Occurring now...Biden and his families' nefarious business dealings-- what business expertise worth $10 million???

Yes, these are allegations. Obviously. Money laundering requires the transactions to have been illegal. People claim that the money was to buy “influence”.

I’m merely asking what influence did they buy. You claimed Comer had an example, but have refused to say what that example is.

Clearly you are trying to hide something about these allegations.
The millions had to be paid for something LEGAL. The Biden family members who received this money need to show what service they performed to receive such a fortune from foreign nationals, and why they set up shell companies to disguise the payments, while the head of the family was VP. If they can’t, they are guilty.
 
The millions had to be paid for something LEGAL. The Biden family members who received this money need to show what service they performed to receive such a fortune from foreign nationals, and why they set up shell companies to disguise the payments, while the head of the family was VP. If they can’t, they are guilty.
No, they don’t. If you want to allege a crime, it’s you who has to show the money was for an illegal purpose.

Since when are people required to prove their innocence?

I would still be very interested in this “example” of a policy decision that Comer referenced. It’s pretty important to the allegations.
 
She was supposedly bumped into, and then thrown into a dressing room but she didn't scream? He doesn't know the woman, and this was done to lend credibility to her BOOK. You mewling quim are all for it, because you think somehow this scores points, and points to democrat support of women sexually abused. We all know if a woman accuses a Democrat they are lying, but all feminazi must be believed, you and your ilk only care about the power it will give democrats to push their idiotic, supposed utopia on people

What was Ben Ghazi? What was going after Hillary on her private emails? What are you doing to Biden? You think you are scoring political points but you guys have become very bad at this. Where is Karl Rove or Lee Atwater? Those guys knew how to play politics. Stop listening to Steve Bannon.
 
There are no communist countries, only socialist ones. Socialism is the process that leads to high communism. The most advanced nations on Earth, that poll the highest for happiness and health, are socialistic. They apply socialist principles to their economies. American workers are making less and working more, with few benefits if any. How is that better than in most industrialized countries, whose labor force is unionized, gets paid well, and enjoys yearly paid vacations and bonuses, with full healthcare coverage and tuition-free education? In those countries, you get plenty of sick leave and women get several months of maternity leave. Their workday is six hours long and ironically, they're more productive working less.
Burrowing%20Owl%20SERIOUSLY-S.jpg
 
Communism is the objective of socialists. Socialism is the revolutionary process that leads to high communism, defined as "a stateless society, without socioeconomic classes or the need for money". Socialists can call themselves communists, as a way of focusing on the objective, which is a gradual transition from capitalism to high-communism through socialism (the socialization and democratization of production/the economy and society).
 
Where did they say that?

Washington Post, New York Times finally admit Hunter’s laptop is real — but only to protect Joe Biden some more

By Post Editorial Board
April 1, 2022 8:31pm Updated

Don’t be confused about why The Washington Post changed its tune this week, admitting that the Hunter Biden laptop is the real deal, or why The New York Times ’fessed up last month: Reality forced their hand, and they can’t downplay the scandal’s impact on President Joe Biden without acknowledging the facts.

Eighteen months ago, both papers (Mottos: “All the news that’s fit to print” and “Democracy dies in darkness”) joined in the drive to suppress The Post’s reporting off the laptop, playing up bogus, clearly partisan claims that it was somehow “Russian disinformation.

Never mind that we had not only authenticated the info and produced confirming sources like former Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski, but also openly reported how we got it — unlike both the other papers’ endless, anonymously sourced reporting on the Trump Russiagate “scandal,” which eventually proved to be utterly fake, the product of Clinton-campaign disinformation.

 
The millions had to be paid for something LEGAL. The Biden family members who received this money need to show what service they performed to receive such a fortune from foreign nationals, and why they set up shell companies to disguise the payments, while the head of the family was VP. If they can’t, they are guilty.
Who was the last elitist democrook political whore who had a child that could produce ANYTHING...

ANYTHING AT ALL....

Even something WORTHLESS, and get a legitimate paycheck?

You can't even expect much of value from a common bed wetter, but a filthy rich elitist democrook? Criminal activity for enrichment is probably the least malevolent thing they're doing to the country.

Shit... Biden's kid couldn't even make it in the fuckin Navy without getting busted for doing blow and there are thousands of ghetto rats with high rank after 20 years that can still do blow and make it to retirement.

That's how pathetic the biden DNA is.


.
 

Washington Post, New York Times finally admit Hunter’s laptop is real — but only to protect Joe Biden some more

By Post Editorial Board
April 1, 2022 8:31pm Updated

Don’t be confused about why The Washington Post changed its tune this week, admitting that the Hunter Biden laptop is the real deal, or why The New York Times ’fessed up last month: Reality forced their hand, and they can’t downplay the scandal’s impact on President Joe Biden without acknowledging the facts.

Eighteen months ago, both papers (Mottos: “All the news that’s fit to print” and “Democracy dies in darkness”) joined in the drive to suppress The Post’s reporting off the laptop, playing up bogus, clearly partisan claims that it was somehow “Russian disinformation.

Never mind that we had not only authenticated the info and produced confirming sources like former Hunter business partner Tony Bobulinski, but also openly reported how we got it — unlike both the other papers’ endless, anonymously sourced reporting on the Trump Russiagate “scandal,” which eventually proved to be utterly fake, the product of Clinton-campaign disinformation.

I asked where The NY Times had declared the laptop to be disinformation. That’s not this link.

Your link talks about the papers authenticating the laptop, which is something that took a long time because they weren’t allowed to examine the contents of the laptop earlier. You can’t criticize the papers for not authenticating something which Republicans refused to allow them access to.
 
What was Ben Ghazi? What was going after Hillary on her private emails? What are you doing to Biden? You think you are scoring political points but you guys have become very bad at this. Where is Karl Rove or Lee Atwater? Those guys knew how to play politics. Stop listening to Steve Bannon.
You mean stand doen Ben Ghazi to to cover up the gun running Obamas admin was doing the one where they left Americans to die horrible death's you know what screw you
 
You mean stand doen Ben Ghazi to to cover up the gun running Obamas admin was doing the one where they left Americans to die horrible death's you know what screw you
What about Trump's 10 Ben Ghazi's? Do you know that son of a bitch killed more high level soldiers than all the past presidents combined?

I'm not talking about grunts or privates. He sent in seals, green beret, etc. Guys like that who had to carry out his high risk wacky operations. And many of them died.

That's cool to be a risk taker in business. But not with soldiers lives. It's not a game
 
What about Trump's 10 Ben Ghazi's? Do you know that son of a bitch killed more high level soldiers than all the past presidents combined?

I'm not talking about grunts or privates. He sent in seals, green beret, etc. Guys like that who had to carry out his high risk wacky operations. And many of them died.

That's cool to be a risk taker in business. But not with soldiers lives. It's not a game
 
What about Trump's 10 Ben Ghazi's? Do you know that son of a bitch killed more high level soldiers than all the past presidents combined?

I'm not talking about grunts or privates. He sent in seals, green beret, etc. Guys like that who had to carry out his high risk wacky operations. And many of them died.

That's cool to be a risk taker in business. But not with soldiers lives. It's not a game
Prove it link up, did he tell support to stand down? Every time you mention Trump you make me laugh
 
What’s the explanation then?

What’s the explanation then?

House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) issued a legally binding subpoena last week requiring the FBI to turn over the file by noon Wednesday, but the bureau instead replied with a six-page letter raising various objections.

“Information from confidential human sources is unverified and, by definition, incomplete,” wrote FBI acting assistant director for congressional affairs Christopher Dunham, who also argued that informant reports must also be kept private to protect sources.

“As is clear from the name itself, confidentiality is definitional to the FBI’s Confidential Human Source program,” Dunham wrote. “Confidential human sources often provide information to the FBI at great risk to themselves and their loved ones. The information they provide also can create significant risks to others who may be referenced in their reporting.”

The FBI official concluded: “We … hope this helps you understand that keeping this kind of source information free from the perception or reality of improper influence — and preventing the redirection of this information for non-law enforcement or non-intelligence uses — is necessary for the FBI’s effective execution of our law enforcement and national security responsibilities.”

Comer slammed the FBI’s stonewalling, but he did not immediately announce further steps to acquire the document. Congress has the power to apply financial pressure to agencies and can also use litigation to enforce its orders or attempt to shame officials through contempt votes.

“It’s clear from the FBI’s response that the unclassified record the Oversight Committee subpoenaed exists, but they are refusing to provide it to the Committee,” Comer said.
 
NEVER has it been debunked. Tell us what Jared has to offer that is worth $2 billion dollars. Now this is influence peddling.
The Saudis, as you well know, INVESTED with Jared. It is still THEIR MONEY.

You have no clue as to the difference, do you? Or, is this simply your willful ignorance?
 
Last edited:
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) issued a legally binding subpoena last week requiring the FBI to turn over the file by noon Wednesday, but the bureau instead replied with a six-page letter raising various objections.

“Information from confidential human sources is unverified and, by definition, incomplete,” wrote FBI acting assistant director for congressional affairs Christopher Dunham, who also argued that informant reports must also be kept private to protect sources.

“As is clear from the name itself, confidentiality is definitional to the FBI’s Confidential Human Source program,” Dunham wrote. “Confidential human sources often provide information to the FBI at great risk to themselves and their loved ones. The information they provide also can create significant risks to others who may be referenced in their reporting.”

The FBI official concluded: “We … hope this helps you understand that keeping this kind of source information free from the perception or reality of improper influence — and preventing the redirection of this information for non-law enforcement or non-intelligence uses — is necessary for the FBI’s effective execution of our law enforcement and national security responsibilities.”

Comer slammed the FBI’s stonewalling, but he did not immediately announce further steps to acquire the document. Congress has the power to apply financial pressure to agencies and can also use litigation to enforce its orders or attempt to shame officials through contempt votes.

“It’s clear from the FBI’s response that the unclassified record the Oversight Committee subpoenaed exists, but they are refusing to provide it to the Committee,” Comer said.
So no on the links!
 
Prove it link up, did he tell support to stand down? Every time you mention Trump you make me laugh
I read all this when I was at Mara Lago. Top secret classified documents everywhere about failed covert operations.

When Trump BenGhazi'ed the Marines he said, "they knew what they were signing up for"

He was mad they call him bone spurs behind his back.
 

Forum List

Back
Top