Obama's job growth were part-time jobs...partially due to Obamacare!

[edthecynic]

Just stop the dumb act, please.
Lets look at another BLS chart.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS11000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Civilian Labor Force Level
Labor force status: Civilian labor force
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

Now the current size of the labor force is listed in the chart as 164556. Do you really think the entire USA labor force is 1 hundred and 64 thousand 5 hundred and 56 people out of a population of over 300 million or is it 164,556,000?????

It is not an act...I have the BLS open in a separate tab

No, not at all
One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand
sounds plausible

Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands

Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you will have 1 million.

 

[edthecynic]

Just stop the dumb act, please.
Lets look at another BLS chart.
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Series Id: LNS11000000
Seasonally Adjusted
Series title: (Seas) Civilian Labor Force Level
Labor force status: Civilian labor force
Type of data: Number in thousands
Age: 16 years and over

Now the current size of the labor force is listed in the chart as 164556. Do you really think the entire USA labor force is 1 hundred and 64 thousand 5 hundred and 56 people out of a population of over 300 million or is it 164,556,000?????

It is not an act...I have the BLS open in a separate tab

No, not at all
One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand
sounds plausible

Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands

Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

 

[keepitreal]

The BLS has the non institutional population
at 255,079 for 2017 with 153,337 working

According to BLS for the end of 2017
4992 were PT for economic reasons

Does that sound right

NO! They are all off by a factor of 1,000.

I'm reading the numbers in millions

Which is what you get if you add 3 zeros at the end of each.

Why do you think they just don't state...numbers in millions?

 

[keepitreal]

It is not an act...I have the BLS open in a separate tab

No, not at all
One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand
sounds plausible

Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands

Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

 

[edthecynic]

The BLS has the non institutional population
at 255,079 for 2017 with 153,337 working

According to BLS for the end of 2017
4992 were PT for economic reasons

Does that sound right

NO! They are all off by a factor of 1,000.

I'm reading the numbers in millions

Which is what you get if you add 3 zeros at the end of each.

Why do you think they just don't state...numbers in millions?

They are rounding off.

 

[edthecynic]

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

What 6,000?

 

[keepitreal]

It is not an act...I have the BLS open in a separate tab

No, not at all
One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand
sounds plausible

Now, that being the case, going back to 6855
what is this number in thousands

Six thousand, 855 thousands is not a numerical number

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

 

[edthecynic]

Number in thousands means the same in both charts.
And Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.
Come on admit it, it will not kill you to admit the truth, you survived admitting the labor force is One hundred sixty four million, five hundred fifty six thousand and not One hundred sixty four thousand, five hundred fifty six.

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

 

[keepitreal]

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

What 6,000?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

 

[keepitreal]

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So, if I add 145 thousand to the 855 thousand
6 thousand becomes 1 million

 

[edthecynic]

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

What 6,000?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It still is 6,000 thousands.

 

[keepitreal]

Then how do you write six million eight hundred fifty five thousand

So, if I add 45,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So to make it six million I add 3 more zeros
6,855,000,000

 

[edthecynic]

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So, if I add 145 thousand to the 855 thousand
6 thousand becomes 1 million

NO, 855 thousands = 855,000 and if you add 145,000 to that you get 1 million.

 

[keepitreal]

Lol...my bad, you're right

So, if I add 145,000 to the 855 thousands, I'll have 7 thousand

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

What 6,000?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It still is 6,000 thousands.

What happens to the million
I'll have 1, 006,000,000

 

[keepitreal]

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So, if I add 145 thousand to the 855 thousand
6 thousand becomes 1 million

NO, 855 thousands = 855,000 and if you add 145,000 to that you get 1 million.

Then what happens to the 6 thousand

 

[edthecynic]

No you won't. you will have 900,000. Geezzz, you can't even do simple arithmetic.

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So to make it six million I add 3 more zeros
6,855,000,000

You just made it 6 billion, it was already 6 million. you added 6 zeros to the 6,855. The BLS would have said "numbers in millions" if they wanted you to add 6 zeros.

 

[keepitreal]

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So, if I add 145 thousand to the 855 thousand
6 thousand becomes 1 million

NO, 855 thousands = 855,000 and if you add 145,000 to that you get 1 million.

I'll have 6 thousand, 1 million

 

[edthecynic]

No you will have 1 million.

Well what happened to the 6 thousand

What 6,000?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It still is 6,000 thousands.

What happens to the million
I'll have 1, 006,000,000

That is 1 billion 6 million. A number you pulled out of your ass!

 

[edthecynic]

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So, if I add 145 thousand to the 855 thousand
6 thousand becomes 1 million

NO, 855 thousands = 855,000 and if you add 145,000 to that you get 1 million.

Then what happens to the 6 thousand

You can shove it back up your ass!

 

[keepitreal]

Isn't 900,000 greater than 6,000

Obviously!
What is your point?

Six thousand, 855 thousands IS a numerical number, it is 6,855,000.

It is 6,000 thousands and 855 thousand which = 6,855,000.

So to make it six million I add 3 more zeros
6,855,000,000

You just made it 6 billion, it was already 6 million. you added 6 zeros to the 6,855. The BLS would have said "numbers in millions" if they wanted you to add 6 zeros.

But, you wrote 6,855,000 being thousands
How come if I add 3 more zeros to your numbers
I go to billions not millions