Obama's job growth were part-time jobs...partially due to Obamacare!

[keepitreal]

Admits 94% Of All New Jobs Under Obama Were Part-Time

How many times are you worthless lying scum POS right-wingers going to mindlessly parrot this LIE?????
As you well know PT jobs for economic reasons went DOWN after the passage of the PPACA!!!!!

LIE

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

Made up numbers unless you provide a link to substantiate the numbers AND source!

I provided a link and the source dickhead

If assholes could fly, this place would be a fucking airport

 

[Faun]

LIE

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

LOLOL

It's hysterical watching theses idiots flop around like a dying fish on a dock.

 

[Faun]

I can back up the OP with another article from investing.com WHILE OBAMA WAS STILL IN OFFICE:

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

A study done by economists at Harvard and Princeton agree that 95% of Obamajobs were part time or short-term contract work.

And lets not forget Obama's "shovel ready jobs" that never existed and his "green jobs" deal that he shoved billions into and those companies all went under. Telling us to get used to 1% GDP? Obama ran on saying he could turn the economy around. Instead he presided over the slowest economic recovery in the history of our nation. But he was half-black, he had that going for him.Oh yea, remember Obama asking where the magic wand was that was going to bring all these manufacturing jobs back?

Well Obama I can tell you where the magic wand is. In the White House.

Lying deplorable human scum, you've already been schooled after telling this lie, so why do you repeat it??

Why Is The GOP Senate So Afraid To Call Witnesses??

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

 

[Faun]

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

 

[Faun]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

LOLOLOLOLOL

Holyfuckingshit.

6,855 IS in thousands. That converts to 6,855,000.

Here, take a look at total nonfarm employed....



The BLS shows there are currently 152383 employed. Like the numbers you posted, that's in thousands.

So do you think there are only 152,383 people working in the U.S.? Or is it 152,383,000?

Now cease with your mind-numbing stupidity.

 

[keepitreal]

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

So, 6855 in millions would be 6,855,000,000

 

[Faun]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

Get it?

Holyfuckingshit!

 

[Faun]

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

Damn you are milking the dumb act to death.
At the top of the chart YOU linked to it says this:
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS12032197
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Employment Level - Part-Time for Economic Reasons, Nonagricultural Industries
Labor force status: Employed
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over
Industry: Nonagriculture industries
Reasons work not as scheduled: Economic reasons
Worker status/schedules: At work part time

That means that every number in every decimal place stands for 1,000, thus 6,855 in the chart is 6,855 thousands, not 6.855 thousand.

WHAT?

Let's try this....

Please write it out using letters not numbers
adding 3 zeros like you said

six thousand and 8 hundred and fifty-five THOUSANDS (PLURAL).
Jesus you are thick!!!!!
What do you think the chart means when it says "NUMBER IN THE THOUSANDS (PLURAL)?????
Why would they tell you the number is in the thousands if it is already six thousand eight hundred and fifty-five?????

Unfuckingbelievable.

 

[keepitreal]

So, 6855 in millions is......

 

[Faun]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

So, 6855 in millions would be 6,855,000,000

Correct.

 

[keepitreal]

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

Fine, please post the number in millions

 

[Faun]

So, 6855 in millions is......

Why are you too scared to answer the question?

The BLS shows there are 152383 in thousands working non-farm jobs.

Do you think that means there are 152,383 employed?

Or 152,383,000 employed?

 

[Faun]

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

Fine, please post the number in millions

Why? The BLS figures are represented in thousands, not millions.

I can't believe anyone can be as dumb as you.

 

[keepitreal]

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

So, 6855 in millions would be 6,855,000,000

Correct.

Well, when I wrote that the first time, before you jumped on
I was told no, that's billions

 

[keepitreal]

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

Fine, please post the number in millions

Why? The BLS figures are represented in thousands, not millions.

I can't believe anyone can be as dumb as you.

Why not? Let's represent the number in millions

But, now I know the number 6855, in millions
would be 6,855,000,000

 

[Faun]

No, the BLS chart would have then said "numbers in the hundreds."

So, write out for me 6855 in hundreds and millions, please and thank you

Just stop the dumb act, please.
Lets look at another BLS chart.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS11000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Civilian Labor Force Level
Labor force status: Civilian labor force
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

Now the current size of the labor force is listed in the chart as 164556. Do you really think the entire USA labor force is 1 hundred and 64 thousand 5 hundred and 56 people out of a population of over 300 million or is it 164,556,000?????

It is not an act...I have the BLS open in a separate tab

No, not at all
One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand
sounds plausible

Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands

Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

Let's try this another way....

The BLS shows there were 145 (in thousands) non-farm jobs added last month



Do you think that means there were 145 jobs added?

Or do you realize that means there were 145,000 jobs added?

Do you see now why you looks so fucking rightarded?

 

[Faun]

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

Fine, please post the number in millions

Why? The BLS figures are represented in thousands, not millions.

I can't believe anyone can be as dumb as you.

Why not? Let's represent the number in millions

But, now I know the number 6855, in millions
would be 6,855,000,000

Then shirley you must know by now that 6855 in thousands is 6,855,000??

 

[Faun]

You are just trolling!
Grow up, child.

Just admit your wrong asshole
6,855,000 is 6 MILLION, NOT 6 thousand

YOU were the one claiming it is 6,000.

Liar

Liar!

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

ROFLMFAO

If your brain was made of chocolate
it wouldn't even fill a mini M&M!

Let's start from the beginning, shall we

How many times are you worthless lying scum POS right-wingers going to mindlessly parrot this LIE?????
As you well know PT jobs for economic reasons went DOWN after the passage of the PPACA!!!!!

LIE

Already PROVEN to be true with actual BLS data. Try a new lie!

2009

Jan-8675
Feb-9053
March-9168
April-8556
May-8663
June-9190
July-8977
Aug-8712
Sept-8134
Oct-8350
Nov-8796
Dec-9222

2010

9161
9108
9210
8830
8392
8734
8610
8509
8540
8279
8526
9029

2011

9027
8633
8537
8305
8144
8600
8372
8463
8423
8151
8161
8259

2012

8747
8302
7753
7581
7736
8268
8218
7723
8003
7768
7898
8038

2013

8506
8163
7598
7590
7523
8328
8207
7567
7437
7628
7478
7848

2014

7617
7269
7321
7120
6917
7706
7568
7021
6618
6698
6597
6855

PPACA passed the end of March 2010 and your numbers show that at 9,210,000 and you end at 6,855,000 which sure seems LOWER to me, which means PT jobs for economic reasons DECREASED after Obama Care passed!!!!!

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link: Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

Get it?

Damn you are milking the dumb act to death.

That means that every number in every decimal place stands for 1,000, thus 6,855 in the chart is 6,855 thousands, not 6.855 thousand.

IDIOT!
The Right try to beat you into submission with their STUPIDITY!!!!!!

WHAT?
Let's try this....

Please write it out using letters not numbers
adding 3 zeros like you said

six thousand and 8 hundred and fifty-five THOUSANDS (PLURAL).
Jesus you are thick!!!!!

How can you have 6 thousand and 855 thousands
when the latter is greater than than 6 thousand

So, write out for me 6855 in hundreds and millions, please and thank you

Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands

Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number

What would you like me to admit I'm wrong about?

Do you admit 1,000 is not 1,000,000
Do you admit that six thousand, eight hundred fifty five thousands
is factually incorrect

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Mind you, this is stemming from 6,855


You claim 6,855,000 is
six thousand eight hundred and fifty five thousands

so, when I asked about adding 45,000 to the 855,000
to make it(6,855) 7 thousand, you corrected me,
It would equal 900,000, 6,900(000)
if 900,000 is greater than 6 thousand
how can a number be
6 thousand 900 thousands

And if I add 145,000 to the 855,000
and that equals 1 million where is that carried over to
when it is preceding a number less than itself

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

What 6,000?

Again, I'm still on 6,855

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So, if I add 145 thousand to the 855 thousand
6 thousand becomes 1 million

It still is 6,000 thousands.

So to make it six million I add 3 more zeros
6,855,000,000

NO, 855 thousands = 855,000 and if you add 145,000 to that you get 1 million

What happens to the million
I'll have 1, 006,000,000

Then what happens to the 6 thousand

You just made it 6 billion, it was already 6 million. you added 6 zeros to the 6,855.

I'll have 6 thousand, 1 million

That is 1 billion 6 million.

But, you wrote 6,855,000 being thousands
How come if I add 3 more zeros to your numbers
I go to billions not millions

No, I wrote 6,855 thousands being 6,855 thousands. You can't read as well as not being able to do simple arithmetic!

Just admit your wrong asshole
6,855,000 is 6 MILLION, NOT 6 thousand

YOU were the one claiming it is 6,000

You were the one who claimed 6855 in thousands
was six thousand eight hundred and fifty five thousands = 6,855,000

When I added 3 more zeros for a total of 10 numbers
you told me that was billions
but, you have 7 numbers and it's thousands


You said if I added 145,000 to the 855,000(6,855)
that would be 1 million...and you're right

But, if I have 6 thousand, 855 thousand (6,855)
and add 145,000 to the 855,000, which equals 1 million
then what happens to the 6 thousand

You can't have 6 thousand 1 million

I asked you, why do you think they say 'in thousands'
instead of 'in millions', you said to round off....

You don't round off thousands to millions
you round off thousands into ten thousands
and ten thousands into hundred thousands
and hundred thousands into millions and so on

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55

6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

 

[keepitreal]

Your numbers show me you're confused

Not millions, thousands

Those were monthly figures from BLS for PT economic reasons

BLS

I choose non agricultural

Why is it always the confused Right who tell everyone else that they are the ones confused???
The BLS says the numbers are in thousands which means you add 3 zeros at the end, so 1,000 thousands is 1,000,000.
From your link:
Number in thousands

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

That's right, Sherlock.

Notice how the Right would rather play dumb than admit they were wrong, even though it contradicts their rants that they are the "high-information voters" and everyone who disagrees with them are "low-information voters."

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

So when the BLS gives you a number like 6855 which you posted, and says the numbers charted are in the thousands, then that means 6855 thousands which is 6,855,000.
Get it??????

6,855 is 6 thousand 8 hundred and 55
6,855,000 is 6 million 855 thousand

LOLOLOLOLOL

Holyfuckingshit.

6,855 IS in thousands. That converts to 6,855,000.

Here, take a look at total nonfarm employed....



The BLS shows there are currently 152383 employed. Like the numbers you posted, that's in thousands.

So do you think there are only 152,383 people working in the U.S.? Or is it 152,383,000?

Now cease with your mind-numbing stupidity.

The estimates in this report were obtained from the Current Population Survey (CPS), a national monthly sample survey of approximately 60,000 eligible households that provides a wide range of information on the labor force, employment, and unemployment. Earnings data are collected from one-fourth of the CPS monthly sample. The survey is conducted for the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) by the U.S. Census Bureau, using a scientifically selected national sample with coverage in all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Bitch, it's just like polls

 

[keepitreal]

Um, 1,000 already has 3 zeros
3 more zeros on 1,000(,000)is 1 million

LOL

Dumb shit, you posted the number in thousands. i.e., 6855 in thousands = 6,855,000

Fine, please post the number in millions

Why? The BLS figures are represented in thousands, not millions.

I can't believe anyone can be as dumb as you.

Why not? Let's represent the number in millions

But, now I know the number 6855, in millions
would be 6,855,000,000

Then shirley you must know by now that 6855 in thousands is 6,855,000??

SURELY