OFFICIAL: Kavanaugh Hearings Thread

[BlackFlag]

Again, this is NOT a court of law, it's a job interview.

I have participated in job interviews before. None of them involved witnesses testifying against me.

The allegation makes it a Court, not an interview.

You’ve never applied for an important job

She faces felony charges for lying. What employer has that ability?

Who’s facing felony charges here?

 

[Oldstyle]

If it WERE a court of law we wouldn't have arbitrary halts to questioning! I want information from this woman. I want answers to questions. I could care less how many letters of support she has received. The GOP Senators that agreed to this set up are IDIOTS! It's already quite obvious that Ford will slow play any of the segments where she is being questioned by the prosecutor brought in to get to the bottom of this. All she needs to do is spend a few minutes reading through the letter SHE wrote to check it's accuracy and that pretty much eats up most of the time that is allowed for her to be questioned!

 

[DrLove]

Yeah - she screwed 54 guys while in an all girls high school
And wound up drunk and half nude on a picnic bench.
When you clowns gonna let those butt nuggets go anyway?

THIS is the person who claims Kavanaugh attempted to rape her, the woman who can't remember where she was, what day it was, what YEAR it was, admits she was drunk, admits she had 50+ sex partners, and whose 4 witnesses say 'it never happened'.....and THIS is who ChiComm Feinstein and the other Obstructionists drag out of the woodpile as a 'credible' accuser to go after Kavanaugh?!

Bwuhahahaha......

You need to understand that when you make shit up and hang your hat on a thoroughly discredited RWNJ blog ...
Your credibility circles the drain.
Trump would do well to understand that reality as well.

 

[MarcATL]

So the right wingers are convinced she's lying.

And the left wingers are convinced she's not lying.

OMFG

THIS IS FUCKING INCREDIBLE

WHAT A PROFOUND BREAKTHROUGH
.

Which side is coming off to you as cool and calm, and which side is coming off as upset and unhinged by these ongoing proceedings?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You’ve never applied for an important job

Oh, please tell me what "important" job you interviewed for where they brought in witnesses to testify against you. Do share.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Again, this is NOT a court of law, it's a job interview.

I have participated in job interviews before. None of them involved witnesses testifying against me.

The allegation makes it a Court, not an interview.

You’ve never applied for an important job

She faces felony charges for lying. What employer has that ability?

Who’s facing felony charges here?

ANYONE caught lying under oath INCLUDING HER

 

[caddo kid]

So far, Ford is looking & sounding pretty credible

After Ford's testimony before this first break, Kavanaugh will have an uphill struggle attempting to counter it.

we are not living in the Anita Hill era but I understand some of the folks here want to return to the past & some here are still living there.

After all, that is the whole concept of MAGA; going backwards in time.

 

[JBvM]

Wow! The Trollish attacks on Ford reveal quite a bit about people who support and apologize for the behavior of men like Kavanaugh, Trump, Weinstein, Cosby. Then again, I don't remember people being so nasty and vigorous in defense of Weinstein and Cosby. They weren't part of the rightwing game plan

Then there is Bill Clinton. Trump trolled the female accusers of Bill and has actually called Bill 'a rapist' without anymore of the so-called evidence demanded by Good Old Boy Brett's apologists. It's been a few decades that Bill's accusers have been under the spotlight, and we know for a fact that most all of them have been proven to be liars. There is the Paula Jones thing .. and ugh, what a lovely human being she turned out to be and she was coached by some of the nastiest dirtiest rightwing manipulators

and

and


and
and

Imagine, Brett Kavanaugh was one of the people trying to entrap and condemn Bill Clinton with less so-called evidence than rightwing creeps demand

 

[deanrd]

The Moon Bat bitch is about to speak. The one whose students say is a vindictive hateful asshole and a terrible professor.

You know that it's already been shown that that is a different professor, right? I bet you knew that but purposely want to lie thinking that others would not notice. I bet that's it. Carry on, woman-hater.

Conservative propagandists know it doesn’t matter if something is a lie, as long as they can get people to believe it.

You should watch this over at Fox. All those fox Trumpsters are going nuts trying to figure out how to ruin her. They keep coming back to ‘but she is so credible’ and getting angry about that.

It’s really quite hilarious.

 

[AZGAL]

Think about how convincing criminal psycopaths are and the acting they do to achieve their goals. Do not believe Dr.Ford because even a FBI and police investigation will still turn up NO EVIDENCE. This is a sham.

 

[LeeOnLido]

“They know the optics of 11 white men questioning Dr. Ford ... will be so harmful and so damaging to the GOP.” -- Areva Martin, CNN legal analyst

"no more mr white guy!" - senator cory booker

“They understand that you have all of these white men who would be questioning this woman ... the optics of it would look terrible.” -- Gloria Borger, CNN chief political analyst

“Women across this nation should be outraged at what these white men senators are doing to this woman.” -- Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif.

“There has been some discussion of the GOP senators who happened to all be ... white men.” -- Jim Sciutto, CNN correspondent

“What troubles me is now there are ... they’re all white men.” -- Jennifer Granholm, former governor of Michigan, on CNN

”You’re seeing on display a metaphor for what this party is, which is basically ignorant white men.” -- “Morning Joe” contributor Donny Deutsch

“All these white men ... stumbling all over themselves asking her, you know, aggressive and obnoxious questions.” -- Asha Rangappa, CNN analyst

“What are those -- that collection of old white men going to do?” -- Cynthia Alksne, MSNBC contributor

“If she testifies in front of the Judiciary Committee, where 11 members are white men ...” -- Susan Del Percio, Republican political strategist, on MSNBC

“Once again, it will be all white men on the Republican side of the Judiciary Committee.” -- CNN anchor Poppy Harlow

“The optics for Republicans are going to be really tricky ... You’ve got all white men on the Republican side here ...” -- Julie Pace, Washington bureau chief for The Associated Press, on CNN

“The Republicans, it happens to be 11 white men still on that side.” -- CNN host John Berman

“The Republicans, it is 11 white men, talk to me about how you think the tone inside this hearing on Monday will be perceived?" -- Berman, a few minutes later


“On the Republican side, all 11 are white men.” -- Berman, again, same show, several minutes later

“What hasn’t changed is the number of white men questioning, certainly, on the Republican side.” -- Dana Bash, CNN chief political correspondent

“The Republican side on the Senate Judiciary Committee is all white men ...” -- Irin Carmon, senior correspondent for New York Magazine, on MSNBC

“Only this crowd of clueless old white guys ...” -- The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin on Twitter

This strategy was set before the doors of this chamber were ever opened this morning.......

if Franken was there, he would only be asking Ford for her secret chocolate chip cookie recipe

 

[MarcATL]

Frankenstein interrupts testimony to bring up a bunch of irrelevant shit to inflame women.

Did you not observe the "Pussy Hat" protests the day after Trump got elected?

This was the world-over mind you.

No sir, Trump, nor the Republicans don't have to do anything more to inflame women, they already are, and have.

Try again.

 

[Intolerant]

OT she is nuttier than squirrel shit. But to liberals she’s totally sane. Nothing but a dog and pony show.

 

[MarcATL]

This is not a criminal trial. It is a hearing to determine the severity of a SC nominee’s lack of character.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

 

[DrLove]

The Moon Bat bitch is about to speak. The one whose students say is a vindictive hateful asshole and a terrible professor.

You know that it's already been shown that that is a different professor, right? I bet you knew that but purposely want to lie thinking that others would not notice. I bet that's it. Carry on, woman-hater.

Conservative propagandists know it doesn’t matter if something is a lie, as long as they can get people to believe it.

You should watch this over at Fox. All those fox Trumpsters are going nuts trying to figure out how to ruin her. They keep coming back to ‘but she is so credible’ and getting angry about that.

It’s really quite hilarious.

Thanks for the tip - I've got it taping on MSNBC but will be sure to catch Hannity tonight

 

[Pop23]

Yeah - she screwed 54 guys while in an all girls high school
And wound up drunk and half nude on a picnic bench.
When you clowns gonna let those butt nuggets go anyway?

THIS is the person who claims Kavanaugh attempted to rape her, the woman who can't remember where she was, what day it was, what YEAR it was, admits she was drunk, admits she had 50+ sex partners, and whose 4 witnesses say 'it never happened'.....and THIS is who ChiComm Feinstein and the other Obstructionists drag out of the woodpile as a 'credible' accuser to go after Kavanaugh?!

Bwuhahahaha......

You need to understand that when you make shit up and hang your hat on a thoroughly discredited RWNJ blog ...
Your credibility circles the drain.
Trump would do well to understand that reality as well.

Why the hell would anyone listen to someone who says he witnessed a gang rape of a drunk woman and did nothing to stop it not report it to police?

 

[KissMy]

 

[bodecea]

Again, this is NOT a court of law, it's a job interview.

I have participated in job interviews before. None of them involved witnesses testifying against me.

The allegation makes it a Court, not an interview.

Nope....this is not a court....because they chose to run it like a court, does not make it one. It is a job interview......a very very very very very very important job interview.

 

[JBvM]

OT she is nuttier than squirrel shit. But to liberals she’s totally sane. Nothing but a dog and pony show.

Yeah, take a look at Brett

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

“They know the optics of 11 white men questioning Dr. Ford ... will be so harmful and so damaging to the GOP.” -- Areva Martin, CNN legal analyst

"no more mr white guy!" - senator cory booker

“They understand that you have all of these white men who would be questioning this woman ... the optics of it would look terrible.” -- Gloria Borger, CNN chief political analyst

“Women across this nation should be outraged at what these white men senators are doing to this woman.” -- Rep. John Garamendi, D-Calif.

“There has been some discussion of the GOP senators who happened to all be ... white men.” -- Jim Sciutto, CNN correspondent

“What troubles me is now there are ... they’re all white men.” -- Jennifer Granholm, former governor of Michigan, on CNN

”You’re seeing on display a metaphor for what this party is, which is basically ignorant white men.” -- “Morning Joe” contributor Donny Deutsch

“All these white men ... stumbling all over themselves asking her, you know, aggressive and obnoxious questions.” -- Asha Rangappa, CNN analyst

“What are those -- that collection of old white men going to do?” -- Cynthia Alksne, MSNBC contributor

“If she testifies in front of the Judiciary Committee, where 11 members are white men ...” -- Susan Del Percio, Republican political strategist, on MSNBC

“Once again, it will be all white men on the Republican side of the Judiciary Committee.” -- CNN anchor Poppy Harlow

“The optics for Republicans are going to be really tricky ... You’ve got all white men on the Republican side here ...” -- Julie Pace, Washington bureau chief for The Associated Press, on CNN

“The Republicans, it happens to be 11 white men still on that side.” -- CNN host John Berman

“The Republicans, it is 11 white men, talk to me about how you think the tone inside this hearing on Monday will be perceived?" -- Berman, a few minutes later


“On the Republican side, all 11 are white men.” -- Berman, again, same show, several minutes later

“What hasn’t changed is the number of white men questioning, certainly, on the Republican side.” -- Dana Bash, CNN chief political correspondent

“The Republican side on the Senate Judiciary Committee is all white men ...” -- Irin Carmon, senior correspondent for New York Magazine, on MSNBC

“Only this crowd of clueless old white guys ...” -- The Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin on Twitter

Change the word "white" to "black" and read it back to them. Watch their reaction.