OFFICIAL: Kavanaugh Hearings Thread

[iceberg]

Kennedy warns of dangers to democracy, won't talk Kavanaugh

the kids are seeing it. us "adults" are so hellbent on getting our way at all costs, we're simply tearing everything down in the process.

how can teachers teach about a system that doesn't work these days? what do the kids see on tv and on whatever they hell kids see shit on these days? is this really what we want to hand down to the next generation. more payback / revenge politics and that you can do whatever you want anymore w/o consequence?

everything is on fire and we're bitching about how big the flames should be on those "other guys" never realizing we're burning too.

but hey - put common sense aside and pretend what we want is true so it makes it more worth fighting for i suppose. i don't know what the answers are anymore. but i do know we're a long long ways away from it.

the kids are seeing it. us "adults"...adulting. and getting it so damn wrong.

 

[beagle9]

Nothing like 'Nazicrats'.

Tell us again why presumption of innocence and due process are anachronisms?

Nazicrats is exactly what your filthy party is. Totalitarian goons with contempt for the most basic principles of law.

I think their leader is Bill Marh... They should be so proud.

 

[The Purge]

You're not on a FOX NEWS facebook page here. This is a political board with big boys and girls, and talking in platitudes will get you nowhere. Be specific about what you are talking about.

Since you obviously don’t know what the word infallible means, since it certainly cannot be applied to Blasey Frauds testimony no matter how partisan you are, and nor do you know how to spell it, let me help you out:

infallible
ɪnˈfalɪb(ə)l/
adjective

1. incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
   "doctors are not infallible"
   synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Again, you're talknig in platitudes--exactly what "mistakes?" We're not the Webster's dictationary on this board either. Be very specific on what "you" think the mistakes that Dr. Ford stated--so that can be debated on this thread.
If you can't describe those you go on ignore.

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

 

[Asclepias]

Since you obviously don’t know what the word infallible means, since it certainly cannot be applied to Blasey Frauds testimony no matter how partisan you are, and nor do you know how to spell it, let me help you out:

infallible
ɪnˈfalɪb(ə)l/
adjective

1. incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
   "doctors are not infallible"
   synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Again, you're talknig in platitudes--exactly what "mistakes?" We're not the Webster's dictationary on this board either. Be very specific on what "you" think the mistakes that Dr. Ford stated--so that can be debated on this thread.
If you can't describe those you go on ignore.

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

 

[The Purge]

Again, you're talknig in platitudes--exactly what "mistakes?" We're not the Webster's dictationary on this board either. Be very specific on what "you" think the mistakes that Dr. Ford stated--so that can be debated on this thread.
If you can't describe those you go on ignore.

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

You are truly a moron. No knowing, bag of bullshit...

"The August 7 examination, held in a Maryland Hilton Hotel, consisted of a one-page, handwritten statement by Ford, an interview and two questions: Is any part of your statement false? And, Did you make up any part of your statement?^

Here's the polygraph test Christine Blasey Ford took on her allegations against Kavanaugh

 

[Asclepias]

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

You are truly a moron. No knowing, bag of bullshit...

"The August 7 examination, held in a Maryland Hilton Hotel, consisted of a one-page, handwritten statement by Ford, an interview and two questions: Is any part of your statement false? And, Did you make up any part of your statement?^

Here's the polygraph test Christine Blasey Ford took on her allegations against Kavanaugh

Its not your fault youre too stupid to realize they arent going to report the control questions.

 

[iceberg]

Again, you're talknig in platitudes--exactly what "mistakes?" We're not the Webster's dictationary on this board either. Be very specific on what "you" think the mistakes that Dr. Ford stated--so that can be debated on this thread.
If you can't describe those you go on ignore.

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

 

[Tilly]

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

So, as I said, and by your own belated admission, her testimony is NOT INFALLIBLE.
Thank you!

 

[Asclepias]

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

I dont have to. I know for a fact they ask control questions to establish a baseline. there is no way someone sat her down, strapped her up, and jumped into the test without establishing a baseline. Only someone seriously retarded would think she was asked only two questions.

 

[The Purge]

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

You are truly a moron. No knowing, bag of bullshit...

"The August 7 examination, held in a Maryland Hilton Hotel, consisted of a one-page, handwritten statement by Ford, an interview and two questions: Is any part of your statement false? And, Did you make up any part of your statement?^

Here's the polygraph test Christine Blasey Ford took on her allegations against Kavanaugh

Its not your fault youre too stupid to realize they arent going to report the control questions.

And NOT A THING, ABOUT THE JUDGE....AND if control questions, by some miracle were asked they are part of the test to verify the findings.. Stop watching Law And Order for your information!

 

[beagle9]

The forum nanny said I couldn't post my opinion due to links above that I had to omit one by one.

My post today starts here, and not above (beautress)
Kavanaugh is a Roman Catholic since birth. He has kept his pledge to both his faith and his nation by living a clean and productive life. One of the modern planks of the DNC has become a hostility to anybody who opposes the killing of a fetus before its birth due to something King David proclaimed in one of his Psalms recorded in the Bible book of the same name. To translate it into modern day words, King David's words are interpreted: "Before I was completely formed in my mother's womb, God knew I was there." Some believe the words mean that life, even in the womb is sacred to God's knowledge, and that to intentionally remove it would be to disappoint God by committing an act of murder against the unborn.

This information makes some women mad because by the time they have done the deed, nobody informed them of this biblical knowledge and insight into the sanctity of human life from the time of conception until birth, from birth until death, and from death into heaven. It angers them because nobody told them this point of view prior to their enriching some abortion doctor who may not be allowed to acknowledge his own beliefs in favor of not upsetting the pregnant women who is not informed because she may become suicidal in extreme situations of having been raped and left for dead by someone she didn't even know.

Some have a panacea for everything as a goal in life. There isn't one for the taking an innocent life that is sacred to God and destroying it.

I am not even a Roman Catholic, I am not a fundamentalist. I am simply stating the two sides as I know it. Some state laws have gone with a disenchantment that their decision caused a good woman to commit suicide or worse. Other state laws are determined by state legislatures that lean toward biblical knowledge of extreme right and wrong and commit themselves to correctness as to what pleases God over what pleases someone who doesn't want the responsibility of a baby that will never have a father due to the extreme circumstances of the act that caused the union that brought the child into life at conception. I am not judging one way or another, I only know what is right for me. Even my political adversaries may not agree with my bringing up the psalm that has caused a rift between believers and doubters, believers and other believers, etc.

I place all judgment in the hands of God in spiritual matters and judgments for people with material issues in the hands of the laws that are written in sundry governing districts.
Not every believer shares my sentiments. It's complicated. If you are a person of faith, you are bound to get grief from those who have none for their reasons. In the world, there are people who chest thump over having more faith than someone sitting on the fence. IMHO, that's in God's hands. Belief and disbelief has a continuum that is more contentious in recent years than it was in Colonial times. The best we can do, imho, is live and let live. That is not everyone's mantra.

I hope that explains at least what one of us thinks who is willing to listen to both sides of the abortion issue. Each person has the right to make his own decision. It's more commonly called free will. That too, was God's gift to mankind--free will to choose for oneself what is right and what isn't.

Y'all have a nice day.

Ok, I read this.... Now what's your stand on abortion ? Are you for it or against it ?

If you are against it along with the majority who are against it let's say, then should the majority along with your view be considered or just ignored no matter how many people see it as the murdering of a precious human being ? How do you think any of our laws have been created and honored by us over the years ? It's because of the negative impacts on human beings is why we usually makes laws to protect and preserve life. How unborn children were somehow taken out of the laws that were for preserving and protecting life is a real mystery to me. It seems to have came with the culture shift during the 60's I would imagine, and it's been down hill ever since.

Yeah live and let live has resulted in millions of potential beautiful lives being lost.

What a shame !

 

[iceberg]

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

I dont have to. I know for a fact they ask control questions to establish a baseline. there is no way someone sat her down, strapped her up, and jumped into the test without establishing a baseline. Only someone seriously retarded would think she was asked only two questions.

but if they only ask cotrol questions cqn that affirm someone is lying?

then are 2 questions enough after that?

 

[Tilly]

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

Lie detector tests are notoriously unreliable, which is why they are inadmissible as evidence.

Her hubby and buddies attesting that she told them this story in 2012, 30 years after the event, is not evidence that the event happened, nor that Kav was the perpetrator.

Character witnesses don’t prove that her allegation is true at all, nor that the event even happened, nor that Kav was the perp.


What else you got?

 

[Tilly]

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.

Nope, he’s already had 6 FBI background checks and nada.
She asked for an FBI investigation as she was instructed by her handlers that this was the only way to delay his nomination.

What else you got?

 

[The Purge]

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

I dont have to. I know for a fact they ask control questions to establish a baseline. there is no way someone sat her down, strapped her up, and jumped into the test without establishing a baseline. Only someone seriously retarded would think she was asked only two questions.

but if they only ask cotrol questions cqn that affirm someone is lying?

then are 2 questions enough after that?

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

I dont have to. I know for a fact they ask control questions to establish a baseline. there is no way someone sat her down, strapped her up, and jumped into the test without establishing a baseline. Only someone seriously retarded would think she was asked only two questions.

but if they only ask cotrol questions cqn that affirm someone is lying?

then are 2 questions enough after that?

How to Cheat a Polygraph Test (Lie Detector)

 

[beagle9]

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

I dont have to. I know for a fact they ask control questions to establish a baseline. there is no way someone sat her down, strapped her up, and jumped into the test without establishing a baseline. Only someone seriously retarded would think she was asked only two questions.

All that, and she don't know who paid for this test ??? Yeah right.

 

[Tilly]

Infallible? Seriously?
I don’t even know what to say to such blatant (wilfull?) idiocy!

You're not on a FOX NEWS facebook page here. This is a political board with big boys and girls, and talking in platitudes will get you nowhere. Be specific about what you are talking about.

Since you obviously don’t know what the word infallible means, since it certainly cannot be applied to Blasey Frauds testimony no matter how partisan you are, and nor do you know how to spell it, let me help you out:

infallible
ɪnˈfalɪb(ə)l/
adjective

1. incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
   "doctors are not infallible"
   synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Again, you're talknig in platitudes--exactly what "mistakes?" We're not the Webster's dictationary on this board either. Be very specific on what "you" think the mistakes that Dr. Ford stated--so that can be debated on this thread.
If you can't describe those you go on ignore.

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

The adrenaline is pumping you are in a fight or flight situation. With women it's always flight.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

Oreo, a woman has accused you of sexually attacking her 36 years ago.
She has provided no date and no location, so you can’t provide an alibi.
The people she cites as witnesses have no recollection of this happening.
How will you PROVE you didn’t do it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Since you obviously don’t know what the word infallible means, since it certainly cannot be applied to Blasey Frauds testimony no matter how partisan you are, and nor do you know how to spell it, let me help you out:

infallible
ɪnˈfalɪb(ə)l/
adjective

1. incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
   "doctors are not infallible"
   synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Again, you're talknig in platitudes--exactly what "mistakes?" We're not the Webster's dictationary on this board either. Be very specific on what "you" think the mistakes that Dr. Ford stated--so that can be debated on this thread.
If you can't describe those you go on ignore.

Let me again remind you of the definition of INFALLIBLE since you clearly still don’t understand the word:

incapable of making mistakes or being wrong.
"doctors are not infallible"
synonyms: unerring, error-free, unfailing, faultless, flawless, impeccable, perfect, true, uncanny, precise, accurate, meticulous, scrupulous;

Now, which part of a testimony entirely lacking in specifics such as date and location, details such as how she got home although she remembers the number of beers she had, and her own named witnesses not corroborating her story don’t you get?

How is testimony lacking in dates, location and corroboration from witnesses put forth by her, faultless, precise, scrupulous, meticulous and true? Or, in a word, INFALLIBLE?

Get it yet, dotard?

Any physcologist in this country will tell you that people who go through a tramactic experience--will lose memory on details of an event, because only the act that caused the TRAMA is burned into memory.

It's the equivalent of someone shooting at you, and you're asked years later the color of homes you ran by, and number of fences you had to jump over to get away from the perpetrator. Those details you will NOT remember. So color or description of the bathroom she locked herself into, address's, specific time and dates are gone from memory.

As an example. My husband & I were in a serious car accident years ago. My husband was air lifted in a flight for life helicopter. I can give you every detail of that car sliding around the corner which what seemed like a 100 miles per hour, but years later I cannot remember the specific date it happened.

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.

What should concern you, is Dr. Ford wanted an FBI investigation of Brett Kavanaugh prior to giving testimony. Indicating that she may know that an FBI investigation into Brett Kavanaugh's early years behavior would out him as unfit to hold a position on the U.S. Supreme court.
Christine Blasey Ford wants FBI investigation before testifying - CNNPolitics

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance.

And she says it took much longer than she thought.
She felt like she told her whole life story.

I think it was much more than 2 questions and that she failed most of it.

 

[The Purge]

BTW--she apparently has passed a lie detector test, and most certainly has her own witness's that will attest of her story that she told them in 2012, and also has plenty of witness's that will attest to her own character.


I agree, she has no evidence to back up her claims.

A 2 question lie detector test, where she knew the questions in advance. Set up by her LEGAL TEAM in August.....she said in sworn testimony she didnt know who paid for it!....yeah, can I sell you a bridge? ....no witnesses. No idea where she was, supposedly ran out of house but DOESN'T KNOW HOW SHE GOT HOME?????....LYING BULLSHIT, AND THEN WE GET SOCIALIST SCUMBAGS THAT KNOW THIS (EVEN YOU SUBVERSIVES ARE SMART ENOUGH TO REALIZE IT) BUT WANT TO RUN OUT THE CLOCK UNTIK THE NOV. ELECTION. HOPING THE DUMB PEOPLE OF AMERICA VOTE IN ENOUGH OF YOU FILTH TO CHANGE THE SC PICK!.....Yes, I shouting. You dishonest DemonRATS are PATHETIC!

You sound like an idiot. They never ask just 2 questions on a polygraph. They ask more control questions than that.

so.. you didnt look at the test first, did you?

I dont have to. I know for a fact they ask control questions to establish a baseline. there is no way someone sat her down, strapped her up, and jumped into the test without establishing a baseline. Only someone seriously retarded would think she was asked only two questions.

All that, and she don't know who paid for this test ??? Yeah right.

Or how she got there, or how she got home or was it 2 boys or 4 boys.....in a court of law she would be sued for slander!

 

[beagle9]

I want the FBI to investigate the envelope that Jackson-Lee slipped to Ford's lawyer. What was in it? a check? Cash? A swiss bank account number?

Reminds me of the tarmat meeting... They were just swapping kids birthday dates, you know just the usual stuff that happens in situations like that.