Why wouldn't they?

First witness: Adam Schiff
Second witness: Joe Biden
Third witness: Hunter Biden
.
.
.
.
.
.
View attachment 290211
So you agree with me then that the Senate will hold a trial, right?

No.

I'm hoping with you. I hope you're right.

:popcorn:
Well I asked you why they wouldn't but you don't seem to have an answer.

Link

You just want plausible deniability... but it's not possible let alone plausible.

:21:
You're deranged. I didn't seek plausible deniability, I asked you why they wouldn't hold a trial. I can think of several reasons why they would but none for why they wouldn't. Seems you agree with me as you can't seem to name a single reason why they wouldn't.
 
The fact that President Trump's job approval ratings continue to grow while the Democrats are holding the Pelosi-Schiff production of Impeachment Theater, suggests that this nonsense will not harm President Trump in any way, but yesterday's revelation by Marie Yovanovitch that the Obama administration was just as worried about the Bidens' involvement in corruption in Ukraine as President Trump is may very well end Biden's chances for the nomination even before Deval Patrick enters the race and takes the black vote away from Biden.

Former U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch revealed at an impeachment hearing Friday that Hunter Biden’s job at a Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holding was a major issue for the Obama White House.

She acknowledged that the Obama State Department included coaching her to answer questions about former Vice President Joseph R. Biden’s son Hunter when she faced Senate confirmation hearings for the ambassador post in 2016.

“It wasn’t just generally about Burisma and corruption. It was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?” asked Rep. Elise Stefanik, New York Republican.

Yes it is,” Ms. Yovanovitch responded.

President Trump’s request for an investigation of alleged corruption involving the Bidens and Burisma is at the heart of Democrats’ impeachment case that the president abused his office for personal political gain.

“For the millions of Americans watching, President Obama’s own State Department was so concerned about potential conflicts of interest from Hunter Biden’s role at Burisma that they raised it themselves while prepping this wonderful ambassador nominee before her confirmation,” Ms. Stefanik said. “And yet our Democratic colleagues and the chairman of this committee cry foul when we dare ask that same question that the Obama State Department was so concerned about. But we will continue asking it.”

Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine ambassador admits

The difference is that while Obama tried to hide the facts of the Bidens' involvement in corruption in Ukraine from Congress and the American people, President Trump is determined to expose them.
"The fact that President Trump's job approval ratings continue to grow while the Democrats are holding the Pelosi-Schiff production of Impeachment Theater, suggests that this nonsense will not harm President Trump in any way"

LOLOL

According to one Republican-leaning poll which is almost always higher than every other poll.
You wish, but the RCP average shows the President's job approval ratings have been going straight up while the Democrats have their gossip fest.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

President Trump's average job approval ratings, 44.2% is higher than Obama's rating (according to Gallup) of 43% at this point in his first term.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama
Dumbfuck, the public hearings began just 3 days ago and there have been only two pollsters out with approval ratings since then. Rasmussen, which has Trump increasing to 50%; And Reuters, which has him at 40%, same as the last time they released a poll.

So yeah, as I said, you're basing your observations on one poll historically favorable to Trump. That's not as revealing as you fool yourself into believing.

As far as comparing Gallup's poll numbers on Obama with all polls on Trump, that's very dishonest of you. A valid comparison would be all polls for both or just Gallup for both. The reason you don't want to compare both is because:

Approval / disapproval
Obama ... 43% / 48%
Trump .... 41% / 57%
In fact, RCP lists six polls since the Pelosi announced the official opening of her impeachment show and the RCP link I gave you shows the average of all the major polls of President Trump's job approval ratings has been steadily climbing despite all the posturing of the Democrats in Congress. Obama is of no importance but his poll numbers at this point in his in his first term compared to President Trump's shows that voters are not being influenced the hearings.

Try talking after all the witnesses have testified.
lol Witnesses to what? No one who has testified so far has any first hand knowledge on anything the President has done wrong. Foe example, Marie Yovanovitch, who testified that she had no knowledge relevant to the allegations the Democrats were making against the President, did testify that the Obama administration was just as concerned about the Bidens' involvement in corruption in Ukraine as President Trump is, but while Obama tried to hide the facts from the public, President Trump is determined to expose them.

Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine ambassador admits

As these proceedings continue, it will only get worse for the Democrats.
 
The Whistleblower Complaint Timeline

WB complaint finally gets to Congress (because the ICIG forced it over the blocking of Barr and Trump) on Sept 9. Two days later the aid is released

Trump isn't going to be impeached.
Wanna bet?

You lose and we never have to read your stupid posts again. I lose and I never post again.

On?
You're foolish to make a bet with rightards... they never pay up when they lose.

Funny, I challenged every libtard on the board that Mueller would come up with zilch and would not impeach. The bet was to self-ban depending on if President Trump was impeached or not.

Not one lib took up the bet.

Are YOU willing to put your money where your mouth is?
On this one I am.

Trump WILL be Impeached. Want to bet?
 
"The fact that President Trump's job approval ratings continue to grow while the Democrats are holding the Pelosi-Schiff production of Impeachment Theater, suggests that this nonsense will not harm President Trump in any way"

LOLOL

According to one Republican-leaning poll which is almost always higher than every other poll.
You wish, but the RCP average shows the President's job approval ratings have been going straight up while the Democrats have their gossip fest.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

President Trump's average job approval ratings, 44.2% is higher than Obama's rating (according to Gallup) of 43% at this point in his first term.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

You Trump people are extremely stupid. OK, Trumps approval rating is one point higher than Obamas. And you think this insures his reelection. In your simple mind it means he's done better than Obama. And that's as simple as it is for you.

The problem with you being simple minded is Trump has a 44 percent approval rating with low unemployment and a strong economy. He's 1 point ahead of a man that had 9-10 percent unemployment and a severe recession.

Trump is in trouble and this impeachment inquiry is not helping him.
My point, which apparently went right over you head, is that the Democrats' impeachment farce is having now effect on the public's approval of President Trump. The only people paying attention to these gossipy hearings are rabid Democrats like yourself and their supporters in left leaning media outlets. The polls show voters are paying no attention. Obama is irrelevant. I only pointed his ratings to put President Trump's current rise in the polls in perspective and to demonstrate how futile the impeachment show is.
You are incapable of going over my head if you are repeating Trumps talking points. There is no increasing approval of Trump and 55 percent of the people support this inquiry. More than 13 million people watched day 1.

Here's how many people watched the first day of public impeachment hearings - CNN
The average of the major polls clearly show the President's job approval ratings have been steadily climbing despite the hearings.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

54 percent of the nation disapproves of Trump. His disapproval numbers have consistently stayed between 53-58 percent. Let me know when his approval rating is 51 percent.
 
You wish, but the RCP average shows the President's job approval ratings have been going straight up while the Democrats have their gossip fest.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

President Trump's average job approval ratings, 44.2% is higher than Obama's rating (according to Gallup) of 43% at this point in his first term.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

You Trump people are extremely stupid. OK, Trumps approval rating is one point higher than Obamas. And you think this insures his reelection. In your simple mind it means he's done better than Obama. And that's as simple as it is for you.

The problem with you being simple minded is Trump has a 44 percent approval rating with low unemployment and a strong economy. He's 1 point ahead of a man that had 9-10 percent unemployment and a severe recession.

Trump is in trouble and this impeachment inquiry is not helping him.
My point, which apparently went right over you head, is that the Democrats' impeachment farce is having now effect on the public's approval of President Trump. The only people paying attention to these gossipy hearings are rabid Democrats like yourself and their supporters in left leaning media outlets. The polls show voters are paying no attention. Obama is irrelevant. I only pointed his ratings to put President Trump's current rise in the polls in perspective and to demonstrate how futile the impeachment show is.
You are incapable of going over my head if you are repeating Trumps talking points. There is no increasing approval of Trump and 55 percent of the people support this inquiry. More than 13 million people watched day 1.

Here's how many people watched the first day of public impeachment hearings - CNN
The average of the major polls clearly show the President's job approval ratings have been steadily climbing despite the hearings.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

54 percent of the nation disapproves of Trump. His disapproval numbers have consistently stayed between 53-58 percent. Let me know when his approval rating is 51 percent.
The fact is Trump's approval ratings are higher than Obama's were at this point in Obama's first term, and this despite the impeachment farce the Democrats are holding in the House.
 
First witness: Adam Schiff
Second witness: Joe Biden
Third witness: Hunter Biden
.
.
.
.
.
.
View attachment 290211
So you agree with me then that the Senate will hold a trial, right?

No.

I'm hoping with you. I hope you're right.

:popcorn:
Well I asked you why they wouldn't but you don't seem to have an answer.

Link

You just want plausible deniability... but it's not possible let alone plausible.

:21:
You're deranged. I didn't seek plausible deniability, I asked you why they wouldn't hold a trial. I can think of several reasons why they would but none for why they wouldn't. Seems you agree with me as you can't seem to name a single reason why they wouldn't.

The lady doth protest ... and yet she knows what I posted and what it means.

The first witnesses that the republicans will call.

The left do not want that.

While I want to watch the entire thing.

:popcorn:
 
No, I said bribery is an impeachable offense. Trump didn't bribe anybody.


He basically told the President of the Ukraine to announce an investigation into Biden or lose their military aid.

Nooooooo that's not bribery. Of course not. Can't be.

He did? Can you point which page and paragraph in the transcript where he said that? Thank you.
In the transcript: "I would like you to do us a favor though".

Witness testimony points to bribery.
John Bolton called it a "drug deal".
William B Taylor Jr. says that aid was withheld until Zelensky announced new investigation of Bidens. Sondland also said that such a deal being arranged.
None of them are actual witnesses to anything.
Sondland isnt a first hand witness.
he is a zero hand witness, aka, participant.
Vindman was on the call.
Mulvaney and Rick Perry need to be allowed to testify.

David Holmes summary:

  • Not only did he hear Sondland talking to the President about investigations, and Sondland made clear to him afterwards he had just talked to the President.

  • Sondland made clear that Trump didn't "give a shit about Ukraine" except for "big stuff" like "Biden investigations".

  • Holmes immediately debriefed superiors at the embassy, so there are more witnesses.

  • Holmes initially thought his testimony was pointless, because witnesses like Taylor and Yovanovitch are so consistent and unimpeachable. It was only when Republicans started the laughable "hearsay" defense that he realized his direct witness to the Trump phone call was significant.

  • Holmes has new details about Lutsenko's conspiracy with Giuliani and Parnas/Fruman to oust Yovanovich, which SDNY has explicitly indicated is a core subject of their investigation and existing indictments.

  • Not mentioned in this article, but Holmes was present as the embassy meeting at which they received the shocking news that OMB had placed a hold on aid in the days leading up to the Zelensky call, and were informed that "the order had come from the President".
Rumor has it that Parnas is singing like a bird to save his own skin.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
The Whistleblower Complaint Timeline

WB complaint finally gets to Congress (because the ICIG forced it over the blocking of Barr and Trump) on Sept 9. Two days later the aid is released

Trump isn't going to be impeached.
Wanna bet?

You lose and we never have to read your stupid posts again. I lose and I never post again.

On?
You're foolish to make a bet with rightards... they never pay up when they lose.

Funny, I challenged every libtard on the board that Mueller would come up with zilch and would not impeach. The bet was to self-ban depending on if President Trump was impeached or not.

Not one lib took up the bet.

Are YOU willing to put your money where your mouth is?
On this one I am.

Trump WILL be Impeached. Want to bet?

Dems may impeach before the election, just to smear the President before the election. But it would go no where in the Senate.

They will not impeach him in the next few months nor will they remove him.
 
"The fact that President Trump's job approval ratings continue to grow while the Democrats are holding the Pelosi-Schiff production of Impeachment Theater, suggests that this nonsense will not harm President Trump in any way"

LOLOL

According to one Republican-leaning poll which is almost always higher than every other poll.
You wish, but the RCP average shows the President's job approval ratings have been going straight up while the Democrats have their gossip fest.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

President Trump's average job approval ratings, 44.2% is higher than Obama's rating (according to Gallup) of 43% at this point in his first term.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama
Dumbfuck, the public hearings began just 3 days ago and there have been only two pollsters out with approval ratings since then. Rasmussen, which has Trump increasing to 50%; And Reuters, which has him at 40%, same as the last time they released a poll.

So yeah, as I said, you're basing your observations on one poll historically favorable to Trump. That's not as revealing as you fool yourself into believing.

As far as comparing Gallup's poll numbers on Obama with all polls on Trump, that's very dishonest of you. A valid comparison would be all polls for both or just Gallup for both. The reason you don't want to compare both is because:

Approval / disapproval
Obama ... 43% / 48%
Trump .... 41% / 57%
In fact, RCP lists six polls since the Pelosi announced the official opening of her impeachment show and the RCP link I gave you shows the average of all the major polls of President Trump's job approval ratings has been steadily climbing despite all the posturing of the Democrats in Congress. Obama is of no importance but his poll numbers at this point in his in his first term compared to President Trump's shows that voters are not being influenced the hearings.

Try talking after all the witnesses have testified.
lol Witnesses to what? No one who has testified so far has any first hand knowledge on anything the President has done wrong. Foe example, Marie Yovanovitch, who testified that she had no knowledge relevant to the allegations the Democrats were making against the President, did testify that the Obama administration was just as concerned about the Bidens' involvement in corruption in Ukraine as President Trump is, but while Obama tried to hide the facts from the public, President Trump is determined to expose them.

Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine ambassador admits

As these proceedings continue, it will only get worse for the Democrats.

If you're wanting first hand knowledge why are you asking for the whistleblower? That bullshit excuse ain't going to cut it. As this inquiry continues, it only gets worse for Trump.
 
Considering that the withholding of the Javelins would predictably result in (additional) Ukrainian wounded and dead, you might even call it "exaction".

There is another aspect that I find is widely overlooked. Nothing yells "anti-corruption crusade" like removing a widely admired anti-corruption crusader from her office. Oh, wait, there is one better than that:

Nothing yells "anti-corruption crusade" as loudly as urging your counterpart to bring the power of the state to bear on a political opponent in an obviously politically motivated "investigation". That's going to teach them Ukrainians a lesson, doesn't it?

That's the U.S. of A. under Trump in a nutshell, teaching the world a lesson in corruption. Devastating though this is, the number of folks who would go along with all that is worse, still.


It is behavior that cannot be defended. To allow this type of bastardization of our foreign policy, to allow the executive to attack the loyal opposition in this manner, is an attack on the Republic.


Damn, there's not suppose to be opposition within the administration, loyal or otherwise. These fuckers are hired to carry out the policy of their elected boss, not try implement their own policy.

.
"Their own policy" is the policy of the United States as it had been for the past several years, supporting Ukraine's efforts to clean out the corrupt oligarchs subverting attempts at a fair and democratic government. It was also the policy of the United States to support Ukraine militarily in its fight against Russian aggression.
If the "boss" didn't like this policy, for whatever reason, he had every right to stand up and tell the State Department why and what he wanted done instead. But Trump didn't do that, did he? He got his private attorney and a bunch of thug friends to do it "under the table" and for the most part the current officials around the President closed their eyes to it and let it happen. I'm grateful to the whistleblower and to the people who have testified to what happened. Not because I couldn't cope with not having "my guy" elected, but because Trump is a crook.


Imagine, had Trump had the 'whistleblower' arrested as a spy.....


Obama did just that.


The Obama administration had 8 whistleblowers. President Obama handled each one the same way - he had the FBI bust into their home, arrest them, and he then prosecuted them for espionage. Of course the biased media kept quiet and looked the other way. Their were a few exceptions. Here's one news report on it:

War on whistleblowers?




Bet you didn't know that.

What did they blow the whistle on? I watched the video and it never said.

The whistleblower claimed Donald Trump solicited a foreign country to help intervene in the 2020 election and that the White House sought to cover it up.
 
You wish, but the RCP average shows the President's job approval ratings have been going straight up while the Democrats have their gossip fest.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

President Trump's average job approval ratings, 44.2% is higher than Obama's rating (according to Gallup) of 43% at this point in his first term.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama

You Trump people are extremely stupid. OK, Trumps approval rating is one point higher than Obamas. And you think this insures his reelection. In your simple mind it means he's done better than Obama. And that's as simple as it is for you.

The problem with you being simple minded is Trump has a 44 percent approval rating with low unemployment and a strong economy. He's 1 point ahead of a man that had 9-10 percent unemployment and a severe recession.

Trump is in trouble and this impeachment inquiry is not helping him.
My point, which apparently went right over you head, is that the Democrats' impeachment farce is having now effect on the public's approval of President Trump. The only people paying attention to these gossipy hearings are rabid Democrats like yourself and their supporters in left leaning media outlets. The polls show voters are paying no attention. Obama is irrelevant. I only pointed his ratings to put President Trump's current rise in the polls in perspective and to demonstrate how futile the impeachment show is.
You are incapable of going over my head if you are repeating Trumps talking points. There is no increasing approval of Trump and 55 percent of the people support this inquiry. More than 13 million people watched day 1.

Here's how many people watched the first day of public impeachment hearings - CNN
The average of the major polls clearly show the President's job approval ratings have been steadily climbing despite the hearings.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

54 percent of the nation disapproves of Trump. His disapproval numbers have consistently stayed between 53-58 percent. Let me know when his approval rating is 51 percent.
Then why do this with an election around the corner? They know they cannot beat him.
 
You wish, but the RCP average shows the President's job approval ratings have been going straight up while the Democrats have their gossip fest.

RealClearPolitics - Election Other - President Trump Job Approval

President Trump's average job approval ratings, 44.2% is higher than Obama's rating (according to Gallup) of 43% at this point in his first term.

Presidential Approval Ratings -- Barack Obama
Dumbfuck, the public hearings began just 3 days ago and there have been only two pollsters out with approval ratings since then. Rasmussen, which has Trump increasing to 50%; And Reuters, which has him at 40%, same as the last time they released a poll.

So yeah, as I said, you're basing your observations on one poll historically favorable to Trump. That's not as revealing as you fool yourself into believing.

As far as comparing Gallup's poll numbers on Obama with all polls on Trump, that's very dishonest of you. A valid comparison would be all polls for both or just Gallup for both. The reason you don't want to compare both is because:

Approval / disapproval
Obama ... 43% / 48%
Trump .... 41% / 57%
In fact, RCP lists six polls since the Pelosi announced the official opening of her impeachment show and the RCP link I gave you shows the average of all the major polls of President Trump's job approval ratings has been steadily climbing despite all the posturing of the Democrats in Congress. Obama is of no importance but his poll numbers at this point in his in his first term compared to President Trump's shows that voters are not being influenced the hearings.

Try talking after all the witnesses have testified.
lol Witnesses to what? No one who has testified so far has any first hand knowledge on anything the President has done wrong. Foe example, Marie Yovanovitch, who testified that she had no knowledge relevant to the allegations the Democrats were making against the President, did testify that the Obama administration was just as concerned about the Bidens' involvement in corruption in Ukraine as President Trump is, but while Obama tried to hide the facts from the public, President Trump is determined to expose them.

Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine ambassador admits

As these proceedings continue, it will only get worse for the Democrats.

If you're wanting first hand knowledge why are you asking for the whistleblower? That bullshit excuse ain't going to cut it. As this inquiry continues, it only gets worse for Trump.
In fact, as the polls show, as these hearings go on, it is getting better for Trump.
 
  1. Since when do we owe Ukraine anything especially for nothing in return?
  2. Every foreign deal comes with elements of benefit to both sides. Except this one?
  3. How is trying to investigate a crime committed years ago by a top US official, especially one involving trying to tamper with an election, "getting caught with your hand in a jar?"
  4. What was the political gain for Trump in any of this? Biden's not even his opponent in next year's election! Just a very unlikely one.
WON'T IT BE FUNNY NOW after Hillary, Biden and the Democrat's using help from both Ukraine and Russia trying to smear Trump failed in 2016, that Trump is removed from office for trying to expose what went on only to have Biden then go on to become the new president anyway?! :auiqs.jpg:

Our conversion to Full Banana Republic will have been complete.
1) congress approved military aid to Ukraine. "power of the purse" belongs to congress. The president can suspend this aid for purpose to benefit the country, but not for personal gain.
2) Suspending aid causes deaths. If a foreign government acts to benefit a political party and the expense of another, it hurts foreign relations.
3) Biden was already investigated prior to the July 25th phone call. Tampering with election? Mueller investigated this.
4) Biden is at the top of many polls for the 2020 presidential race.

1) Yes, he can suspend funds for that reason, and Trump laid out several. It's the Democrats who claim to be able to read minds, and mind reading should not be grounds for impeachment.

2) Again, no evidence that Trump suspended anything for political reasons. Ukraine officials had no idea the funds were suspended until a month after the phone call. Obviously, they didn't drastically need them at the time. What Trump provided to them in the past was sufficient.

3)Yes, Biden was investigated by his bosses team. What did you really expect, a conviction?

4) The election is a little less than a year away. Trump nor anybody knows who the nominee will be. What is evident is that Biden has been losing ground since spring.
It matters not whether or not Biden wins the Democrat's nomination as he's still eligible to run in the election even if he loses their nomination.

Lying about whether or not Biden is a political rival of Trump's reveals your desperation.


It matters not whether or not Biden wins the Democrat's nomination as he's still eligible to run in the election even if he loses their nomination.
Wow, short bus, according to you no natural born citizen over 35 can't be investigated during a presidential election year. Did your special ed teacher tell you that?

.
LOLOL

Moron, I said nothing of the sort. How the fuck do you keep getting this wrong?? I never said a candidate for president can't be investigated. You only think that's what I said because you're a flaming imbecile. What I said was.... a president running for re-election is not allowed to solicit a foreign national to help find dirt on another candidate running for that same office.

Maybe you like having a lawless dictator run a banana republic where they can use he power of their political office to eliminate their competition, but most don't.


Poor little short buy, I highlighted exactly what you said, being eligible to run for office is not an exemption from investigation. You commies are proving that on a daily basis. You're doing exactly what you're accusing Trump of doing. Don't think your short bus status excuses your hypocrisy.

.
 
He basically told the President of the Ukraine to announce an investigation into Biden or lose their military aid.

Nooooooo that's not bribery. Of course not. Can't be.

He did? Can you point which page and paragraph in the transcript where he said that? Thank you.
In the transcript: "I would like you to do us a favor though".

Witness testimony points to bribery.
John Bolton called it a "drug deal".
William B Taylor Jr. says that aid was withheld until Zelensky announced new investigation of Bidens. Sondland also said that such a deal being arranged.
None of them are actual witnesses to anything.
Sondland isnt a first hand witness.
he is a zero hand witness, aka, participant.
Vindman was on the call.
Mulvaney and Rick Perry need to be allowed to testify.

David Holmes summary:

  • Not only did he hear Sondland talking to the President about investigations, and Sondland made clear to him afterwards he had just talked to the President.

  • Sondland made clear that Trump didn't "give a shit about Ukraine" except for "big stuff" like "Biden investigations".

  • Holmes immediately debriefed superiors at the embassy, so there are more witnesses.

  • Holmes initially thought his testimony was pointless, because witnesses like Taylor and Yovanovitch are so consistent and unimpeachable. It was only when Republicans started the laughable "hearsay" defense that he realized his direct witness to the Trump phone call was significant.

  • Holmes has new details about Lutsenko's conspiracy with Giuliani and Parnas/Fruman to oust Yovanovich, which SDNY has explicitly indicated is a core subject of their investigation and existing indictments.

  • Not mentioned in this article, but Holmes was present as the embassy meeting at which they received the shocking news that OMB had placed a hold on aid in the days leading up to the Zelensky call, and were informed that "the order had come from the President".
Rumor has it that Parnas is singing like a bird to save his own skin.

There will be more joining the chorus. Watch for Giuliani to become a singer. The last place a 70 something year old former US prosecuting attorney from NYC wants to be is in a New York federal prison facility.
 
Laura Ingraham Literally Said 'Attempted Bribery Is Not In Constitution'

Yes Fox News idiots are admitting the crime.

And newsflash, "attempted" criminal acts are crimes in themselves

He got caught in the act...because the whistle blower came forward...and that's the only reason he didn't succeed

More proof that NaziCons are idiots.

EJXvCzfXYAAWMcA.jpg

Gee, if he were in California and got less than $950 dollars it would have been petty theft thanks to you fricken loons,
 
“Republicans spent much of the week complaining about how the people testifying in the impeachment hearings weren’t firsthand witnesses. Well, here was an actual transcript furnished by the White House and a firsthand witness to what Sondland was saying about Trump’s interest in Ukraine. Both suggest Trump wasn’t all that keen on Ukrainian good governance.” ibid

True.

Trump was only keen to ‘get dirt’ on Biden, at the expense of Ukrainian good governance.
Oh-Wait-Youre-Serious_o_97195.gif
 
Dumbfuck, the public hearings began just 3 days ago and there have been only two pollsters out with approval ratings since then. Rasmussen, which has Trump increasing to 50%; And Reuters, which has him at 40%, same as the last time they released a poll.

So yeah, as I said, you're basing your observations on one poll historically favorable to Trump. That's not as revealing as you fool yourself into believing.

As far as comparing Gallup's poll numbers on Obama with all polls on Trump, that's very dishonest of you. A valid comparison would be all polls for both or just Gallup for both. The reason you don't want to compare both is because:

Approval / disapproval
Obama ... 43% / 48%
Trump .... 41% / 57%
In fact, RCP lists six polls since the Pelosi announced the official opening of her impeachment show and the RCP link I gave you shows the average of all the major polls of President Trump's job approval ratings has been steadily climbing despite all the posturing of the Democrats in Congress. Obama is of no importance but his poll numbers at this point in his in his first term compared to President Trump's shows that voters are not being influenced the hearings.

Try talking after all the witnesses have testified.
lol Witnesses to what? No one who has testified so far has any first hand knowledge on anything the President has done wrong. Foe example, Marie Yovanovitch, who testified that she had no knowledge relevant to the allegations the Democrats were making against the President, did testify that the Obama administration was just as concerned about the Bidens' involvement in corruption in Ukraine as President Trump is, but while Obama tried to hide the facts from the public, President Trump is determined to expose them.

Obama officials wary of Hunter Biden’s big-money job, ousted Ukraine ambassador admits

As these proceedings continue, it will only get worse for the Democrats.

If you're wanting first hand knowledge why are you asking for the whistleblower? That bullshit excuse ain't going to cut it. As this inquiry continues, it only gets worse for Trump.
In fact, as the polls show, as these hearings go on, it is getting better for Trump.

Of course it is. And next year The Preakness is going to be a unicorn race.
 

Forum List

Back
Top