Obamacare Operator Fired After Taking Call From Hannity

and you're an idiot. she's not a public employee. she's an employee of an entity that's been contracted to handle the call center. further, low level employees, in any industry, are not to talk to the media. a responsible media personality would know and respect that.

she is a contracted public employee and cite the law for your second assertion.
there's no law. there's employee handbooks. and she is not contracted by 'the public.' she is in no way a public employee. however, even if she were if it were against whatever public entities rules for low-level employees to speak with the media they could be fired if they choose to break that rule.


She was a brand spanking new employee whose previous employment was at McDonald's and the Olive Garden. She didn't know the niceties about what to do if a member of the media called. That wasn't part of their training. She wasn't political. No ax to grind. No statement to make. She wouldn't have risked her job if she'd known that was what she was doing.
 
and you're an idiot. she's not a public employee. she's an employee of an entity that's been contracted to handle the call center. further, low level employees, in any industry, are not to talk to the media. a responsible media personality would know and respect that.

link?

have none of you had a job?

so you can not prove your assertion.

that what I thought.

Then - stop lying.
 
she is a contracted public employee and cite the law for your second assertion.
there's no law. there's employee handbooks. and she is not contracted by 'the public.' she is in no way a public employee. however, even if she were if it were against whatever public entities rules for low-level employees to speak with the media they could be fired if they choose to break that rule.


She was a brand spanking new employee whose previous employment was at McDonald's and the Olive Garden. She didn't know the niceties about what to do if a member of the media called. That wasn't part of their training. She wasn't political. No ax to grind. No statement to make. She wouldn't have risked her job if she'd known that was what she was doing.
you don't think she was supplied some sort of handbook and training? i just can't see that happening
 
What does it take for you people? You just cannot envision anyone who has a different ideal than your sick agenda capable of doing good for someone, can you?

No, it is not that.

They know that the ones of their ilk would never make a generous gesture and pay over 26K to a woman - that is unthinkable for a leftard.
They will easily make YOU pay that amount in your taxes, but THEM - no, never.
Leftards are very mean spirited people, they are incapable of personal generosity and envy it when the people of opposite cam demonstrate it.

you honestly don't see the irony in that, do you?


there is no irony - various studies have proven that the left is mean and almost never gives to charities and otherwise share their PERSONAL money.
They only want to redistribute others people money - but that is not a synonym of generosity - that is a feature of control grab.
 
Don't think being fired is the only thing she will have to endure from this vindictive president. She can expect an IRS audit, and will probably be pulled over and harassed a few times now that she's embarrassed the messiah.
 
Bleeding Heart Tightwads

:lol:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/21/opinion/21kristof.html?_r=0

James Peron: Are Conservatives Really More Charitable? Or Just More Religious?

Liberals are the least likely to help the poor. That's the inescapable conclusion of this new study: states where people participate in religion at a high rate are also the most generous; conversely, the least generous states are also the least religious.

Liberals, popular stereotypes notwithstanding, are not more generous and compassionate than conservatives. To an outsider it might seem plausible that Americans whose political rhetoric emphasizes "fairness" and "social justice" would be more charitably inclined than those who stress economic liberty and individual autonomy.
 
So all Hannity has to do is call every Obamacare worker. They'll all get fired and that will be the end of Obamacare. With Hannity's fat Fox contract he can afford to pay them all. He should be willing to do that to save America from the horror of people getting health insurance.
 
there's no law. there's employee handbooks. and she is not contracted by 'the public.' she is in no way a public employee. however, even if she were if it were against whatever public entities rules for low-level employees to speak with the media they could be fired if they choose to break that rule.


She was a brand spanking new employee whose previous employment was at McDonald's and the Olive Garden. She didn't know the niceties about what to do if a member of the media called. That wasn't part of their training. She wasn't political. No ax to grind. No statement to make. She wouldn't have risked her job if she'd known that was what she was doing.
you don't think she was supplied some sort of handbook and training? i just can't see that happening


If she was, what are the odds that it covered calls from Sean Hannity? And if it did, what are the odds that this instruction was positioned prominently? She was well-spoken and sounded intelligent but how many brand new employees read every line of an employee manual? She had a lot of procedures to learn about. I bet that's where most of her study time was spent while at work. And when not at work she had two kids to take care of.

This was one strike and out for an extraordinary situation.


Now that Hannity has gifted her a year's wages, she might consider it the best phone call she ever received. But I was surprised to hear she was fired because I wouldn't have thought the company would have wanted the potential bad PR for terminating her. My husband was not surprised she was fired. He predicted it on Monday and was annoyed with Hannity over it. Now that Hannity made it good, he's not so annoyed. But I still did not predict it as a sure thing that the company would fire her for this one event which she couldn't have expected when she clocked in to work that day.
 
http://www.gordon.edu/ace/pdf/Spr07BRGrinols.pdf

Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate
Conservatism—America’s Charity Divide, Who Gives, Who
Doesn’t, and Why It Matters

Who Really Cares? has four main messages: (1) The four forces in
American life primarily responsible for making people charitable are
“religion, skepticism about the government in economic life, strong
families, and personal entrepreneurism” (p. 11). (2) “Conservative
principles are most congenial to the four forces of charity” (p. 12). (3)
“Liberals, who often claim to care more about others than conservatives
do, are personally less charitable” (p. 70). With respect to the firstpoint,
for example, it is not true that those with higher incomes tend to give
higher percentages (liberals earn slightly more as a group, but give less).
 
more obama admin transparency...fire those who give a bad view of what is actually happening

good for hannity, bad for obama

Fire those who give an honest view of what is actually happening, if I understand the story.

it is actually worse than that - the person who was answering the question is a simple person down the ladder without any political interest and therefore genuine.

And she voiced the truth - nobody likes it.

Truth HURTS :D

Hannity appreciated her honesty. Now, both Hannity and this young woman reap the rewards. She for her honesty, he for his generosity. Truth only hurts those who seek to lie. I am soooo weary of these libtard apologists. Are they truly this abominably inhuman.
 
she is a contracted public employee and cite the law for your second assertion.
there's no law. there's employee handbooks. and she is not contracted by 'the public.' she is in no way a public employee. however, even if she were if it were against whatever public entities rules for low-level employees to speak with the media they could be fired if they choose to break that rule.


She was a brand spanking new employee whose previous employment was at McDonald's and the Olive Garden. She didn't know the niceties about what to do if a member of the media called. That wasn't part of their training. She wasn't political. No ax to grind. No statement to make. She wouldn't have risked her job if she'd known that was what she was doing.

And he offered her money so she went on his show. Good for her but it doesn't make him some hero. It's a small price to pay to have that kind of press especially when Megan Kelly is about to steal his gig.
 
http://www.gordon.edu/ace/pdf/Spr07BRGrinols.pdf

Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate
Conservatism—America’s Charity Divide, Who Gives, Who
Doesn’t, and Why It Matters

Who Really Cares? has four main messages: (1) The four forces in
American life primarily responsible for making people charitable are
“religion, skepticism about the government in economic life, strong
families, and personal entrepreneurism” (p. 11). (2) “Conservative
principles are most congenial to the four forces of charity” (p. 12). (3)
“Liberals, who often claim to care more about others than conservatives
do, are personally less charitable” (p. 70). With respect to the firstpoint,
for example, it is not true that those with higher incomes tend to give
higher percentages (liberals earn slightly more as a group, but give less).

Isn't is giving generously a noble thing? Giving generously of others chattels is the most charitable act of all because in that way you ensure that others are compelled to act as you would, were you so inclined to respond to human compulsion and compassion. Sadly, liberals/progressives are devoid of humanity.
 
Fire those who give an honest view of what is actually happening, if I understand the story.

it is actually worse than that - the person who was answering the question is a simple person down the ladder without any political interest and therefore genuine.

And she voiced the truth - nobody likes it.

Truth HURTS :D

Hannity appreciated her honesty. Now, both Hannity and this young woman reap the rewards. She for her honesty, he for his generosity. Truth only hurts those who seek to lie. I am soooo weary of these libtard apologists. Are they truly this abominably inhuman.

what I meant is that the ones behind the scenes of her being fired got furious ( it was sarcasm about hurt feelings) - the ones who are imposing this monstrosity on American people and Americans through this woman just told the plain truth - The King is naked :D
 
IF this is true, it would knock my socks off. Of course there's no way to prove the truth or not of such a story, but given the source - Hannity - I have my doubts that we know the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

What does it take for you people? You just cannot envision anyone who has a different ideal than your sick agenda capable of doing good for someone, can you?

No, it is not that.

They know that the ones of their ilk would never make a generous gesture and pay over 26K to a woman - that is unthinkable for a leftard.
They will easily make YOU pay that amount in your taxes, but THEM and form the PERSONAL resources - no, never.
Leftards are very mean spirited people, they are incapable of personal generosity and envy and hate it when the people of opposite camp demonstrate it.

Right you are.
 
So all Hannity has to do is call every Obamacare worker. They'll all get fired and that will be the end of Obamacare. With Hannity's fat Fox contract he can afford to pay them all. He should be willing to do that to save America from the horror of people getting health insurance.

Pretty sure that by now all the obamacare workers have been read the riot act and threatened with nothing less than loss-of-employment, if not worse.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vox
http://www.gordon.edu/ace/pdf/Spr07BRGrinols.pdf

Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate
Conservatism—America’s Charity Divide, Who Gives, Who
Doesn’t, and Why It Matters

Who Really Cares? has four main messages: (1) The four forces in
American life primarily responsible for making people charitable are
“religion, skepticism about the government in economic life, strong
families, and personal entrepreneurism” (p. 11). (2) “Conservative
principles are most congenial to the four forces of charity” (p. 12). (3)
“Liberals, who often claim to care more about others than conservatives
do, are personally less charitable” (p. 70). With respect to the firstpoint,
for example, it is not true that those with higher incomes tend to give
higher percentages (liberals earn slightly more as a group, but give less).

Isn't is giving generously a noble thing? Giving generously of others chattels is the most charitable act of all because in that way you ensure that others are compelled to act as you would, were you so inclined to respond to human compulsion and compassion. Sadly, liberals/progressives are devoid of humanity.

That is exactly what studies prove - leftards are tightwads when it comes to the PERSONAL MEANS, not others people money.
They are "generous" only with your or mine money ;)
 
there's no law. there's employee handbooks. and she is not contracted by 'the public.' she is in no way a public employee. however, even if she were if it were against whatever public entities rules for low-level employees to speak with the media they could be fired if they choose to break that rule.


She was a brand spanking new employee whose previous employment was at McDonald's and the Olive Garden. She didn't know the niceties about what to do if a member of the media called. That wasn't part of their training. She wasn't political. No ax to grind. No statement to make. She wouldn't have risked her job if she'd known that was what she was doing.

And he offered her money so she went on his show. Good for her but it doesn't make him some hero. It's a small price to pay to have that kind of press especially when Megan Kelly is about to steal his gig.


He did not offer her money.

He called the hotline number which Obama announced. She answered. There was no offer of money.

Not until after she was fired.
 

Forum List

Back
Top