the result of 22% interest rates under the Carter administration, and the Bush 43 recession, which was the result of the tech bubble collapse that occurred at the end of the Clinton administration.

Nope, nearly all started during the Republican presidents' terms. And neither Reagan nor Bush inherited one. Both had recessions start under their respective terms.

ROFL, The collapse of the tech bubble started during the Clinton administration. That fact is irrefutable. Lib douche bags like you were gloating that the decline of the stock market during the last months of the Clinton administration were supposedly the result of the election recount.

Interest rates went to 22% during the Carter administration. Bringing those down caused the economy to go into a recession. That is the inevitable result of credit inflation.

Even the NBER is laughing at your ignorance. They say there was no recession when either Reagan or Bush became president...

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

What part of "they had recessions handed to them" didn't you understand?

As you were shown by NBER, neither one was handed a recession.

 

[Faun]

There is something seriously wrong with you.

If not in the Act I cited, cite the federal statute which authorizes the Department of Health & Human Services to transport the apprehended minors to all parts of the U.S.....

2011 Obama's dream act

2014 flooded with Minor's with no parents.



Still trying to blame bush ?



.

So fruit cake we got flooded with Minor's with no parents in 2014 because of a 2008 law?


What now news goes by pigeons still asshole?

No, moron, we get flooded every year.

By children with no parents?



You stupid bitch

What kinda drugs you smoking?
Don't Bogart it kid pass it along

And here's bear513 calling himself a drug addict ^^^

 

[Faun]

See that? I'm 100% right. You are too stupid to read the law for yourself. You need me to do it for you.

Since I feel pity for you, here ya go...

(c) PROVIDING SAFE AND SECURE PLACEMENTS FOR CHILDREN.— (1) POLICIES AND PROGRAMS.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Homeland Security, Attorney General, and Secretary of State shall establish policies and programs to ensure that unaccompanied alien children in the United States are protected from traffickers and other persons seeking to victimize or otherwise engage such children in criminal, harmful, or exploitative activity, including policies and programs reflecting best practices in witness security programs. (2) SAFE AND SECURE PLACEMENTS.—Subject to section 462(b)(2) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 279(b)(2)), an unaccompanied alien child in the custody of the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall be promptly placed in the least restrictive setting that is in the best interest of the child. In making such placements, the Secretary may consider danger to self, danger to the community, and risk of flight. Placement of child trafficking victims may include placement in an Unaccompanied Refugee Minor program, pursuant to section 412(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1522(d)), if a suitable family member is not available to provide care. A child shall not be placed in a secure facility absent a determination that the child poses a danger to self or others or has been charged with having committed a criminal offense. The placement of a child in a secure facility shall be reviewed, at a minimum, on a monthly basis, in accordance with procedures prescribed by the Secretary, to determine if such placement remains warranted.
(3) SAFETY AND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENTS.— (A) IN GENERAL.—Subject to the requirements of subparagraph (B), an unaccompanied alien child may not be placed with a person or entity unless the Secretary of Health and Human Services makes a determination that the proposed custodian is capable of providing for the child’s physical and mental well-being. Such determination shall, at a minimum, include verification of the custodian’s identity and relationship to the child, if any, as well as an independent finding that the individual has not engaged in any activity that would indicate a potential risk to the child.​

Where does that statute prevent the government from returning the child to the country he/she came from? Answer: it doesn't.

BTW, dumbass, I'm not required to do your work for you, which includes posting any evidence needed to support your idiotic claims.

Strawman.

No one said it prevents kids from being sent back. It even lists such qualifiers.

It also provides for HHS to take custody and find homes for them in the U.S.

That's one option allowed. However, there's little evidence that the vast bulk of these kids have been victims of trafficking.

Bitch about it to the government. They're transporting tens of thousands of such kids all around the U.S. every year -- including 2017...

Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors By State

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

What you think matters to no one.

 

[bripat9643]

Where does that statute prevent the government from returning the child to the country he/she came from? Answer: it doesn't.

BTW, dumbass, I'm not required to do your work for you, which includes posting any evidence needed to support your idiotic claims.

Strawman.

No one said it prevents kids from being sent back. It even lists such qualifiers.

It also provides for HHS to take custody and find homes for them in the U.S.

That's one option allowed. However, there's little evidence that the vast bulk of these kids have been victims of trafficking.

Bitch about it to the government. They're transporting tens of thousands of such kids all around the U.S. every year -- including 2017...

Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors By State

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

What you think matters to no one.

Then why are you responding?

 

[bripat9643]

Republican presidents have recessions that were handed to them by Democrat presidents, like the Reagan recession, which was the result of 22% interest rates under the Carter administration, and the Bush 43 recession, which was the result of the tech bubble collapse that occurred at the end of the Clinton administration.

Nope, nearly all started during the Republican presidents' terms. And neither Reagan nor Bush inherited one. Both had recessions start under their respective terms.

ROFL, The collapse of the tech bubble started during the Clinton administration. That fact is irrefutable. Lib douche bags like you were gloating that the decline of the stock market during the last months of the Clinton administration were supposedly the result of the election recount.

Interest rates went to 22% during the Carter administration. Bringing those down caused the economy to go into a recession. That is the inevitable result of credit inflation.

Even the NBER is laughing at your ignorance. They say there was no recession when either Reagan or Bush became president...

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

What part of "they had recessions handed to them" didn't you understand?

As you were shown by NBER, neither one was handed a recession.

You're a one-note Charlie who can't function when your canned arguments are refuted.

 

[Faun]

Strawman.

No one said it prevents kids from being sent back. It even lists such qualifiers.

It also provides for HHS to take custody and find homes for them in the U.S.

That's one option allowed. However, there's little evidence that the vast bulk of these kids have been victims of trafficking.

Bitch about it to the government. They're transporting tens of thousands of such kids all around the U.S. every year -- including 2017...

Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors By State

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

What you think matters to no one.

Then why are you responding?

I'm speaking to your nonsense of what you think should be done with those kids. Despite your unimportant opinion, they're still being granted access into the U.S. and escorted to all 50 states -- thanks the the act Bush signed into law in 2008.

 

[Faun]

Nope, nearly all started during the Republican presidents' terms. And neither Reagan nor Bush inherited one. Both had recessions start under their respective terms.

ROFL, The collapse of the tech bubble started during the Clinton administration. That fact is irrefutable. Lib douche bags like you were gloating that the decline of the stock market during the last months of the Clinton administration were supposedly the result of the election recount.

Interest rates went to 22% during the Carter administration. Bringing those down caused the economy to go into a recession. That is the inevitable result of credit inflation.

Even the NBER is laughing at your ignorance. They say there was no recession when either Reagan or Bush became president...

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

What part of "they had recessions handed to them" didn't you understand?

As you were shown by NBER, neither one was handed a recession.

You're a one-note Charlie who can't function when your canned arguments are refuted.

LOL

I'll be sure to let you know when you refute something I said.

 

[bripat9643]

That's one option allowed. However, there's little evidence that the vast bulk of these kids have been victims of trafficking.

Bitch about it to the government. They're transporting tens of thousands of such kids all around the U.S. every year -- including 2017...

Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors By State

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

What you think matters to no one.

Then why are you responding?

I'm speaking to your nonsense of what you think should be done with those kids. Despite your unimportant opinion, they're still being granted access into the U.S. and escorted to all 50 states -- thanks the the act Bush signed into law in 2008.

If my opinion matters to no one, then why bother responding? You obviously think it matters.

Also, I have seen no evidence that the government is currently providing transportation so that illegal alien children can enter the country.

 

[Faun]

Bitch about it to the government. They're transporting tens of thousands of such kids all around the U.S. every year -- including 2017...

Unaccompanied Children Released to Sponsors By State

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

What you think matters to no one.

Then why are you responding?

I'm speaking to your nonsense of what you think should be done with those kids. Despite your unimportant opinion, they're still being granted access into the U.S. and escorted to all 50 states -- thanks the the act Bush signed into law in 2008.

If my opinion matters to no one, then why bother responding? You obviously think it matters.

Also, I have seen no evidence that the government is currently providing transportation so that illegal alien children can enter the country.

I've already clarified that once for free. There's a charge if I have to repeat it for ya.

 

[Markle]

I've already shown this to you; but regrettably, you apparently didn't learn. So here's a refresher course...

Real GDP:

Q4-2000: 12,679.3
Q4-2008: 14,577.0 - 15.0% (Bush)
Q4-2016: 16,842.4 - 15.3% (Obama)

https://www.bea.gov/national/xls/gdplev.xls

I hope you're taking notes this time.

The Strange Ups and Downs of the U.S. Economy Since 1929

 

[bripat9643]

ROFL, The collapse of the tech bubble started during the Clinton administration. That fact is irrefutable. Lib douche bags like you were gloating that the decline of the stock market during the last months of the Clinton administration were supposedly the result of the election recount.

Interest rates went to 22% during the Carter administration. Bringing those down caused the economy to go into a recession. That is the inevitable result of credit inflation.

Even the NBER is laughing at your ignorance. They say there was no recession when either Reagan or Bush became president...

http://www.nber.org/cycles.html

What part of "they had recessions handed to them" didn't you understand?

As you were shown by NBER, neither one was handed a recession.

You're a one-note Charlie who can't function when your canned arguments are refuted.

LOL

I'll be sure to let you know when you refute something I said.

ROFL! Thanks for proving what an oblivious dumbass you are.

 

[bripat9643]

The only place they should be transported is back to where they came from. They should have never been allowed to cross the border in the first place. They are here only because Obama encouraged them to come.

What you think matters to no one.

Then why are you responding?

I'm speaking to your nonsense of what you think should be done with those kids. Despite your unimportant opinion, they're still being granted access into the U.S. and escorted to all 50 states -- thanks the the act Bush signed into law in 2008.

If my opinion matters to no one, then why bother responding? You obviously think it matters.

Also, I have seen no evidence that the government is currently providing transportation so that illegal alien children can enter the country.

I've already clarified that once for free. There's a charge if I have to repeat it for ya.

You bleated like a stuck pig.

 

[Markle]

Obamacare economy? LOL. These boys are chanting theology now. The gdp sucked for 8 years. Fail.

Bro -- every recession and depression we ever had was presided over by a GOP president starting with Herbert Hoover in 1929. What happens is this, the GOP, if they get
into power, remove all the stops that slows down the economy, like Dodd-Frank, EPA regs, tax breaks for 1%, etc. And the economy responds by tying a rocket to its body
and goes straight up and then crashes in about 6-7 years. The only GOP President that did not have a recession was Reagan, but if you were alive then, you might remember 18.5% interest rates and Volker increased the interest rate a full 1% to try to pull back the inflation. It wasn't until Clinton came in that it settled down a little. My message is this:
you are better off with an economy that grows at 2.5% than one that grows at a higher rate. The 2-2/1/2 % growth of the Democrats produces a much stronger economy that lasts. .

Why go back only to Hoover? The fact is, there's been a recession under almost every single Republican president.

There are only two exceptions ... One was James Garfield, who served only six months as president; and the other is Donald Trump, who's been president for only 3½ months (so far). Neither having had enough time in office to send us spiraling into recession like every other Republican president.

How long did the 1920 Depression last and what was done to end it?

 

[bripat9643]

Obamacare economy? LOL. These boys are chanting theology now. The gdp sucked for 8 years. Fail.

Bro -- every recession and depression we ever had was presided over by a GOP president starting with Herbert Hoover in 1929. What happens is this, the GOP, if they get
into power, remove all the stops that slows down the economy, like Dodd-Frank, EPA regs, tax breaks for 1%, etc. And the economy responds by tying a rocket to its body
and goes straight up and then crashes in about 6-7 years. The only GOP President that did not have a recession was Reagan, but if you were alive then, you might remember 18.5% interest rates and Volker increased the interest rate a full 1% to try to pull back the inflation. It wasn't until Clinton came in that it settled down a little. My message is this:
you are better off with an economy that grows at 2.5% than one that grows at a higher rate. The 2-2/1/2 % growth of the Democrats produces a much stronger economy that lasts. .

Why go back only to Hoover? The fact is, there's been a recession under almost every single Republican president.

There are only two exceptions ... One was James Garfield, who served only six months as president; and the other is Donald Trump, who's been president for only 3½ months (so far). Neither having had enough time in office to send us spiraling into recession like every other Republican president.

How long did the 1920 Depression last and what was done to end it?

Leftwingers never talk about that depression because it doesn't support their meme that only massive government spending and control can end a depression/recession.

 

[Markle]

Then why did they come alone?

Who are you trying to bull shit?

It was an Obama Hallmark card

.

Holyfuckingshit!

They came alone because that was one of the requirements to qualify for care and placement under the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, which was limited to unaccompanied minors who came from a country which doesn't border the U.S..

That wasn't a qualifier of the Dream Act -- which never became law anyway.

How many times do you want to make a fool of yourself over this? Do you have a number in mind or are you just wingin' it?

So in this fantasy world of yours we didn't have thousands of children entering this country .. flooding the gates because of Obama's dream act?

What realty do you live in?

A land of rainbows and unicorns?

God you are a fucking moron

Spits the moron who actually blamed Obama for a law passed by Bush.

Obama was Bush on steroids. Both were crap.

Not according to the American people. Bush left office with a 34% approval rating whereas Obama left with a 60% JAR.

Few people denied that petulant Barack Hussein Obama was apparently a decent husband and father. The issue is that he was a horrid, failed president.

The end of 2016 the average of people who thought we were going in the right direction was 28.2%. Today that same figure is 36.4% from the Real Clear Politics averages.

 

[Markle]

Nope, nearly all started during the Republican presidents' terms. And neither Reagan nor Bush inherited one. Both had recessions start under their respective terms.

 

[pinqy]

Describe the population in the denominator.....

Once again, for the obviously very slow.

Labor force participation rate equation
You calculate the labor force participation rate by dividing the number of people actively participating in the labor force by the total number of people eligible to participate in the labor force. You can then multiply the resulting quotient by 100 to get the percentage.
The Labor Force Participation Rate: Equation & Concept ...
study.com/academy/lesson/the-labor-force-participation-rate-equation-lesson-quiz.html

Try it in your own words to show you actually understand