ObamaCare Enrollment At 6 Million Just Before Deadline

[francoHFW]

It hasn"t started yet lol...

 

[francoHFW]

Insurers are finally being regulated for the good of the people. End of story.

 

[Avorysuds]

The original goal of the Obama Administration was to enroll 7 million people before the March 31, 2014 deadline. After the glitchy rollout, that goal was adjusted to 6 million.

Obamacare Enrolls 6 Million People Just 4 Days Before Deadline

Enrollment has surged over the last few days as the March 31 deadline approached — over a million people have signed up for health insurance since March 17.

The numbers will only grow larger from here.

Yer dumb and a liar.

 

[Zander]

Here's what amazes me about you left wing idiots.

The goal of obiecare was to insure 46 million uninsured. And drive down the cost of insurance by $2,500 per family.

The law caused 6 million to become uninsured, the cost has gone up for everyone, the quality of plans has dropped significantly and the law is still being delayed due to the worst parts of it's effects being put in action would be political suicide. Yet you still support this disaster.

6 million insured, a number that can't or won't be proven because it's bullshit is the cause of celebration.

The website, that still doesn't work came at a cost of 112 million dollars. This does not include the millions spent on state exchanges such as Oregon who has enrolled exactly zero people.

The insurance companies are lining up for their 6 billion dollar payday of tax payer money.

So adding in the number of people newly added to medicaid which is more tax payer money the bill is probably approaching closer to 20 billion for this year. To insure 6 million people the majority of were already paying for their own insurance before this train wreck.

And you really think you can hide all of this failure? Just how stupid do think people are?

as stupid as the country that elected BO, Twice.....

 

[francoHFW]

And you morons elected W twice- a catastrophe in every possible way lol...

 

[Avorysuds]

And you morons elected W twice- a catastrophe in every possible way lol...

Well thanks for admitting you;re as stupid as those who voted for Bush... You really owned someone out there with that post.... I guess.

Obamacare keeps getting worse and worse, more and more people are hating it and now predictions are that costs will double and triple before Obama is out of office.

We'll just have to keep watching, not like Obama gave us a choice when he decided for us how we will live our lives.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Insurers are finally being regulated for the good of the people. End of story.

Regulated? Are you fucking serious? Insurance companies aren't being regulated, the citizens that have to pay for it are. You get less coverage at a higher price with higher deductible's courtesy of the government and the insurance companies get to collect another 6 billion in your tax dollars to provide this sub-par service.

That's your fucking version of regulated?

 

[Stephanie]

I heard an interview with Gary Lauer, CEO of e-healthinsurance this morning.

He is very high on the ACA......and says that 45% of the people buying ACA compliant plans on his website are in the 18-34 demo.

Nutters.....you should try to see the other side of this issue for a change.

Wow. Insurance Companies are excited about government regulations that force consumers to buy their product? What a huge surprise.

And why wouldn't they, they know taxpayers will be subsidizing it for them.
But I heard that age group is shunning signing up so who you going to believe
just awful people are rushing out to live off the taxpayer's backs

 

[JakeStarkey]

So why can't Obama tell us how many paid up?

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Frank was punished for lying about this elsewhere.

 

[J.E.D]

6 million out of 46 million is a success?

The goal of the ACA is to ensure that all Americans can have affordable health insurance. 6 million is the number who signed up during the initial open enrollment period; not the end goal.

Of course, you know that already. You're just being obtuse. But while you're playing games and poopooing the numbers, more people are signing up. Come November, the numbers will be even higher. Who do you think those people will be voting for - the party that gave them affordable health care, or the party that wants to take it away from them?

 

[Geaux4it]

6 million out of 46 million is a success?

The goal of the ACA is to ensure that all Americans can have affordable health insurance. 6 million is the number who signed up during the initial open enrollment period; not the end goal.

Of course, you know that already. You're just being obtuse. But while you're playing games and poopooing the numbers, more people are signing up. Come November, the numbers will be even higher. Who do you think those people will be voting for - the party that gave them affordable health care, or the party that wants to take it away from them?

The affordable care act? LMAO

Red Herring

-Geaux

 

[Plasmaball]

oh no, you too?

divide 6.million into 1.5 TRILLION it's cost us taxpayers

that make it a RAGING SUCCESS to Obama and left

no wonder our country is going broke and losing our freedom's along with it

You don't make enough to pay taxes..not on a lunch ladies salary

 

[g5000]

Like people have never been able to get health care before this, come on G

Many millions, tens of millions, were involuntarily uninsured, Stephanie. A fact the GOP chose to completely ignore while the Democrats telegraphed quite loudly what they would do about it if they ever got the chance.

As for those who have had insurance all along, they all saw their premiums rising year after year, outpacing inflation. For decades. More and more people were getting priced out of the market. Again, the GOP ignored this.

I never bought into the "46 million uninsured Americans" crap. That was a blatant lie. But it was undeniable we had a serious problem with our health care system in America and the GOP didn't give a shit.

The GOP sold us into bondage. They knew what the Democrats would do if given a chance, and they did nothing to stop it from happening.

Now we have ObamaCare. And people are signing up and getting insurance. Five years from now, a supermajority of Americans will not want to see it go away. Watch and see.

really, so they did nothing huh?

That's right. They did nothing. They owned the White House, the Senate, the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court. And did...NOTHING.

Oh, wait. They did do something. They rammed through a trillion dollar government medical entitlement (Medicare Part D), without paying for it. To get the votes of seniors.

But for the working joes of America, they did...NOTHING.

 

[g5000]

ObamaCare's closest blood relative is RomneyCare. You know Romney, right? He's the guy the schizophrenic Republican Party decided to put up as their candidate for President. They guy who INVENTED ObamaCare.

Is ObamaCare going to be astronomically expensive to the taxpayers? Oh, hell yeah.

RomneyCare had a dysfunctionall rollout, too. And to this day, Massachussets has the highest health care costs in America. Eight years after RomneyCare's launch.

Here's a little tidbit to add to the pile: Five years after RomneyCare launched, 60 percent of the people of Massachusetts said it was full of bugs and was in need of fixing.

But here's the part where the schizos clap their hands over their ears and shout la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you: In the same poll, 75 percent of the people of Massachusetts said they wanted to keep RomneyCare around.

RomneyCare's younger brother, ObamaCare, will probably experience the same results.

 

[Rocko]

ObamaCare's closest blood relative is RomneyCare. You know Romney, right? He's the guy the schizophrenic Republican Party decided to put up as their candidate for President. They guy who INVENTED ObamaCare.

Is ObamaCare going to be astronomically expensive to the taxpayers? Oh, hell yeah.

RomneyCare had a dysfunctionall rollout, too. And to this day, Massachussets has the highest health care costs in America. Eight years after RomneyCare's launch.

Here's a little tidbit to add to the pile: Five years after RomneyCare launched, 60 percent of the people of Massachusetts said it was full of bugs and was in need of fixing.

But here's the part where the schizos clap their hands over their ears and shout la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you: In the same poll, 75 percent of the people of Massachusetts said they wanted to keep RomneyCare around.

RomneyCare's younger brother, ObamaCare, will probably experience the same results.

Maybe it will become popular, but that doesn't mean the program will be a success. The main goals of Obamacare is to reduce cost of health care and issuer more Americans. So far it's a failure.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So why can't Obama tell us how many paid up?

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Frank was punished for lying about this elsewhere.

How many paid, Jake?

Can you tell us? Ask your supervisor at OFA

 

[g5000]

I heard an interview with Gary Lauer, CEO of e-healthinsurance this morning.

He is very high on the ACA......and says that 45% of the people buying ACA compliant plans on his website are in the 18-34 demo.

Nutters.....you should try to see the other side of this issue for a change.

Wow. Insurance Companies are excited about government regulations that force consumers to buy their product? What a huge surprise.

Nope. You can pay the tax if you want. You have a choice.

You want a third choice, though...donchya? You want to choose not to buy coverage....and not pay the tax. Then...we can all pay for you when you get sick or injured. Right?

Please provide the stats for people who are voluntarily uninsured who end up being a taxpayer burden with their medical costs.

 

[Kondor3]

ObamaCare's closest blood relative is RomneyCare. You know Romney, right? He's the guy the schizophrenic Republican Party decided to put up as their candidate for President. They guy who INVENTED ObamaCare...

Just because a dumbass Republican did it on the State level is no reason to attempt it nor to defend it on the National level.

...Is ObamaCare going to be astronomically expensive to the taxpayers? Oh, hell yeah...

So, why are we doing it? Most folks had decent coverage beforehand.

For those who did NOT have decent coverage beforehand, why not set up a National Poor and Preexisting Conditions Healthcare adjunct to what we already have, and leave what already existed and worked well alone? Why screw things up for the huge numbers of people who already had something that worked? If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

...RomneyCare had a dysfunctionall rollout, too. And to this day, Massachussets has the highest health care costs in America. Eight years after RomneyCare's launch...

Then why did the present Administration not study that shaky State-level programming much better, and draw the appropriate lessons from it, and avoid some of this grief?

...Here's a little tidbit to add to the pile: Five years after RomneyCare launched, 60 percent of the people of Massachusetts said it was full of bugs and was in need of fixing...

This, too, does nothing to conjure-up a tolerable prognosis for ObamaCare.

...But here's the part where the schizos clap their hands over their ears and shout la-la-la-I-can't-hear-you: In the same poll, 75 percent of the people of Massachusetts said they wanted to keep RomneyCare around...

Well, once you've gone Nanny State and shredded other options and made folks dependent upon Government Cheese Healthcare, well, of course they would say that.

Also, I'd be curious to see that poll divided into Taxpayers versus Welfare Folk.

...RomneyCare's younger brother, ObamaCare, will probably experience the same results.

I doubt it will live long enough for us to learn that answer; especially if the Pubs (a) retain control of the House in 2014 and 2016, (b) regain and retain the Senate in 2014 and 2016, and (c) recapture the White House in 2016.

Hell, we've already got Democrats trying to distance themselves from Obama, on the topic of healthcare, from coast to coast, as their own reelection bids loom larger and larger in their minds, with the mid-terms looming larger now on the horizon.

A quick and radical de-funding by Congress, and it's over.

The Democrats arrogance and heavy-handedness in shoving this down the throats of the American People is probably going to come back to haunt them and bite them in the ass, in the coming months, and over the next couple of years.

The Democrats are also a little too smug in believing that ObamaCare can't be stopped by a Round 2 or 3 or 4 of legislative action.

The Republicans are almost certainly tweaking their approach for a better yield next time, or the one beyond.

ObamaCare may be law, but I think it's a law that's very much at-risk, and, rather than the fight being over, something tells me that the fight hasn't even begun yet, in earnest.

We shall see... meanwhile... one way or another... it's gonna be one helluva fight, and interesting times.

 

[Vigilante]

6 million out of 46 million is a success?

The goal of the ACA is to ensure that all Americans can have affordable health insurance. 6 million is the number who signed up during the initial open enrollment period; not the end goal.

Of course, you know that already. You're just being obtuse. But while you're playing games and poopooing the numbers, more people are signing up. Come November, the numbers will be even higher. Who do you think those people will be voting for - the party that gave them affordable health care, or the party that wants to take it away from them?

Yes, the Democrats FORCING millions of Americans to pay anywhere from 20% to over 200% more for medical coverage than they were paying is just what the people will remember before they vote. Should mandate everyone gets their new healthcare bill on Nov.1, 2014!

 

[g5000]

Nope. You can pay the tax if you want. You have a choice.

You want a third choice, though...donchya? You want to choose not to buy coverage....and not pay the tax. Then...we can all pay for you when you get sick or injured. Right?

I'm serious about wanting to see the stats for the voluntarily uninsured who end up being a taxpayer burden. Please provide them.

Liberals feel the need to demonize the people whose money they are stealing, so liberals can assuage their guilt about taking money from those people because it is "the right thing to do".

For example, calling the people they are forcing to buy health insurance "freeloaders" so they can overcharge them for insurance and give that money to people who did nothing to earn it. It takes a serious mental twist to call the people you are stealing from "freeloaders" when you are giving the money you stole to ACTUAL freeloaders.